poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... s16bp1.… · poverty indicators e di...

23
POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of income Isabel Molina Dept. of Statistics, Univ. Carlos III de Madrid (Coauthors: M. Graf and J.M. Mar´ ın)

Upload: others

Post on 22-Sep-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

Poverty mapping at local level with suitablemodelling of income

Isabel MolinaDept. of Statistics, Univ. Carlos III de Madrid

(Coauthors: M. Graf and J.M. Marın)

Page 2: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

POPULATION AT RISK OF POVERTY

2

Page 3: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

POVERTY INDICATORS

DIRECT ESTIMATORS

EB METHOD

APPLICATION

SIMULATIONS WITH OUTLIERS

PROPOSAL

RESULTS

3

Page 4: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

NOTATION

• U finite population of size N.

• U partitioned into D subsets U1, . . . ,UD of sizes N1, . . . ,ND ,called domains or areas.

• s sample of size n drawn from the population U.

• sd = s ∩ Ud sub-sample from domain d of size nd .

• rd = Ud − sd out-of-sample elements from domain d .

• Small area problem: nd too small for some domains.

4

Page 5: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

POVERTY INDICATORS

• Edi welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d .

• z = poverty line.

• Poverty indicator of order α ≥ 0 for domain d :

Fαd =1

Nd

Nd∑i=1

(z − Edi

z

)αI (Edi < z).

• When α = 0⇒ Poverty incidence

• When α = 1⇒ Poverty gap

• Other: Quintile share ratio, Gini coef., Sen index, Theil index,Generalized entropy, Fuzzy monetary/supplementary index.

X Foster, Greer & Thornbecke (1984), Econom.X Neri, Ballini & Betti (2005), Stat. in Transition 5

Page 6: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

DIRECT ESTIMATORS

• Direct estimator for a domain d : Estimator that uses onlythe sample data from that domain.

• Example: For linear parameters such as means or totals, theHorwitz-Thompson estimator.

• FGT poverty indicators as means:

Fαd =1

Nd

Nd∑i=1

Fαdi , Fαdi =

(z − Edi

z

)αI (Edi < z).

• πdi inclusion probability of unit i in sd .• wdi = 1/πdi sampling weight.• Horwitz-Thompson estimator (random sampling without

replacement):

FDIRαd =

1

Nd

∑i∈sd

wdiFαdi .

6

Page 7: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

EB METHOD

• Assumption: For a given one-to-one transformation of thewelfare variables, Ydi = T (Edi ), it holds

Ydi = x′diβ + ud + edi , udiid∼ N(0, σ2u), edi

iid∼ N(0, σ2e ).

• FGT poverty indicator in terms of transformed variables Ydi :

Fαd =1

Nd

Nd∑i=1

{z − T−1(Ydi )

z

}αI{T−1(Ydi ) < z

}= hα(Yd),

where Yd = (Yd1, . . . ,YdNd)′.

X Molina and Rao (2010), CJS 7

Page 8: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

EB METHOD

• Partition Yd into sample and out-of-sample: Yd = (Y′ds ,Y′dr )′

• General parameter: δd = h(Yd), h(·) real measurable.

• Best estimator: δd with minimum MSE (δd) = E (δd − δd)2

• The best estimator is given by

δBd = EYdr[δd |yds ]

• For δd = hα(Yd) = Fαd , the best estimator is

FBαd = EYdr

[Fαd |yds ] = FBαd(β, σ2u, σ

2e )

• Empirical best (EB) estimator: FEBαd = FB

αd(β, σ2u, σ2e ).

X Molina and Rao (2010), CJS 8

Page 9: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

POVERTY MAPPING IN SPAIN

• Data source: Spanish Survey on Income and LivingConditions (EU-SILC) of 2006.

• Areas: D = 52 provinces for each gender. We fit a separatemodel for each gender.

• Transformation: We consider the nested-error model for thelog-equivalized disposable income: Ydi = T (Edi ) = log Edi .

• Explanatory variables: indicators of 5 age groups, of havingSpanish nationality, of 3 education levels and of labor forcestatus (unemployed, employed or inactive).

9

Page 10: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

MODEL DIAGNOSTICS

Residuals

−10 −8 −6 −4 −2 0 2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

−4 −2 0 2 4−1

0−8

−6−4

−20

2

Theoretical Quantiles

Sam

ple

Qua

ntile

s

10

Page 11: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

MODEL DIAGNOSTICS

0 5000 10000 15000

−10

−8−6

−4−2

02

Index

Res

idua

ls

9.2 9.4 9.6 9.8 10.0 10.2−1

0−8

−6−4

−20

2

Fitted values

Res

idua

ls

11

Page 12: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

SIMULATION: NO OUTLIERS

y

De

nsity

−2 0 2 4 6

0.0

00

.05

0.1

00

.15

0.2

00

.25

0.3

00

.35

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●●

● ●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

−1 0 1 2

−2

02

4

x1s

ys

12

Page 13: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

POV. INCIDENCE: NO OUTLIERS

0 20 40 60 80

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Area

Dire

ct, T

rue

●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

● True Direct

0 20 40 60 80

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Area

EB

, Tru

e

●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

● True EB

0 20 40 60 80

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Area

FH

, Tru

e

●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

● True FH

0 20 40 60 80

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Area

EL

L, Tru

e

●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

● True ELL

13

Page 14: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

SIMULATION: 2 % OUTLIERS

y

De

nsity

−10 −5 0 5

0.0

00

.05

0.1

00

.15

0.2

00

.25

0.3

0

● ●●

●●

●●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●●

●● ●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●●● ● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●● ●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●● ●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●●

●●

● ●

●● ●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

● ●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

● ●

● ●

● ●●●

●●

●●

● ●●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●● ●

●●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●

● ● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●● ●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●●

●●

● ● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●●

●●

−1 0 1 2

−1

0−

50

5

x1s

ys

14

Page 15: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

POV. INCIDENCE: 2 % OUTLIERS

0 20 40 60 80

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Area

Dire

ct, T

rue

●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●

● True Direct

0 20 40 60 80

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Area

EB

, Tru

e

●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●

● True EB

0 20 40 60 80

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Area

FH

, Tru

e

●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●

● True FH

0 20 40 60 80

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Area

EL

L, Tru

e

●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

●●●

● True ELL

15

Page 16: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

GENERALIZED GAMMA

• Gamma distribution: Y ∼ G (k , θ), k shape, θ scale

f (y ; k , θ) =(y/θ)k−1

Γ(k)

e−y/θ

θ, y > 0, k, θ > 0.

