ppt13

24
13 Implementing Strategy in Companies That Compete Across Industries and Countries

Upload: kanukuntla-ranjith

Post on 18-Jan-2015

766 views

Category:

Business


6 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ppt13

13Implementing

Strategy in Companies That Compete Across Industries and

Countries

Page 2: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 2

Managing Corporate Strategy Through the Multidivisional Structure

• Functional or product structures are not sufficient when a company enters new industries

• Multidivisional structure innovations– Divisions (operating responsibility)– Corporate headquarters staff to monitor divisions

(strategic responsibility)– Each division may be organized differently

Page 3: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 3

Multidivisional Structure

Page 4: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 4

Advantages of a Multidivisional Structure

• Enhanced corporate financial control

• Enhanced strategic control

• Growth

• Stronger pursuit of internal efficiency

Page 5: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 5

Problems in Implementing a Multidivisional Structure

• Establishing the divisional-corporate authority relationship

• Distortion of information

• Competition for resources

• Transfer pricing

• Short-term R&D focus

• Duplication of functional resources

Page 6: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 6

Structure, Control, Culture, and Corporate-Level Strategy

• Unrelated diversification– Easiest and cheapest strategy to manage– Allows corporate managers to evaluate divisional

performance easily and accurately– Divisions have considerable autonomy– No integration among divisions is necessary

Page 7: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 7

Structure, Control, Culture, and Corporate-Level Strategy (cont’d)

• Vertical integration– More expensive than unrelated diversification

– Multidivisional structure provides necessary controls to achieve benefits from the control of resource transfers

– Must strike balance between centralized and decentralized control

– Divisions must have input regarding resource transfer

– Managed through a combination of corporate and divisional controls

Page 8: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 8

Structure, Control, Culture, and Corporate-Level Strategy (cont’d)

• Related diversification– Multidivisional structure allows gains from the transfer,

sharing, or leveraging of R&D knowledge, industry information, and customer bases across divisions

– Difficult to measure performance of individual divisions

– High bureaucratic costs

– Integration and control at divisional level is required

– Incentives and rewards for cooperation are necessary

Page 9: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 9

Corporate Strategy and Structure and Control

Page 10: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 10

The Role of Information Technology

• IT provides a common software platform that can make it less problematic for divisions to share information

• IT facilitates output and financial control

• IT helps corporate managers react more quickly because of higher-quality, more timely information

• IT makes it easier to decentralize control to divisional managers, but react quickly if necessary

• IT makes it difficult to distort information because of standardized information

• IT eases the transfer pricing problem

Page 11: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 11

Implementing Strategy Across Countries

• Multidomestic strategy– Local responsiveness; decentralized control

• International strategy– Centralized R&D and marketing; other functions

are decentralized

• Global strategy– Cost reductions; centralized functions

• Transnational strategy– Local responsiveness and cost reduction

Page 12: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 12

Global Strategy/Structure Relationships

Page 13: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 13

Implementing a Multidomestic Strategy

• Global-area structure– All value creation activities duplicated and

overseas division established in every country of operation

– Decentralized authority– Managers at global headquarters evaluate

performance of overseas divisions– No integrating mechanisms needed– No global organizational culture– Duplication of specialist activities raises costs

Page 14: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 14

Global-Area Structure

Page 15: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 15

Implementing International Strategy

• International division structure– Used when a company sells domestically made products in

markets abroad– Foreign sales organization added to existing structure;

same control system– Customization is minimal– Subsidiary handles local sales and distribution– Behavior controls keep the home office informed– International division coordinates flow of different

products across different countries– Domestic and overseas managers may compete for control

of strategy making

Page 16: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 16

International Division Structure

Page 17: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 17

Implementing Global Strategy

• Global product-division structure– All value chain activities located to allow

efficiency, quality, and innovation– Problems of coordinating and integrating global

activities– Structure must lower bureaucratic costs and

provide central control– Product division headquarters coordinates

activities

Page 18: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 18

Global Product-Division Structure

Page 19: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 19

Implementing Transnational Strategy

• Global Matrix Structure– Lower cost structures and differentiate activities– Decentralized control provides flexibility for local

issues, but product and corporate managers at headquarters have centralized control to coordinate company activities on global level

– Knowledge and experience can be transferred– Global corporate culture– IT integration mechanisms provide coordination– Bureaucratic costs are high

Page 20: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 20

Global Matrix Structure

Page 21: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 21

Entry Mode and Implementation

• Internal new venturing– Structure, control, and culture must encourage

creativity and give intrapreneurs autonomy and freedom to develop and champion new products and allow corporate managers to monitor profitability and fit

– Organization-wide new venturing vs. separate new-venture division

Page 22: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 22

Entry Mode and Implementation (cont’d)

• Joint venturing– Managing culture differences

– Allocating authority and responsibility

• Mergers and acquisitions– Must establish new lines of authority

– Must streamline operations

– In unrelated acquisitions, managers must understand the new industry

– Must standardize control systems

– Must recognize culture differences

Page 23: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 23

IT, the Internet, and Outsourcing

• IT and strategy implementation– Knowledge leveraging through IT to achieve low

costs and differentiation– Flattening the organization, moving toward

decentralization and increased integration through IT

– Virtual organization– Knowledge management system

Page 24: Ppt13

Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 - 24

IT, the Internet, and Outsourcing

• Strategic outsourcing and network structure– IT increases the efficiency of inter-organizational

relationships– Business-to-business (B2B) networks– Network structure