poster for escp 2015_thi ha vo
TRANSCRIPT
QUICK TIPS (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)
This PowerPoint template requires basic PowerPoint
(version 2007 or newer) skills. Below is a list of
commonly asked questions specific to this template.
If you are using an older version of PowerPoint some
template features may not work properly.
Template FAQs
Verifying the quality of your graphics
Go to the VIEW menu and click on ZOOM to set your
preferred magnification. This template is at 100% the
size of the final poster. All text and graphics will be
printed at 100% their size. To see what your poster will
look like when printed, set the zoom to 100% and
evaluate the quality of all your graphics before you
submit your poster for printing.
Modifying the layout
This template has four different
column layouts. Right-click
your mouse on the background
and click on LAYOUT to see the
layout options. The columns in
the provided layouts are fixed and cannot be moved
but advanced users can modify any layout by going to
VIEW and then SLIDE MASTER.
Importing text and graphics from external sources
TEXT: Paste or type your text into a pre-existing
placeholder or drag in a new placeholder from the left
side of the template. Move it anywhere as needed.
PHOTOS: Drag in a picture placeholder, size it first,
click in it and insert a photo from the menu.
TABLES: You can copy and paste a table from an
external document onto this poster template. To adjust
the way the text fits within the cells of a table that has
been pasted, right-click on the table, click FORMAT
SHAPE then click on TEXT BOX and change the
INTERNAL MARGIN values to 0.25.
Modifying the color scheme
To change the color scheme of this template go to the
DESIGN menu and click on COLORS. You can choose
from the provided color combinations or create your
own.
QUICK DESIGN GUIDE (--THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRINT--)
This PowerPoint 2007 template produces an A0 size
professional poster. You can use it to create your
research poster and save valuable time placing titles,
subtitles, text, and graphics.
We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide
you through the poster design process and answer your
poster production questions.
To view our template tutorials, go online to
PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK.
When you are ready to print your poster, go online to
PosterPresentations.com.
Need Assistance? Call us at 1.866.649.3004
Object Placeholders
Using the placeholders
To add text, click inside a placeholder on the poster
and type or paste your text. To move a placeholder,
click it once (to select it). Place your cursor on its
frame, and your cursor will change to this symbol
Click once and drag it to a new location where you can
resize it.
Section Header placeholder
Click and drag this preformatted section header
placeholder to the poster area to add another section
header. Use section headers to separate topics or
concepts within your presentation.
Text placeholder
Move this preformatted text placeholder to the poster
to add a new body of text.
Picture placeholder
Move this graphic placeholder onto your poster, size it
first, and then click it to add a picture to the poster.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012
www.PosterPresentations.com
© 2013 PosterPresentations.com 2117 Fourth Street , Unit C Berkeley CA 94710 [email protected]
Student discounts are available on our Facebook page.
Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.
The CLEO tool for evaluation of potential significance of a
pharmacist intervention (PI) was validated in general practice2. This
study aims to test the validity and reliability of the CLEO tool used in
a centralized chemotherapy preparation unit (CPU) at the Grenoble
University Hospital Center.
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
METHODS
CONCLUSIONS & PERSPECTIVES
Targeted populations was needed to improve concordance (by
subgroup analyses)
• Pharmacists in the CPU (particularly senior pharmacists)
• PIs on Hematogastro – Enterology
• Refused PIs
METHODS
The highest strength of agreement was found for economic
dimension of the CLEO classification, then clinical dimension.
The lowest values were obtained for organizational dimension.
Reproductibility of validity and reliability of the CLEO tool in a
local setting is not always obvious. Subgroup analyses is useful
to target the main sources of disagreement (e.g., panel experts,
pharmacists or types of PIs) and further training of rating and
peer-review process is necessary to improve agreement.
