pre-conference workshop reasearch on e-learning at berlins universities at online educa 2007 on the...
TRANSCRIPT
Pre-Conference Workshop „reasearch on e-learning at Berlin‘s universities“
at Online Educa 2007 on the 28th of November
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
An economical and didactical analysis of German e-learning projects
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 2
research question
What are the development conditions for e-learning products on the German e-learning-market for target groups with - social disadvantages, - learning problems, - disabilities; - for migrants and - elderly people?
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 3
method
Economical and didactical analysis based on a basic model of the e-learning-market
– Market environment: qualitative analysis of the political and economical influences
– Demand side: qualitative analysis of consumers and learners
– Supply side: quantitative analysis of economical and didactical aspects of 102 projects that have produced e-learning for disadvantaged groups
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 4
findings
Market environment– Politics and society
• Most impact from public funding policies• No special public funding of e-learning-
production for disadvantaged target groups
– Neighbour markets• Changeable development of the e-
learning market in general has strong influence of the sector for disadvantaged target groups
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 5
findings
Demand side– Consumers
Three factors are relevant for advantage or disadvantage of target groups on the e-learning market: purchasing power, e-learning interest and expense of production
– LearnersThree aspects of using digital media are relevant for the target group:
– Learning with digital media– Learning about digital media– Train problem solving by using digital
media
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 6
findings
Supply side – Project organization
Distribution of projects and target groups
64
42
18
32 social disadvantaged
learning problems
disabilities
migrants
elderly people
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 7
findings
Supply side – Project organization
Start of the projects
0
5
10
15
20
25
1985-1986
1987-1988
1989-1990
1991-1992
1993-1994
1995-1996
1997-1998
1999-2000
2001-2002
2003-2004
nu
mb
er
of
pro
ject
s
social disadvantaged learning problems disabilities migrants elderly people
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 8
findings
Supply side - Project organizationThere is no economical development on the e-learning market sector for disadvantaged target groups:– Only 20% ongoing projects– In most cases e-learning production is only a part of the project aims– Most of the projects are non-commercial pilot projects
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 9
findings
Supply side – Project organizationmain sources of financing
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1985-1986
1987-1988
1989-1990
1991-1992
1993-1994
1995-1996
1997-1998
1999-2000
2001-2002
2003-2004
nu
mb
er
of p
roje
cts
public R&D funding long-term public funding short-term public funding
private Funding sales
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 10
findings
Supply side – Didactical approaches– Didactical approaches of the projects match only partly the needs of the disadvantaged target groups– Learning forms used by the projects are more determined by the general discussion in media didactics than by the needs of the learners
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 11
findings
Supply side – Didactical approaches
extent of self-directed learning
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1985-1986
1987-1988
1989-1990
1991-1992
1993-1994
1995-1996
1997-1998
1999-2000
2001-2002
2003-2004
num
ber
of p
roje
cts self-directed
self-directed andexternally directed
externally directed
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 12
findings
Supply side – Product concepts– Concepts of the products follow the development of the core market with delay
• More content products than service and technology
• Number of internet-based products is growing slowly
– Product concepts are more pilot concepts than professional production
• One of three projects produce only one product
• More than 80% of the products are totally new developed
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 13
findings
Supply side – Marketing
Marketing of e-learning-products
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1985-1986
1987-1988
1989-1990
1991-1992
1993-1994
1995-1996
1997-1998
1999-2000
2001-2002
2003-2004
num
ber
of p
roje
cts
Marketing without Marketing
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 14
conclusions
• existing e-learning solutions for disadvantaged target groups are nearly in total financed by the public sector
• most of the e-learning projects for disadvantaged people don’t have an economic perspective
• the didactical solutions of the existing e-learning products cover only partly the needs of users
• the technological and didactical concepts of e-learning products for disadvantaged learners are often years behind the state of the art
Christian Pfeffer-Hoffmann – Online Educa 28.11.2007
E-Learning for Disadvantaged Target Groups
Seite 15
questions to discuss
• Is there a chance to improve the quality and quantity of e-learning products for disadvantaged target groups by using concepts of modularisation and reusability of learning objects?
• What is the situation of disadvantaged target groups in other national e-learning markets?