prasauskas et al 2016

1
FACTORS GOVERNING THE DISPERSION OF EXHALED PARTICLES DURING VAPING OF AN E-CIGARETTE Background: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are rapidly increasing in the market as an alternative to conventional tobacco cigarettes. E-cigarettes are battery-powered devices that deliver an aerosol to users from an e-liquid. E-liquids typically contain propylene glycol and glycerol in varying proportions as the aerosol formers and may contain nicotine and flavourings. E-cigarettes do not contain tobacco, do not require combustion and do not generate side-stream smoke. There is little data available on the properties of exhaled e-cigarette “particles” in the scientific literature and as a result there is a growing discussion amongst the public health community as to whether the “particles” exhaled following use of such products has potential implications for indoor air quality and bystanders. Aim : To investigate the impact of different factors on the dispersion of exhaled e-cigarette particles at a bystander’s position, namely vaping topography, distance from bystander and room ventilation rate, following use of a commercial e-cigarette. TADAS PRASAUSKAS 1 , DAINIUS MARTUZEVICIUS 1 , ARI SETYAN 2,3 , JING WANG 2,3 , GRANT O’CONNELL 4 , XAVIER CAHOURS 5 , STÉPHANE COLARD 5 Presenting author email: [email protected] 1 Department of Environmental Technology, Kaunas University of Technology, 50254 Kaunas, Lithuania 2 Laboratory for Advanced Analytical Technologies, Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology), 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland 3 Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland 4 Fontem Ventures B.V., 12th floor, Barbara Strozzilaan 101, 1083 HN Amsterdam, The Netherlands 5 SEITA-Imperial Brands, 45404 Fleury-les-Aubrais, France Fig. 1. Room- simulating chamber with heated “dummy” and controlled ventilation. 1 FMPS; 2 – ELPI; 3 SMPS; T, V temperature and VOCs sensors Methods: A room-simulating chamber was developed (Fig. 1). An occupant bystander was represented by a seated heated “dummy”. The ventilation air supplied to a chamber was treated with three steps of filtration. Variables: three experienced e-cigarette volunteers; ventilation rates of 0, 1 and 2 ACH; distance 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 metres from the bystander. Highly time-resolved aerosol samples were analysed at the bystander’s position using a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS) and an Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI+). Chemical composition of exhaled e-cigarette particles were also analysed. Conclusion This study shows for the first time exhaled e-cigarette particles are liquid droplets that evaporate rapidly upon exhalation. The results presented here may have a positive implication for continued use of e-cigarettes in indoor areas. This work was supported by Fontem Ventures B.V. Fig. 2. Particle number concentration growth (A) and decay (B) rates (min -1 ) during a puff (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, significant if p<0.05) Results : The distance and the vaping topography exhibited the highest influence on dispersion of exhaled particles (Fig. 2). A greater distance between e-cigarette user and a bystander resulted in lower maximum particle concentrations (median value: 0.5 m - 4.4ˣ10 6 , 1.0 m – 2.1ˣ10 6 , 2.0 m – 7.4ˣ10 4 ). Even at a close distance the decay of particle concentrations was very rapid. Vaping topography may be related to physiological differences and e-cigarette use behaviours amongst the volunteers which influenced significant differences between PNC. The ventilation rate did not significantly influence particle size distributions or maximum particle concentrations (most of the exhaled particles evaporated immediately after exhalation). The chemical composition of the exhaled particles was shown to be largely composed of water (~96% water + ~4% glycerol) (Table 1). E-Cig_Vol_1 E-Cig_Vol_2 E-Cig_Vol_3 0 40 80 120 160 200 Median 25%-75% Min-Max Outliers E-Cig_ACH_0 E-Cig_ACH_1 E-Cig_ACH_2 Median 25%-75% Min-Max E-Cig_Dist_0.5 E-Cig_Dist_1 E-Cig_Dist_2 Median 25%-75% Min-Max Outliers E-Cig_Vol_1 E-Cig_Vol_2 E-Cig_Vol_3 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Median 25%-75% Min-Max Outliers E-Cig_ACH_0 E-Cig_ACH_1 E-Cig_ACH_2 Median 25%-75% Min-Max Outliers Extremes E-Cig_Dist_0.5 E-Cig_Dist_1 E-Cig_Dist_2 Median 25%-75% Min-Max Outliers Extremes 200 160 120 80 40 0 100 80 60 40 20 0 Vol_1 0.5 m ACH_0 Vol_2 Vol_3 ACH_1 ACH_2 1 m 2 m 120 p = 0.00 p = 0.03 p = 0.03 p = 0.08 p = 0.99 p = 0.00 A B Vaper Water Propylene Glycol Glycerin Nicotine 1 95.80% 0.01% 4.15% 0.00% 2 95.60% 0.03% 4.35% 0.00% 3 97.20% 0.06% 2.69% 0.00% Table 1. The chemical composition of the exhaled particles during vaping of e-cigarette

Upload: fontem-ventures

Post on 16-Apr-2017

10 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Prasauskas et al 2016

FACTORS GOVERNING THE DISPERSION OF EXHALED PARTICLES DURING VAPING OF

AN E-CIGARETTE

Background:

• Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are rapidly increasing in the market as an alternative to conventional tobacco cigarettes.

