April 2017

Disclosure/Forward Looking Statements

• The information contained herein, while obtained from sources which we believe are reliable, is not guaranteed as to its accuracy or completeness. References are made herein to

historical information containing geologic and technical information. By its nature, this information cannot be verified. A Qualified Person has not verified the sampling, analytical, and

test data underlying the historical information. Kenorland Minerals (The Company) has assumed that this historical information is accurate and complete in all material aspects and,

while the Company has carefully reviewed all the available information, it cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness. The content of this presentation is for information

purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to purchase any securities referred to herein.

• This presentation contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this

presentation and the Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

• Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future price of metals, the estimation of mineral resources, the realization of mineral

resource estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production, capital expenditures, success of exploration activities, permitting time lines, requirements for additional

capital, government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims, limitations on insurance coverage, the

completion of transactions and future listings and regulatory approvals. In certain cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects" or

"does not expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words and phrases

or state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved".

• Forward-looking information in this presentation includes, among other things, disclosure regarding: the Company’s mineral properties as well as its future outlook, statements with

respect to the future price of minerals, the success of exploration activities, permitting time lines, costs and expenditures requirements for additional capital, future listings and

regulatory approval.

• In making the forward looking statements in this presentation, the Company has applied certain factors and assumptions that it believes are reasonable, including that there is no

material deterioration in general business and economic conditions; that the supply and demand for, deliveries of, and the level and volatility of prices of the Company's primary

metals and minerals develop as expected; that the Company receives regulatory and governmental approvals for its properties on a timely basis; that the Company is able to obtain

financing for its properties on reasonable terms; that the Company is able to procure equipment and supplies in sufficient quantities and on a timely basis; that engineering and

exploration timetables and capital costs for the Company's exploration plans are not incorrectly estimated or affected by unforeseen circumstances; that any environmental and other

proceedings or disputes are satisfactorily resolved; and that the Company maintain its ongoing relations with its business partners.

• However, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the

Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors may include, among

others, actual results of current exploration activities; actual results of reclamation activities; future metal prices; accidents, labor disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays

in obtaining governmental or regulatory approvals or financing or in the completion of exploration activities, as well as those factors discussed in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in

this presentation. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in

forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-

looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.

• Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, except in

accordance with applicable securities laws.

Kenorland Minerals

Management and Technical Team

• Zach Flood, President and Director: Mr. Flood is an exploration geologist who has worked on and managed exploration projects in various countries around the world including Mongolia, China, Dem. Rep. Congo, Peru, Argentina, and Canada. Most recently, Mr. Flood served as business development geologist for Kaizen Discovery which led to multiple acquisitions made in North America and South America.

• Francis MacDonald, Vice President of Exploration: Mr. MacDonald is an exploration geologist who has spent the majority of his career with Newmont Mining Corporation managing grassroots exploration projects in North America, West Africa, and East Africa. He has extensive knowledge of exploration and targeting techniques related to orogenic gold and VMS deposits in Precambrian terranes.

• Scott Smits, Chief Geologist: Mr. Smits has been involved in a broad range of positions and responsibilities, including mineral exploration and project evaluations since 2007. He honed his technically driven skillset during his time as a leading geologist on the Madrid deposit, at the Hope Bay Project for Newmont Mining Corporation. His most recent role was Senior Geologist within Newmont Mining Corporation’s Exploration Development Group conducting project generation and evaluations.

• Dave Stevenson, Chief Geophysicist: Mr. Stevenson is a mineral exploration geoscientist with over 10 years combined experience in mineral exploration and geoscientific research throughout Canada, Australia and South America. He has worked with a number of junior and mid-tier companies focusing on regional scale targeting to deposit scale resource definition. His current PhD research (being concluded at The Centre for Exploration Targeting; The University of Western Australia) involves developing and implementing an integrated structural geology and potential field geophysical approach to identifying crustal-scale architectural controls on mineralized systems.

