potential collaborations on ncsx with the compact toroidal hybrid (cth) group, auburn university

10
Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University Presented at NCSX Research Forum Dec. 7-8, 2006 Stephen Knowlton, Auburn University

Upload: halil

Post on 03-Feb-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University. Presented at NCSX Research Forum Dec. 7-8, 2006 Stephen Knowlton, Auburn University. CTH experiment investigates subset of NCSX research areas. Integrity of magnetic flux surfaces - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University

Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group,

Auburn University

Presented at NCSX Research Forum

Dec. 7-8, 2006

Stephen Knowlton, Auburn University

Page 2: Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University

CTH experiment investigates subset of NCSX research areas

• Integrity of magnetic flux surfaces• Measurement and reconstruction of magnetic

equilibrium• Low- current-driven instabilities and disruptions

What are areas in which CTH personnel may contribute to NCSX research campaigns in FY09, FY11, and beyond?

Are there specific questions for research preparation on NCSX useful to address on CTH?

Page 3: Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University

Collaborative Research Interests

• How to determine/confirm best coil model from field-mapping and other magnetic measurements?

• Can we adequately reduce static islands in the vacuum configuration

• What are effects of (controlled) static islands on both equilibrium and stability?

• Can we identify location (phase) of islands in plasmas?

• Compare predicted LCFS with edge profile measurements.

• How well can we reconstruct current profile from external magnetics, and if we include internal B-measurement (e.g. mm-wave Faraday rotation)?

• Is control of external rotational transform profile robustly effective in avoiding current-driven disruptions?

Page 4: Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University

E-beam mapping for accurate coil modeling

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

ZnO phosphor-coated wire mesh w/ LED’sat edge for alignment

Movable phosphor-coated wand

Entire set-up (gun, screen, camera) was rotated toroidally by two field periods to test for n>0 deviations in equilibrium.

= 36˚

= 252˚

Page 5: Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University

CTH exhibits good flux surfaces

Composite photo of measured flux surfaces

Magnetic axis localized to within several mm

Mag axis

-2.00E-01

-1.50E-01

-1.00E-01

-5.00E-02

0.00E+00

5.00E-02

1.00E-01

1.50E-01

2.00E-01

6.00E-01 6.50E-01 7.00E-01 7.50E-01 8.00E-01 8.50E-01 9.00E-01

x (cm)

y (cm)

2/13 IFT

2/15 IFT

2/17 IFT

2/19 IFT

2/13 Exp

2/15 Exp

2/17 Exp

2/19 Exp

Low rotational transform (iota_edge ≤ 0.2) with zero auxiliary toroidal field- no low-order rational surfaces => no islands- Low aspect ratio configuration achieved

Comparison of model from IFT (closed symbols) w/ expt. (open symbols)

0.6 m

Page 6: Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University

Small deviations from design investigated by least-squares fitting

In design, r0 = 0.385 m, a1 = b1 = 0Best fit: r0 = 0.384 m, a1 = 2.6 mm, b1 = 0.7 mm

Results also directed us to find flaw in vertical field configuration (0.4% field imbalance)

Alter coil model by varying coil parameters in optimizer in IFT line-following program;

- least squares fit of differences between multiple experimental magnetic axis positions and computed results.

- includes BEXT,poloidal coil positions and currents, helical coil winding lawExample: Helical coil winding law ( tor. Angle; pol. Angle)

= 2/5 + 1 sin + 2 sin 2 rCOIL = r0 + a1 cos b1 sin

- perform SVD analysis to identify likely source(s) of error (Hanson/Muñoz)

=> Continuing to validate this scheme

Page 7: Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University

Static island successfully reduced

1/3 island reduced to minimal width by application primary & (orthogonal) secondary corrections

Page 8: Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University

Contributions to field mapping on NCSX

• Provide analysis & modeling– Apply validated SVD analysis procedure to NCSX coil model and

measurements– Use field-mapping results to assist in placement of correction coils, if not

already fully designed & emplaced.– Suppression of vacuum islands

• Provide test-bed for NCSX techniques– Can we (or should we) map at pulsed high field (B~0.5 T) to reduce effect of

remnant fields?– Test techniques for faster, more accurate mapping– Possibility of field-mapping at different toroidal locations

• Contribute existing hardware.

Page 9: Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University

Extra

Page 10: Potential Collaborations on NCSX with the Compact Toroidal Hybrid (CTH) group, Auburn University

CTH program: field-mapping & ECRH plasmas supplemented by ohmic current

• Easily alternate between field-mapping & plasma operation

• Densities up to 4 x 1018 m-3

(ECRH) cutoff attained; higher with ohmic current

• Diagnostics-Segmented Rogowski coils-Flux loops-Diamagnetic loop-Langmuir probes

5 field periodsRo =.75 m, R/<a> ≥ 4Bo ≤ 0.7 TIp ≤ 30 kA; ≤0.5Pin= 15 kW ECRH @18GHz

-SXR arrays; 4mm interferometer