• E-cigarettes are battery-powered devices that deliver an aerosol to users from an e-liquid. E-liquids typically contain propylene glycol and glycerol in varyingproportions as the aerosol formers and may contain nicotine and flavourings.

• E-cigarettes do not contain tobacco, do not require combustion and do not generate side-stream smoke.

• There is little data available on the properties of exhaled e-cigarette “particles” in the scientific literature and as a result there is a growing discussion amongst thepublic health community as to whether the “particles” exhaled following use of such products has potential implications for indoor air quality and bystanders.

Aim:

• To investigate the impact of different factors on the dispersion of exhaled e-cigarette particles at a bystander’s position, namely vaping topography, distance frombystander and room ventilation rate, following use of a commercial e-cigarette.

TADAS PRASAUSKAS1, DAINIUS MARTUZEVICIUS1, ARI SETYAN2,3, JING WANG2,3, GRANT O’CONNELL4, XAVIER CAHOURS5, STÉPHANE COLARD5

Presenting author email: [email protected]

1Department of Environmental Technology, Kaunas University of Technology, 50254 Kaunas, Lithuania 2Laboratory for Advanced Analytical Technologies, Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology), 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland

3Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland4Fontem Ventures B.V., 12th floor, Barbara Strozzilaan 101, 1083 HN Amsterdam, The Netherlands

5SEITA-Imperial Brands, 45404 Fleury-les-Aubrais, France

Fig. 1. Room-simulatingchamber withheated “dummy”and controlledventilation. 1 –FMPS; 2 – ELPI; 3– SMPS; T, V –temperature andVOCs sensors

Methods:

• A room-simulating chamber was developed (Fig. 1).

• An occupant bystander was represented by a seated heated“dummy”.

• The ventilation air supplied to a chamber was treated withthree steps of filtration.

• Variables: three experienced e-cigarette volunteers; ventilationrates of 0, 1 and 2 ACH; distance 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 metres fromthe bystander.

• Highly time-resolved aerosol samples were analysed at thebystander’s position using a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS)and an Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI+).

• Chemical composition of exhaled e-cigarette particles were alsoanalysed.

Conclusion

• This study shows for the first time exhaled e-cigarette particles are liquid droplets that evaporate rapidly upon exhalation.

• The results presented here may have a positive implication for continued use of e-cigarettes in indoor areas.This work was supported by

Fontem Ventures B.V.

Fig. 2. Particle number concentration growth (A) and decay (B) rates (min-1) during a puff (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, significant if p<0.05)

Results:

• The distance and the vaping topography exhibited the highest influence ondispersion of exhaled particles (Fig. 2).

• A greater distance between e-cigarette user and a bystander resulted in lowermaximum particle concentrations (median value: 0.5 m - 4.4ˣ106, 1.0 m –2.1ˣ106, 2.0 m – 7.4ˣ104).

• Even at a close distance the decay of particle concentrations was very rapid.

• Vaping topography may be related to physiological differences and e-cigaretteuse behaviours amongst the volunteers which influenced significantdifferences between PNC.

• The ventilation rate did not significantly influence particle size distributionsor maximum particle concentrations (most of the exhaled particles evaporatedimmediately after exhalation).

• The chemical composition of the exhaled particles was shown to be largelycomposed of water (~96% water + ~4% glycerol) (Table 1).

E-Cig_Vol_1 E-Cig_Vol_2 E-Cig_Vol_30

40

80

120

160

200

Median 25%-75% Min-Max Outliers

E-Cig_ACH_0 E-Cig_ACH_1 E-Cig_ACH_20

40

80

120

160

200 Median 25%-75% Min-Max

E-Cig_Dist_0.5 E-Cig_Dist_1 E-Cig_Dist_20

40

80

120

160

200

Median 25%-75% Min-Max Outliers

E-Cig_Vol_1 E-Cig_Vol_2 E-Cig_Vol_30

20

40

60

80

100

120 Median 25%-75% Min-Max Outliers

E-Cig_ACH_0 E-Cig_ACH_1 E-Cig_ACH_20

20

40

60

80

100

120 Median 25%-75% Min-Max Outliers Extremes

E-Cig_Dist_0.5 E-Cig_Dist_1 E-Cig_Dist_20

20

40

60

80

100

120 Median 25%-75% Min-Max Outliers Extremes

200

160

120

80

40

0

100

80

60

40

20

0Vol_1 0.5 mACH_0Vol_2 Vol_3 ACH_1 ACH_2 1 m 2 m

120

p = 0.00 p = 0.03 p = 0.03

p = 0.08 p = 0.99 p = 0.00

A

B

Vaper WaterPropylene

GlycolGlycerin Nicotine

1 95.80% 0.01% 4.15% 0.00%2 95.60% 0.03% 4.35% 0.00%3 97.20% 0.06% 2.69% 0.00%

Table 1. The chemical composition of the exhaled particles during vaping of e-cigarette