powerpoint presentation from the final green line extension community visioning process meeting on...
DESCRIPTION
Powerpoint presentation from the final Green Line Extension Community Visioning Process meeting on 11.2.11TRANSCRIPT
Mystic Valley Parkway Green Line
Community Visioning Process
Pre-Meeting
November 2, 2011
1
Presentation Will Cover:
• Overview of the Green Line project
• Potential station area for Mystic Valley Parkway
• Purpose of this study
• Recap of previous meetings
Overview
2
Green Line Extension Project Area
3
Mystic Valley Parkway Project Area
4
This process identifies:
• Land use changes that are possible within the station area
• Benefits from a station and associated transit-oriented development
• Potential impacts and mitigation measures
• Recommendations for the two cities and MassDOT
This process isn’t:
• An assessment of whether or not the Green Line should be extended
• A study providing more information on the Phase I Green Line Extension
• An engineering study
Mystic Valley Parkway Visioning Process
5
Public Engagement Process
Community
Vision
Community
Opportunities
Community
Questions
Issue
Identification Draft
Recommendations
Continuous Public Involvement
Continuous Stakeholder Outreach
Tonight’s Meeting
6
Questions?
7
Mystic Valley Parkway Green Line
Community Visioning Process
Public Meeting #5
November 2, 2011 8
Public Involvement Process
9
Stakeholder Interviews
Meetings with Cities
Public Meeting #1
Kick-Off and Topic
Identification
Outcome List of Topics to be
Explored in Meeting #2
February 16
Topics from Meeting 1 Public Meeting #2
Community Questions
Outcome Questions Answered
and Concerns
Responded To
March 30
Information on Transit
Oriented Development Public Meeting #3
Community Assets
and Preferences
Outcome Understand Key
Community Assets and
Visual Preferences Preference Poll
May 17
Assets and Preferences
from Meeting 3
Public Meeting #4
Community Visioning
Outcome Series of land
use/development
scenarios
June 23
Scenarios from
Meeting 4 Public Meeting #5
Recommendations
Outcome Set of Recommendations
to Cities and MassDOT
November 2
Tonight’s Agenda
• Presentation of draft recommendations
• Opportunity for Q&A and comment
• Meeting evaluation and next steps
Agenda
10
Keypad Questions
11
Are you ready for the holidays?
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0 of 200 12
1. Yes, it’s my favorite time of the year
2. Yes, I could use a few days of vacation
3. No, it means winter is approaching
4. No, I’m already behind on my holiday shopping
5. None of the above
10
Which category below best describes you?
Pick one
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0 of 200
1. A concerned resident
2. Government (City, Town, State, or Federal)
3. Business/property owner
4. Non-profit organizations and advocacy groups
5. Other
Previous
Meeting
----------
51%
6%
26%
9%
9%
13
10
Where do you live?
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%1. Medford
2. Somerville
3. Arlington
4. Cambridge
5. Winchester
6. Boston
7. Other
0 of 200
Previous
Meeting
----------
56%
22%
6%
3%
0%
0%
14%
14
10
Do you own a home or rent?
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0 of 200
1. I own a single family home
2. I own a multi-family home (e.g., two-family or triple-decker)
3. I own a condominium or townhouse
4. I rent my home
5. Other (none)
Previous
Meeting
----------
57%
24%
3%
16%
0%
15
10
How long have you lived in the Medford,
Somerville, Arlington, or Cambridge area?
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0 of 200
1. 0 - 1 Year
2. 2 - 5 Years
3. 6 - 10 Years
4. 11 - 20 Years
5. 20+ Years
6. I live in another municipality
Previous
Meeting
----------
3%
14%
14%
28%
31%
11%
16
10
What is your age?
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0 of 200
1. 0 – 19
2. 20 – 29
3. 30 – 39
4. 40 – 49
5. 50 – 59
6. 60 – 69
7. 70 or Better
Previous
Meeting
----------
0%
6%
17%
25%
22%
22%
8%
17
10
How do you identify yourself?
