poster for escp 2015_thi ha vo

1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com The CLEO tool for evaluation of potential significance of a pharmacist intervention (PI) was validated in general practice 2 . This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the CLEO tool used in a centralized chemotherapy preparation unit (CPU) at the Grenoble University Hospital Center. INTRODUCTION METHODS CONCLUSIONS & PERSPECTIVES Targeted populations was needed to improve concordance (by subgroup analyses) Pharmacists in the CPU (particularly senior pharmacists) PIs on Hematogastro Enterology Refused PIs The highest strength of agreement was found for economic dimension of the CLEO classification, then clinical dimension. The lowest values were obtained for organizational dimension. Reproductibility of validity and reliability of the CLEO tool in a local setting is not always obvious. Subgroup analyses is useful to target the main sources of disagreement (e.g., panel experts, pharmacists or types of PIs) and further training of rating and peer-review process is necessary to improve agreement. Validation process of the CLEO tool for evaluating potential significance of pharmacist interventions in a centralized chemotherapy preparation unit Contact: Thi Ha Vo Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 / ThEMAS EDISCE - Université Joseph Fourier, Univ. Grenoble - Alpes 38700 La Tronche, FRANCE Email: [email protected] Vo Thi Ha 1 , Zecchini Celine 2 , Federspiel Isabelle 2 , Chanoine Sebastien 2 , ALLENET Benoit 1,2 , BEDOUCH Pierrick 1,2 1 UJF-Univ. Grenoble Alpes / CNRS / TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 / ThEMAS 2 Pôle Pharmacie, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble F-38041, France. EVALUATION OF IMPACTS OF A PHARMACIST INTERVENTION BY THE CLEO TOOL 1. CLINICAL IMPACT (CL) Score Impact Definition: The clinical impact is evaluated according to the most likely case expected , not the worst / best case -1C Nuisible The PI can lead to adverse outcomes on clinical status, knowledge, satisfaction, patient adherence and/or quality of life of the patient. 0C Null The PI can have no influence on the patient regarding the clinical status, knowledge, satisfaction, patient adherence and or quality of life of the patient. 1C Minor The PI can improves knowledge, satisfaction, medication adherence and/or quality of life OR The PI can prevent damage that does not require monitoring/treatment 2C Moderate The PI can prevent harm that requires further monitoring/treatment, but does not lead or do not extend a hospital stay of the patient. 3C Major The PI can prevent harm which causes or lengthens a hospital stay OR causes permanent disability or handicap. 4C Lethal The PI can prevent an accident that causes a potentially intensive care or death of the patient. ND Non-determined The available information does not determine the clinical impact. The clinical impact is evaluated for the patient's benefit. Harm: alteration of the physical and mental capacities arising from an accident or illness. Quality of life: physical function (autonomy, physical abilities, capacity to perform the tasks of daily life ...), psychological (anxiety, depression, emotion ...), social (relative to family environment, friendly or professional, engaging in personal relationships, participation in social and leisure activities ...) and somatic (symptoms related to the disease). Monitoring: monitoring clinically relevant (physiological or psychological), biological. Treatment: changing therapy or adding an additional medical / surgical treatment. 2. ECONOMIC IMPACT (E) Score Impact Definition -1E Increase of cost The PI increases the cost of the drug treatment of the patient. 0E No change The PI does not change the cost of drug treatment of the patient. 1E Decrease of cost The PI saves the cost of drug treatment of the patient. ND Non-determined The available information does not allow to determine the economic impact. The cost of drug therapy contains two main elements: o The cost of drugs o The cost of monitoring of drug therapy (eg, clinical monitoring, kinetic , biological monitoring ...). The cost of drug therapy is based on the financial cost of the hospital. 3. ORGANISATIONAL IMPACT (O) Score Impact Definition -1O Desfavorable The PI reduces the quality of care process. 0O Null The PI does not change the quality of the care process. 1O Favorable The PI increases the quality of the care process. ND Non-determined The available information does not identify the organizational impact. The organizational impact is coded regarding the overall impact on the quality of the care process from the perspective of health care providers (eg, time savings, improved security, knowledge, job satisfaction of nursing staff; facilitating professional tasks or teamwork, continuity of care, etc.) RESULTS References Period of study : 10 weeks, 214 PIs related to 167 patients. 1. Vo TH et al. Methods assessing the significance of a pharmacist intervention: literature review. ESCP 2013 International Workshop. Edinburgh, 30 – 31 may 2013, Scotland (Poster). 2. Vo TH et al. Development and Validation of a multidimensional scale “CLEO” for evaluating potential significance of a pharmacist intervention. 2014 American College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting. Austin, Texas, 12-15 octobre 2014 (Poster). 3. Zecchini C, Vo TH et al. Clinical, economic and organizational impact of pharmacist interventions during pharmaceutical analysis of injectable antineoplastics. ESCP 2015 Symposium. Lisbon, Portugal 28-30 October 2015 (Oral Communication).