Directors

• Peter Meredith: Currently Mr. Meredith is a Director of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (formerly Ivanplats Limited), Peregrine Diamonds, Cordoba Minerals and Great Canadian Gaming. Mr. Meredith was formerly a Director and Deputy Chairman of Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (now Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd.), where he was involved in overseeing Ivanhoe's business development and corporate relations. Mr. Meredith was also Chairman of SouthGobi Resources Ltd. as well as the President and CEO of Global Mining Management Corp. Peter Meredith previously spent 31 years with Deloitte LLP, chartered accountants, and retired as a partner in 1996. Mr. Meredith is a Chartered Professional Accountant and is a member of the Institute of Chartered Professional Accountants of British Columbia, the Institute of Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario. Mr. Meredith was certified as a Chartered Accountant (now Chartered Professional Accountant) by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants in 1968.

• Alex Ruggieri: Mr. Ruggieri is a finance professional and holder of the Chartered Financial Analyst designation. He is a member of John Tognetti’s team at Haywood Securities and has experience in all aspects of the Canadian Capital Markets. Prior to Haywood he served as an assistant to Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Waterfront Partners a Real Estate Development firm based in San Francisco.

Technical Advisors

• David Broughton (PhD, Fellow of the Society of Economic Geologists and a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada): Dr. Broughton is recognized as an expert in sediment-hosted copper deposits, and has been a key participant in several discoveries and successful development projects. After completing BSc and MSc degrees at University of Waterloo, he worked 10 years in gold exploration and mining in Canada, primarily in the Abitibi, for companies including Hemlo Gold, Agnico-Eagle, Canamax and Cyprus Amax. Dr. Broughton joined Ivanhoe Mines in January 2008 as VP Exploration, he was co-leader of the Kamoa discovery team that was the 2015 recipient of the Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada’s (PDAC) prestigious Thayer Lindsley Award for International mineral discovery of the year. He also lead the Ivanhoe team that discovered the world-class Flatreef PGE-Ni-Cu deposit in South Africa's Bushveld Complex, which is currently being developed.

• David I. Groves (PhD, Honorary DSc, Fellow of the Australian Academy of Sciences (FAAS): David I. Groves is currently an internationally known geological consultant who has consulted to both global major gold mining companies, including Newmont and AngloGold Ashanti, and Australian and Canadian junior gold and lithium exploration companies. David joined the Geology Department at the University of Western Australia as a Lecturer and progressed to Professor (Personal Chair) as he became Director of the Key Centre for Strategic Mineral Deposits and Centre for Global Metallogeny.

• Rick Valenta (PhD, FAusimm, P. Geo): Rick Valenta is a structural and economic geologist with over 30 years experience in mineral exploration research, consultancy and management. He has played a key role in numerous successful exploration programs with a range in focus including regional project generation, opportunity review and sourcing, regional and local 3D modelling of mineralised systems, and advanced exploration of known prospects, working with a range of major and junior companies.

Kenorland Minerals - Tanacross Project

• Regional structural setting analogous to world-class porphyry districts

• Regional stream sediment sampling highlights the entire project area with elevated copper

• Occurrence of significant porphyry Cu-Mo-Au mineralization (Taurus deposit) in the immediate project area as well as widespread proximal and distal alteration/mineralization

• Historic exploration focused on sparse outcrop exposures; majority of property covered by residual soils – soil geochemistry is effective

• Leached environment; supergene mineralization is preserved

• Ongoing tectonic and metallogenic studies through both MDRU Yukon-Alaska Metallogeny Project as well as the USGS

• Recent major discoveries (i.e. Coffee, 2010 and Tetlin, 2012) highlight the mineral potential of the region which remains vastly underexplored

Project Location

Significant Cretaceous mineral deposits of Yukon/Alaska

• Recent major discoveries in eastern Alaska and western Yukon (Coffee and Tetlin) exemplify the potential for new discoveries in the district

• Alaska ranked 14th globally in the 2016 Fraser Institute survey for Investment Attractiveness

Name Oz Au Grade Au g/t) Contained Cu (lbs) Grade Cu (%)Donlin Creek 45,000,000 2.20 - -Fort Knox (incl. prod.) 10,000,000 0.40 - -Pogo (incl. prod.) 7,956,000 12.50 - -Coffee 5,180,000 1.45 - -Casino 18,017,000 0.24 9,900,000,000 0.20Nucleus-Revenue 3,251,000 0.54 428,000,000 0.50Whistler 6,344,000 0.51 1,056,000,000 0.12Pebble 107,000,000 0.50 81,000,000,000 0.40

