practicing what we preach: designing authentic ......practicing what we preach: designing authentic...

12
Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Upload: others

Post on 07-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development

Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen LandyTuesday, October 23, 2018

Page 2: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

Levers for Improving Institutional Capacity & Enthusiasm for Programmatic Assessment

Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen LandyTuesday, October 24, 2017

Page 3: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

Faculty Development

General Education Outcomes

ASLCAP/SWIG

CIE WIGDL UR

For High-Impact Practices (HIPs)

Page 4: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

Faculty Development HIPs

Across-HIPs Training:Backward Design

Scaffolding ReflectionsHIP-specific Training+

Outcomes:1. Alignment to General Education Outcomes2. Clarity of Reflection Prompt

Page 5: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

Faculty Development Assessing FD Outcomes

Page 6: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

Faculty Development Results, FD Outcome 1

GENERAL EDUCATION ALIGNMENT

DIMENSIONHIP

ASL CIE/CR SWIG UR ALL

EXPLICIT ID OF GEN. ED. OUTCOMES 2.67 2.03 1.88 2.92 2.37

PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.93 1.56 2.17 2.2 1.88

ALIGNMENT OF PROJECT COMPONENTS 2.05 1.54 1.88 2.38 1.9

NUMBER OF SUBMISSIONS 21 34 12 20 87

Page 7: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

Faculty Development Results, FD Outcome 2

REFLECTION CLARITY

DIMENSIONHIP

ASL CIE/CR SWIG UR ALL

CLARITY OF DIRECTIONS 2.02 2.28 1.7 1.18 1.85

CLARITY OF PURPOSE 2.55 2.5 1.9 1.25 2.11

NUMBER OF SUBMISSIONS 20 29 15 20 84

Page 8: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

Faculty Development Next Steps

• Disseminate data & discuss implications

• Repeat & Refine the protocol

• Scale

Page 9: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

Questions?

Ian [email protected]

Kathleen [email protected]

@KathleenELandy

Page 10: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

HIPs General Education Alignment Rubric

For Backward Design workshop deliverables

Instructor: Course/Section: HIP: ______________________________

*Gen Ed Outcomes 1-4, See Reverse Side of this page.

**For outcome-specific dimensions, see reverse side of this page.

Strong

Revisions

Suggested

Revisions

Required

3 2 1

Explicit Identification of Gen Ed Outcome

The project explicitly states and incorporates at least one QCC Gen. Ed. Outcome.*

The project indirectly incorporates at least one QCC Gen. Ed. Outcome.

The project does not incorporate any QCC Gen. Ed. Outcome.

Project Description

The project description thoroughly addresses outcome-specific dimensions**.

The project description partially addresses outcome-specific dimensions**.

The project description does not address outcome-specific dimensions**.

Alignment of Project Components with Gen Ed Outcome

The components of the project are aligned and call for the application of knowledge/skills directly related to the outcome(s).

The components of the project are aligned and call for the application of some knowledge/skills related to the outcome(s).

Components of the project are misaligned and call for the application of knowledge/skills not related to the outcome(s).

Page 11: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

QCC General Education Outcomes

1. Communicate effectively through written and oral forms

2. Use analytical reasoning to identify issues or problems and evaluate evidence in order to make informed decisions

3. Reason quantitatively as required in various fields of interest and in everyday life

4. Apply information management and digital technology skills useful for academic research and lifelong learning

General Education Outcome-Specific Rubric Dimensions

Written Communication Analytical Reasoning Quantitative Reasoning Information Management & Technology Skills

Awareness of audience, purpose, and genre

Content Development & Organization

Control of Grammar & Mechanics

Evidence or sources

Identify and explain an issue, problem, or question

Present, organize, and evaluate sufficient and relevant evidence

Reach an informed conclusion or solution

Demonstrates ability to express information quantitatively in mathematical forms or to accurately convert information presented in mathematical forms to written language

Performs quantitative tasks: o a calculation or estimation to

yield a result o the extraction and

interpretation of information from a graph or other visual representation of data

o the construction of such a representation

Performs analysis, explanation or interpretation of aspects of quantitative thinking such as reasoning, method, rational, or verification of the obtained

Identify the scope of inquiry or investigation needed for the assignment

Use evidence or sources (cite as appropriate)

Evaluate information and sources critically

Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose

(Alternative Version)

Awareness of audience, purpose, and genre

Content Development & Organization

Control of Grammar & Mechanics

(Alternative Version) Identify the scope of inquiry or

investigation needed for the assignment

Use evidence or sources (cite as appropriate)

Evaluate information and sources critically

Apply digital technology tools effectively to accomplish the specific task/inquiry

Page 12: Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic ......Practicing What We Preach: Designing Authentic Assessment for Faculty Development Dr. Ian Beckford & Dr. Kathleen Landy Tuesday,

HIPs Academic Reflection Rubric

For Scaffolded Reflection workshop deliverables

Instructor: Course/Section: HIP: ______________________________

.

Strong

Revisions

Suggested

Revisions

Required

3 2 1

Clarity of Purpose

The reflection prompt explicitly calls for students to write about one or more of the following in reference to the HIP-specific project:

Course content Metacognition/learning process Interdisciplinary/Real world

connections Personal awareness/growth

The reflection prompt calls for students to write about one or more of the following (yet not in reference to the HIP-specific project):

Course content Metacognition/learning process Interdisciplinary/Real world

connections Personal awareness/growth

The reflection prompt is overly broad, calling for neither a specific type of reflection, nor commentary on a specific learning activity.

Clarity of Directions

The reflection prompt includes clear directions for students with regard to:

Frequency of reflection Mode of reflection Grading expectations (if any)

The reflection prompt includes vague or partial directions for students with regard to:

Frequency of reflection Mode of reflection Grading expectations (if any)

The reflection prompt does not include clear directions for students with regard to:

Frequency of reflection Mode of reflection Grading expectations (if any)