Validation process of the CLEO tool for evaluating potential significance of pharmacist interventions
in a centralized chemotherapy preparation unit
Contact:
Thi Ha Vo
Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 / ThEMAS
EDISCE - Université Joseph Fourier, Univ. Grenoble - Alpes
38700 La Tronche, FRANCE
Email: [email protected]
Vo Thi Ha1, Zecchini Celine2, Federspiel Isabelle2, Chanoine Sebastien2, ALLENET Benoit1,2, BEDOUCH Pierrick1,2
1UJF-Univ. Grenoble Alpes / CNRS / TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 / ThEMAS 2Pôle Pharmacie, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble F-38041, France.
EVALUATION OF IMPACTS OF A PHARMACIST INTERVENTION
BY THE CLEO TOOL
1. CLINICAL IMPACT (CL)
Score Impact Definition: The clinical impact is evaluated according to the most likely case
expected , not the worst / best case
-1C Nuisible The PI can lead to adverse outcomes on clinical status, knowledge, satisfaction,
patient adherence and/or quality of life of the patient.
0C Null The PI can have no influence on the patient regarding the clinical status,
knowledge, satisfaction, patient adherence and or quality of life of the patient.
1C Minor The PI can improves knowledge, satisfaction, medication adherence and/or
quality of life OR
The PI can prevent damage that does not require monitoring/treatment
2C Moderate The PI can prevent harm that requires further monitoring/treatment, but does
not lead or do not extend a hospital stay of the patient.
3C Major The PI can prevent harm which causes or lengthens a hospital stay OR causes
permanent disability or handicap.
4C Lethal The PI can prevent an accident that causes a potentially intensive care or death
of the patient.
ND Non-determined The available information does not determine the clinical impact.
The clinical impact is evaluated for the patient's benefit.
Harm: alteration of the physical and mental capacities arising from an accident or illness.
Quality of life: physical function (autonomy, physical abilities, capacity to perform the tasks of daily life ...),
psychological (anxiety, depression, emotion ...), social (relative to family environment, friendly or
professional, engaging in personal relationships, participation in social and leisure activities ...) and somatic
(symptoms related to the disease).
Monitoring: monitoring clinically relevant (physiological or psychological), biological.
Treatment: changing therapy or adding an additional medical / surgical treatment.
2. ECONOMIC IMPACT (E)
Score Impact Definition
-1E Increase of cost The PI increases the cost of the drug treatment of the patient.
0E No change The PI does not change the cost of drug treatment of the patient.
1E Decrease of cost The PI saves the cost of drug treatment of the patient.
ND Non-determined The available information does not allow to determine the economic impact.
The cost of drug therapy contains two main elements:
o The cost of drugs
o The cost of monitoring of drug therapy (eg, clinical monitoring, kinetic , biological monitoring ...).
The cost of drug therapy is based on the financial cost of the hospital.
3. ORGANISATIONAL IMPACT (O)
Score Impact Definition
-1O Desfavorable The PI reduces the quality of care process.
0O Null The PI does not change the quality of the care process.
1O Favorable The PI increases the quality of the care process.
ND Non-determined The available information does not identify the organizational impact.
The organizational impact is coded regarding the overall impact on the quality of the care process from the
perspective of health care providers (eg, time savings, improved security, knowledge, job satisfaction of
nursing staff; facilitating professional tasks or teamwork, continuity of care, etc.)
RESULTS
References
Period of study : 10 weeks, 214 PIs related to 167 patients.
1. Vo TH et al. Methods assessing the significance of a pharmacist intervention:
literature review. ESCP 2013 International Workshop. Edinburgh, 30 – 31 may 2013,
Scotland (Poster).
2. Vo TH et al. Development and Validation of a multidimensional scale “CLEO”
for evaluating potential significance of a pharmacist intervention. 2014 American
College of Clinical Pharmacy Annual Meeting. Austin, Texas, 12-15 octobre 2014
(Poster).
3. Zecchini C, Vo TH et al. Clinical, economic and organizational impact of
pharmacist interventions during pharmaceutical analysis of injectable
antineoplastics. ESCP 2015 Symposium. Lisbon, Portugal 28-30 October 2015 (Oral
Communication).