Terranes of the Northern Cordillera

Tanacross Project

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

Tectonic evolution of the Northern Cordillera

A. Mid-Permian - West-dipping subduction beneath the outboard, allochtonous Yukon-Tanana terrane (YTT)

B. Late Triassic - Closure of the Seventymile-Slide Mountain ocean; development of a new east-dipping subduction zone and associated Late Triassic plutonism in the YTT

C. Early Jurassic – Continued subduction beneath the continental margin results in orogen-parallel thrusting; syn-kinematic to slightly post-kinematic intrusions

D. Mid Cretaceous – Northeast-dipping subduction results in collision of the Wrangellia composite terrane (WR), extension and exhumation of Yukon Tanana assemblage with post-kinematic intrusion of mid-Cretaceous granitoids with coeval calderas

E. Late Cretaceous – Formation of outer northeast-dipping subduction zone; slab breakoff and inactive subduction of the inner mid-Cretaceous subduction zone; late Cretaceous plutonism with coeval calderas

Dusel-Bacon et al., 2015

Magma Fertility for Porphyries

50 55 60 65 70 75

10

100

SiO2 (%)

Sr/Y

Tetlin Skarn, Tok, Alaska Productive Porphyries, Yukon Pebble, Alaska Productive Porphyries, Global Database

Chuquicamata

Cadia Hill Bingham

Batu Hijau

Yanacocha

Similarities in whole-rock geochemistry of porphyry systems across the globe (high Sr/Y ratios, etc)

• Tetlin and Bluff prospect on Tanacross Project have the same U-Pb age (72 Ma)

• Tetlin intrusive rocks indicate that the Tanacross region was a productive segment of the arc during the late-Cretaceous

Unmineralized Reference Suite

Ore-forming Igneous Suite

Loucks, 2014

Cross Orogen-Structures: Chilean Porphyry Example

El Abra

Conchi

Chuquicamata

RadomiroTomic

Chimborazo

Zalvidar

La Escondida

• Many significant porphyry Cu deposits are spatially associated with intersections between arc-parallel and arc-perpendicular structures

• Vertically accretive cross-orogen structures represent early extensional transform faults controlled by an early basin architecture

• These structures are in turn reactivated repeatedly during arc-development as conduits for mineralising fluids from the mantle into the upper crust

Simplified TMI Map, Northern Chile (Behn et al., 2001)

Magnetics - TMI

McCuaig, Hronsky, 2014

Magnetics - Structural Interpretation

Sixtymile-Pika Fault System (NE)

Big Creek Fault System (NW)

Area of interest

Yukon-Alaska Metallogeny Project (YAM)

• The YAM project of the MDRU at UBC was initiated in 2014 with the goal of establishing a metallogenic framework for the Yukon-Tanana terrane

• Significant outcomes of the project include the recognition of structural and temporal controls on various mineral deposit types throughout the region

Sanchez et al 2014

Lineament Analysis

Area of interest along corridor of high structural density/complexity

Area of interest

Yukon-Alaska Metallogeny Project (YAM)

• Zones of structural complexity/ lineament density often correspond to higher damage zones on structures

• Damage zones allow for fluid focusing

Sanchez et al 2014

Overview: Structure/Mineralization

Yukon Alaska Metallogeny Research Outcomes

• Cretaceous structures formed during Intermontane collision with the ancestral margin of Laurentia

• NW trending arc-parallel structures (dextral strike-slip) are interpreted to control the emplacement of Cu-Au porphyry and Au epithermal systems during the Mid-Cretaceous (115-98Ma) and Late-Cretaceous (79-72Ma) (Sanchez et al 2014)

• NE trending arc-perpendicular structures (sinistral-oblique extensional) are interpreted to control the emplacement of Cu-Mo porphyry systems and Ag-rich polymetallic vein and carbonate replacement deposits (CRD) during the Late Cretaceous (72-67Ma) (Sanchez et al 2014)

