pre-construction sediment sampling report for saltwater

Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement

Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5

Prepared For:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest

1101 Tautog Circle

Silverdale, WA 98315-1101

Contract N44255-15-D-0002

Purchase Order No. MOMS00007451696

August 4, 2017

Kane Environmental Project Number: MOMS7451696 Prepared By: Kane Environmental, Inc. 3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 Seattle, WA 98103 ________________________ _________________________ Nathan Evenson John Kane, LHG Project Geologist Principal, President

Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling Report for Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Waterfront Area, Vicinity of Dry Docks 1-5 Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ III

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ ES-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................ 1

2.0 FIELD METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 3

2.1 Sampling Station Locations ............................................................................................................ 3

2.2 Sediment Sample Collection .......................................................................................................... 3

2.3 Equipment Decontamination .......................................................................................................... 4

3.0 ANALYTICAL METHODS ................................................................................................................. 5

3.1 Laboratory QA/QC Procedures ...................................................................................................... 5

3.2 Data Validation ............................................................................................................................... 5

4.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................... 6

4.1 Field Observations .......................................................................................................................... 6

4.2 Laboratory Analysis and Data Quality ............................................................................................ 6

4.2.1 Particle Size ................................................................................................................................ 6

4.2.2 Total Organic Carbon .................................................................................................................. 7

4.2.3 Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls ......................................................................................................... 7

4.2.4 Metals .......................................................................................................................................... 8

5.0 DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................................... 9

6.0 LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 10

7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 11


ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Vicinity Map

Figure 2 – Study Area Plan

Figure 3 – Dry Dock 3 Sample Locations





TABLES

Table 1 – Summary of Summary of Sediment Sampling Field Observations

Table 2 – Summary of Sediment Sample Grain Size

Table 3 – Summary of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and Total Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in

Sediment

Table 4 – Summary of Metals in Sediment

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A – Sample Chain-Of-Custody Forms

Attachment B – Laboratory Analytical Reports

Attachment C – Data Validation Report


iii

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

bsf below sea floor cm centimeters CSL Cleanup Screening Levels EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology EDD Electronic Data Deliverable PDF Portable Document Format GPS Global Positioning System mg/kg milligrams per kilogram mg/kgOC milligrams per kilogram of organic carbon MS matrix spike MSD matrix spike duplicate NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command NBK Naval Base Kitsap OU Operable Unit PCBs poly-chlorinated biphenyls PSNS Puget Sound Naval Shipyard QA Quality Assurance QC Quality Control RPD relative percent difference SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan SCO Sediment Cleanup Objective SMS Washington State Sediment Management Standards TOC total organic carbon μg/kg micrograms per kilogram WAC Washington State Administrative Code wt% weight percent


ES-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Kane Environmental, Inc. (Kane Environmental) has completed a sediment sampling scope of work in the

waterfront area of Naval Base Kitsap (NBK)-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS) in

accordance with the approved Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) (Kane Environmental and Naval Facilities

Engineering Command Northwest [NAVFAC NW], 2016). This sample collection was conducted within

Operable Unit (OU) B Marine of the PSNS Complex Superfund Site. Samples were collected near buried

subaqueous sections of the saltwater distribution system piping located immediately to the south of dry

docks 1 through 5. These sections of subaqueous buried piping are planned for replacement from Summer

2017 to Spring 2018. This sampling was completed in accordance with an agreement between the Navy

and stakeholders. This scope of work was completed to establish pre-construction concentrations of metals

and poly-chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in sediment adjacent to the area that will be disturbed during

saltwater piping replacement activities. Following completion of construction activities related to piping

replacement, a second round of sediment samples will be collected from the sampling stations sampled as

part of this scope of work in order to assess any impacts that the construction activities may have had on

sediment quality. In addition, information gathered during this scope of work will be provided to the

construction contractor to aid in determination of the practices that should be used when dredging, handling,

and disposing of the sediments removed during construction activities.

Following the completion of a SAP and project coordination tasks, Kane Environmental and NAVFAC NW

staff worked with the PSNS divers to collect sediment samples for laboratory analysis from fifteen waterfront

locations adjacent to buried subaqueous piping located south of dry docks 1 through 5. Each of these

sediment samples was submitted for laboratory analysis for determination of particle size distribution and

concentrations of total organic carbon (TOC), PCBs, and metals in accordance with the approved SAP.

Concentrations of metals and PCBs measured in sediment samples are compared to the Marine Sediment

Cleanup Screening Level (CSL) and Sediment Cleanup Objective (SCO) concentrations set forth in the

Washington State Sediment Management Standards (SMS). Results indicate that sediment collected from

most sampling stations contains mercury at concentrations exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment CSL and

SCO, and sediment from some sampling stations contains concentrations of other metals and PCBs

exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment CSL.


1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Kane Environmental, Inc. (Kane Environmental) has completed a scope of work that included the collection

of sediment samples for laboratory analysis from fifteen locations adjacent to dry docks 1 through 5 along

the waterfront area of PSNS at NBK-Bremerton. A vicinity map showing the location of the sampling area

is shown in Figure 1, and an aerial photograph overview of the sampling area is shown in Figure 2. Figures

3 through 7 show the sampling locations.

1.1 Background

Sediment sampling was conducted within Operable Unit (OU) B Marine of the PSNS Complex Superfund

Site. Samples were collected near buried subaqueous sections of the saltwater distribution system piping

located immediately to the south of dry docks 1 through 5, which are planned for replacement from Summer

2017 to Spring 2018. This sampling was completed in accordance with the approved SAP. The sections of

existing subaqueous buried saltwater pipe scheduled for replacement are located between approximately

17 and 70 feet from the current dry dock 1 through 5 caissons. Approximate locations of sections of buried

saltwater pipe scheduled for replacement as part of this project are shown in Figures 3 through 7.

This scope of work was completed to establish pre-construction concentrations of metals and PCBs in

sediment adjacent to the area that will be disturbed during saltwater piping replacement activities. Following

completion of construction activities related to piping replacement, a post-construction round of sediment

sampling will be completed at the same sampling locations sampled as part of this scope of work, in order

to assess any impacts that the construction activities may have had on surface sediment quality.

1.2 Scope of Work

Under Purchase Order #MOMS00007451696 of Contract N44255-15-D-0002, Kane Environmental was

contracted by Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest (NAVFAC NW) to complete a scope of

work that included the following tasks:

Sampling and Analysis Plan: Kane Environmental and NAVFAC NW co-authored a Sampling

and Analysis Plan (SAP) that was reviewed by the Site stakeholders.

Equipment Rental: Kane Environmental coordinated rental of sediment samplers for collection of

sediment samples.

Sample Collection: Kane Environmental and NAVFAC NW worked with the PSNS Divers to collect

sediment samples from 15 sampling stations along the waterfront area of PSNS. As part of

sampling, Kane Environmental and NAVFAC NW collected field observations regarding sampling

activities, conditions at each sampling location, and to the physical properties of the sampled

sediments.


2

Laboratory Analysis: Sediment samples were submitted to the ALS Environmental (ALS)

laboratory location in Kelso, Washington, for Particle Size Determination Analysis by ASTM Method

D422 (Expanded Breakout). Sediment samples were submitted to Analytical Resources,

Incorporated (ARI) in Tukwila, Washington, for the following analyses:

o Total Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc by EPA Method

6010C

o Total Mercury by EPA Method 7471B

o Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by EPA Method 8082A

o Total Organic Carbon (TOC) by the Plumb, 1981 method

Data Validation: Kane Environmental retained EcoChem, Inc. (EcoChem) to provide an

independent Data Validation Report assessing the quality of the PCBs and metals results. TOC

and particle size data validation was not included as part of this scope of work.

Sampling Report: Kane Environmental prepared this report, including all tables and figures,

summarizing the results of pre-construction sediment sampling activities.


3

2.0 FIELD METHODOLOGY

Collection of sediment samples was conducted in cooperation with the PSNS Divers, from aboard a Navy

sampling vessel. Descriptions of the methodologies used in the field are described in the subsections below.

2.1 Sampling Station Locations

The locations of sections of buried saltwater distribution system piping relative to fixed points (dry dock

walls and caissons) were determined prior to sampling by NAVFAC NW. The planned locations of sampling

stations were established by NAVFAC NW approximately 15 feet south of the mapped locations of buried

sections of saltwater distribution system piping. This distance was based on the maximum buried depths

of the piping sections (10 to 15 feet) and the assumed slope of the zone of sediment that would be disturbed

during replacement of the piping. The locations of sampling stations were set in the field by using

measurement tapes or lines attached to fixed features on the dry docks and caissons to position the

sampling vessel over each sampling location. Notes detailing the measurement points were recorded for

use during post-construction sediment sampling. Once positioned, a marker buoy attached to an anchor

line was dropped from the sampling vessel. Line lengths were adjusted in an attempt to minimize the extent

to which the buoys drifted from their location above the sampling location. A GPS unit on the sampling

vessel was used to collect a GPS point at the location of each marker buoy. Sampling station location

information is included in Table 1, locations of sampling stations based on field measurements are shown

in Figures 3 through 7.

2.2 Sediment Sample Collection

Divers used handheld, decontaminated stainless-steel-construction box samplers to collect grab samples

from each sampling station, as marked by the anchors of the marker buoys. Divers inserted samplers into

the sediment at an approximately 90-degree angle, and pushed the samplers at least 12 centimeters (cm)

into the sediment. Following insertion of the sampler into the sediment, the diver engaged the bottom trap

mechanism, placed the cover on the top of the sampler, and returned the sampler to the sampling vessel.

During sampling, the diver reported observations regarding the substrate and depth of water at the sampling

station to staff onboard the sampling vessel. Depths of water recorded by divers at each sampling station

are listed in Table 1.

The time that the sampler was brought onboard was noted, and the sampler was inspected by Kane

Environmental staff for evidence of sediment loss and the depth of sampler penetration was recorded (time

and penetration depth for each sample is listed in Table 1). Kane Environmental staff used a

decontaminated stainless steel trowel and fresh nitrile-gloved hands to remove the upper 10 cm of sediment

not in contact with the walls of the sampler and placed this material in a decontaminated stainless steel

bowl. Large objects not representative of the overall sample (such as large organisms or rocks) were


4

removed from the sample as appropriate, and the sediment characteristics were logged. Sample

characteristics and a description of any materials removed from samples are provided in Table 1.

Following sample logging, a mechanical mixer with a decontaminated mixing paddle was used to mix the

sample material in the bowl for approximately five minutes, until homogenized. Sample material was then

transferred to sampling containers provided by the analytical laboratories. These containers were labeled

with the sample ID (assigned in accordance with the SAP), time and date of sample collection, and

requested analysis. At select sampling locations, field duplicate samples were also collected and submitted

for laboratory analysis, in accordance with the laboratory analytical plan described in the SAP. Sampling

containers filled with sediment were placed in ice-filled coolers and held at temperatures below four degrees

Celsius until they were delivered to the analytical laboratories. Sediment samples were delivered to the

analytical laboratories under standard chain-of-custody procedures. For the samples delivered to ALS, this

included transport by a commercial delivery service in a cooler sealed with custody seals. Samples were

received by ALS with all custody seals intact, and with samples within acceptable temperature limits. Copies

of sample chain-of-custody forms are included in this report as Attachment A.

2.3 Equipment Decontamination

Sediment samplers and other sampling tools were decontaminated between use with each sediment

sample using an Alconox detergent-distilled water solution and plastic-bristle scrubbing brushes. Following

decontamination, sampling equipment was rinsed with distilled water and with site water. Wash water was

disposed of following completion of sampling in accordance with the SAP.


5

3.0 ANALYTICAL METHODS

Sediment samples were submitted to the ALS Environmental laboratory in Kelso, Washington and the ARI

laboratory in Tukwila, Washington. The following analyses were conducted on submitted samples:

Particle Size Determination Analysis by ASTM Method D422 (Expanded Breakout)

Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc by EPA Method 6010C

Mercury by EPA Method 7471B

PCBs by EPA Method 8082A

TOC by the Plumb, 1981 method.

All analyses were performed in accordance with the ALS and ARI in-house Quality Assurance/Quality

Control Plans and the procedures described in the SAP. Sample analyses were performed in compliance

with EPA analytical methods and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) guidelines. All

samples were analyzed within specified holding times. Each laboratory provided a Level III-type analytical

report PDF file, which are included in this report as Attachment B. In addition, each laboratory provided an

Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) report, which were provided to NAVFAC NW along with this report file.

3.1 Laboratory QA/QC Procedures

Internal test methods run by the laboratory to ensure data accuracy and reproducibility included method

blanks, laboratory control samples, laboratory control sample duplicates, sample replicates, matrix spikes,

and matrix spike duplicates.

3.2 Data Validation

EcoChem, Inc. (EcoChem) was retained to provide a third-party Level III-type data validation report that

provided an assessment of the quality of the PCBs and metals results provided by ARI. This data quality

report is included as Attachment C. As part of this data quality report, data qualifications were assigned to

some of the PCBs and metals results. These data qualifications are included in Tables 3 and 4, and

discussed in Sections 4 and 5 below.


6

4.0 RESULTS

4.1 Field Observations

Field observations gathered during sediment sampling are summarized in Table 1. Most sediment samples

were composed primarily of silt and clay-sized particles, with varying fractions of sand and gravel (see

Section 4.2.1 below for further discussion). Samples displayed varying shades of olive gray to olive-green

coloration. Samples collected from stations DD2-M and DD5-M exuded a sulfide odor, other samples did

not exude any distinct odor. Samples collected from stations DD1-W, DD1-M, and DD2-E displayed

evidence of stratification, other samples appeared homogenous. No petroleum sheen, chemical odor, or

sign of gross contamination were observed in sediment samples.

