power generation for the better water maker: subsystems design review october 29, 2013
DESCRIPTION
Power Generation for the Better Water Maker: Subsystems Design Review October 29, 2013. Agenda. Concept Selection Treadle Bike Subsystems Engineering Requirements Proof of Concept Budget/Cost Analysis Project Plan to DDR. Problem Statement. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Agenda● Concept Selection
o Treadleo Bike
● Subsystems
● Engineering Requirements
● Proof of Concept
● Budget/Cost Analysis
● Project Plan to DDR
Problem StatementThe Better Water Maker was developed to disinfect water in nations
with high mortality rates due to poor water and sanitation systems. The goal of our team is to provide a low cost, efficient power generation system for the Better Water Maker that does not tire the user, while it is fun and easy to use.
Concept Selection• The original selection
was too much like re-inventing the wheel
• From there, we toyed with a mechanical treadle design
• Finally, we worked back towards a more reasonable design
Treadle Pump• Used in developing
world for irrigation
• Piston-Cylinder System
• Difficult to translate into power
Subsystems• Seating• Power Train• Electronics• User Interface• Sanitation System Interface• Structural Components• Manuals• Testing• Risk Analysis
Engineering RequirementsFunction
Importance Units
Range Goal Value CN Fulfilled
ER1 Cost 9 USD 0-200 150 CN7, CN8
ER2Generated Power 9 W, V 23-29 27.5, 14.3
CN1, CN14, CN17
ER3 Shipping Size 3 weight CN4ER4 Training Time 3 minutes 5-30 10 CN16
ER5 Ease of Repair 3 minutes 20-60 30CN7, CN10, CN16
ER6 Effort Required 9 n/aLow Intensity
CN2, CN12, CN13
ER7 Weight 3 lb CN3, CN16
ER8Number of Installers 3 People 1-3 1
CN3, CN7, CN10, CN16
ER9 Number of Tools 3 Tools CN7
ER10 Unit Life 3
Gallons Treated >180,000
CN5, CN6, CN9, CN10, CN15, CN16
ER11 Support User 9 lb
40-200 130 CN5, CN12
ER12
Can Hook Up to 12V Car adapter 9 Binary Yes Yes CN14
Proof of Concept“Historically, two treadles were used for some tasks, but even then the maximum output would have been quite small, perhaps only 0-15 percent of what an individual using pedal operated cranks can produce under optimum conditions.”
(Wilson, “Understanding Pedal Power”, 1986)
Proof of Concept• “A person can generate four times more power (1/4 horsepower
[hp]) by pedaling than by hand-cranking.”
• “Pedal power enables a person to drive devices at the same rate as that achieved by hand-cranking, but with far less effort and fatigue.”
• Test Plan - run motor with a second motor to determine required torque
• Our power requirement = 23 to 29 Watts
(Wilson, 1986)
Schematic
*P13417 Design
potentially wooden gearbox versus plastic
1-4 motors
ergonomic recumbent seat, potentially adjustable
will re-evaluate effectiveness
4 gears and 1 sprocket inside of gearbox
Mechanical Analysis• RPM output of 7424• Max torque value of 3.7 lbf-ft
o Low stress on shaft
*Calculations made using Shigley’s Design of Machine Elements
Electrical Details of Pump and Bulb● 12V nominal system
○ Operates closer to 14V○ Voltage is limited to 14.3V in current design
● Pump turns on after ~10s, bulb draws power immediately○ Controlled using a capacitor
● Resistance of system with pump off = ~9.3Ω● Resistance of system with pump on = ~7.17Ω
Electrical Systems in the Generator● DC Motors
○ Possibility of using from 1 to 4 DC motors● Regulator Circuitry
○ Limits voltage to a max value■ Current design limits voltage to 14.3V■ We would like this raised to 15V
● LED user interface○ Display information to the user
Regulator Circuit● Would like to make use of Team 13417’s design
○ Limits voltage at 15V● 1 inductor● 5 capacitors● 10uF to 100uF ● 3 diodes● 4 ICs● 2 switching regulators, 2 amplifiers
Selection of DC Motors● Run tests at different RPM ● Develop a voltage to RPM ratio for each motor
or set of motors● Need to generate 15V under load at a
reasonable RPM● Once a motor configuration is selected, the gear
ratios in the gearbox can be finalized○ Gear ratio is based on 50-60 RPM user input
Risk Curve● Add risks as they arise● Review and adjust
risks on Fridays● Superimpose lines to
stay on track● Current value = 105
Feasibility• Parts are readily available
o Standardized sizes
• Design aspects are fundamental
• High RPM, high efficiency
Test PlanER2: Generated PowerER4: Training TimeER5: Ease of RepairER6: Effort RequiredER8 and ER9: Number of Installers and
Tools
Bill of Materials (BOM)
BOM for Power Generation System
Cost Analysis• This is not an actual cost
estimate, preliminary cost estimate.
• Many of the component’s manufacturers have not responded or have not been contacted.
• Yellow=Variable Pricing
• Orange=Worst Case Pricing
Project Plan• List of tasks that
will be completed before the Detailed Design Review
• An action item log is also maintained to delegate more specific tasks
Manuals• Template is prepared• Pictures are the main ingredient• User Manual will contain:
o The Use Of the BWMo Setting Up the BWMo Properly Using the BWMo Maintainng the BWMo Troubleshooting and Repairing the BWMo Parts and Toolso Contact Information