Area of interest

Sanchez et al 2014

Tanacross Project – Land Status

Tanacross Project

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

• 40,292 ha – 100% owned by Kenorland Minerals

• Project is located on Alaska state-owned land

• Opportunity to increase land holding through additional staking

Regional Geology

Tanacross Project

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

• Cretaceous deposits associated with Cretaceous intrusions

• Examples include: Fort Knox, Pogo, Coffee, Casino, Freegold, Tetlin, Whistler, Pebble

Regional Magnetics dRTP over DEM

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

NW trending, arc-parallel structure

(Big Creek fault system)

NE trending, arc-perpendicular structures

(Sixtymile-Pika, Dip Creek)

Gravity – High pass filtered Bouguer

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

NE trending gravity low interpretated as the emplacement of felsic intrusives

along the Sixtymile-Pika Fault system

Regional Geology & Stream Sediment (Cu)

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

• USGS RASS (Rock Analysis Storage System) stream sediment samples

• Oxide residue analysis uses a weak oxalic acid digestion that selectively targets Fe & Mn oxides which have scavenged metals

• Samples were then analysed by optical emission spectroscopy

• Highly anomalous Cu values in stream sediments throughout the project area

• No regional Au data

Regional Magnetics – dRTP & Stream Sediment (Cu)

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

• USGS RASS (Rock Analysis Storage System) stream sediment samples

• Oxide residue analysis uses a weak oxalic acid digestion that selectively targets Fe & Mn oxides which have scavenged metals

• Samples were then analysed by optical emission spectroscopy

Geochemistry – RASS Catchments

Cu

Zn

Mo

Be

Pb

Sn

Geochemical Prospectivity

Regional Geology & Occurrences Geochemistry - Prospectivity

Basin Prospectivity Value = 2*Cu + 1.5*Mo + 1*Zn + 1*Pb + 0.75*Sn + 0.75*Be + 0.5*As + 0.5*Hg

Occurrences – Taurus (East Taurus deposit)

Target:- Porphyry Cu

Work History:- 1970’s - Geologic mapping, magnetometer and IP surveys, detailed soil

grids; strong anomalies of Cu and Mo- 1990’s – airborne magnetic, EM and IP surveys (BHP)- Known drilling consists of 33 DDH (6,163m) and 12 RC (info unknown)- Many holes ending in mineralization, no Au analysis in much of historical

drilling

Comments:- EW trending McCord fault may be controlling the emplacement of the

monzonite intrusive centers - Leached cap varies from 40-50m in depth, supergene varies from 30-50m

in thickness- 1993 Noranda reported 25 million tonnes @ 0.3% Cu + 0.039% Mo- 2008 Senator reported 75 million tonnes @ 0.275% Cu + 0.032% Mo +

0.166g/t Au

Taurus (East Taurus deposit) – Held by third party (Senator Minerals USA)

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

Occurrences - Bluff Prospect

Target:- Porphyry Cu

Work History:- Soil sampling, unknown if ridge and spur or a detailed grid

- Small IP grid; large chargeability anomaly, extent unknown

- Diamond drilling: At least one drill hole with anomalous Cu, Au, Ag within leached cap; four more drill holes with no information (Full Metal Minerals – 2011)

Comments:- Large strong hydrothermal alteration within high level quartz-monzonite

and granodiorite intrusions

Bluff Prospect Ala

ska

Yuko

n

Occurrences - East Dennison Prospect

Target:- Porphyry Cu

Work History:- Soil, stream, and rock sampling gave moderately anomalous values for

Cu and Mo, and locally Zn and Ag

- No geophysics has been conducted

Comments:- Geologically similar to Taurus and Bluff prospects

East Dennison Prospect

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

Occurrences - Pushbush Prospect

Target:- Porphyry Cu

Work History:- Trenching and surface sampling

- Two drill holes in the 70’s; did not encounter mineralization

- Full Metal Minerals worked ground in 2011 (no reports)

Comments:- No geological information in historic reports

Pushbush Prospect

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

Target:- Banded Pb-Zn - peripheral porphyry-related mineralization (?)