4.2 Laboratory Analysis and Data Quality

In subsections 4.2.3 and 4.2.4 below, concentrations of PCBs and metals in sediment are compared to

Sediment Management Standards (SMS) Marine Sediment Cleanup Screening Levels (CSL) and Marine

Sediment Cleanup Objectives (SCO). The CSL is the concentration of a contaminant in sediment defined

in the Sediment Management Standards code (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] Section 173-204)

as the “minor adverse effects level”, while the SCO is defined as the concentration of a contaminant in

sediment that is the “no adverse effects level”.

Laboratory analytical reports provided by ALS (containing particle size data) and ARI (containing TOC,

PCBs, and metals data) are included as Attachment B. The data quality report referenced in the

subsections below and provided by third-party data validation laboratory EcoChem is included as

Attachment C.

4.2.1 Particle Size

Results of particle size analysis of sediment samples are summarized in Table 2. Samples collected from

stations DD3-E, DD3-W, and DD1-E were composed primarily of gravel-sized particles. The sample

collected from station DD1-M was composed primarily of sand-sized particles. All other sediment samples,

which included all samples collected from stations located adjacent to dry docks 2, 4, and 5, were composed

primarily of silt and clay-sized particles.

Particle size results were not assessed in the data quality report. The case narrative included in the

laboratory analytical report from ALS indicated that no anomalies associated with the analysis of these

samples were observed. A field duplicate of the sample collected from station DD4-W was analyzed; the

results obtained from this sample were very similar to those obtained from the field sample collected from

station DD4-W.


7

4.2.2 Total Organic Carbon

Results of TOC analysis of sediment samples are summarized in Table 3. Samples collected during this

scope of work contained concentrations of TOC ranging from 0.29% to 2.90% by weight (wt%).

TOC results were not assessed in the data quality report. The case narrative included in the laboratory

analytical report from ARI indicated that no anomalies associated with the analysis of these samples were

observed. A field duplicate of the sample collected from station DD3-W was analyzed; the results obtained

from this sample (0.72 wt% TOC) were similar to those obtained from the field sample collected from station

DD3-W (0.58 wt% TOC).

4.2.3 Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls

Results of PCBs analysis of sediment samples are summarized in Table 3. Detections of Aroclors 1254

and 1260 were reported for sediment samples collected from each sampling station. No detections of other

PCBs were reported. Total concentrations of PCBs reported in sediment samples ranged from 42.4

micrograms per kilogram (μg/kg) to 406 μg/kg. TOC-normalized PCB concentrations ranged from 5.24 to

70.0 milligrams per kilogram of organic carbon (mg/kgOC). In the sample collected from station DD3-E, the

TOC concentration fell below the range of concentrations normally accepted for use in normalizing PCBs

concentrations (0.5 to 3.5 wt% TOC; Ecology, 2015). Therefore, a TOC-normalized total PCBs

concentration was not reported for this sample. TOC-normalized total PCBs concentrations in samples

collected from stations DD3-W, DD2-E, DD4-E, DD4-M, and DD5-E exceeded the SMS Marine Sediment

SCO. The TOC-normalized total PCBs concentration in the sample collected from station DD3-W also

exceeded the SMS Marine Sediment CSL.

According to the data quality report, due to a non-target background interference, the reporting limit for

Aroclor 1248 was elevated in approximately half of the sediment samples. This elevated reporting limit was

typically approximately 29 μg/kg, which is less than 25% of the reported total PCBs concentration of all

samples for which this issue was identified. Therefore, this is not considered likely to have a significant

impact on the findings of this report.

The analytical method for PCBs analysis requires that a duplicate confirmatory analysis be conducted by

the laboratory for all individual PCBs that are detected in a sample. The data quality report (Attachment C)

noted that for selected samples, the relative percent difference (RPD) between the concentrations of Aroclor

1260 reported for the initial and the duplicate analyses was above 40%. The reported Aroclor 1260

concentrations for these samples were qualified as “estimated” values in the data quality report, and the

total PCBs concentrations for these samples are flagged with a “J” in Table 3. In one sample (DD2-E-

022217), the RPD between the results of these two analyses was greater than 60% for Aroclor 1260. The

reported Aroclor 1260 concentration for this sample is qualified as a “tentative identification” in the data

quality report, and the total PCBs concentrations for this sample are flagged with an “N” in Table 3.


8

No other qualifications were assigned to PCBs results by the data quality report. Overall, the data quality

report stated that all PCBs data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.

4.2.4 Metals

Results of metals analysis of sediment samples is summarized in Table 4.

Mercury was reported at concentrations exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment SCO and CSL in sediment

samples collected from all stations except DD3-E and DD3-M. The sample collected from station DD3-M

was reported to contain mercury at a concentration exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment SCO, but not the

CSL.

Arsenic and copper were present at concentrations exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment SCO and CSL in

sediment samples collected from stations DD3-W and DD2-E. Lead and zinc were also reported at a

concentration exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment SCO and CSL in the sample collected from station

DD3-W.

Zinc was reported at concentrations exceeding the SMS Marine Sediment SCO, but not the CSL, in

sediment samples collected from stations DD3-M, DD1-W, DD2-E, DD4-W, and DD5-M.

The RPD between the concentrations of lead and mercury reported the DD3-E field sample and laboratory

duplicate was slightly in exceedance of the 20% control limit set by EcoChem (lead RPD was 24.3%,

mercury RPD was 21.6%). Based on this control limit exceedance, lead and mercury concentrations

reported for all samples are qualified as “estimated” values in the data quality report, and are flagged with

a “J” in Table 4. Kane Environmental notes that the RPDs between the concentrations of lead and mercury

reported in a field sample and a field duplicate collected from station DD1-E were 14.2% and 16.6%,

respectively, both values that fall within the EcoChem 20% control limit. A matrix spike (MS) and matrix

spike duplicate (MSD) were also analyzed for the DD3-E field sample. Based on elevated concentrations

of mercury recovered in the MS and MSD, the data quality report qualified mercury concentrations for all

samples as having a potential high bias due to a matrix effect. These concentrations are flagged with an

“H” in Table 4. See Section 5.0 for discussion of these qualifications.

No other qualifications were assigned to metals results by the data quality report. Overall, the data quality

report stated that all metals data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.


9

5.0 DISCUSSION

Elevated concentrations of mercury were reported in sediment samples collected from most of the sediment

sampling stations established adjacent to the saltwater distribution system piping scheduled for

replacement. The concentrations of mercury in sediment exceeded both the SMS Marine Sediment SCO

and CSL concentrations in thirteen of the fifteen sampled locations, including all samples collected near dry

docks 1, 2, 4, and 5. Arsenic, copper, lead, and zinc were also present above both the SMS Marine

Sediment SCO and CSL in the sample collected from station DD3-W, while arsenic and copper were above

these limits in the sample collected from station DD2-E.

The TOC-normalized total PCBs concentration reported in the sediment sample collected from station DD3-

W exceeded the SMS Marine Sediment SCO and CSL. TOC-normalized total PCBs concentrations in

samples collected from several other stations (including at least one sample from the vicinity of each dry

dock except dry dock 1) exceeded the SMS Marine Sediment SCO, but not the CSL.

Based on the results of MS/MSD analyses conducted on sample DD3-E-022217, the data quality report

assigned a potential high bias qualification to mercury concentrations reported for all sediment samples.

This potential high bias (“H” flag in Table 4) indicates that the reported concentration of mercury may be

greater than the actual concentration in the sample. It is notable that the sample on which the MS/MSD

analysis was performed has a gravel-dominated grain size profile that is distinct from the silt and clay-

dominated matrix of most other sediment samples (see Table 2). Therefore, the high-bias matrix effect

suggested by quality control results obtained from this sample may not apply to other samples with silt and

clay-dominated matrices.


10

6.0 LIMITATIONS

Kane Environmental has performed this work in general accordance with generally accepted professional

practices using the standard of the industry today, for the nature and conditions of the work completed in

the same locality and at the same time as the work was performed, and with the terms and conditions as

set forth in our proposal.

Kane Environmental shall not be responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts

that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time the report was prepared. Facts and

conditions referenced in this report may change over time and the conclusions and recommendations set

forth herein are applicable only to the facts and conditions as described at the time the work was performed.

This report does not include other services not specifically described in the scope of work in Section 1.2 of

this report. Conclusions were made within the operative constraints of the scope of work, budget, and

schedule for this project.

Our assessment of the findings of this investigation may change as new data become available, either from

persons familiar with the site or during additional site studies, exploration or sampling. This report is

intended for the exclusive use of Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest, and its designated

assignees. It is not meant to represent a legal opinion. No other warranty, express or implied, is made.


11

7.0 REFERENCES

Kane Environmental, Inc. and Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest. 28 October 2016. FINAL

Sampling and Analysis Plan, Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Distribution Piping Replacement: Pre-

and Post-Construction Sampling.

Washington Administrative Code. 25 February 2013. WAC 173-204: Sediment Management Standards.

Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). March 2015. Sediment Cleanup Users Manual II.

Ecology Publication No. 12-09-057.

FIGURES

Study Area

(shown in Figure 2)

Figure 1

Vicinity Map

3815 Woodland Park Avenue North, Suite 102

Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476

www.kane-environmental.com

Kane Project No. MOMS7451696

Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling

Saltwater Distribution System Piping Replacement

Dry Docks 1-5, Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton

Base Maps: 1981 USGS Bremerton East and

Bremerton West 7.5-Minute Topographic Maps

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

2000

AutoCAD SHX Text

4000

AutoCAD SHX Text

Approximate Scale in Feet

Dry D

ock 1

Dry D

ock 2

Dry D

ock 4

Dry D

ock 5

Dry D

ock 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Figure 2

Study Area Plan




N


Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476


Kane Project No. MOMS7451696

Aerial Photo Date: April 19, 2015

Aerial Photo Source: Google Earth Pro

Approximate outlines of Figures 3 through 7

AutoCAD SHX Text

%%ULEGEND

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

300

AutoCAD SHX Text

600

AutoCAD SHX Text


DD3-E

DD3-M

DD3-W

Figure 3

Dry Dock 3

Sample Locations




N


Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476


Kane Project No: MOMS7451696

Approximate Location of Existing Buried Saltwater Distribution Pipe

Approximate Location of Sediment Sampling Station



AutoCAD SHX Text

%%ULEGEND

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

65

AutoCAD SHX Text

130

AutoCAD SHX Text


DD1-EDD1-M

DD1-W

Figure 4

Dry Dock 1

Sample Locations




N


Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476





AutoCAD SHX Text

%%ULEGEND

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

65

AutoCAD SHX Text

130

AutoCAD SHX Text


DD2-E

DD2-M

DD2-W

Figure 5

Dry Dock 2

Sample Locations




N


Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476







AutoCAD SHX Text

%%ULEGEND

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

65

AutoCAD SHX Text

130

AutoCAD SHX Text


DD4-E

DD4-MDD4-W

Figure 6

Dry Dock 4

Sample Locations




N


Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476







AutoCAD SHX Text

%%ULEGEND

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

65

AutoCAD SHX Text

130

AutoCAD SHX Text


DD5-E

DD5-M

DD5-W

Figure 7

Dry Dock 5

Sample Locations




N


Seattle, WA - 206-691-0476







AutoCAD SHX Text

%%ULEGEND

AutoCAD SHX Text

0

AutoCAD SHX Text

65

AutoCAD SHX Text

130

AutoCAD SHX Text


TABLES

TABLE 1Summary of Sediment Sampling Field ObservationsPre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Main ReplacementNaval Base Kitsap-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval ShipyardDry Docks 1-5Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696

Sampling Station Latitude Longitude Station Location NotesDepth of Water

Sampler Penetration

Depth Sample ID

Sampler Onboard

Time Materials Removed From Sample Sediment Log(decimal ⁰) (decimal ⁰) (feet) (cm)

DD3-E

DD3-M 47.560340 -122.629408 33 feet south of edge of caisson 34 14 DD3-M-022217 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive green silt with clay (ML). Trace medium to coarse sand.

Shell fragments present. No apparent stratification, no odor or sheen.

DD3-W 47.560300 -122.629650

47.560405 -122.629155 34

DD1-E 47.561073 -122.63112885 feet south of

engineering mark on quay wall

32 20 DD1-E-022217, DD1-E-022217-DUP

DD2-E 47.560400 -122.632692 21 feet south of edge of quay wall 42

18 DD1-W-022217 None

15 DD2-E-022217 None

DD1-W 47.561082 -122.63156585 feet south of


32

DD1-M 47.561023 -122.63129085 feet south of


29 19 DD1-M-022217 None

25 feet south of edge of quay wall

25 feet south of edge of quay wall 34 14 DD3-W-022217,

DD3-W-022217-DUP None

Large clams, three (3)-inch-diameter cobbles12 DD3-E-022217

0-1 cm bsf: Olive-green silt with sand and shell fragments (ML). 1-10 cm bsf: Dark olive-gray silt with fine sand, with trace clay and shell

fragments (ML). No odor or sheen.

0-2 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay and shell fragments (ML). 2-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay, with trace shell fragments and fine to

medium sand (ML). No odor or sheen.

951

1000

1010

1052

1058

1104

1200

0-10 cm bsf: Dark gray to black organic non-plastic silt with clay and trace rounded medium to coarse sand (OL). Few shell fragments present. No apparent

stratification, no odor or sheen.

0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt and clay with gravel (ML). Few shell fragments present. No apparent stratification, no odor or sheen.

0-10 cm bsf: Dark gray-green, silty and clayey gravel and sand (GM-SM). Gravel sizes up to 3/4 inch in diameter. Shell fragments present. No apparent

stratification, no odor or staining.