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0 of 200
1. White
2. Black or African American
3. Hispanic or Latino
4. Asian
5. Other
6. Two or more
Previous
Meeting
----------
91%
0%
3%
3%
3%
0%
18
10
Have you attended a Green Line Extension meeting before?
0%
0%
0 of 200 19
1. Yes
2. No
Previous
Meeting
----------
84%
16%
10
20
Meeting Purpose:
• Develop a series of land use
scenarios for the study area
• Understand benefits and impacts
• Inform MAPC’s understanding of the community’s preferences
Feedback Received:
• Create more open space
• Strong connectivity between new development and surrounding area
• Consider neighborhood character
• Mixing uses is good
• More senior housing is needed
• Keep Whole Foods as neighborhood anchor
Recap Meeting #4 – Community Vision
21
Vision
A well-connected, walkable, bike-able, neighborhood scale station area that provides new opportunities for
mixed-income housing, job creation, increased tax revenue, and access to quality public transit. New development must knit into the fabric of the existing
neighborhood and provide opportunities for increasing
access to affordable housing and quality jobs. Connectivity from the surrounding area is critical in
making the station a part of the neighborhood.
4
3
2
1
T
Focus Area Sites
23
Focus Area 1
24
Focus Area 1
Vision for Potential Changes: • Allow for up to four floors of mixed-use development • First floor mix of retail and office space • Up to three floors of residential above • Create open space at corner of Mystic Valley Parkway and Boston Avenue
Example Images
Three-Floor Mixed-Use Four-Floor Mixed-Use
http://www.homedesignfind.com
25
Focus Area 2
26
Focus Area 2
Vision for Potential Changes: • Allow for up to three floors of office/R&D development • First floor could include small café/restaurant space • Smaller parking structure to support new development
Example Images
Three-Floor Office Building Three-Floor Office Building
27
Focus Area 3
28
Focus Area 3
Vision for Potential Changes: • Allow for up to four floors of senior affordable housing • Allow for construction of affordable townhomes on site • Consolidate senior units into fewer buildings, more open space • Reconstruct new community center for residents on site
Example Images
Four-Story Senior Housing Townhomes
29
Focus Area 4
30
Focus Area 4
Vision for Potential Changes: • Allow for up to six floors of mixed-use development • Ground floor Whole Foods and small retail space • Up to four floors of residential above • Mix of underground and surface parking
Example Images
Six-Floor Mixed-Use Six-Floor Mixed-Use
http://www.rainiervalleypost.com http://www.prlog.org
Potential Benefits
31
Potential New Housing Units: • 117 market-rate units • 55 new senior affordable units • 4 new low-income family townhome units
Potential Economic Development: • 240 new jobs • Double tax revenue
Potential Sq.Ft. of Office/Commercial: • 50,000 Sq.Ft. of commercial • 67,000 Sq.Ft. of office
Potential Homeowner Equity: • $25 million in added home equity
32
Vision Implementation
• Changes to existing land use regulations (zoning)
would be needed to allow for the types of
development which would lead to the realization
of the vision
• Design guidelines and a design review process can
help to ensure new development respects existing
neighborhood character
Land Use and Zoning
33
Concerns We Heard:
• Green Line Extension to Mystic Valley Parkway may increase housing values, which may raise property taxes and may displace residents who may be low-income or on a fixed income (such as seniors)
Displacement Could Impact:
• Low-income homeowners or homeowners on a fixed-income
• Low-income renters or renters on a fixed-income
• Homeowners on a fixed-income who want to maintain ownership of their home to pass on to their heirs
Managing Neighborhood Change
34
Homeowners:
• 48% of housing units within a half-mile radius are owner-
occupied (2,064 units)
• Approximately 35% of homeowners within a half-mile
radius spend more than 30% of household income on housing
costs (Cost Burdened)
• 35% of homeowners over the age of 65 are cost burdened
• 65% of all homeowners over the age of 65 do not have a
mortgage on their home
Managing Neighborhood Change
35
Renters:
• 52% of housing units in the study area are rentals