Work History:- Soil sampling; highly anomalous values in Cu, Zn, Pb, Ag, and Au

- Airborne EM, followed up by ground EM. Weak anomalies detected from ground EM on high frequency only

- One line of IP was conducted

- Three Winkie drill holes by Cities Service, and two short Winkie drill holes by Borax. Did not intersect any mineralization which would explain the strong surface geochemistry

- Full Metal Minerals worked ground in 2011 (no reports)

Comments:- Limited drilling has failed to explain the broad soil geochemical anomaly

Big Creek Prospect

Occurrences – Big Creek Prospect

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

Occurrences - Bjork Prospect

Target:- Banded Pb-Zn - peripheral porphyry-related mineralization (?)

Work History:- Ridge and spur soils, detailed soil grid; two subparallel large anomalies of

Zn, Pb, Cu, Ag, Au

- Airborne and ground EM surveys; strong EM anomalies, parallel but not coincident with soil geochem anomalies

- Ground magnetic survey; four lines

- 3 short drill holes (100 feet) – very anomalous Cu (leached environment) and Au, Ag

Bjork Prospect

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

Occurrences – Ladue Group Prospects

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

Target:- Banded Pb-Zn (Cu) - peripheral porphyry-related mineralization (?)

Work History:- Airborne and ground EM surveys; several moderate chargeability anomalies

detected

- Ground magnetics/gravity surveys

- Soil sampling; anomalous in Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag

- One drill hole targeting positive magnetic anomaly, returned encouraging galena and sphalerite

Comments:- Numerous zones of Cu-Pb-Zn were identified from soil sampling;

interpretation was stratiform massive sulphide, but was determined to not host a near surface massive sulphide body

Ladue Group

Occurrences - Baggage/McElfish Creek

Target:- Porphyry Cu

Work History:- Soil grid; coincident Cu-Mo anomaly (Cu up to 550 ppm, Mo up to 38 ppm)

- Two IP lines were conducted at right angles to one another over the geochemical anomaly

Comments:- Large circular altered zone: silicification +/- sericite

- Large Cu-Mo soil anomaly with a coincident IP anomaly, no intrusive rocks have been noted to date on the prospect – high level part of system?

Baggage/McElfish Creek

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

Property Geology & Satellite Imagery

Satellite Image Property Geology

No bedrock exposure aside from ridge tops

EM (Dighem – 900hz) & Magnetics – AS over 1VD

EM (900 Hz) Magnetics (AS and 1VD)

EM (Dighem – 900hz) & Magnetics dRTP

Pebble Porphyry ZTEM (30hz)

(same scale as image on the right)

• The known porphyry occurrences of East and West Taurus have coincident resistive / magnetic signatures

• Multiple targets with similar geophysical expression exist throughout the property, most of these areas have no outcrop exposure

• These are interpreted as potential intrusive centers, along with other discrete magnetic highs EM & Magnetic Contours

Tanacross Project - Casino Porphyry Cu Analogue

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

• The Tanacross Project is located near the intersection of the Big Creek Fault System, and the Sixtymile-Pika Fault

• The Casino Porphyry Cu deposit is located near the intersection of the Big Creek Fault system and the Dip Creek Fault

• These structures are interpreted to control the emplacement of porphyry, epithermal, and CRD systems during the Mid to Late Cretaceous in this region of the Northern Cordillera (Sanchez 2014)

• Globally, the intersection of crustal-scale arc perpendicular and parallel structures are recognized to control the emplacement of large mineral systems in other highly productive porphyry districts

Casino Porphyry Cu (Mo, Au) - Analogue

Casino deposit outline

Casino Porphyry Cu (Mo, Au) - Analogue

Ala

ska

Yuko

n

• The Tanacross Project is located at the intersection of the arc-parallel Big Creek Fault system and the arc-perpendicular Sixtymile-Pika Fault

• Both of these structures are interpreted to control the emplacement of mineral systems in the Yukon and Alaska

• Globally, the intersection of regional arc parallel and arc-perpendicular fault systems are recognized to control the emplacement of large porphyry systems in productive arc settings

• Regional stream geochemistry also highlights the entire Tanacross Project area as prospective for Cu mineralization

Mineral System: Batholith associated porphyry deposits

• Anderson et al 2013 use upward continued (UC) aeromagnetic data to map-out the buried batholith associated with the giant Pebble Cu-Au-Mo porphyry deposit and to identify other batholith associated systems in SW-Alaska