Upload: ha-vo-thi

Post on 13-Apr-2017

405 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Poster for ESCP 2015_Thi Ha VO

QUICK TIPS (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)

This PowerPoint template requires basic PowerPoint

(version 2007 or newer) skills. Below is a list of

commonly asked questions specific to this template.

If you are using an older version of PowerPoint some

template features may not work properly.

Template FAQs

Verifying the quality of your graphics

Go to the VIEW menu and click on ZOOM to set your

preferred magnification. This template is at 100% the

size of the final poster. All text and graphics will be

printed at 100% their size. To see what your poster will

look like when printed, set the zoom to 100% and

evaluate the quality of all your graphics before you

submit your poster for printing.

Modifying the layout

This template has four different

column layouts. Right-click

your mouse on the background

and click on LAYOUT to see the

layout options. The columns in

the provided layouts are fixed and cannot be moved

but advanced users can modify any layout by going to

VIEW and then SLIDE MASTER.

Importing text and graphics from external sources

TEXT: Paste or type your text into a pre-existing

placeholder or drag in a new placeholder from the left

side of the template. Move it anywhere as needed.

PHOTOS: Drag in a picture placeholder, size it first,

click in it and insert a photo from the menu.

TABLES: You can copy and paste a table from an

external document onto this poster template. To adjust

the way the text fits within the cells of a table that has

been pasted, right-click on the table, click FORMAT

SHAPE then click on TEXT BOX and change the

INTERNAL MARGIN values to 0.25.

Modifying the color scheme

To change the color scheme of this template go to the

DESIGN menu and click on COLORS. You can choose

from the provided color combinations or create your

own.

QUICK DESIGN GUIDE (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces an A0 size

professional poster. You can use it to create your

research poster and save valuable time placing titles,

subtitles, text, and graphics.

We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide

you through the poster design process and answer your

poster production questions.

To view our template tutorials, go online to

PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK.

When you are ready to print your poster, go online to

PosterPresentations.com.

Need Assistance? Call us at 1.866.649.3004

Object Placeholders

Using the placeholders

To add text, click inside a placeholder on the poster

and type or paste your text. To move a placeholder,

click it once (to select it). Place your cursor on its

frame, and your cursor will change to this symbol

Click once and drag it to a new location where you can

resize it.

Section Header placeholder

Click and drag this preformatted section header

placeholder to the poster area to add another section

header. Use section headers to separate topics or

concepts within your presentation.

Text placeholder

Move this preformatted text placeholder to the poster

to add a new body of text.

Picture placeholder

Move this graphic placeholder onto your poster, size it

first, and then click it to add a picture to the poster.

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

© 2013 PosterPresentations.com 2117 Fourth Street , Unit C Berkeley CA 94710 [email protected]

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page.

Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

The CLEO tool for evaluation of potential significance of a

pharmacist intervention (PI) was validated in general practice2. This

study aims to test the validity and reliability of the CLEO tool used in

a centralized chemotherapy preparation unit (CPU) at the Grenoble

University Hospital Center.

INTRODUCTION

OBJECTIVES

METHODS

CONCLUSIONS & PERSPECTIVES

Targeted populations was needed to improve concordance (by

subgroup analyses)

• Pharmacists in the CPU (particularly senior pharmacists)

• PIs on Hematogastro – Enterology

• Refused PIs

METHODS

The highest strength of agreement was found for economic

dimension of the CLEO classification, then clinical dimension.

The lowest values were obtained for organizational dimension.

Reproductibility of validity and reliability of the CLEO tool in a

local setting is not always obvious. Subgroup analyses is useful

to target the main sources of disagreement (e.g., panel experts,

pharmacists or types of PIs) and further training of rating and

peer-review process is necessary to improve agreement.