0-1 cm bsf: Olive-green surficial silt with seaweed fragments (ML). 1-10 cm bsf: Dark olive-gray silt and clay with trace clay, organic matter, and

shell fragments (ML). No odor or sheen.

None

15 DD2-M-022217 1206 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay, with trace shell fragments and fine sand (ML). Sulfide odor. No apparent stratification or sheen.DD2-M 47.560335 -122.632973 36 feet south of edge

of caisson 50

20 DD2-W-022217 1211 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay and shell fragments, with trace fine to medium sand (ML). No apparent stratification. No odor or sheen.DD2-W 47.560418 -122.633158 21 feet south of edge

of quay wall 44

18 DD4-W-022217, DD4-W-022217-DUP 1300 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay, with trace fine sand (ML). No apparent

stratification. No odor or sheen.DD4-W 47.560418 -122.633158 32 feet south of edge of quay wall 49

13 DD4-E-022217 1307 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark gray silt with clay and shell fragments, with trace fine to medium sand (ML). No apparent stratification. No odor or sheen.DD4-E 47.560018 -122.635723 32 feet south of edge

of caisson 49

20 DD4-M-022217 1311 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay (ML). No apparent stratification. No odor or sheen.DD4-M 47.560018 -122.635723 32 feet south of edge

of quay wall 49

bsf = below sea floorGPS points listed are approximate. Sample locations shown in Figure 3‐7 are based on field measurements.

TABLE 1 (continued)Summary of Sediment Sampling Field ObservationsPre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Main ReplacementNaval Base Kitsap-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval ShipyardDry Docks 1-5Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696

Sampling Station Latitude Longitude Station Location NotesDepth of Water

Sampler Penetration

Depth Sample ID

Sampler Onboard

Time Materials Removed From Sample Sediment Log(decimal ⁰) (decimal ⁰) (feet) (cm)

22 DD5-E-022217, DD5-E-022217-DUP 1344 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silty with clay (ML). No apparent stratification, no

odor or staining.DD5-E 47.558077 -122.637698 40 feet south of edge of quay wall 48

19 DD5-M-022217 1349 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay and shell fragments (ML). Trace sulfide odor. No apparent stratification. No sheen.DD5-M 47.558117 -122.637943 40 feet south of edge

of caisson 46

20 DD5-W-022217 1353 None 0-10 cm bsf: Dark olive gray silt with clay (ML). Trace sulfide odor. No apparent stratification. No sheen.DD5-W 47.558138 -122.638305 40 feet south of edge

of quay wall 48

bsf = below sea floorGPS points listed are approximate. Sample locations shown in Figure 3‐7 are based on field measurements.

TABLE 2Summary of Sediment Sample Grain SizePre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Main ReplacementNaval Base Kitsap-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval ShipyardDry Docks 1-5Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696

Sam

ple

ID

Sam

ple

Dat

e

Sam

plin

g St

atio

n

Gra

vel,

Med

ium

(<-2

Φ)

Gra

vel,

Fine

(-2

to -1Φ

)TO

TAL

GRA

VEL

Sand

, Ver

y C

oars

e (-1

to 0Φ

)Sa

nd, C

oars

e (0

to 1Φ

)Sa

nd, M

ediu

m (1

to 2Φ

)Sa

nd, F

ine

(2 to

3Φ

)Sa

nd, V

ery

Fine

(3 to

4Φ

)TO

TAL

SAND

31.3

to 7

5 μm

(4 to

5Φ

)15

.6 to

31.

3 μm

(5 to

6Φ

)7.

8 to

15.

6 μm

(6 to

7Φ

)3.

9 to

7.8

μm

(7 to

8Φ

)1.

95 to

3.9

μm

(8 to

9Φ

)0.

98 to

1.9

5 μm

(9 to

10Φ

)<0

.98 μm

(>10Φ

)TO

TAL

SILT

AND

CLA

Y

wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt%DD3-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-E 54.50 28.04 82.54 6.11 2.81 1.23 1.01 0.36 11.52 1.53 1.09 1.44 1.22 2.58 0.51 1.88 10.25DD3-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-M 9.55 17.3 26.85 5.18 6.62 5.03 5.40 2.24 24.47 9.04 7.13 10.38 7.39 7.55 3.91 7.97 53.37DD3-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-W 8.76 50.52 59.28 7.04 12.05 5.90 2.03 0.38 27.40 1.96 1.32 2.33 1.00 1.63 1.78 2.14 12.16DD1-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-E 69.53 5.99 75.52 3.41 1.07 0.49 0.81 0.37 6.15 3.09 3.66 3.84 2.40 1.92 2.56 3.11 20.58DD1-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-W 1.19 2.97 4.16 3.89 1.51 1.26 2.59 1.54 10.79 8.67 17.43 14.68 7.01 9.89 14.60 10.11 82.39DD1-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-M 0.00 2.35 2.35 3.41 8.52 15.87 24.49 4.72 57.01 6.99 5.17 5.64 3.72 3.84 5.17 4.46 34.99DD2-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-E 9.40 20.25 29.65 13.73 6.07 4.64 4.18 1.15 29.77 4.80 13.07 9.55 5.11 1.86 5.69 7.13 47.21DD2-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-M 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.14 0.29 0.48 0.66 1.78 9.25 11.85 19.42 13.34 13.22 9.74 18.93 95.75DD2-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-W 5.19 20.33 25.52 12.49 7.51 5.54 4.71 1.00 31.25 5.97 5.27 5.04 4.09 6.84 3.35 6.22 36.78DD4-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-W 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.90 1.22 2.24 1.34 6.27 11.18 16.12 20.08 9.78 17.52 11.66 7.89 94.23DD4-W-022217-DUP 2/22/2017 DD4-W 0.00 1.29 1.29 0.76 1.20 1.22 1.88 1.52 6.58 10.42 16.39 18.49 10.80 16.06 9.75 11.28 93.19DD4-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-E 4.36 29.51 33.87 14.80 4.13 1.57 1.53 0.68 22.71 3.56 9.97 8.91 3.90 4.38 4.60 8.19 43.51DD4-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-M 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.15 0.21 0.26 0.78 1.06 2.46 11.98 15.20 19.50 9.59 15.45 11.41 13.22 96.35DD5-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-E 0.00 1.72 1.72 0.11 0.19 0.27 1.16 1.15 2.88 7.37 19.91 17.21 15.07 12.48 9.62 16.17 97.83DD5-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-M 9.06 18.33 27.39 6.44 2.76 2.34 4.09 1.88 17.51 6.04 11.74 9.25 5.41 3.78 6.40 7.77 50.39DD5-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-W 2.13 0.86 2.99 0.59 0.67 0.60 1.37 1.06 4.29 8.07 19.87 17.03 10.41 14.14 6.29 18.31 94.12Notes: wt% = weight percent, based on dry weights

TABLE 3Summary of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and Total Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in SedimentPre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Main ReplacementNaval Base Kitsap-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval ShipyardDry Docks 1-5Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696

Sam

ple

ID

Sam

ple

Dat

e

Sam

plin

g St

atio

n

Tota

l Org

anic

Car

bon

(TO

C)

Tota

l PC

Bs

Tota

l PC

Bs (T

OC

-nor

mal

ized

)

wt%DD3-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-E 0.29DD3-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-M 1.26DD3-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-W 0.58 406 J 70.0 JDD3-W-022217-DUP 2/22/2017 DD3-W 0.72DD1-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-E 1.82DD1-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-W 2.81 264 J 9.40 JDD1-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-M 2.35DD2-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-E 1.22 324 N,J 26.6 N,JDD2-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-M 2.84DD2-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-W 2.64DD4-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-W 2.55DD4-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-E 0.90DD4-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-M 2.20DD5-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-E 0.90DD5-E-022217-DUP 2/22/2017 DD5-E ---DD5-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-M 1.79 120 J 6.68 JDD5-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-W 2.90 165 J 5.69 J

Notes: wt% = weight percentug/kg = micrograms per kilogram [equivalent to parts per billion (ppb)]

NV = No cleanup value established under this criteriaBold values exceed the Marine Sediment Cleanup Objective Concentration.Bold and shaded values exceed the Marine Sediment Cleanup Screening Level.

N = According to the data quality report, Aroclor 1260 is considered a tentatively identified compound in this sample.

5.996.32

170

mg/kgOC42.4

---

NA11.6

6.10

5.24

ug/kg

146

---111

123

167

SMS Marine Sediment Cleanup Screening Level (Table III, WAC 173-204-562)

SMS Marine Sediment Cleanup Objective (Table III, WAC 173-204-562) 12

184

mg/kgOC = milligrams per kilogram organic carbon [equivalent to carbon-normalized parts per million]

---

65NV

NV

J = According to the data quality report, the reported concentration of Aroclor 1260 is the approximate concentration of this analyte in the sample.

NA = The total organic carbon concentration for this sample is outside of the range (0.5 to 3.5 wt% TOC) of concentrations acceptable for carbon-normalization of PCBs concentrations (Ecology, 2015). Therefore, no carbon-normalized concentration is listed.

302264280179

11.829.312.719.8

TABLE 4Summary of Metals in SedimentPre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Main ReplacementNaval Base Kitsap-Bremerton and Puget Sound Naval ShipyardDry Docks 1-5Kane Environmental Project #MOMS7451696

Sam

ple

ID

Sam

ple

Dat

e

Sam

plin

g St

atio

n

Arse

nic

Cad

miu

m

Chr

omiu

m

Cop

per

Lead

Nic

kel

Silv

er

Zinc

Mer

cury

DD3-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-E 28.4 J 0.3191 J,HDD3-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-M 136 J 0.4909 J,HDD3-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD3-W 546 J 1.822 J,HDD1-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-E 66.2 J 0.8374 J,HDD1-E-022217-DUP 2/22/2017 DD1-E 76.3 J 0.9885 J,HDD1-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-W 152 J 1.395 J,HDD1-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD1-M 103 J 1.237 J,HDD2-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-E 219 J 1.392 J,HDD2-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-M 79.7 J 0.8605 J,HDD2-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD2-W 70.4 J 0.8313 J,HDD4-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-W 105 J 1.450 J,HDD4-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-E 54.3 J 0.8149 J,HDD4-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD4-M 90.0 J 0.8845 J,HDD5-E-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-E 73.8 J 0.7495 J,HDD5-M-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-M 101 J 0.8146 J,HDD5-W-022217 2/22/2017 DD5-W 75.6 J 0.7062 J,H

Notes: mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram [equivalent to parts per million (ppm)]NV = No cleanup value under this criteria.Bold values exceed the Marine Sediment Cleanup Objective Concentration.Bold and shaded values exceed the Marine Sediment Cleanup Screening Level.J = According to the data quality report, the listed concentration is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.H = According to the data quality report, based on elevated matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries, a potential high bias due to matrix effects may affect the reported concentration of this analyte.

6.1 410 0.41

25.545.633.635.233.6

260 390 450 NV

0.59270 390 530 NV 6.1 960

1.81

331295232

32.0

41.7

SMS Marine Sediment Cleanup Screening Level (Table III, WAC 173-204-562)

SMS Marine Sediment Cleanup Objective (Table III, WAC 173-204-562) 5.1

45.833.6

93

57

6.7

23.8

32.7

<1.08

2.271.03

<1.16121

1.972.24

2.09

2.730.8412.22

mg/kgmg/kg mg/kg

187

<0.6371.87

0.826

20.050.040.7

153428

2470

mg/kg19.449.6

20.847.165.4

<1.25

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kgmg/kg

16121920056.6

64.5246511237

24513081519913036.3

67.743.059.061.266.1

35.9

70.142.861.358.0 46.7

32.858.733.246.7

27.4

50.938.8

324

453222808290<1.25

<0.9560.7891.91

<1.62

<0.939<0.511<1.74

332

299

27.6 1.44 41.9 270 33.9 <0.791

217501311392271449<1.16

<0.993

<0.649<0.867<1.88<1.12<1.1245.2

56.345.4

59.0

ATTACHMENT A SAMPLE CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORMS

CLII;NT <::AMPI I= ID

f1. DD3- ,_,

f6.1)D!- M-oz.t'l.ti

fS.pj) 2- M-DL1:"2.1"7 f9.PJ>2· W-01.!"2.1 I 10. ~j)z.j - ,, ~ -17

Report Requirements _ I. Routine Report: Method

Blank, Surrogate, as required

_ Jl. Report Dup., MS, MSO as required

~ Ill. CLP Like Summary (no raw data)

_ IV. Data Validation Report

X..v. EDD

I By:

1111111111111111111111111 73526 CHAIN OF CUSTODY

1317 South 13th Ave, Kelso, WA 9862~ Phone (360) 577-7222/80Q..695-7222/ FAX (360) 636-1068

I

n.

I LABID Date Time Matrix

" '" O'l5 i S~ec\ I X .·

~~ ,_., looo I X yn 11 11>10 I X z.Jzz, 11 IOSZ. I )<

Z-/1-2117 /05"0 2. )< 'rZ/Z.Zi/1 lict.i I )<

Circle which metals are to be analvzed on

1 SR# ~~ /7ol&:li

.I

COC Set __ of __

COC#·-"~--...,~-Page 1 of;!(

'2-

Total Metals: AI As Sb Ba Be 8 Ca Cd Cfo Cr Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Mo Ni K Ag Na Se Sr Tl- Sn V Zn Hg

Dissolved Metals: AI As Sb Ba Be B Ca Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Mo Ni K Ag Na Se Sr Tl Sn V Zn Hg

Tm .. u. vwuu "~"w". 24 hr. 48 hr.

