powerpoint presentation12 estimated savings, investment and roi earlier system conventional system...
TRANSCRIPT
40%
ORGANIZATION
Buildings
16% Lighting
9% IT / electronics
10% Water heating
25% Other
40%
32%
28%
Transportation
Industry
100%
ENERGY CONSUMPTION
Energy Pockets
Chiller70%
Chilled Water Pump12%
Condenser Water Pump
12%
Cooling Tower6%
40% HVAC
4
METHODOLOGY
SUCCESS STORIES
5
CASE STUDY
Commercial Building
9
Min Load: 80 TR, Maximum Load: 250 TR
L CHW Range: 7-11 Deg C; E CDW Range: 28 -36 Deg C
PLANT PERFORMANCE PROFILE
Plant Room Upgrade/ECM IMPLEMENTED
Equipment
• High Efficient Chiller
• Inline Vertical Pumps
• CTI certified Cooling Tower
System Level
• Dedicated Pumping for Zero Bypass/Leakage
• All Variable system design to sustain plant performance
• System Designed for < 0.8 IKW/Tr Performance
Integration
• Chiller Plant optimizer
• Real Time data logging
• Advance Remote monitoring
• Adaptive Algorithms for continuous performance improvement
12
ESTIMATED SAVINGS, INVESTMENT AND ROI Earlier System Conventional System Advantec System
Chiller Performance: ( Kw/TR)
1. Chiller Performance @ 100% 0.65 0.65
2. Chiller Performance @ 75% 0.48 0.48
3. Chiller Performance @ 50% 0.34 0.34
4. Chiller Performance @ 25% 0.32 0.32
Average Chiller performance 1.28 0.65 0.5
Chilled water pumps performance (KW/TR) 0.18 0.18 0.15
Condenser Circuit Performance (Pump + CT) (KW/TR) 0.13 0.13 0.1
A Average Plant room performance (Chiller + Pumps+ CT) 1.59 0.96 0.75
B RUN HOURS ( 290 Days & 8 Hours operation) 2320 2320 2320
C Average Load 145 145 145
Investment ( lacs)
Chillers 55 55
Pumps 12 12
CT 5 5
VFD 12 12
Piping, Valves & Accessories 15 15
Integration, Remote monitoring, Energy Management, Optimization - 25
D TOTAL INVESTMENT ( Lacs) 99 124
E Estimated Electrical Consumption (KWH) 534876 322944 252300
F Estimated Annual Savings potential (KWH) 211932 282576
G Estimated Annual Savings potential (KWH) % 40% 53%
H Energy savings (INR) ( 1 KWH = INR 12) 2543184 3390912
I Energy savings (Lacs INR) ( 1 KWH = INR 12) 25.43 33.91
J PAY BACK Period Years 3.89 3.66
* The CPO Design has improved the Savings by 12% and ROI improved by 4 Months.
Energy Savings Achieved
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
ikW/ton
Over 45%
Improvement
1.5
0.8
Chiller Plant Efficiency Chart(As per current performance)
0.6
Actual 0.64
Old 1.44
Target0.65
13
Plant room performance post ECM
CASE STUDY -
HOTEL BUILDING
15
Min Load: 200 TR, Maximum Load: 1100 TR
PLANT PERFORMANCE PROFILE
58%
5%
20%
12% 5%AC Plant Power Consumption
Chiller CHWP CHWS
0.57
1.00
0.70
1.17 1.1
-
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
Chiller 1# Chiller 2# Chiller 3# Chiller 4# Chiller 5#
IKW
/TR
Individual Chiller Performance
CASE STUDY-2
17
CASE STUDY _ 2
CASE STUDY _ 2
Thank you
Retrofitting Existing Building = Asset Enhancement
Integrated Solution for Building = Sustainability
Benefits - Integrated System Concept