Validation process of the CLEO tool for evaluating potential significance of pharmacist interventions

in a centralized chemotherapy preparation unit

Contact:

Thi Ha Vo

Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 / ThEMAS

EDISCE - Université Joseph Fourier, Univ. Grenoble - Alpes

38700 La Tronche, FRANCE

Email: [email protected]

Vo Thi Ha1, Zecchini Celine2, Federspiel Isabelle2, Chanoine Sebastien2, ALLENET Benoit1,2, BEDOUCH Pierrick1,2

1UJF-Univ. Grenoble Alpes / CNRS / TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 / ThEMAS 2Pôle Pharmacie, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble F-38041, France.

EVALUATION OF IMPACTS OF A PHARMACIST INTERVENTION

BY THE CLEO TOOL

1. CLINICAL IMPACT (CL)

Score Impact Definition: The clinical impact is evaluated according to the most likely case

expected , not the worst / best case

-1C Nuisible The PI can lead to adverse outcomes on clinical status, knowledge, satisfaction,

patient adherence and/or quality of life of the patient.

0C Null The PI can have no influence on the patient regarding the clinical status,

knowledge, satisfaction, patient adherence and or quality of life of the patient.

1C Minor The PI can improves knowledge, satisfaction, medication adherence and/or

quality of life OR

The PI can prevent damage that does not require monitoring/treatment

2C Moderate The PI can prevent harm that requires further monitoring/treatment, but does

not lead or do not extend a hospital stay of the patient.

3C Major The PI can prevent harm which causes or lengthens a hospital stay OR causes

permanent disability or handicap.

4C Lethal The PI can prevent an accident that causes a potentially intensive care or death

of the patient.

ND Non-determined The available information does not determine the clinical impact.

The clinical impact is evaluated for the patient's benefit.

Harm: alteration of the physical and mental capacities arising from an accident or illness.

Quality of life: physical function (autonomy, physical abilities, capacity to perform the tasks of daily life ...),

psychological (anxiety, depression, emotion ...), social (relative to family environment, friendly or

professional, engaging in personal relationships, participation in social and leisure activities ...) and somatic

(symptoms related to the disease).

Monitoring: monitoring clinically relevant (physiological or psychological), biological.

Treatment: changing therapy or adding an additional medical / surgical treatment.

2. ECONOMIC IMPACT (E)

Score Impact Definition

-1E Increase of cost The PI increases the cost of the drug treatment of the patient.

0E No change The PI does not change the cost of drug treatment of the patient.

1E Decrease of cost The PI saves the cost of drug treatment of the patient.

ND Non-determined The available information does not allow to determine the economic impact.

The cost of drug therapy contains two main elements:

o The cost of drugs

o The cost of monitoring of drug therapy (eg, clinical monitoring, kinetic , biological monitoring ...).

The cost of drug therapy is based on the financial cost of the hospital.

3. ORGANISATIONAL IMPACT (O)

Score Impact Definition

-1O Desfavorable The PI reduces the quality of care process.

0O Null The PI does not change the quality of the care process.

1O Favorable The PI increases the quality of the care process.

ND Non-determined The available information does not identify the organizational impact.

The organizational impact is coded regarding the overall impact on the quality of the care process from the

perspective of health care providers (eg, time savings, improved security, knowledge, job satisfaction of

nursing staff; facilitating professional tasks or teamwork, continuity of care, etc.)

RESULTS

References

Period of study : 10 weeks, 214 PIs related to 167 patients.

1. Vo TH et al. Methods assessing the significance of a pharmacist intervention:

literature review. ESCP 2013 International Workshop. Edinburgh, 30 – 31 may 2013,

Scotland (Poster).

2. Vo TH et al. Development and Validation of a multidimensional scale “CLEO”

for evaluating potential significance of a pharmacist intervention. 2014 American

College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting. Austin, Texas, 12-15 octobre 2014

(Poster).

3. Zecchini C, Vo TH et al. Clinical, economic and organizational impact of

pharmacist interventions during pharmaceutical analysis of injectable

antineoplastics. ESCP 2015 Symposium. Lisbon, Portugal 28-30 October 2015 (Oral

Communication).