practical and conceptual considerations of research object preservation

8
Inna Kouper, Beth Plale, Indiana University Dharma Akmon, Margaret Hedstrom, University of Michigan Practical and Conceptual Considerations of Research Object Preservation Digital Preservation 2014 Meeting Washington, DC July 23, 2014

Upload: sead

Post on 25-May-2015

371 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

A presentation given at the Library of Congress Digital Preservation Meeting, 2014

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Practical and Conceptual Considerations of Research Object Preservation

Inna Kouper, Beth Plale, Indiana UniversityDharma Akmon, Margaret Hedstrom, University of Michigan

Practical and Conceptual Considerations of Research Object Preservation

Digital Preservation 2014 MeetingWashington, DCJuly 23, 2014

Page 2: Practical and Conceptual Considerations of Research Object Preservation

Data Preservation Challenges

• Research spans over months or years• Data are heterogeneous and complex• Data changes states through collection, processing,

analysis and publication• Processes are as important as products• Multiple agents, including individuals and organizations,

are involved• People, processes and products are in non-linear

relationships

Capture and formalize for automation, reproducility and re-use?

Page 3: Practical and Conceptual Considerations of Research Object Preservation

Research Object

Unique ID

Agents

StatesRelationships

Content

Research Object Framework

• Data creator• Curator• Data re-use

scientist

• Live• Curated• Published

• Aggregates• Related to• Describes• Derived from• Versioned from

• Files• Bitstream

s• Pointers

Bundles of resources that use common standards and services to transfer and consume them

Page 4: Practical and Conceptual Considerations of Research Object Preservation

Live Objects• In a state of flux• Handled by members of the project team• Transition initiated by intent to publish

Curation Objects• Content packaged using BagIT protocol• Metadata and relationships captured via OAI/ORE maps• Mutable, but changes are selective (metadata)

Publication Objects• Immutable and citable (DOI)• Deposited using the best match algorithm• Lineage (revisions and derivations) is tracked

Research Object States

Page 5: Practical and Conceptual Considerations of Research Object Preservation

Working with Live Objects

Page 6: Practical and Conceptual Considerations of Research Object Preservation

Curation and Publishing

Page 7: Practical and Conceptual Considerations of Research Object Preservation

Broader Implications

• RO concept and its implementation in SEAD allows us to document content, context, processes, states

• Entities can be edited on multiple levels• ROs can be deposited to institutional repositories,

cloud storage, domain repositories• Needed:

– multiple licensing and permissions (to address diverse models of RO ownership)

– sophisticated lineage tracking (to build trust, authority and authenticity)

– cases of re-use (to create better tools and services)

Page 8: Practical and Conceptual Considerations of Research Object Preservation

Thank you

IU Scholarworks

http://sead-data.net/@inkouper@dharmaakmon@SEADdatanet