ppor literature
DESCRIPTION
Perinatal Periods of Risk Office of Epidemiology & Community Health Monitoring Kansas City, Mo, Health Department. PPOR Literature. Few published articles reporting PPOR findings Emphasis generally on blacks and whites - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
![Page 2: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Few published articles reporting PPOR findings
Emphasis generally on blacks and whites
PPOR may not be mentioned by name, but fetal-infant deaths are distributed using the PPOR matrix
Kitagawa analysis generally lacking Other phase 2 analyses may be lacking
Kansas City, Mo, Health Department has published four (4) papers in recent years
![Page 3: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Report on PPOR for Kansas City, Mo Kitagawa analysis Other phase 2 analyses
Restricted to non-Hispanic blacks and whites
No discussion of community efforts other than mention of a limited FIMR project and a Child Fatality Review Program for one of the counties in which KCMo is situated
KCMo is part of 4 different counties
![Page 4: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Restricted to non-Hispanic blacks and whites
Kitagawa analysis (methodology shown in Appendix) Other phase 2 analyses
Jackson County is 2nd most populous county in Mo
Approximately 50% of population lives in Kansas City Demography quite different between city residents and non-city
residents
Demonstrated geographic and racial differences in fetal-infant mortality
Geographic differences suggested that different intervention strategies may have to be used
![Page 5: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Restricted to non-Hispanic blacks and whites in KCMo
Kitagawa analysis Other phase 2 analyses
Compared PPOR findings for 1996-2000 to those for 2001-2005
Demonstrated 30% reduction in excess fetal-infant mortality overall (17.0% for blacks, 66.7% for whites)
Nearly doubled the disparity ratio between the two groups
![Page 6: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Used 5 county area of Missouri and Kansas
Kitagawa analysis
Goal was to look at Hispanic fetal-infant mortality
92.4% of Hispanic population in the Kansas City-Overland Park-Kansas City, MO-KS, CSA resided in the 5 counties
7.8% of population in the 5 counties; 77.0% of Mexican heritage
Hispanic and non-Hispanic white fetal-infant mortality rates similar; half that of non-Hispanic blacks
Excess Hispanic mortality (91%) concentrated in the MHP category
Interventions would have different focus
![Page 7: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Perinatal Periods of Risk (PPOR): A Useful Tool for Analyzing Fetal and Infant Mortality
PPOR analysis is an approach to investigating and monitoring causes of fetal and infant deaths.
The purpose of PPOR analyses is to change in community direction and priorities for reducing fetal and infant deaths.
Kitagawa analysis is to identify excess deaths due to birthweight distribution or due to birthweight-specific mortality. Mainly, it is used to partition the excess in Maternal Health/Prematurity
7
![Page 8: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
![Page 9: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Access and process fetal and infant death, live birth, and linked birth-infant death data files
Quality of data: assess to miss % of gestational week, birthweight (grams), education, and race/ethnicity
9
![Page 10: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Phase I Analysis: Identifies subpopulations and periods
of risk with the largest excess fetal and infant deaths
Phase II Analysis: Explains why the excess deaths
occurred and directs prevention efforts
10
![Page 11: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Variables Fetal DeathsLinked Birth-Infant Deaths Live Births
Date births X X
Date deaths X X
Birthweight (gm) X X X
Gestational age X X X
Mother’s age X X X
Mother’s education
X X X
Race/ethnicity X X X
Cause of death X X
11
![Page 12: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Table 3* using percentages of very low birthweight contribution instead of percentages of total excess
MHP Percent attributable Percent attributable to Very low birthweight to birthweightbirthweight- specific (500-1,499 grams) distribution mortality
White 93.7% (41.5/44.3) 6.3% (2.8/44.3) Black 100% 0% Hispanic 90.8% (85.0/93.6) 9.2% (8.6/93.6)For example, among Hispanic, 91% is attributable to birthweight frequency, therefore, the target improvements should focus on reducing birthweight frequency.