-5Day -J(:standard

i i I 'State: AK CA WI Other I Circle One)

At11al'"\s <5 l:>j ASTM 'D'f21.. - Lo>"tieVIi.>e & brea.i-<ou-1- ·

J;:x-1-;"- coA+a.rvte.Y6 prov'cX.e.J. oV\ ~led s«..w<pie.S .[;,, lc.t.b QC P"'f'o%:5.

I By: !By: .J By: -~·"

I By:

I ~i~te~:me h }l>Ul 4'-. 1\ 1 Pri fc..b lf'nnted Name Printed Name Printed Name printed Name

ILJaioni•u• Z./1._'~/11 · 1525 ;ua1onhne Vd\0''""" u•••• • i•ne ua1e1 • """ I '

Page 9 of 58

A ~onuln:mn,.,n>ai CHAIN OF CUSTODY r01

I I SR# ( ( I

II 11111111111111111111111 73526 COC Set __ of __

COG# ~

1317 South 13th Ave, Kelso, WA 9862? Phone (360) 577-72221800~95.-7222 I FAX (360) 636-1068 ' I Page

I PStvS'~ D. _,-_ - • )A; looM r;'"ilb'/0 I~ Zck • !n.LD E .• ~)VI

lcomp•ny it<t<Ae- I;V\VII/1:> V\ t\ lj 3a~j;! ! fl<.-1'- A..e.IJ, SJe, IOZ " , , wA 'l"l>l 03

~t.J1b "4 ;:~::le• enn~ ,,,. j.,, .

I

l II -~~ rJa+e.. E"vwso"'

Cl.lf=_NT SAM PI t:; 10 LABID Date Time Matrix

j1. PDI.f- iJ- ot'2.211· ~iJP /t7 130:3 2hZ. I ~e.& I l'x J2. ·ot..~'Z.J1 Jz In (!1 /?,~/- I I l'x' j3. i)i)i.l ~~ l'z. /z1.(11 lbJ I 12. I'X J4. Di/5- E> o-z:z:VI lz. In f II I ;J<./ '-1 I IX ,I IS.f>D5 ·M·o~nn 1'2 ln. 117 il>'-ICi 1 D< Je.D1>5- w-o-z.n_L7 /n, 11 '17 13')3 ' 1 I>< J7. J8. ,9. ·- 1-10.

-· H~mD '""v""""v" QirrJe whicb metals @[!il to be analyzeg

_I. Routine Report: Method P.O.#l!dD&l:l:I!:I!il ~ :f.i.;, Blank, Surrogate, as Bill To:. Total Metals: AI As Sb ~-B~~~~~~~~~-MK~~•&n~v~~ required

o.o@ ~a.N:- •·•· '' ~~ .,MJ..f.c<ll-_II. Report Dup., MS, MSD


as required I I 'State :AKCAWI : OthPr i 'One) 2{. Ill. CLP Like Summary Tur""'~~ .. ~ ,. ...~ ... ~

L"~~c.-\ lorw. leO v+, (no raw data) 24 hr. _48hr. AM1j615 b'j .1\STM DLf"Z'Z- -=5Day

_ IV. Data Validation Report .X.. Standard 'Ex+-("31, Co...,+au'\U-5 pro J• d.e.J Oil\ "5:€,.-l e.c:J- scwvtpleB .f;r /o...b &C f'Vf05e-S. ){v. EDD

I By: ~J }f&Yf

!By: I By: ley: I By: I By:

,~_,('....,. ).u J!J .i •• .i ••

lr:te;;a~ lt'ri )T

Printed Name 1 Printed Name j Printed Name Printed Name

( U: he.. Gt ' l< """'""' n ..J,., J rin

9 ""417 !()10 Hrm jFirm jfirm jFirm

i Z..l &-f> Ill l">l.f'i i uatell ime '

Page 10 of 58

2 of 97

3 of 97

ATTACHMENT B LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS

March 16, 2017 Analytical Report for Service Request No: K1701881

Nate EvensonKane Environmental3815 Woodland Park Avenue N, Suite 102Seattle, WA 98103

Analyses were performed according to our laboratory’s NELAP-approved quality assurance program. The test results meet requirements of the current NELAP standards, where applicable, and except as noted in the laboratory case narrative provided. For a specific list of NELAP-accredited analytes, refer to the certifications section at www.alsglobal.com. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and ALS Group USA Corp. dba ALS Environmental (ALS) is not responsible for use of less than the complete report. Results apply only to the items submitted to the laboratory for analysis and individual items (samples) analyzed, as listed in the report.

For your reference, these analyses have been assigned our service request numberEnclosed are the results of the sample(s) submitted to our laboratory February 24, 2017

RE: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC / MOMS7451696

Dear Nate,

K1701881.

Please contact me if you have any questions. My extension is 3275. You may also contact me via email at [email protected].

Respectfully submitted,

ALS Group USA, Corp. dba ALS Environmental

Chris LeafProject Manager

ALS Group USA, Corp1317 South 13th AvenueKelso, WA 98626

+1 360 577 7222+1 360 636 1068

T :F :

ALS Environmental

www.alsglobal.com

RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNERPage 1 of 58

Chris.Leaf

Chris Leaf

www.alsglobal.com

ALS Environmental

F :T :

+1 360 636 1068+1 360 577 7222

Kelso, WA 986261317 South 13th AvenueALS Group USA, Corp

Table of Contents

RIGHT SOLUTIONS | RIGHT PARTNER

Acronyms

Qualifiers

State Certifications, Accreditations, And Licenses

Case Narrative

Chain of Custody

Total Solids

General Chemistry

Raw Data

Total Solids

General Chemistry

Page 2 of 58

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

A2LA American Association for Laboratory Accreditation

CARB California Air Resources Board

CAS Number Chemical Abstract Service registry Number

CFC Chlorofluorocarbon

CFU Colony-Forming Unit

DEC Department of Environmental Conservation

DEQ Department of Environmental Quality

DHS Department of Health Services

DOE Department of Ecology

DOH Department of Health

EPA U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

ELAP Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program

GC Gas Chromatography

GC/MS Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

LOD Limit of Detection

LOQ Limit of Quantitation

LUFT Leaking Underground Fuel Tank

M ModifiedMCL Maximum Contaminant Level is the highest permissible concentration of a substance

allowed in drinking water as established by the USEPA.

MDL Method Detection Limit

MPN Most Probable Number

MRL Method Reporting Limit

NA Not Applicable

NC Not Calculated

NCASI National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement

ND Not Detected

NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

PQL Practical Quantitation Limit

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

SIM Selected Ion Monitoring

TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbonstr Trace level is the concentration of an analyte that is less than the PQL but greater than or

equal to the MDL.

Acronyms

Page 3 of 58

Inorganic Data Qualifiers

* The result is an outlier. See case narrative.

# The control limit criteria is not applicable. See case narrative.

B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result as defined by the DOD or NELAC standards.

E The result is an estimate amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range.

J The result is an estimated value.

U The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non-detect") at or above the MRL/MDL. DOD-QSM 4.2 definition : Analyte was not detected and is reported as less than the LOD or as defined by the project. The detection limit is adjusted for dilution.

i The MRL/MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a matrix interference.

X See case narrative.

Q See case narrative. One or more quality control criteria was outside the limits.

H The holding time for this test is immediately following sample collection. The samples were analyzed as soon as possible afterreceipt by the laboratory.

Metals Data Qualifiers



E The percent difference for the serial dilution was greater than 10%, indicating a possible matrix interference in the sample.

M The duplicate injection precision was not met.

N The Matrix Spike sample recovery is not within control limits. See case narrative.

S The reported value was determined by the Method of Standard Additions (MSA).


W The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits, while sample absorbance is less than 50% of spike absorbance.

i The MRL/MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a matrix interference.


+ The correlation coefficient for the MSA is less than 0.995.


Organic Data Qualifiers

* The result is an outlier. See case narrative.


A A tentatively identified compound, a suspected aldol-condensation product.

B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result as defined by the DOD or NELAC standards.

C The analyte was qualitatively confirmed using GC/MS techniques, pattern recognition, or by comparing to historical data.

D The reported result is from a dilution.

E The result is an estimated value.


N The result is presumptive. The analyte was tentatively identified, but a confirmation analysis was not performed.

PThe GC or HPLC confirmation criteria was exceeded. The relative percent difference is greater than 40% between the two analytical results.


i The MRL/MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a chromatographic interference.



Additional Petroleum Hydrocarbon Specific Qualifiers

F The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample matches the elution pattern of the calibration standard.

L The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of a greater amount of lighter molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.

H The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of a greater amount of heavier molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.

O The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles an oil, but does not match the calibration standard.

Y The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product eluting in approximately the correct carbon range, but the elution pattern does not match the calibration standard.

Z The chromatographic fingerprint does not resemble a petroleum product.

Page 4 of 58

Agency Web Site Number

Alaska DEC UST http://dec.alaska.gov/applications/eh/ehllabreports/USTLabs.aspx UST-040

Arizona DHS http://www.azdhs.gov/lab/license/env.htm AZ0339

Arkansas - DEQ http://www.adeq.state.ar.us/techsvs/labcert.htm 88-0637

California DHS (ELAP) http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/labs/Pages/ELAP.aspx 2795

DOD ELAP http://www.denix.osd.mil/edqw/Accreditation/AccreditedLabs.cfm L14-51

Florida DOH http://www.doh.state.fl.us/lab/EnvLabCert/WaterCert.htm E87412

Hawaii DOH Not available -

ISO 17025 http://www.pjlabs.com/ L16-57

Louisiana DEQhttp://www.deq.louisiana.gov/portal/DIVISIONS/PublicParticipationandPermitSupport/LouisianaLaboratoryAccreditationProgram.aspx 03016

Maine DHS Not available WA01276

Minnesota DOH http://www.health.state.mn.us/accreditation 053-999-457

Montana DPHHS http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/publichealth/ CERT0047

Nevada DEP http://ndep.nv.gov/bsdw/labservice.htm WA01276

New Jersey DEP http://www.nj.gov/dep/oqa/ WA005

North Carolina DWQ http://www.dwqlab.org/ 605

Oklahoma DEQ http://www.deq.state.ok.us/CSDnew/labcert.htm 9801

Oregon – DEQ (NELAP)http://public.health.oregon.gov/LaboratoryServices/EnvironmentalLaboratoryAccreditation/Pages/index.aspx WA100010

South Carolina DHEC http://www.scdhec.gov/environment/envserv/ 61002

Texas CEQ http://www.tceq.texas.gov/field/qa/env_lab_accreditation.html T104704427

Washington DOE http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/eap/labs/lab-accreditation.html C544

Wyoming (EPA Region 8) http://www.epa.gov/region8/water/dwhome/wyomingdi.html -

Kelso Laboratory Website www.alsglobal.com NA

ALS Group USA Corp. dba ALS Environmental (ALS) - KelsoState Certifications, Accreditations, and Licenses

Analyses were performed according to our laboratory’s NELAP-approved quality assurance program. A complete listing of specific NELAP-certified analytes, can be found in the certification section at www.ALSGlobal.com or at the accreditation bodies web site.Please refer to the certification and/or accreditation body's web site if samples are submitted for compliance purposes. The states highlighted above, require the analysis be listed on the state certification if used for compliance purposes and if the method/anlayte is offered by that state.

Page 5 of 58

Case Narrative

ALS Environmental—Kelso Laboratory 1317 South 13th Avenue, Kelso, WA 98626 Phone (360)577-7222 Fax (360)636-1068 www.alsglobal.com


Page 6 of 58

Approved by______________________________________________

ALS ENVIRONMENTAL Client: Kane Environmental Service Request No.: K1701881 Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/ Date Received: 02/24/17 MOMS7451696 Sample Matrix: Sediment

Case Narrative All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of ALS Environmental. This report contains analytical results for samples designated for Tier IV validation deliverables including summary forms and all of the associated raw data for each of the analyses. When appropriate to the method, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Sample Receipt Sixteen sediment samples were received for analysis at ALS Environmental on 02/24/17. The samples were received in good condition and consistent with the accompanying chain of custody form. The samples were stored in a refrigerator at 4ºC upon receipt at the laboratory. General Chemistry Parameters No anomalies associated with the analysis of these samples were observed.

Page 7 of 58

Chris.Leaf

Chris Leaf

Chain of Custody



Page 8 of 58

CLII;NT <::AMPI I= ID

f1. DD3- ,_,

f6.1)D!- M-oz.t'l.ti

fS.pj) 2- M-DL1:"2.1"7 f9.PJ>2· W-01.!"2.1 I 10. ~j)z.j - ,, ~ -17

Report Requirements _ I. Routine Report: Method

Blank, Surrogate, as required

_ Jl. Report Dup., MS, MSO as required

~ Ill. CLP Like Summary (no raw data)

_ IV. Data Validation Report

X..v. EDD

I By:

1111111111111111111111111 73526 CHAIN OF CUSTODY

1317 South 13th Ave, Kelso, WA 9862~ Phone (360) 577-7222/80Q..695-7222/ FAX (360) 636-1068

I

n.

I LABID Date Time Matrix

" '" O'l5 i S~ec\ I X .·

~~ ,_., looo I X yn 11 11>10 I X z.Jzz, 11 IOSZ. I )<

Z-/1-2117 /05"0 2. )< 'rZ/Z.Zi/1 lict.i I )<

Circle which metals are to be analvzed on

1 SR# ~~ /7ol&:li

.I

COC Set __ of __

COC#·-"~--...,~-Page 1 of;!(

'2-

Total Metals: AI As Sb Ba Be 8 Ca Cd Cfo Cr Cu Fe Pb Mg Mn Mo Ni K Ag Na Se Sr Tl- Sn V Zn Hg


Tm .. u. vwuu "~"w". 24 hr. 48 hr.