• Approximately 44% of renters are considered cost
burdened
• 53% of all cost burdened renters are over the age of 65
Managing Neighborhood Change
36
Homeowners on a Fixed-Income:
• Circuit Breaker – State program, tax credit to reduce overall property tax bill for qualified 65 and older homeowners
• Accessory Dwelling Unit Bylaw – Homeowners can construct small accessory housing unit on property, could rent for income or use as own residence and rent/sell main house
• Add More Affordable Housing – Construct more senior affordable housing, adopt inclusionary zoning
• Weatherization Program – Funding to help retrofit existing homes to make them more energy efficient, helps save money on heating and cooling costs
Managing Neighborhood Change
37
Potential Impacts on Housing Costs:
• Assessed single family home values could increase by up to
15% in the area
• A 15% increase in single family home assessed value could
generate on average $47k in additional home equity
Measures to Ease Property Tax Increase
• Estimated property tax increase of $550
• Weatherization program can save $350/year on home
heating costs
• Circuit breaker, and other policy programs could help
ease increased property tax
Managing Neighborhood Change
38
Renters on a Fixed-Income:
• Preservation of Existing Units – Deed restrictions, tax
incentives to encourage preservation, utilize low-income tax
credits to preserve affordability of units
• Construct additional senior housing at Walkling Court
• Adopt Inclusionary Zoning
• Condo Conversion Ordinance – Assistance to renters whose
unit is being converted to ownership. Creates notice
requirements, relocation assistance, and moving cost assistance
Managing Neighborhood Change
39
40
Increase Walk Time at Intersection
Increase Walk Time at Intersection
Improve Walking
Connectivity
Improve Mid-Block Crossings
Increase Open Space and Walking
Paths
Improve Lighting and Streetscape
Transportation
41
• Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure
• Install pedestrian countdown signals at all intersections
with vehicular signals
• Upgrade sidewalk ramps to ADA accessibility standards
• Install Sharrows along Boston Avenue
• Complete shared-use pathway improvements along
Mystic River
• Ensure adequate and safe bicycle parking in the station
area
Recommendations for Expanding Economic Development
• Cities should continue business loan and storefront
improvement programs, target funds to station areas
• Encourage formation of retail association in West Medford
Square, extended to cover Boston Avenue
• Initiate dialogue with Tufts University Office for Technology
Licensing and Industry Collaboration, determine office needs
and unmet demand
• Invest in streetscape and enhancements to increase overall
visual attractiveness of the area
Economic Development
42
• Green Line Extension to Mystic Valley Parkway will create new transportation choices and increase access to jobs and housing
• Vision for the station area has the potential to create additional housing units, jobs and tax base for both cities and their residents
• Extension is not without impacts. Vehicle trips will increase with new development and property taxes in the area are likely to increase
• Strategies and policies can be put in place to mitigate impacts to the extent possible
Conclusion
43
Thank you!
44
Meeting Evaluation
Meeting #4 – Meeting Evaluation
45
Did today’s event improve your understanding of
the topics presented?
0%
0%
0%
0%
1. Definitely
2. Somewhat
3. A little
4. Not really
0 of 200 46
10
0%
0%
0%
0%
0 of 200
How did today’s event make you feel about the
possible extension of the Green Line to MVP?
1. Excited
2. Optimistic
3. So So
4. Pessimistic
47
10
How would you rate the overall effectiveness
of the meeting?
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0 of 200
1. Very Effective
2. Good
3. OK
4. Needs Improvement
5. Poorly Managed
48
10
Thank you for your participation!
Draft Report Will Be Released Soon
Followed by a 15-Day Comment Period
Ways to provide comments:
• Comment forms from tonight’s meeting
• Email: [email protected]
• Website: www.mass.gov/greenlineextension OR www.mapc.org
• Mail: Metropolitan Area Planning Council, 60 Temple Place,
Boston, MA 02111
• Phone: 617-451-2770 49