• Generalized Gamma distribution: Y ∼ GG (a, θ, k),

f (y ; a, θ, k) =a(y/θ)k−1

Γ(k/a)

e−(y/θ)a

θ, y > 0, a, θ, k > 0.

• Reparameterization: Y ∼ GG (a, θ, p), p = k/a⇔ k = ap

f (y ; a, θ, p) =a(y/θ)ap−1

Γ(p)

e−(y/θ)a

θ, y > 0, a, θ, p > 0.

• For p large, GG (a, θ, p) ≈ logN(a, θ).

16

Page 17: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

GENERALIZED BETA OF THE SECOND KIND

• It can be obtained as a scale mixture:

Y |u ∼ GG (a, bu1/a, p)U ∼ InvG (1, q)

}⇒ Y ∼ GB2(a, b, p, q).

• Density of Y ∼ GB2(a, b, p, q):

f (y ; a, b, p, q) =a

bB(p, q)

(y/b)ap−1

{1 + (y/b)a}p+q , y > 0, a, b, p, q > 0.

• a shape, b scale, p length of left tail, q length of right tail.

• logY has location parameter log b.

17

Page 18: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

MULTIVARIATE GB2 MODEL

• MGB2 mixed regression model:

Ydi |udind∼ GG (a, bdiu

1/ad , p),

ud ∼ InvG (1, q),log bdi = x′diβ, i = 1, . . . ,Nd , d = 1, . . . ,D.

• Equivalent model:

Yd = (Yd1, . . . ,YdNd)′

ind∼ MGB2(a, {bdi}Ndi=1, p, q),

log bdi = x′diβ, i = 1, . . . ,Nd , d = 1, . . . ,D.

• Marginals are univariate GB2:

Ydi ∼ GB2(a, bdi , p, q), i = 1, . . . ,Nd , d = 1, . . . ,D.

X Graf, Marın and Molina (2014), Unpublished 18

Page 19: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

MULTIVARIATE GB2 MODEL

Moments of log variables:

• E [log(Ydi )|ud ] = x′diβ +1

a[log ud + ψ(p)]︸ ︷︷ ︸

vd

,

• E [log(Ydi )] = x′diβ +1

a[ψ(p)− ψ(q)]︸ ︷︷ ︸

c

,

• V [log(Ydi )] =1

a2

[ψ(1)(p) + ψ(1)(q)

],

• Cov [log(Ydi ), log(Ydj)] =1

a2ψ(1)(q), j 6= i ,

where ψ(x) =∂ log Γ(x)

∂xand ψ(1)(x) =

∂ψ(x)

∂x.

X Graf, Marın and Molina (2014), Unpublished 19

Page 20: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

MULTIVARIATE GB2 MODEL

• Decomposition into non-sample and sample:

Yd = (Y′dr ,Y′ds)′

• Conditional distribution of non-sample given sample:

Ydr |ydsind∼ MGB2(a, {b∗di}i∈rd , p, q

∗d),

b∗di = bdi

1 +∑i∈sd

(ydibdi

)a1/a

, i ∈ rd ,

q∗d = q + ndp, d = 1, . . . ,D

X Graf, Marın and Molina (2014), Unpublished 20

Page 21: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

SIMULATION RESULTS: POV. INCIDENCE• If income simulated from the MGB2 model fitted to realincome, EB estimates based on Log Normal biased upwards!

Mean values, Pov. Inc. ( %)

0 20 40 60 80

1820

2224

2628

3032

Area

Pov

. Inc

iden

ce

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

● TrueEB GB2

EB Log NormalDirect

MSEs, Pov. Inc. ( %)

0 20 40 60 80

1015

2025

3035

40

Area

MS

E P

ov. I

ncid

ence

EB GB2 EB Log Normal Direct

21

Page 22: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

SIMULATION RESULTS: POV. INCIDENCE• If income simulated from the Log Normal model fitted to realincome, EB estimates based on MGB2 are good!

Mean values, Pov. Inc. ( %)

0 20 40 60 80

1015

20

Area

Pov

. Inc

iden

ce

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●●●●

● TrueEB GB2

EB Log NormalDirect

MSEs, Pov. Inc. ( %)

0 20 40 60 80

510

1520

2530

35

Area

MS

E P

ov. I

ncid

ence

EB GB2 EB Log Normal Direct

22

Page 23: Poverty mapping at local level with suitable modelling of ... S16BP1.… · POVERTY INDICATORS E di welfare measure for indiv. i in domain d. z = poverty line. Poverty indicator of

POV. INDICATORS DIRECT ESTIMATORS EB METHOD APPLICATION OUTLIERS PROPOSAL RESULTS

DOMO ARIGATO!!EZKERRIK ASKO!!GRAZIE MILLE!!MERCI BEAUCOUP!!¡¡MOITAS GRAZAS!!¡¡MOLTES GRACIES!!¡¡MUCHAS GRACIAS!!THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!VIELEN DANK!!

23