-5Day -J(:standard

i i I 'State: AK CA WI Other I Circle One)

At11al'"\s <5 l:>j ASTM 'D'f21.. - Lo>"tieVIi.>e & brea.i-<ou-1- ·

J;:x-1-;"- coA+a.rvte.Y6 prov'cX.e.J. oV\ ~led s«..w<pie.S .[;,, lc.t.b QC P"'f'o%:5.

I By: !By: .J By: -~·"

I By:

I ~i~te~:me h }l>Ul 4'-. 1\ 1 Pri fc..b lf'nnted Name Printed Name Printed Name printed Name

ILJaioni•u• Z./1._'~/11 · 1525 ;ua1onhne Vd\0''""" u•••• • i•ne ua1e1 • """ I '

Page 9 of 58

A ~onuln:mn,.,n>ai CHAIN OF CUSTODY r01

I I SR# ( ( I

II 11111111111111111111111 73526 COC Set __ of __

COG# ~

1317 South 13th Ave, Kelso, WA 9862? Phone (360) 577-72221800~95.-7222 I FAX (360) 636-1068 ' I Page

I PStvS'~ D. _,-_ - • )A; looM r;'"ilb'/0 I~ Zck • !n.LD E .• ~)VI

lcomp•ny it<t<Ae- I;V\VII/1:> V\ t\ lj 3a~j;! ! fl<.-1'- A..e.IJ, SJe, IOZ " , , wA 'l"l>l 03

~t.J1b "4 ;:~::le• enn~ ,,,. j.,, .

I

l II -~~ rJa+e.. E"vwso"'

Cl.lf=_NT SAM PI t:; 10 LABID Date Time Matrix

j1. PDI.f- iJ- ot'2.211· ~iJP /t7 130:3 2hZ. I ~e.& I l'x J2. ·ot..~'Z.J1 Jz In (!1 /?,~/- I I l'x' j3. i)i)i.l ~~ l'z. /z1.(11 lbJ I 12. I'X J4. Di/5- E> o-z:z:VI lz. In f II I ;J<./ '-1 I IX ,I IS.f>D5 ·M·o~nn 1'2 ln. 117 il>'-ICi 1 D< Je.D1>5- w-o-z.n_L7 /n, 11 '17 13')3 ' 1 I>< J7. J8. ,9. ·- 1-10.

-· H~mD '""v""""v" QirrJe whicb metals @[!il to be analyzeg

_I. Routine Report: Method P.O.#l!dD&l:l:I!:I!il ~ :f.i.;, Blank, Surrogate, as Bill To:. Total Metals: AI As Sb ~-B~~~~~~~~~-MK~~•&n~v~~ required

o.o@ ~a.N:- •·•· '' ~~ .,MJ..f.c<ll-_II. Report Dup., MS, MSD


as required I I 'State :AKCAWI : OthPr i 'One) 2{. Ill. CLP Like Summary Tur""'~~ .. ~ ,. ...~ ... ~

L"~~c.-\ lorw. leO v+, (no raw data) 24 hr. _48hr. AM1j615 b'j .1\STM DLf"Z'Z- -=5Day

_ IV. Data Validation Report .X.. Standard 'Ex+-("31, Co...,+au'\U-5 pro J• d.e.J Oil\ "5:€,.-l e.c:J- scwvtpleB .f;r /o...b &C f'Vf05e-S. ){v. EDD

I By: ~J }f&Yf

!By: I By: ley: I By: I By:

,~_,('....,. ).u J!J .i •• .i ••

lr:te;;a~ lt'ri )T

Printed Name 1 Printed Name j Printed Name Printed Name

( U: he.. Gt ' l< """'""' n ..J,., J rin

9 ""417 !()10 Hrm jFirm jfirm jFirm

i Z..l &-f> Ill l">l.f'i i uatell ime '

Page 10 of 58

A PCC (_ Cooler Receipt and Preservation Form

Client tart [nJ Received: ,_)) ' '"JY1 - f 7

Ser..vice Request K17__:o:O_· _!_<?_' _fl_/ -----;--c--

By: Z::.j ) Unloaded: cQ ,;J 'f ·I 7 By: O...c) Opened: ,;) :JL.f 1 ]

L Samples were received via? USPS ( \}:edEx_/ UPS DHL PDX Courier Hand Delivered

2. Samples were received in: (circle) (::__~o,;{;; ~: Box Envelope Other

3. Were custody seals on coolers? NA··"Q) N If yes, how many and where? ( f·rcrrf / '\

If present, were custody seals intact? ('-.Y,/ N If present, were they signed and dated?

NA

(.y' N . '-, ... .J ., lj,.,. . -- ColT. Thermometer Cooler/COC 10 Tracking Number

c~ -... ... -_~rT11t'np Cooletr: TemoBiank T;;;;;;,...., Factor ID NA

-o :;;J - () 2' ! ·1 i>< of '-~ '}{ {) 735.;( !:c:' (; 4'1-f q:.nq - -- - - - -I- - -

4. Packing material: Insert(_!Jaggi:_!) Bubble WrdjJ ,GelP~c~~-Wet Ice 'pry Ice Sleeves

5. Were custody papers properlyfi]!.;d out (ink, signed, etc.)? ..... . ·-··--------· -

6. Were samples received in good condition (temperature, unbroken)? Indicate in the table below

If applicable, tissue samples were received: Frozen Partially Thawed Thawed 7. Were all sample labels complete (i.e analysis, preservation, etc.)?

8. Did all sample labels and tags agree with custody papers? Indicate major discrepancies in the table on page 2.

9. Were appropriate bottles/containers and volumes received for the tests indicated?

I 0. Were the pH-preserved bottles (see SMO GEN SOP) received at the appropriate pH? Indicate in the table below

I 1. Were VOA vials received without headspace? Indicate in the table below.

12. Was C12/Res negative?

-~·:;_

Sample ID on Bottle Sample 10 on COC Identified by:

NA Filed

i7D1

NA( ~-Y) N . \

NA Yj -----···

NA (_l_-) NA _ y __ )

?,.e•''-

NA '_ Y _]\18__) y

r'N'A~' Y )-'--·)\

'- NA Y

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

I I I ---------

I'·_· .• t~ BoUle Count Out of Head- Volume Reagent Lot sample to Bottle Type Temn space Broke pH Reaaent added Number Initial$ Time

L. - - - - .. -- L.. - ~- - ~ - --

Notes, Discrepancies, & Resolutions:. ___________________________________ _

7125116 Page __ oj __ _

Page 11 of 58

Total Solids



Page 12 of 58

Client:

02/24/17

K1701881

Date Received:Date Collected:

Service Request:

SoilPSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696Kane Environmental

Sample Matrix:Project: 02/22/17

Solids, Total

Basis:Units: Percent

As Received160.3 ModifiedNonePrep Method:

Analysis Method:

Lab CodeSample NameDate

AnalyzedDil.MDLMRLResult Q

DD3-E-022217 02/27/17 10:391--77.2K1701881-001DD3-M-022217 02/27/17 10:391--41.5K1701881-002DD3-W-022217 02/27/17 10:391--76.2K1701881-003DD1-E-022217 02/27/17 10:391--37.8K1701881-004DD1-W-022217 02/27/17 10:391--32.7K1701881-005DD1-M-022217 02/27/17 10:391--60.0K1701881-006DD2-E-022217 02/27/17 10:391--42.8K1701881-007DD2-M-022217 02/27/17 10:391--24.3K1701881-008DD2-W-022217 02/27/17 10:391--50.8K1701881-009DD4-W-022217 02/27/17 10:391--32.0K1701881-010DD4-W-022217-DUP 02/27/17 10:391--32.7K1701881-011DD4-E-022217 02/27/17 10:391--43.8K1701881-012DD4-M-022217 02/27/17 10:391--26.6K1701881-013DD5-E-022217 02/27/17 10:391--25.8K1701881-014DD5-M-022217 02/27/17 10:391--46.1K1701881-015DD5-W-022217 02/27/17 10:391--28.7K1701881-016

Analytical Report

ALS Group USA, Corp. dba ALS Environmental

Printed 2/28/2017 9:39:13 AM 17-0000412702 rev 00Superset Reference:

Page 13 of 58

ALS Group USA, Corp.dba ALS Environmental

QA/QC Report

Client:ProjectSample Matrix:

Prep Method:Analysis Method:

Kane EnvironmentalPSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696Soil

160.3 ModifiedNone

Service Request:Date Collected:Date Received:

Basis:Units:

K170188102/22/1702/24/17

PercentAs Received

Replicate Sample SummaryInorganic Parameters

Sample Name: Lab Code:Date

AnalyzedRPDLimitMRL RPD

DuplicateResult Average

SampleResult

1 - 32.7 32.3 32.5 20DD1-W-022217 K1701881-005DUP 02/27/1710 - 50.8 46.0 48.4 20DD2-W-022217 K1701881-009DUP 02/27/17<1 - 26.6 26.5 26.6 20DD4-M-022217 K1701881-013DUP 02/27/17

Results flagged with an asterisk (*) indicate values outside control criteria.

Results flagged with a pound (#) indicate the control criteria is not applicable.

Percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPD) are determined by the software using values in the calculation which have not been rounded.

Printed 2/28/2017 9:39:13 AM 17-0000412702 rev 00Superset Reference:

Page 14 of 58

General Chemistry



Page 15 of 58

dba ALS EnvironmentalAnalytical Report

Client: Kane Environmental Service Request: K1701881Project: PSNS Sed Pre-Con-NAVFAC/MOM57451696 Date Collected: 2/22/2017Sample Matrix: Soil Date Received: 2/24/2017

Date Analyzed: 2/27/2017

Particle Size DeterminationASTM D422M

Sample Name: DD3-E-022217Lab Code: K1701881-001

Sand Fraction: Dry Weight (Grams) 37.0416Sand Fraction: Weight Recovered (Grams) 37.0307Sand Fraction: Percent Recovery 99.97

Dry Weight Percent of TotalDescription Phi Size (Grams) Weight RecoveredGravel, Medium <-2 Ø 21.4444 54.55Gravel, Fine -2 Ø to -1 Ø 11.0236 28.04Sand, Very Coarse -1 to 0 Ø 2.4022 6.11Sand, Coarse 0 to 1 Ø 1.1051 2.81Sand, Medium 1 to 2 Ø 0.4825 1.23Sand, Fine 2 to 3 Ø 0.3955 1.01Sand, Very Fine 3 to 4 Ø 0.1433 0.3675.0 µm 4 Ø 0.6000 1.5331.3 µm 5 Ø 0.4300 1.0915.6 µm 6 Ø 0.5650 1.447.8 µm 7 Ø 0.4800 1.223.9 µm 8 Ø 1.0150 2.581.95 µm 9 Ø 0.2000 0.510.98 µm > 10 Ø 0.7400 1.88

41.0266 104.36

K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 16 of 58





Sample Name: DD3-M-022217Lab Code: K1701881-002



13.6549 104.63

K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 17 of 58





Sample Name: DD3-W-022217Lab Code: K1701881-003



38.5590 98.84

K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 18 of 58








42.5572 102.25

K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 19 of 58








11.1688 97.33

K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 20 of 58








19.1566 94.36

K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 21 of 58








19.2069 106.62

K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 22 of 58








7.8655 97.61

K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 23 of 58








18.7335 93.55

K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 24 of 58








10.4849 101.49

K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 25 of 58





Sample Name: DD4-W-022217-DUPLab Code: K1701881-011



10.5731 101.05

K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 26 of 58








20.7848 100.10

K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 27 of 58








9.5673 99.24

K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 28 of 58








9.3143 102.44

K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 29 of 58








22.5574 95.28

K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 30 of 58








9.1087 101.40

K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 31 of 58





Sample Name: DD1-W-022217Lab Code: K1701881-005DUP



11.1711 97.53

K1701881wet.CL1 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 32 of 58





Sample Name: DD2-W-022217Lab Code: K1701881-009DUP



20.3259 96.47

K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 33 of 58





Sample Name: DD4-M-022217Lab Code: K1701881-013DUP



8.6847 98.53

K1701881wet.CL2 \3/15/2017 Page No.:

Page 34 of 58

Raw Data



Page 35 of 58

Total Solids



Page 36 of 58

77.28.8010.08411.393K1701881-001 1.28941.54.505.79710.837K1701881-002 1.30176.29.4210.72412.360K1701881-003 1.30437.84.435.70611.723K1701881-004 1.27832.74.715.99214.416K1701881-005 1.28432.33.574.85411.055K1701881-005DUP 1.280 160.06.928.22411.537K1701881-006 1.30042.84.555.84110.636K1701881-007 1.29424.32.453.74510.098K1701881-008 1.29350.88.449.74516.609K1701881-009 1.30146.05.586.87912.123K1701881-009DUP 1.298 1032.03.384.68210.567K1701881-010 1.29832.74.005.29712.218K1701881-011 1.29643.84.866.15911.088K1701881-012 1.30026.62.934.21611.002K1701881-013 1.29026.53.694.98613.911K1701881-013DUP 1.297 <125.82.683.98210.381K1701881-014 1.30146.16.557.83714.193K1701881-015 1.29228.73.214.50111.155K1701881-016 1.29599.61.993.2801.999K1701880-001 1.28899.22.193.4912.208K1701880-002 1.300

Oven ID Time OutTime InTemp In Date In Date OutTemp Outk-oven-07 105 10:392/27/2017 08:022/28/2017Oven1 105

Thermometer ID

Cal End ValueCal Start Value Start DateCal EQID End DateStart Time End TimeK-BALANCE-50 0.999, 99.998 1.000, 99.997 2/27/2017 2/27/201708:53 10:39Calibration1

K-BALANCE-50 1.000, 99.997 1.000, 99.999 2/28/2017 2/28/201708:58 09:02Calibration2

BenchsheetService Request #:Test:Method:

K1701881, KQ1702113, K1701880TS160.3 Modified

Pan ID: Lab Code:Wet Wt. (g)Tare (g) Tare + Dry

Wt. (g) Dry Weight (g) % Total Solids

536188Run #:Balance ID: K-BALANCE-50

RPD

Comments: DJM Weight set serial No. 42868. Sample -2,-4 have very large rocks that didn't get included. Reviewed by SC 2/28/17

Page 37 of 58

General Chemistry



Page 38 of 58

Analytical Resources, Incorporated

Analytical Chemists and Consultants

Kane Environmental

RE: Navy

Seattle, WA 98103

3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102

Nate Evenson

Please find enclosed sample receipt documentation and analytical results for samples from the project referenced

above.

