possibilities of tof measurements on npi neutron generators mitja majerle department of nuclear...
TRANSCRIPT
Possibilities of TOF measurements on NPI neutron generators
Mitja Majerle
Department of Nuclear Reactions
Nuclear Physics Institute ASCR
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Contens
Cyclotron, neutron generators Time structure of the pulse Scintillator efficiency to neutrons and photons
(NE213) Preliminary TOF spectra Analysis, simulations Conclusion, new possibilities
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Cyclotron, neutron generators
Isochronous cyclotron U-120M Protons 20-37.5 MeV Neutron generators, p+Li/C, p+Be, p+D2O for quasi
monoenergetic and white neutron spectra
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Neutron spectra p+Li/C, p+Be
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
TOF measurement
cyclotron
neutrongenerator
p+n,
TOF base (ca. 4 m)
500 MHz (=2ns) continuous acquisition
Energy spectrum TOF spectrum
Time [ns]
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Pulse time structure (on NE213) Macrostructure – RF needs to be switched on and off to avoid
discharges (frequency 100-150 Hz), duty-cycle 5-80% Microstructure - Several bunches of protons at different
cyclotron orbits, exiting with RF frequency (20-30 MHz)
Neutron pulses
Time
RF signal
0.6msDetectorresponse
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Pulses timescale in detail
Micropulse duration is ca 50 ns. Pulses from NE213 scintillator (50) are 10-20 ns long. 1000-4000 pulses from scintillator per macropulse. The idea is to record the time of all pulses and to put it in the
histogram – this should give some TOF structure.
Start of macropulse
Micropulse duration 50 ns.2 s
Time
Detectorresponse
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Scintillator response to neutrons and photons Photons in light
material – Compton edge
Neutrons – elastic scattering – proton
Proton/electron – different light output
n/g discrimination might be possible on falling edge
MCNPX simulation
Neutron and photon pulses on stilbene, photomultiplier 1 M
10 MeV n
4 MeV
Energy
Det. response
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
First neutron TOF spectrum,1 macropulse, 200 MHz sample fq.
Gammas from p+Li/C
Neutrons, place of QM peak from p+Li/C
Time Of Flight [ns]
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Sorting by energy, p+Li/C
All pulses Only pulses with high energy
Time Of Flight [ns] Time Of Flight [ns]
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
TOF spectrum structure
Peak of gammas is not narrow ~ FWHM 5 ns, is there place for improvements or this is pulse structure ?
We see only QM peak and few MeV, then frame overlap (40 ns cycle) – closer distance=worse accuracy ?
n/g discrimination works, or can we discriminate only on the basis of deposited energy ? Several photons deposit energy in the same pulse ?
..
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Analysis details – exact time
Exact time of the pulse Maximum Gauss+exp(-ax) Convolution gauss*exp(-ax)
Combining macropulses, RF frequency drift, 500 MHz sampling ? Gamma peak width was not decreased – few options to try, but it seems that
this is beam time structure what we see -> we should go further away for better accuracy (TOF time >> 5 ns FWHM).
Time [ns]
Det. response
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Analysis details - distance
TOF spectrum of p(20 MeV)+Be sampled, two distances 1.5 m and 4.2 m
Closer distance – more background 20%, simulations suggest less, photons ?
n/g discrimination tested on p+Li/C, correct?/interpretation?=work in progress, trying new methods
background
p+Li, n/g discrimination
Energyn/g
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
MCNPX simulations
Time and energy spectra of photons and neutrons can be simulated
From time spectra and simulated NE213 efficiencies the response can be sampled
TOF gamma, p+Be TOF neutron, p+Be
Time
300 ns
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
MCNPX vs. experiment, p+Be
1.00E-04
1.00E-03
1.00E-02
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
10
15
20
Simulated TOF/dep.ene. Sampled TOF/dep.ene.
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
MCNPX vs. experiment, p+Li/C
Simulated TOF
Simulated, 5 ns gauss – acquisition problems ?
Sampled TOF
Time [ns]
Counts
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Conclusion Measuring neutron TOF spectra with NE213 is feasible and showed
limited success already Measurements performed within 10 minutes 2 experiments with TOF sampling, p+Li/C, p+Be – we have learned
some specifics of setups, background conditions, DAQ settings .. Shape of some “abnormal” macropulses (hiding interesting
information on background):
A lot of work on sampled spectra ahead: n/g discrimination, estimation of background, routine use of simulations at experiment planning, shape of NE213 pulses – to fit or not ? …
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Beyond NE213
Current pulse time structure -> compromise between energy range+background and accuracy (distance from target)
Max. distance within hall is ca 5 m, background and accuracy are acceptable there, if only we could get rid of frame overlap.
Detector with fast response, but also some energy resolution – proton recoil telescope (not sensible to gammas)
AER working group F meeting, Liblice, 11.4.2012
Medley at TSL
R. Bevilacqua et al. / Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 646 (2011) 100–107