ppp: public private partnership or ppp: personalized profits partnership in solid waste management...
TRANSCRIPT
PPP: Public Private Partnershipor
PPP: Personalized Profits Partnershipin
Solid Waste Management
Dr Vivek S Agrawal
www.cdcindia.org
2
SWM costs going down?
• Chennai2000-2007 INR 760 to 1300 per MT
• Punjab
2011-2035 INR 250-350 per MT with annual increase
3
Types of Models
Cluster of Cities Part of City
Area Based
Entire City
Competition between
Municipal Corporation
and Private entities.
Efficiency in work
Strengths
Part of City
Weaknesses
Saturation of
Manpower to a
limited Area
Philosophy : Optimum utilization of existing resources
Efficiency in Work
Employment
Generation
Strengths
Entire City
Weaknesses
Somewhere
duplication of
cost to Public
Sector
Philosophy : Synchronization in various activities
Small and Medium Local
Bodies are involved.
Small ULBs also get
benefit of Technology.
Economies of Scale
Strengths
Cluster of Cities
Weaknesses
Risk of Inefficiencies
The Cost of
Transportation is
very high.
Philosophy : The waste processing plant to get adequate quantity of waste for viability
Bhatinda Cluster S.No. Name of ULBs
Est. Tonnage (MT)
Distance (Km) upto Processing Site
Tipping rate per TPD
1 Abohar 24.20 109 8522 Malaut 35.13 51 6823 Giddarbaha 9.60 35 6074 Sangat 2.20 39 5575 Raman 27.16 16 627
6 Talwandi Sabo 9.40 65 7027 Maur 4.10 37 6078 Kotfateh 32.84 42 5129 Sardulgarh 4.20 32 777
10 Mansa 3.50 62 70211 Bareta 9.10 45 90712 Budhalada 27.88 8 83213 Bhikhi 4.40 76 74214 Bucho Mandi 2.00 81 48715 Tappa 6.20 78 667
16 Rampura Phul 69.10 58 587
17 Goniana 2.94 19 507
18 Bhatinda 112.33 5 437
•1
• Door to Door garbage collection
•2
•Door to Door garbage collection +Transportation
•3
•Street Sweeping +Transportation
•4
•Door to Door garbage collection + Transportation + Street Sweeping
•5
•Total Sanitation
•6
•Transfer Station Development
•7
•Transfer Station Operation and Maintenance
•8
•Integrated Solid Waste Management
Activity Based
Activity Based Merits & Demerits
Advantages
Efficiency in Particular Activity
Effective Monitoring
Disadvantages
Decentralization of Work
Rise in Expenditure
11
Financial Models:
• Capex and Opex both by ULB
• Capex by ULB,
Opex by Private
Partner
• Capex by Private Partner,
Opex by ULB
• Capex and Opex both by
Private Partner
Many a times Community may also contribute.
Benefits envisaged:
• Potential benefits for both citizens and governments
• PPPs increase competition, and efficiency in service provision, expand coverage and reduce delivery costs, if used wisely
• PPPs allow government to extend services without increasing the number of public employees and without making large capital investments in facilities and equipment
12
Access
OR
Nexus?13
Nagpur Jaipur Ulhasnagar Bangalore
Scope of work D2D C&T
10 years
Integrated SWM
20 years
D2D C&T of SW
8 years
D2D collection from bulk generators and transportation 10 years
Tender Qty 800 TPD 1200 TPD 250 TPD 500 TPD
Technical Experience Required
Quantum of waste handled
3-10 Yrs C&TScore Based
1–8 municipalities .O&M experience of 25-50 vehicles.
2Lac-6Lac MT p.a.Score Based
1 Year
D2D: 50000 householdsProcessing: 100 TPD
Complete storage, C&T for 3 years in India. O&M experience of 25 vehicles (RC/DP)for 3 years. Tie up with manufacturer with valid ISO 9001 manufacturer of RC 3T, 6T and 10T, GVW chasis vehicles of international standard.
300 TPD
Processing Experience 250 TPD, C&T, Construction, O&M, Logistics, based on project cost.
125 TPD
Financial Parameters
Turnover
Net Worth
Rs. 5 Crores to Rs. 14 Crores pa.a in last 2 years.
Rs. 50Lacs – Rs. 100 LacsScore based
Rs. 50 Crores p.a.
Rs. 10 Crores
Rs. 100 Crores p.a. in past 3 financial years
25% of estimated cost.
Others Solvency: Rs. 50Lacs – Rs. 100 Lacs. EMD : Rs. 25 Lacs.Score Based
EMD: Rs. 50 Lacs EMD Rs. 1 Crore Bank solvency of Rs. 10 Crores. Tipping rate is per day per vehicle , instead of per ton
EMD: Rs. 1 Crore
15
8year 10 year 10 year 20 year0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Scope of Work Vs. Experience
Scope of work
Ten
der
Qty
3 year exp
Processing Exp
3-10 year exp
1 year exp
Jaipur
Nagpur
Bangalore
Ulhasnagar
16
Ulhasnagar Bangalore Nagpur Jaipur 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Quantum of Waste handled
TP
D
17
Ulhasnagar Bangalore Nagpur Jaipur 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Turnover Parameter
Ulhasnagar Bangalore Nagpur Jaipur
250TPD250TPD
500TPD
800 TPD
1200 TPD
INR Crores
18
Ulhasnagar Bangalore Nagpur Jaipur 0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
EMDIN
R C
rore
Bhatinda Cluster S.No. Name of ULBs Est. Tonnage (MT) Distance (Km) upto Processing Site
1 Abohar 24.20 1092 Malaut 35.13 513 Giddarbaha 9.60 354 Sangat 2.20 395 Raman 27.16 16
6 Talwandi Sabo 9.40 657 Maur 4.10 378 Kotfateh 32.84 429 Sardulgarh 4.20 3210 Mansa 3.50 6211 Bareta 9.10 4512 Budhalada 27.88 813 Bhikhi 4.40 7614 Bucho Mandi 2.00 8115 Tappa 6.20 78
16 Rampura Phul 69.10 58
17 Goniana 2.94 19
18 Bhatinda 112.33 5
Total 386.28
20
21
Way Ahead for ISWM
I
III
V
IV
II
PRIVATE SECTOR
GOVERNMENT
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE
NGOS
CORPORATE
• Training
• Capacity Building
• Financial Investor
• Setting up Industries
• Technology Provider
• Regulator
Social Security
Policy Intervention
• Infrastructure
• Technology
• Social Intervention
• Human Resource
• Community Development
Integration
Of various
stakeholder
“ the waste itself has a value and is the source of income for the municipalities……financial issues are not a problem, man power is not a problem, private sector availability is not a problem our problem is the management”
23