Sample analyses were performed according to ARI's Quality Assurance Plan and any provided project specific

Quality Assurance Plan. Each analytical section of this report has been approved and reviewed by an analytical

peer, the appropriate Laboratory Supervisor or qualified substitute, and a technical reviewer.

Should you have any questions or problems, please feel free to contact us at your convenience.

17 March 2017

Associated Work Order(s) Associated SDG ID(s)

17B0342 N/A

-----

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically

and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed in the enclose Narrative. ARI, an accredited

laboratory, certifies that the report results for which ARI is accredited meets all the reqirements of the

accrediting body. A list of certified analyses, accreditations, and expiration dates is included in this report.

Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or

his/her designee, as verified by the following signature.

Analytical Resources, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the

chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its

entirety.

Mark Harris, Project Manager Cert# 100006

PJLA TestingAccreditation # 66169

1 of 97

2 of 97

3 of 97

4 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental

3815 Woodland Park Ave. N., Suite 102 MOMS7451696

Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103

Analytical ReportAnalytical Chemists and Consultants


ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES

Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received

DD3-E-02217 17B0342-01 Solid 22-Feb-2017 09:51 23-Feb-2017 17:50

DD3-M-022217 17B0342-02 Solid 22-Feb-2017 10:00 23-Feb-2017 17:50

DD3-W-022217 17B0342-03 Solid 22-Feb-2017 10:10 23-Feb-2017 17:50

DD3-W-022217-DUP 17B0342-04 Solid 22-Feb-2017 10:15 23-Feb-2017 17:50


DD1-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-06 Solid 22-Feb-2017 10:54 23-Feb-2017 17:50










DD5-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-16 Solid 22-Feb-2017 13:46 23-Feb-2017 17:50





entirety.

5 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



Client: Kane Environmental

Project: Navy

Workorder: 17B0342

Sample receipt

18 samples were received 23-Feb-2017 17:50 under ARI work order 17B0342. For details regarding sample receipt, please

refer to the Cooler Receipt Form.

PCB Aroclors - EPA Method SW8082A

These samples were extracted and analyzed within the recommended holding times.

All initial and continuing calibrations were within method requirements.

The areas for all internal standards were within acceptable QC limits.

The percent recoveries for all surrogates were within established QC limits.

No target compounds were detected in the method blank above the LOQs.

The percent recoveries for all compounds were within acceptable QC limits for the LCS.

A matrix spike (MS) and a matrix spike duplicate (MSD) were extracted and analyzed in conjunction with sample

'DD2-M-022217'. The percent recoveries and RPDs were within acceptable QC limits for the MS/MSD.

Total Metals - EPA Methods 6010C/7471B

These samples were digested and analyzed within the recommended holding times.


No target elements were detected in the method blanks above the LOQs.

The percent recoveries for all elements were within acceptable QC limits for the LCSs.

Matrix spikes (MSs) and matrix spike duplicates (MSDs) were prepared and analyzed in conjunction with sample

'DD3-E-02217'. The percent recoveries for zinc and mercury were high following the analyses of the MSs. The percent

recovery for mercury was high following the analysis of the MSD. The RPD for mercury was high following the analyses of

the MS/MSD. Since the percent recoveries for all elements were within acceptable QC limits for the corresponding LCSs and

SRMs, it was concluded that the sample matrix was the cause of the high MS results. No corrective actions were taken.

Matrix duplicates (MDs) were prepared and analyzed in conjunction with sample 'DD3-E-02217'.The RPDs for lead and

Case Narrative



entirety.

6 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



mercury were high following the analyses of the MDs. Since the percent recoveries for all elements were within acceptable

QC limits for the corresponding LCSs and SRMs, it was concluded that a lack of sample homogeneity was the cause of the

high RPDs. No corrective actions were taken.

The RPD for arsenic was high following the analysis of the dilution check analyzed in conjunction with sample

'DD3-E-02217'. Since the percent recoveries for arsenic were within acceptable QC limits for the corresponding LCS and

SRM, no corrective actions were taken.

TOC/TS - Methods Plumb, 1981/SM2540-G

These samples were prepared and analyzed within the recommended holding times.


No target compounds were detected in the method blanks above the LOQs.

The percent recovery for TOC was within acceptable QC limits for the SRM.

A matrix spike (MS) and a matrix spike duplicate (MSD) were prepared and analyzed in conjunction with sample

'DD5-M-022217'. The percent recoveries and RPD were within acceptable QC limits for the MS/MSD.

A matrix duplicate (MD) and a matrix triplicate (MT) were prepared and analyzed in conjunction with sample

'DD5-M-022217'. The RPD and %RSD were within acceptable QC limits for the MD and the MT.



entirety.

7 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-E-02217

17B0342-01 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB

Method: EPA 8082A Sampled: 02/22/2017 09:51

Instrument: ECD7 Analyzed: 03/03/2017 20:20

Preparation Batch: BFB0651

Prepared: 02/27/2017 14:55 Final Volume: 5 mL

Preparation Method: EPA 3546 (Microwave)Sample Preparation:

Sample Size: 7.21 g (wet) Dry Weight:5.83 g

% Solids: 80.91

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL

Initial Volume: 5 mL

Cleanup Method: Sulfuric Acid

Cleanup Batch: CFC0009

Cleaned: 02-Mar-2017

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL


Cleanup Method: Sulfur



Limit

Reporting

Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte

Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg17.16.912674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg17.16.911104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg17.16.911141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg17.16.953469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg17.16.912672-29-6 UAroclor 1248

25.21 ug/kg17.16.911097-69-1Aroclor 1254

17.21 ug/kg17.18.011096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg17.18.037324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg17.18.011100-14-4 UAroclor 1268

40-133 % 98.4 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl

53-120 % 90.1 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene

40-133 % 98.8 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]

53-120 % 100 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]



entirety.

8 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-E-02217

17B0342-01 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry

Method: SM 2540 G-97 Sampled: 02/22/2017 09:51

Instrument: N/A Analyzed: 02/27/2017 13:16


Prepared: 02/27/2017 10:51 Final Volume: 1 g

Preparation Method: No Prep Wet ChemSample Preparation:

Sample Size: 1 g (wet) Dry Weight:0.78 g

% Solids: 78.44

Limit

Reporting

Result Notes UnitsDilutionAnalyte CAS Number

78.441 %0.04Total Solids



entirety.

9 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-E-02217

17B0342-01RE1 (Solid)

Metals and Metallic Compounds

Method: EPA 6010C Sampled: 02/22/2017 09:51

Instrument: ICP2 Analyzed: 03/09/2017 10:19

Preparation Batch: BFC0180


Preparation Method: SWC EPA 3050BSample Preparation:


% Solids: 76.30

Analyte Limit

Reporting

Result Notes UnitsDilutionCAS Number

19.45 mg/kg15.97440-38-2 DArsenic

ND5 mg/kg0.6377440-43-9 UCadmium

20.05 mg/kg1.597440-47-3 DChromium

64.55 mg/kg0.6377440-50-8 DCopper

28.45 mg/kg6.377439-92-1 DLead

20.85 mg/kg3.197440-02-0 DNickel

ND5 mg/kg0.9567440-22-4 USilver

1535 mg/kg3.197440-66-6 DZinc



entirety.

10 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-E-02217

17B0342-01RE1 (Solid)


Method: EPA 7471B Sampled: 02/22/2017 09:51

Instrument: CETAC Analyzed: 03/10/2017 14:35



Preparation Method: SMM EPA 7471BSample Preparation:


% Solids: 76.30

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.31911 mg/kg0.028497439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

11 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-E-02217

17B0342-01RE1 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry

Method: Plumb 1981, Combustion IR Sampled: 02/22/2017 09:51

Instrument: APOLLO1 Analyzed: 03/08/2017 10:38





% Solids: 78.44

Limit

Reporting


0.291 %0.02Total Organic Carbon



entirety.

12 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-M-022217

17B0342-02 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 46.70

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg19.37.712674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg19.37.711104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg19.37.711141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg19.37.753469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg29.029.012672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248

69.81 ug/kg19.37.711097-69-1Aroclor 1254

76.11 ug/kg19.39.011096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg19.39.037324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg19.39.011100-14-4 UAroclor 1268

40-133 % 106 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl


40-133 % 101 %Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C]

53-120 % 98.4 %Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C]



entirety.

13 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-M-022217

17B0342-02 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 44.07

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

14 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-M-022217

17B0342-02 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 44.07

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

15 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-M-022217

17B0342-02RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 38.54

Analyte Limit

Reporting


49.62 mg/kg12.07440-38-2Arsenic

1.872 mg/kg0.4817440-43-9Cadmium

50.02 mg/kg1.207440-47-3Chromium

2462 mg/kg0.4817440-50-8Copper

1362 mg/kg4.817439-92-1Lead

47.12 mg/kg2.407440-02-0Nickel

0.7892 mg/kg0.7217440-22-4Silver

4282 mg/kg2.407440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

16 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-M-022217

17B0342-02RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 38.54

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.49091 mg/kg0.058447439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

17 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-W-022217

17B0342-03 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 76.39

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg18.47.412674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg18.47.411104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg18.47.411141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg18.47.453469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg18.47.412672-29-6 UAroclor 1248

73.91 ug/kg18.47.411097-69-1Aroclor 1254

3321 ug/kg18.48.611096-82-5 P1Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg18.48.637324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg18.48.611100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

18 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-W-022217

17B0342-03 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 75.30

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

19 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-W-022217

17B0342-03 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 75.30

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

20 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-W-022217

17B0342-03RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 73.22

Analyte Limit

Reporting


1875 mg/kg16.87440-38-2 DArsenic

0.8265 mg/kg0.6737440-43-9 DCadmium

40.75 mg/kg1.687440-47-3 DChromium

5115 mg/kg0.6737440-50-8 DCopper

5465 mg/kg6.737439-92-1 DLead

65.45 mg/kg3.367440-02-0 DNickel

1.915 mg/kg1.017440-22-4 DSilver

24705 mg/kg3.367440-66-6 DZinc



entirety.

21 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-W-022217

17B0342-03RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 73.22

Analyte Limit

Reporting


1.8221 mg/kg0.030627439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

22 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-W-022217-DUP

17B0342-04 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 77.85

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

23 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD3-W-022217-DUP

17B0342-04 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 77.85

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

24 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-E-022217

17B0342-05 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 39.90

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg19.07.612674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg19.07.611104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg19.07.611141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg19.07.653469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg19.07.612672-29-6 UAroclor 1248

64.01 ug/kg19.07.611097-69-1Aroclor 1254

47.11 ug/kg19.08.811096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg19.08.837324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg19.08.811100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

25 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-E-022217

17B0342-05 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 40.60

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

26 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-E-022217

17B0342-05 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 40.60

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

27 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-E-022217

17B0342-05RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 42.65

Analyte Limit

Reporting


32.05 mg/kg27.17440-38-2 DArsenic


35.95 mg/kg2.717440-47-3 DChromium

2375 mg/kg1.087440-50-8 DCopper

66.25 mg/kg10.87439-92-1 DLead

27.45 mg/kg5.417440-02-0 DNickel


3245 mg/kg5.417440-66-6 DZinc



entirety.