12
Published in Public Health Published in Public Health ReportsReports
*Table 3 is from page 715, Public Health Reports/ Sept-Oct. 2009/Volume 124
![Page 13: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Enter Enter Calculated CalculatedBirthweight Number of Live
Births&Fetal Deaths
Number of Feto-Infant
Deaths
Birthweight Distribution
Feto-Infant Mortality Rates
500‑749 78 35 0.6% 448.7750‑999 81 24 0.6% 296.31,000‑1,249 79 11 0.6% 139.21,250‑1,499 99 11 0.8% 111.11,500‑1,999 326 16 2.5% 49.12,000‑2,499 914 20 7.0% 21.92,500+ 11464 73 87.9% 6.4Total 13041 190 100.0% 14.6
Enter Enter Calculated CalculatedBirthweight Number of Live
Births&Fetal Deaths
Number of Feto-Infant
Deaths
Birthweight Distribution
Feto-Infant Mortality Rates
500‑749 7008 4019 0.2% 573.5750‑999 7961 1945 0.2% 244.31,000‑1,249 9383 1263 0.2% 134.61,250‑1,499 11075 1085 0.3% 98.01,500‑1,999 43178 2178 1.1% 50.42,000‑2,499 128439 2552 3.4% 19.92,500+ 3566957 9690 94.5% 2.7Total 3774001 22732 100.0% 6.06.0
Kitagawa Table for birthweight—Target population
Kitagawa Table for birthweight—Reference population
![Page 14: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Actual Contribution to the Difference in
Excess Mortality RatesPercentage Contribution to the
Difference in Excess Mortality Rates Column (1) Column (2) Calculated (3) Calculated (4) Column (5) Column (6)
Feto-Infant Feto-Infant Birthweight Mortality Birthweight Mortality
Birthweight Distribution Rates Total Distribution Rates Total500-749 2.1 -0.5 1.6 24.7% -5.7% 18.9%750-999 1.1 0.2 1.3 13.0% 2.5% 15.5%1,000-1,249 0.5 0.0 0.5 5.7% 0.2% 6.0%1,250-1,499 0.5 0.1 0.6 5.7% 0.8% 6.5%1,500-1,999 0.7 0.0 0.6 7.9% -0.3% 7.6%2,000-2,499 0.8 0.1 0.9 8.8% 1.2% 10.0%2,500-6,499 -0.3 3.3 3.0 -3.5% 39.0% 35.5%Total 5.3 3.2 8.5 62.2% 37.8% 100.0%MH / Prem. 4.2 -0.2 4.0 49.1% -2.2% 46.9%
Birthweight-specific components for the absolute difference in overall feto‑infant mortality rates between populations due to birthweight distribution and feto‑infant mortality rates
Birthweight-specific components for the percentage difference in overall feto‑infant mortality rates between populations due to birthweight distribution and feto‑infant mortality rates
![Page 15: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Of the overall excess of 8.5, the majority (62.2%) is attributable to birthweight frequency in the target population. The high rate of live births and fetal deaths of 500-749 grams birthweight alone contributes 24.7% to the overall excess. The overall contribution of VLBW is 4.0, of which 4.2 (100%) is attributable to difference in birthweight frequency and -0.2 – to negative difference in the birthweight-specific mortality. Clearly, in addressing Maternal Health/ Prematurity excess, special attention should be directed to reducing the percentage of very low birthweight.
15
![Page 16: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Analysis of Feto-Infant Mortality Rates in Kansas City, Missouri, 1996-2000
vs. 2001-2005
Perinatal Periods of Risk (PPOR)Perinatal Periods of Risk (PPOR)
16
![Page 17: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
500-1499 g
1500+ g
Fetal NeonatalPost
neonatal
Maternal Health/ Maternal Health/ PrematurityPrematurity
Maternal Maternal
CareCare
NewbornNewborn
CareCare
Infant Infant HealthHealth
![Page 18: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Map Feto-Infant DeathsBlacks, KCMO, 1996-2000 vs.
