pragmatics
DESCRIPTION
PRAGMATICS. Language functions. Language as a tool FORM phonological semantic syntactic Language as an act FUNCTION „the pragmatic uses that speakers put language to in communication”. Language functions. social bonding and maintenance („phatic communication”) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PRAGMATICS
![Page 2: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Language functions
![Page 3: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Language as a tool
FORM
phonological
semantic
syntactic
Language as an actFUNCTION
„the pragmatic uses that speakers put language to in communication”
![Page 4: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Language functions
social bonding
and maintenance
(„phatic communication”)
expression of identity
![Page 5: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
‘informative’ communication
collective memory
![Page 6: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Language functions by Halliday (1973)
instrumental
I pronounce you husband and wife.regulatory
You’ll be the doctor and I’ll be the patient, right?
heuristic
When was Shakespeare born?
![Page 7: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
imaginative
The little pony shook and suddenly turned into a beautiful princess.
representational
We all long to be loved.interactional (‘phatic function’)
How are you today?personal
I hate being bullied.
![Page 8: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Speech Act Theory by Austin (1962)and Searle (1972) Locution Illocution Perlocution
- Oh, what a lovely bike!
- I’ll lend it to you if you give me a chewing gum, all right?
![Page 9: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Felicity conditions
![Page 10: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
direct
(Stop teasing the dog!)
and indirect speech acts
(You’ll stop teasing the dog.
Would you stop teasing the dog?
I wish you would stop teasing the dog.)
![Page 11: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Grice’s Communication Theory
![Page 12: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Communicative situations are rather limited:
rely on shared knowledge, common goals and mutual interests,
do not convey a large amount of new info,do not attempt to bring about a complete
change of view or behaviour,based on agreed processes of adjustment
and accommodation.
![Page 13: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Grice’s Interaction Theory (1975)
Maxims of
Quality
Quantity
Relevance
Manner
![Page 14: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Other elements of cooperative communicative acts
conversational implicature (implied but unstated meanings)
- Where is your husband?- He is in the living room or in the kitchen.
Implication: The speaker does not know which room he is in.
![Page 15: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
presupposition (what is assumed or taken for granted that is why unstated)
Sam has stopped beating his wife.
Sam hasn’t stopped beating his wife.
Presupposition: Sam beat his wife.
![Page 16: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Food – 3 milesGood Food – 30 miles
Daily Grill – In Palm Desert at El Paso
“I never read The Economist”Management Trainee, Age 42
![Page 17: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
shared assumptions and agreement on how specific encounters are to be regulated in terms of
turn-taking (taking the floor)
exchange
silence
![Page 18: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Pragmatic differences across cultures
Deborah Tannen
level of indirectness tolerated
paralinguistic signals of different speech acts
different cultural expectations - stereotypes (the pushy New Yorker, the stony American Indian, the inscrutable Chinese)
![Page 19: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Example 1:
TAKING THE FLOOR
Indian English (by raising volume)
British English (by repeating the introductory phrase)
![Page 20: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Example 2: ‘Thanksgiving dinner’ situation
A: In fact one of my students told me for the first time, I taught her for over a year, that she was adopted. And then I thought – uh – THAT explains SO many things.
B: What. That she was –A: Cause she’s so different from her motherB: smarter than she
should have been? Or stupider than she should’ve been.
A: It wasn’t smart or stupid, Actually, it was just she was so different. Just different.
B: [hm]
![Page 21: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Anna Wierzbicka
Ethnocentric view of speech acts Cross-cultural differences in directness
Mrs Vanessa! Please! Sit! Sit! Will/Won’t/Would you sit down?Please, have a little more! You must! Would you like to have some more? How about a beer?What’s the time? You wouldn’t happen to have the correct time, would you?
![Page 22: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Indirectness and politenessYou are to get off. Not to show oneself to
me here!
Why don’t you bloody get off? Get off, will you.
Underlying beliefs
individualism
collectivism
„compromise”
![Page 23: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Michael Clyne Should you not make your utterance more informative
than required? (How are you?) Should you always be truthful? (I’m fine thanks) Should you always be relevant and straightforward?
(Arab business, collectivism)
![Page 24: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Goals of a pragmatic theory produce a classification of speech acts, analyse and define speech acts, specify the various uses of expressions, relate literary and direct language use to
linguistic structure, the structure of the communicative situation, the social institutions, speaker-meaning, implication, presupposition and
understanding.
![Page 25: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Communicative competence
„An aspect of our competence that enables us to convey and interpret messages and to negotiate meaning interpersonally within specific contexts” (Dell Hymes , 1967)
CALP and BICS
![Page 26: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Canale & Swain (1980)
Grammatical competenceDiscourse competenceSociolinguistic competenceStrategic competence
![Page 27: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Bachman, 1990
Language competence
Organisational Pragmatic
Grammatical Textual llocutionary Sociolinguistic- Vocab - Cohesion - Ideational - Dialect- Morphology - Rhetoric - Manipulative - Register- Syntax - Heuristic - Naturalness- Phonology - Imaginative - Cultural
/Graphology references & figures of speech
![Page 28: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Communicative language ability (Bachman, 1990)
Knowledge structures Language competence
Strategic competence
Psychophysiological
mechanisms
Context of situation
![Page 29: PRAGMATICS](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062422/56812c4d550346895d90d34e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
This is why the idea of intercultural competence has arisen. It actually means that in intercultural communication you should have alternative strategies to communicate your messages and negotiate meaning as you can’t take messages at face value. Eg. In native communication you would rarely ask if a yes is a real yes, or if a no is a real no, but intercultural communication this may be necessary. And yes, it does mean an awareness and knowledge that other nations may have different patterns of communication (e.g. attentive listening for us means silence and nodding, whereas in Italy or even New York simultaneous speaking. If you are aware of this difference, you migh actually explain that you silence doesn’t mean the lack of interest but you find it difficult to talk together with others).,