28 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-E-022217

17B0342-05RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 42.65

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.83741 mg/kg0.049267439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

29 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-E-022217-DUP

17B0342-06RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 35.82

Analyte Limit

Reporting


27.62 mg/kg13.27440-38-2Arsenic

1.442 mg/kg0.5277440-43-9Cadmium

41.92 mg/kg1.327440-47-3Chromium

2702 mg/kg0.5277440-50-8Copper

76.32 mg/kg5.277439-92-1Lead

33.92 mg/kg2.647440-02-0Nickel


3322 mg/kg2.647440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

30 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-E-022217-DUP

17B0342-06RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 35.82

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.98851 mg/kg0.059917439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

31 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-W-022217

17B0342-07 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 32.21

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg19.27.712674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg19.27.711104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg19.27.711141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg19.27.753469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg19.27.712672-29-6 UAroclor 1248

1601 ug/kg19.27.711097-69-1Aroclor 1254

1041 ug/kg19.28.911096-82-5 P1Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg19.28.937324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg19.28.911100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

32 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-W-022217

17B0342-07 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 32.65

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

33 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-W-022217

17B0342-07 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 32.65

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

34 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-W-022217

17B0342-07RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 31.08

Analyte Limit

Reporting


41.72 mg/kg15.67440-38-2Arsenic

2.272 mg/kg0.6267440-43-9Cadmium

70.12 mg/kg1.567440-47-3Chromium

2452 mg/kg0.6267440-50-8Copper

1522 mg/kg6.267439-92-1Lead

50.92 mg/kg3.137440-02-0Nickel


4532 mg/kg3.137440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

35 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-W-022217

17B0342-07RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 31.08

Analyte Limit

Reporting


1.3951 mg/kg0.071187439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

36 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-M-022217

17B0342-08 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 58.53

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg18.57.412674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg18.57.411104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg18.57.411141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg18.57.453469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg27.727.712672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248

65.81 ug/kg18.57.411097-69-1Aroclor 1254

57.41 ug/kg18.58.611096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg18.58.637324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg18.58.611100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

37 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-M-022217

17B0342-08 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 59.68

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

38 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-M-022217

17B0342-08 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 59.68

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

39 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-M-022217

17B0342-08RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 57.27

Analyte Limit

Reporting


23.82 mg/kg8.527440-38-2Arsenic

1.032 mg/kg0.3417440-43-9Cadmium

42.82 mg/kg0.8527440-47-3Chromium

1302 mg/kg0.3417440-50-8Copper

1032 mg/kg3.417439-92-1Lead

38.82 mg/kg1.707440-02-0Nickel


2222 mg/kg1.707440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

40 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD1-M-022217

17B0342-08RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 57.27

Analyte Limit

Reporting


1.2371 mg/kg0.039157439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

41 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-E-022217

17B0342-09 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 49.87

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg20.08.012674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg20.08.011104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg20.08.011141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg20.08.053469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg39.939.912672-29-6 Y1, UAroclor 1248

1431 ug/kg20.08.011097-69-1Aroclor 1254

1811 ug/kg20.09.311096-82-5 P1Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg20.09.337324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg20.09.311100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

42 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-E-022217

17B0342-09 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 45.04

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

43 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-E-022217

17B0342-09 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 45.04

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

44 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-E-022217

17B0342-09RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 42.84

Analyte Limit

Reporting


1215 mg/kg29.07440-38-2 DArsenic


61.35 mg/kg2.907440-47-3 DChromium

8155 mg/kg1.167440-50-8 DCopper

2195 mg/kg11.67439-92-1 DLead

59.05 mg/kg5.807440-02-0 DNickel


8085 mg/kg5.807440-66-6 DZinc



entirety.

45 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-E-022217

17B0342-09RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 42.84

Analyte Limit

Reporting


1.3921 mg/kg0.052347439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

46 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-M-022217

17B0342-10 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 24.14

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg19.67.812674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg19.67.811104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg19.67.811141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg19.67.853469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg19.67.812672-29-6 UAroclor 1248

93.11 ug/kg19.67.811097-69-1Aroclor 1254

76.91 ug/kg19.69.111096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg19.69.137324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg19.69.111100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

47 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-M-022217

17B0342-10 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 24.30

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

48 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-M-022217

17B0342-10RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 23.50

Analyte Limit

Reporting


32.72 mg/kg20.97440-38-2Arsenic

2.732 mg/kg0.8367440-43-9Cadmium

58.02 mg/kg2.097440-47-3Chromium

1992 mg/kg0.8367440-50-8Copper

79.72 mg/kg8.367439-92-1Lead

46.72 mg/kg4.187440-02-0Nickel


2902 mg/kg4.187440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

49 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-M-022217

17B0342-10RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 23.50

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.86051 mg/kg0.094567439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

50 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-M-022217

17B0342-10RE1 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 24.30

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

51 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-W-022217

17B0342-11 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 47.96

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg18.67.412674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg18.67.411104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg18.67.411141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg18.67.453469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg18.67.412672-29-6 UAroclor 1248

82.91 ug/kg18.67.411097-69-1Aroclor 1254

83.91 ug/kg18.68.611096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg18.68.637324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg18.68.611100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

52 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-W-022217

17B0342-11 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 47.99

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

53 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-W-022217

17B0342-11 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 47.99

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

54 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-W-022217

17B0342-11RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 45.75

Analyte Limit

Reporting


25.52 mg/kg10.87440-38-2Arsenic

0.8412 mg/kg0.4327440-43-9Cadmium

36.32 mg/kg1.087440-47-3Chromium

1302 mg/kg0.4327440-50-8Copper

70.42 mg/kg4.327439-92-1Lead

32.82 mg/kg2.167440-02-0Nickel


2172 mg/kg2.167440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

55 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD2-W-022217

17B0342-11RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 45.75

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.83131 mg/kg0.046707439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

56 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-W-022217

17B0342-12 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 32.79

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg18.97.612674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg18.97.611104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg18.97.611141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg18.97.653469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg37.837.812672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248

1711 ug/kg18.97.611097-69-1Aroclor 1254

1311 ug/kg18.98.811096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg18.98.837324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg18.98.811100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

57 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-W-022217

17B0342-12 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 33.22

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

58 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-W-022217

17B0342-12 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 33.22

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

59 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-W-022217

17B0342-12RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 31.72

Analyte Limit

Reporting


45.62 mg/kg14.47440-38-2Arsenic

2.222 mg/kg0.5787440-43-9Cadmium

67.72 mg/kg1.447440-47-3Chromium

3312 mg/kg0.5787440-50-8Copper

1052 mg/kg5.787439-92-1Lead

58.72 mg/kg2.897440-02-0Nickel


5012 mg/kg2.897440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

60 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-W-022217

17B0342-12RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 31.72

Analyte Limit

Reporting


1.4501 mg/kg0.057537439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

61 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-E-022217

17B0342-13 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 45.58

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg19.67.812674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg19.67.811104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg19.67.811141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg19.67.853469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg29.429.412672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248

1421 ug/kg19.67.811097-69-1Aroclor 1254

1221 ug/kg19.69.111096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg19.69.137324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg19.69.111100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

62 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-E-022217

17B0342-13 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 46.37

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

63 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-E-022217

17B0342-13 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 46.37

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

64 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-E-022217

17B0342-13RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 38.02

Analyte Limit

Reporting


33.65 mg/kg31.37440-38-2 DArsenic


43.05 mg/kg3.137440-47-3 DChromium

2955 mg/kg1.257440-50-8 DCopper

54.35 mg/kg12.57439-92-1 DLead

33.25 mg/kg6.267440-02-0 DNickel


3115 mg/kg6.267440-66-6 DZinc



entirety.

65 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-E-022217

17B0342-13RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 38.02

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.81491 mg/kg0.056207439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

66 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-M-022217

17B0342-14 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 26.82

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg19.67.812674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg19.67.811104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg19.67.811141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg19.67.853469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg39.239.212672-29-6 Y1, UAroclor 1248

1441 ug/kg19.67.811097-69-1Aroclor 1254

1361 ug/kg19.69.111096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg19.69.137324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg19.69.111100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

67 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-M-022217

17B0342-14 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 26.83

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

68 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-M-022217

17B0342-14 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 26.83

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

69 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-M-022217

17B0342-14RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 26.52

Analyte Limit

Reporting


35.22 mg/kg18.77440-38-2Arsenic

2.092 mg/kg0.7477440-43-9Cadmium

59.02 mg/kg1.877440-47-3Chromium

2322 mg/kg0.7477440-50-8Copper

90.02 mg/kg7.477439-92-1Lead

46.72 mg/kg3.737440-02-0Nickel


2922 mg/kg3.737440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

70 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD4-M-022217

17B0342-14RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 26.52

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.88451 mg/kg0.077597439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

71 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-E-022217

17B0342-15 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 25.92

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg19.27.712674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg19.27.711104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg19.27.711141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg19.27.753469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg28.828.812672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248

97.71 ug/kg19.27.711097-69-1Aroclor 1254

80.91 ug/kg19.28.911096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg19.28.937324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg19.28.911100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

72 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-E-022217

17B0342-15 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 25.94

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

73 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-E-022217

17B0342-15 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 25.94

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

74 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-E-022217

17B0342-15RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 25.68

Analyte Limit

Reporting


33.62 mg/kg18.77440-38-2Arsenic

1.812 mg/kg0.7477440-43-9Cadmium

61.22 mg/kg1.877440-47-3Chromium

1612 mg/kg0.7477440-50-8Copper

73.62 mg/kg7.477439-92-1Lead

45.22 mg/kg3.747440-02-0Nickel


2712 mg/kg3.747440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

75 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-E-022217

17B0342-15RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 25.68

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.74951 mg/kg0.086157439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

76 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-E-022217-DUP

17B0342-16 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 25.81

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg19.37.712674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg19.37.711104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg19.37.711141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg19.37.753469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg29.029.012672-29-6 Y1Aroclor 1248

1011 ug/kg19.37.711097-69-1Aroclor 1254

83.41 ug/kg19.39.011096-82-5Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg19.39.037324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg19.39.011100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

77 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-M-022217

17B0342-17 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 43.15

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg19.27.712674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg19.27.711104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg19.27.711141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg19.27.753469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg19.27.712672-29-6 UAroclor 1248

65.51 ug/kg19.27.711097-69-1Aroclor 1254

54.01 ug/kg19.28.911096-82-5 P1Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg19.28.937324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg19.28.911100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

78 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-M-022217

17B0342-17 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 41.93

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

79 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-M-022217

17B0342-17 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 41.93

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

80 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-M-022217

17B0342-17RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 25.15

Analyte Limit

Reporting


45.82 mg/kg19.37440-38-2Arsenic

1.972 mg/kg0.7717440-43-9Cadmium

66.12 mg/kg1.937440-47-3Chromium

2192 mg/kg0.7717440-50-8Copper

1012 mg/kg7.717439-92-1Lead

56.32 mg/kg3.867440-02-0Nickel


4492 mg/kg3.867440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

81 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-M-022217

17B0342-17RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 25.15

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.81461 mg/kg0.096987439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

82 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-W-022217

17B0342-18 (Solid)

Aroclor PCB







% Solids: 29.29

Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Sample Cleanup:

Final Volume: 5 mL





Limit

Reporting


Detection

LimitCAS Number

ND1 ug/kg19.87.912674-11-2 UAroclor 1016

ND1 ug/kg19.87.911104-28-2 UAroclor 1221

ND1 ug/kg19.87.911141-16-5 UAroclor 1232

ND1 ug/kg19.87.953469-21-9 UAroclor 1242

ND1 ug/kg19.87.912672-29-6 UAroclor 1248

84.91 ug/kg19.87.911097-69-1Aroclor 1254

80.01 ug/kg19.89.211096-82-5 P1Aroclor 1260

ND1 ug/kg19.89.237324-23-5 UAroclor 1262

ND1 ug/kg19.89.211100-14-4 UAroclor 1268







entirety.

83 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-W-022217

17B0342-18 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 28.97

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

84 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-W-022217

17B0342-18 (Solid)

Wet Chemistry







% Solids: 28.97

Limit

Reporting





entirety.

85 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-W-022217

17B0342-18RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 28.57

Analyte Limit

Reporting


33.62 mg/kg16.67440-38-2Arsenic

2.242 mg/kg0.6627440-43-9Cadmium

56.62 mg/kg1.667440-47-3Chromium

2002 mg/kg0.6627440-50-8Copper

75.62 mg/kg6.627439-92-1Lead

45.42 mg/kg3.317440-02-0Nickel


2992 mg/kg3.317440-66-6Zinc



entirety.

86 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



DD5-W-022217

17B0342-18RE1 (Solid)








% Solids: 28.57

Analyte Limit

Reporting


0.70621 mg/kg0.076767439-97-6Mercury



entirety.

87 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



Aroclor PCB - Quality Control

Batch BFB0651 - EPA 3546 (Microwave)

Instrument: ECD7

Result Limit

Reporting

Units Level

Spike

Result

Source

%REC

%REC

Limits RPD

RPD

Limit Notes QC Sample/Analyte

Detection

Limit

Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 03-Mar-2017 18:58Blank (BFB0651-BLK1)

20.0ND U8.0Aroclor 1016 ug/kg









40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 97.2 %40.038.9 ug/kg

53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene 87.0 %40.034.8 ug/kg

40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 95.0 %40.038.0 ug/kg

53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C] 98.4 %40.039.4 ug/kg

Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 03-Mar-2017 19:25LCS (BFB0651-BS1)

20.0408 52-12081.7 %5008.0Aroclor 1016 ug/kg

20.0431 57-12086.3 %5009.3Aroclor 1260 ug/kg

40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 99.6 %40.039.8 ug/kg

53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene 89.3 %40.035.7 ug/kg

40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 97.0 %40.038.8 ug/kg

53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C] 98.5 %40.039.4 ug/kg

Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 04-Mar-2017 00:52Source: 17B0342-10Matrix Spike (BFB0651-MS1)

19.7353 ND 52-12071.8 %4927.9Aroclor 1016 ug/kg

19.7436 111 57-12066.0 %4929.1Aroclor 1260 ug/kg

36.9 40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 97.2 %39.438.3 ug/kg

33.5 53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene 86.1 %39.433.9 ug/kg

37.4 40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 95.9 %39.437.7 ug/kg

35.5 53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C] 89.7 %39.435.3 ug/kg

Recovery limits for target analytes in MS/MSD QC samples are advisory only.

Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 04-Mar-2017 01:19Source: 17B0342-10Matrix Spike Dup (BFB0651-MSD1)

19.7335 ND 3052-12068.1 % 5.364927.9Aroclor 1016 ug/kg

19.7427 111 3057-12064.1 % 2.154929.1Aroclor 1260 ug/kg



entirety.