• The following slides exhibit the coincident UC magnetic signature and gravimetric signatures of Pebble vs. Kenorland’s Tanacross Property

SW NE

Modified from: McCuaig & Hronsky 2014

Anderson et al 2013

Pebble vs. Tanacross: Upward Continued Magnetics

Pebble magnetics (UC) & occurrences

Tanacross magnetics (UC) & occurrences

• Upward continuation (UC) filter used to examine regional and crustal-scale magnetic signatures• Broad regional magnetic highs associated with buried batholiths under the Pebble and Tanacross projects

• High-pass filter applied to the Bouguer gravity to examine density contrasts in the mid-to-upper crust• Pebble and the Tanacross project are associated with gravity lows associated with buried batholiths

Pebble vs. Tanacross: High-pass Bouger Gravity

Pebble gravity – note high density of stations

Tanacross gravity – note low density of stations in Alaska

Tanacross Project - Conclusions

• Regional structural setting analogous to world-class porphyry districts

• Regional stream sediment sampling highlights the entire project area with elevated copper

• Occurrence of significant porphyry Cu-Mo-Au mineralization (Taurus deposit) in the immediate project area as well as widespread proximal and distal alteration/mineralization

• Historic exploration focused on sparse outcrop exposures; majority of property covered by residual soils – soil geochemistry is effective

• Leached environment; supergene mineralization is preserved

• Ongoing tectonic and metallogenic studies through both MDRU Yukon-Alaska Metallogeny Project as well as the USGS

• Recent major discoveries (i.e. Coffee, 2010 and Tetlin, 2012) highlight the mineral potential of the region which remains vastly underexplored

References

• Allan M.M., Mortensen J.K., Hart C.J., Bailey L.A., Sanchez M.G. Ciolkiewicz W., McKenzie G.G., Creaser R.A.; 2013: Magmatic and Metallogenic Framework of West-Cetnral Yukon and Eastern Alaska, Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication 17, pp. 111-168

• Anderson, E.D., Hitzman, M.W., Monecke, T., Bedrosian, P.A., Shah, A.K., Kelley, K.D.; 2013: Geological analysis of aeromagnetic data from Southwestern Alaska: Implications for exploration in the area of the Pebble porphyry Cu-Au-Mo deposit, Economic Geology, Vol. 108, pp. 421-436

• Behn, G., Camus, F., Carrasco, P., Ware, H.; 2001: Aeromagnetic signature of porphyry copper systems in Northern Chile and its geologic implications, Economic Geology, Vol. 96, pp. 239 - 248

• Dusel-Bacon, C., Aleinikoff, J.N., Day, W.C., and Mortensen, J.K., 2015, Mesozoic magmatism and timing of epigenetic Pb-Zn-Ag mineralization in the western Fortymile mining district, east-central Alaska: Zircon U-Pb geochronology, whole-rock geochemistry, and Pb isotopes: Geosphere, v. 11, no. 3, pp. 786–822

• Loucks, R.R; 2014.: Distinctive composition of copper-forming arc magmas, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, Vol. 61, pp. 5-16

• Mair J.L., Hart C., Stephens J.R.; 2006: Deformation history of the northwestern Selwyn Basin, Yukon, Canada: Implications for orogen evolution and mid-Cretaceous magmatism;, Geologic Society of America, Vol. 118 no. 3-4, pp. 304-323

• Mair J.L., Farmer G.L., Groves D.I., Hart C.J., Goldfarb R.J.; 2011: Petrogenesis of postcollisional magmatism at Scheelite Dome, Yukon, Canada: Evidence for a lithospheric mantle source for magmas associated with intrusion-related gold systems; Economic Geology, Vol. 106, pp. 451-480

• McCuaig, T.C., Hronsky, J.M.A., 2014: The mineral system concept: the key to exploration targeting, Society of Exploration Geologists Special Publication 18 (2014): 153-175

• Sanchez M.G., Allan M.M., Hart C.J, Mortensen J.K.; 2014: Extracting the ore-deposit-controlling structures from aeromagnetic, gravimentric, topographic, and regional geologic data in western Yukon and eastern Alaska, Interpretation, Vol. 2. No. 4, pp. SJ75-SJ102