2001-2005
Maternal Health/Prematurity 84
InfantHealth 66
MaternalCare 37
NewbornCare 23
210 fetal and infant deaths. Total fetal deaths and live births: 12,795
Maternal Health/Prematurity 81
InfantHealth 45
MaternalCare 40
NewbornCare 24
190 fetal and infant deaths. Total fetal deaths and live births: 13,154
1996-2000
2001-2005
18
![Page 19: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Maternal Health/Prematurity 6.5
InfantHealth 5.2
MaternalCare 2.9
NewbornCare 1.8
Focus on Overall Feto-Infant Mortality
Blacks, KCMO, 1996-2000 vs. 2001-2005
Total feto-infant mortality rate: 16.4 =(210/12,795)x 1000
Maternal Health/Prematurity 6.2
InfantHealth 3.4
MaternalCare 3.0
NewbornCare 1.8
Total feto-infant mortality rate: 14.4 =(190/13,154)x 1000
1996-2000
2001-2005
19
![Page 20: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
KCMO Blacks U.S. Reference Excess
- =16.4 5.8 10.6
6.56.5
2.92.9 1.81.8 5.25.2
2.22.2
1.51.5 1.11.1 1.01.0
4.34.3
1.41.4 0.70.7 4.24.2
- =
KCMO Blacks U.S. Reference Excess
- =14.4 5.8 8.6
6.26.2
3.03.0 1.81.8 3.43.4
2.22.2
1.51.5 1.11.1 1.01.0
4.04.0
1.51.5 0.70.7 2.42.4
- =
1996-2000
2001-2005
![Page 21: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Total Excess Deaths =136 Total Excess Deaths =113
1996-2000 2001-2005
![Page 22: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
A. Overall Excess Rates B. Maternal Health/Prematurity Excess Rates
1996-2000
2001-2005
![Page 23: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Maternal Health/ Prematurity
Maternal Health/Prematurity
Smoking
Prenatal care
Parity
Unintended pregnancy
Maternal diabetes
23
![Page 24: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Selected risk factors
Black(%)
Reference(%) P value
Smoking 20.8 10.7 <0.001
First trimester care 77.4 94.3 <0.001
No prenatal care 7.5 1.7 <0.001
Parity (>2) 35.5 19.9 <0.001
Unintended pregnancy
64.5 23.2 <0.001
Income <$40 K 69.5 12.0 <0.001
Birth interval <18 m
30.5 50.0 <0.001
Maternal diabetes 4.3 4.0 >0.0524
Birthweight Distribution (VLBW Births: 500-1499 grams) in Kansas City, MO 2001-2008
![Page 25: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
• Maternal Health and Prematurity (N=44)
• 43% Preterm labor• 46% Smoking• 32% Substance abuse• 11% Alcohol use• 34% 1st trimester care• 14% Teen mothers• 73% multiple pregnancies• 36% Maternal STDs• 30% Maternal bacterial infection• 18% Maternal HTN/diabetes• 17% History of fetal/infant loss
25
![Page 26: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Infant Health
Infant Health
SIDS
Injury
Infection
Anomalies
Perinatal
From Dr. William M Sappenfield, CDC 26
![Page 27: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Category 1996-2000 2001-2005
Infant deaths*
Rate** Infant deaths
Rate
Infant Health
66 5.2 45 3.4
SIDS 35 2.7 20 1.5
Injury12 0.9 7 0.5
*Infant health (birth weight with 1500+ g and post-neonatal infant deaths)
**Infant death rate is per 1,000 fetal deaths and live births
27
![Page 28: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Black Infant Mortality Rates, Infant Black Infant Mortality Rates, Infant Health Category, Kansas City, MO. Health Category, Kansas City, MO.
1996-2000 vs. 2001-20051996-2000 vs. 2001-2005During 2006-2008, the rate remained 3.4 deaths per 1,000 live births at the same category.
28
![Page 29: PPOR Literature](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062517/5681362b550346895d9da418/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Jinwen Cai, MD
Biostatistician, Office of Epidemiology & Community Health Monitoring
[email protected] 816.513.6044
Gerald L Hoff, PhD, FACE
Epidemiologist & Manager, Office of Epidemiology & Community Health Monitoring
[email protected] 816.513.6149
29