powerpoint presentation · title: powerpoint presentation author: sandra rilling created date:...

This project has received funding from the

European Union‘s Horizon 2020 research and

innovation programme under grant agreement No 723974.

Progress, Results

WP2: Mapping C-ITS context

08.08.2017

WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context 208.08.2017

• Task 2.1: Identifying and mapping C-ITS services

• Lead: CE Delft

• Task 2.2: Barriers, enablers and KPIs for implementation of C-

ITS

• Lead: CE Delft

• Task 2.3: Taxonomy of case studies

• Lead: University of Barcelona

Structure of WP2


Planning


Task 2.1: Overview of C-ITS applications


• Assessment of ITS initiatives (macro-level)

• Identification

• Assessment of ITS services (meso-level)

• Identification

• Categorisation

Objectives


• ITS: application of ICT in transport

• C-ITS:

a subset of the overall ITS that communicates and shares information

between ITS stations to give advice or facilitate actions with the

objective of improving safety, sustainability, efficiency and comfort

beyond the scope of stand-alone systems.

• ITS services: combined use of ITS technologies in order to fulfil user

requirements related to a transport mode (or integration of more than

one transport mode) on a certain market.

Definitions

708.08.2017

• 94 ITS services identified• Desk study

• Interviews

• Data gathered on:• Country

• TRL

• ITS key-enabling technology

• Deployment area

• Transport mode

• Type of transport

• Primary benefits

• Type of stakeholders

• Institutional framework

• Transferability

ITS services identified

WP2: Mapping of C-ITS context


• Categorisation needs a market driven approach in order to be

alligned with NEWBITS purposes

• Based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) a market

type segmentation was chosen:

• Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS)

• Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)

• Advanced Transportation Pricing System (ATPS)

• Advanced Public Transportation System (APTS)

• Cooperative vehicle system (CVS)

Categorisation of ITS services


• Long list of criteria was developed based on literature review

• Based on AHP these criteria were ranked based on theirrelevance for NEWBITS purposes

• Top 5:

• Primary benefits

• Type of stakeholders

• Innovation level

• ITS key-enabling technology

• Transferability

• Selection of 4 criteria: primary benefit, innovation level, ITS technology and market segment

Categorisation approach


• Tabular one-to-one mapping

Mapping of identified ITS services on categories (1)


• Three dimensional mapping

Mapping of identified ITS services on categories (2)


Mapping of ITS services: Service types


Task 2.2: Assessment of barriers,

enablers and KPIs


• Assessment of barriers and enablers

• Identify main barriers and enablers for the deployment of ITS services.

• Assess the relevance of the barriers and enablers for the different market segments and types of services.

• Explore the impact of external factors (macro-trends) of future relevance of barriers and enablers

• Assessment of KPIs

• Identify main KPIs used for ITS services

• Assess the relevance/usage of KPIs for the different market segments and types of services

• Assess the main barriers for applying the KPIs.

Objectives


Methodology assessment barriers and enablers

1. Conduct a systematic review of barriers and

enablers

• Literature review

• Interviews

2. Identification of main barriers and enablers

by market segment

4. Exploration of the impact of external factors

on the future relevance of barriers and

enablers

3. Identification of main barriers and enablers

by service type

• Stakeholder survey

• Input from

identified services

in NEWBITS D2.1


Assessment steps Research Method


Overview of barriers and enablers


Relevance of barriers

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Existence of the last mover advantage

Lack of a sufficient legal framework

Lack of political prioritisation

Lack of funding

Lack of attractive business models

Current infrastructure not ready to integrate ITS…

Lack of interoperability and incompatibility

Technical weaknesses in ensuring data security

High or uncertain maintenance costs

Lack of user acceptance

Limited understanding of user needs

Lack of cooperation between stakeholders

Lack of skilled staff for ITS companies

Lack of demonstrated benefits of ITS services

No real barriers

Other

Frequency by which barriers are mentioned

Total


Main barriers per market segment


Main enablers per market segment


Service type Important

characteristics

Most relevant barriers

Type 1 TRL 9 Lack of user acceptance

Lack of political prioritisation

Type 2 TRL 7; CVS and ATIS Technical barriers

Lack of user acceptance

Lack of legal framework

Type 3 TRL 7 – 9; efficiency

main primary benefit

Wide range of barriers are relevant

Type 4 TRL 7; CVS Lack of user acceptance

Lack of demonstrated benefits

Lack of legal framework

Current infrastructure not ready

Main barriers per service type


Service type Important

characteristics

Most relevant enablers

Type 1 TRL 9 Increased user acceptance

More attractive business cases

Type 2 TRL 7; CVS and ATIS More cooperation stakeholders

Legal framework

Involvement of end-users

Type 3 TRL 7 – 9; efficiency

main primary benefit

Wide range of enablers

Type 4 TRL 7; CVS More cooperation stakeholders

Public awareness

Main enablers per service type


• Increased political commitment:

• due to increased attention sustainable transport, urbanisation,

increase multimodal transport

• More attractive business models:

• due to urbanisation, ageing population

• Improved infrastructure:

• due to emerging technologies (e.g. 5G)

• More user-acceptance

• due to more prominent role generation Y

Impact megatrends on relevance barriers/enablers


Methodology assessment barriers and enablers

1. Conduct a systematic review of KPIs • Literature review

• Interviews

2. Mapping of KPIs by market segment

4. Assess barriers for the appliance of

KPIs

3. Assess utilisation of relevant KPIs per

service type


• Input from identified

services in NEWBITS

D2.1



Assessment steps Research Method


Main deployment KPIs


Main benefit KPIs


• As benefit KPIs are mainly related to the primary objective of

the service

• No clear distinction in benefit KPIs per market segment or

service type can be identified.

Relevant KPIs per market segment or service type


Barriers for implementation KPIs

0 5 10 15 20 25

Lack of available/compatible data

Lack of knowledge/skills

Data ownership leading to difficulties in accessing information

Lack of financing/funding

Lack of cooperation between stakeholders

Lack of clearly defined KPIs

Difficulties to realise cooperation (organisational/cultural backgrounds)

Lack of guidance/best practices

Perceived limited added value of KPIs

Data privacy

Other

Lack of staff resources

Frequency by which the barrier is mentioned

powerpoint presentation · title: powerpoint presentation author: sandra rilling created date:...

Documents