88 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



Aroclor PCB - Quality Control

Batch BFB0651 - EPA 3546 (Microwave)

Instrument: ECD7

Result Limit

Reporting

Units Level

Spike

Result

Source

%REC

%REC

Limits RPD

RPD


Detection

Limit

Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 04-Mar-2017 01:19Source: 17B0342-10Matrix Spike Dup (BFB0651-MSD1)

36.9 40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 91.0 %39.335.8 ug/kg

33.5 53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene 82.0 %39.332.2 ug/kg

37.4 40-133Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl [2C] 91.0 %39.335.8 ug/kg

35.5 53-120Surrogate: Tetrachlorometaxylene [2C] 85.9 %39.333.8 ug/kg




entirety.

89 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



Metals and Metallic Compounds - Quality Control

Batch BFC0180 - SWC EPA 3050B

Instrument: ICP2

Result Limit

Reporting

Units Level

Spike

Result

Source

%REC

%REC

Limits RPD

RPD


Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:00Blank (BFC0180-BLK1)

5.00ND UArsenic mg/kg

0.200ND UCadmium mg/kg

0.500ND UChromium mg/kg

0.200ND UCopper mg/kg

2.00ND ULead mg/kg

1.00ND UNickel mg/kg

0.300ND USilver mg/kg

1.00ND UZinc mg/kg

Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:36LCS (BFC0180-BS1)

5.00204 80-120102 %200Arsenic mg/kg

0.20049.6 80-12099.1 %50.0Cadmium mg/kg

0.50052.6 80-120105 %50.0Chromium mg/kg

0.20049.9 80-12099.7 %50.0Copper mg/kg

2.00204 80-120102 %200Lead mg/kg

1.0052.6 80-120105 %50.0Nickel mg/kg

0.30051.7 80-120103 %50.0Silver mg/kg

1.0052.2 80-120104 %50.0Zinc mg/kg

Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:23Source: 17B0342-01RE1Duplicate (BFC0180-DUP1)

15.919.0 19.4 202.10 DArsenic mg/kg

0.636ND ND U, DCadmium mg/kg

1.5922.8 20.0 2012.90 DChromium mg/kg

0.63677.5 64.5 2018.20 DCopper mg/kg

6.3636.3 28.4 2024.30 *, DLead mg/kg

3.1821.8 20.8 204.69 DNickel mg/kg

0.954ND ND USilver mg/kg

3.18138 153 2010.70 DZinc mg/kg

Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:28Source: 17B0342-01RE1Matrix Spike (BFC0180-MS1)

15.9280 19.4 75-125102 %255 DArsenic mg/kg

0.63765.5 ND 75-125102 %63.7 DCadmium mg/kg

1.5987.0 20.0 75-125105 %63.7 DChromium mg/kg

0.637125 64.5 75-12595.6 %63.7 DCopper mg/kg

6.37292 28.4 75-125103 %255 DLead mg/kg



entirety.

90 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103





Instrument: ICP2

Result Limit

Reporting

Units Level

Spike

Result

Source

%REC

%REC

Limits RPD

RPD



3.1987.8 20.8 75-125105 %63.7 DNickel mg/kg

0.95664.8 ND 75-125102 %63.7 DSilver mg/kg

3.19250 153 75-125153 %63.7 *, DZinc mg/kg


Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:32Source: 17B0342-01RE1Matrix Spike Dup (BFC0180-MSD1)

16.0286 19.4 2075-125104 % 2.13256 DArsenic mg/kg

0.64066.1 ND 2075-125103 % 0.8864.0 DCadmium mg/kg

1.6088.2 20.0 2075-125107 % 1.2964.0 DChromium mg/kg

0.640124 64.5 2075-12592.9 % 1.1864.0 DCopper mg/kg

6.40295 28.4 2075-125104 % 1.11256 DLead mg/kg

3.2084.1 20.8 2075-12598.9 % 4.3464.0 DNickel mg/kg

0.96067.0 ND 2075-125105 % 3.3064.0 DSilver mg/kg

3.20227 153 2075-125115 % 9.9264.0 DZinc mg/kg


Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 12:12Source: 17B0342-01RE1Post Spike (BFC0180-PS1)

5.27 153 80-120115 %2.50 DZinc mg/kg

Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:15Source: 17B0342-01RE1Dilution Check (BFC0180-SRL1)

79.7ND 19.4 1018.80 U, DArsenic mg/kg

3.19ND ND U, DCadmium mg/kg

7.9720.7 20.0 103.66 DChromium mg/kg

3.1964.7 64.5 100.21 DCopper mg/kg

31.9ND 28.4 105.35 U, DLead mg/kg

15.922.5 20.8 107.63 DNickel mg/kg

4.78ND ND USilver mg/kg

15.9162 153 105.78 DZinc mg/kg

Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 09-Mar-2017 10:04SRM: E001354Reference (BFC0180-SRM1)

4.99125 78.7-121.9110 %114Arsenic mg/kg

0.19997.6 82.8-117105 %93.2Cadmium mg/kg

0.499115 79.7-120.2105 %109Chromium mg/kg

0.199124 81.2-118102 %122Copper mg/kg

1.99107 81.3-117.6105 %102Lead mg/kg



entirety.

91 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103





Instrument: ICP2

Result Limit

Reporting

Units Level

Spike

Result

Source

%REC

%REC

Limits RPD

RPD



0.99785.0 82.9-117.2107 %79.7Nickel mg/kg

0.29942.5 75.4-124.6102 %41.8Silver mg/kg

0.997243 81.9-118.5107 %227Zinc mg/kg



entirety.

92 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103




Batch BFC0181 - SMM EPA 7471B

Instrument: CETAC

Result Limit

Reporting

Units Level

Spike

Result

Source

%REC

%REC

Limits RPD

RPD


Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 10-Mar-2017 13:19Blank (BFC0181-BLK1)

0.02500ND UMercury mg/kg

Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 10-Mar-2017 13:21LCS (BFC0181-BS1)

0.025000.5750 80-120115 %0.5000Mercury mg/kg

Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 10-Mar-2017 14:37Source: 17B0342-01RE1Duplicate (BFC0181-DUP1)

0.028870.2569 0.3191 2021.60 *Mercury mg/kg


0.028870.7015 0.3191 75-125132 %0.2887 *Mercury mg/kg


Prepared: 08-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 10-Mar-2017 14:40Source: 17B0342-01RE1Matrix Spike Dup (BFC0181-MSD1)

0.028870.9757 0.3191 2075-125227 % 32.700.2887 *Mercury mg/kg



0.25009.475 72-128.2101 %9.360 DMercury mg/kg



entirety.

93 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



Wet Chemistry - Quality Control

Batch BFB0656 - No Prep Wet Chem

Instrument: APOLLO1

Result Limit

Reporting

Units Level

Spike

Result

Source

%REC

%REC

Limits RPD

RPD


Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 09:39Blank (BFB0656-BLK1)

0.02ND UTotal Organic Carbon %

0.04ND UTotal Solids %

Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 14:39Source: 17B0342-17Duplicate (BFB0656-DUP1)

0.021.54 1.79 2014.70Total Organic Carbon %

0.0445.66 41.93 208.51Total Solids %

Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 14:46Source: 17B0342-17Duplicate (BFB0656-DUP2)

0.021.73 1.79 203.52Total Organic Carbon %

0.0444.56 41.93 206.09Total Solids %

Prepared: 06-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 15:05Source: 17B0342-17Matrix Spike (BFB0656-MS1)

0.025.92 1.79 75-125115 %3.60Total Organic Carbon %


Prepared: 06-Mar-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 15:12Source: 17B0342-17Matrix Spike Dup (BFB0656-MSD1)

0.025.71 1.79 20075-12591.1 % 3.744.30Total Organic Carbon %


Prepared: 27-Feb-2017 Analyzed: 08-Mar-2017 10:19SRM: E007832DL (BFB0656-SRM2)

0.022.40 75-12589.2 %2.69Total Organic Carbon %



entirety.

94 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



Certified Analyses included in this Report

CertificationsAnalyte

EPA 6010C in Solid

NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAPSilver

NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAP,ADECArsenic

NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAP,ADECCadmium

NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAP,ADECChromium

NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAPCopper

NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAP,ADECNickel

NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAP,ADECLead

NELAP,WADOE,DoD-ELAPZinc

EPA 7471B in Solid

WADOE,NELAP,DoD-ELAP,CALAPMercury

EPA 8082A in Solid

WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1016

WADOE,DoD-ELAP,NELAP,CALAP,ADECAroclor 1016 [2C]

















Plumb 1981, Combustion IR in Solid

DoD-ELAPTotal Organic Carbon



entirety.

95 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



Code Description Number Expires

UST-033Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation 05/06/2017ADEC

2748California Department of Public Health CAELAP 02/28/2018CALAP

66169DoD-Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program 03/30/2017DoD-ELAP

WA100006ORELAP - Oregon Laboratory Accreditation Program 05/11/2017NELAP

C558WA Dept of Ecology 06/30/2017WADOE

C558Ecology - Drinking Water 06/30/2017WA-DW



entirety.

96 of 97

Project:

Project Number:

Project Manager:

Reported:

Kane Environmental


Nate Evenson

Navy

17-Mar-2017 10:10Seattle, WA 98103



Notes and Definitions

Flagged value is not within established control limits.*

The reported value is from a dilutionD

Estimated concentration value detected below the reporting limit.J

The reported value is greater than 40% difference between the concentrations determined on two GC columns where applicable.P1

This analyte is not detected above the applicable reporting or detection limit.U

Raised reporting limit due to interferenceY1

Sample results reported on a dry weight basis

Relative Percent DifferenceRPD

dry

Not ReportedNR

Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limitND

Analyte DETECTEDDET

[2C] Indicates this result was quantified on the second column on a dual column analysis.

97 of 97

ATTACHMENT C DATA VALIDATION REPORT

DATA QUALITY REPORT

PRE-CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT SAMPLING FOR SALTWATER DISTRIBUTION PIPING REPLACEMENT

PUGET SOUND NAVAL SHIPYARD - NAVAL BASE KITSAP-BREMERTON

Kane Project # MOMS7451696

Prepared for: Kane Environmental

3815 Woodland Park Avenue, Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98103

Prepared by: EcoChem, Inc.

1011 Western Ave., Suite 1006 Seattle, Washington 98104

EcoChem Project Number: C25105-2

April 13, 2017

Approved for Release:

Christina Mott Frans Senior Project Chemist

PROJECT NARRATIVE

BASIS FOR DATA VALIDATION

This report documents the results of summary data validation (EPA Stage 2B) performed on sediment sample data collected in support of the Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Distribution Piping Replacement Project at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. This data set includes analytical results for sediment samples and the associated laboratory and field quality control analyses (method blanks, laboratory control samples, laboratory duplicates, and matrix spikes). A complete list of samples is provided in the SAMPLE INDEX.

Samples were analyzed by Analytical Resources, Incorporated, Tukwila, Washington. Data were validated by the following EcoChem, Inc. chemists.

TEST METHOD PRIMARY REVIEW CHEMISTS

SECONDARY REVIEWCHEMIST

Polychlorinated Biphenyl Compounds (PCBs) SW8082A E. Clayton C. Frans

Total Metals SW6010C SW7471B

The data were reviewed using guidance and quality control criteria documented in the analytical methods, the USEPA National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (Aug 2014), and the USEPA National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Inorganic Data Review, (USEPA, Final January 2010).

Sample results and related QC data were received in both electronic and portable document format (pdf) format. The laboratory electronic data deliverables (EDD) were verified against the hard copy data packages prior to validation.

For each data package, a Summary level of review was performed. A summary level is equivalent to an USEPA CLP “QA Level III” level of effort. The validation level for each sample is provided in the database.

EcoChem’s goal in assigning data assessment qualifiers is to assist in proper data interpretation. If values are estimated (J or UJ), data may be used for site evaluation and risk assessment purposes but reasons for data qualification should be taken into consideration when interpreting sample concentrations. If values are assigned an R, the data are to be rejected and should not be used for any site evaluation purposes. If values have no data qualifier assigned, then the data meet the data quality objectives as stated in the documents and methods referenced above.

Data qualifier definitions, reason codes, and validation criteria are included as Appendix A. A Qualified Data Summary Table is included in Appendix B. Data Validation Worksheets will be kept on file at EcoChem, Inc. Qualified laboratory electronic data deliverables (EDD) have already been submitted prior to this report.

Sample IndexPre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Distribution Piping Replacement

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard - Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton

SDG Sample ID Laboratory ID PCBs MetalsDD3-E-022217 17B0342-01

DD3-M-022217 17B0342-02

DD3-W-022217 17B0342-03

DD1-E-022217 17B0342-05

DD1-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-06

DD1-W-022217 17B0342-07

DD1-M-022217 17B0342-08

DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09

DD2-M-022217 17B0342-10

DD2-W-022217 17B0342-11

DD4-W-022217 17B0342-12

DD4-E-022217 17B0342-13

DD4-M-022217 17B0342-14

DD5-E-022217 17B0342-15

DD5-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-16

DD5-M-022217 17B0342-17

DD5-W-022217 17B0342-18

17B0342

4/13/2017Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\sidx_qdst.xlsxPage 1 of 1 EcoChem, Inc.

cmf 4/13/2017 PCB Aroclors - 1 EcoChem, Inc. Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\25105-2 PCB_Aroclors Report.docx

DATA VALIDATION REPORT PSNS – Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling

PCB Aroclors by Method SW8082A

This report documents the review of analytical data from the analyses of sediment samples and the associated laboratory and field quality control (QC) samples. Samples were analyzed by ARI Laboratories, Tukwila, Washington. Refer to the Sample Index for a complete list of samples.

SDG Number of Samples

Validation Level

17B0342 18 Sediment Stage 2B

I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS

The laboratory submitted all required deliverables. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative.

II. EDD TO HARDCOPY VERIFICATION

Ten percent (10%) of the results in the laboratory EDD were verified by comparison to the laboratory data package. No errors were noted.

III. TECHNICAL DATA VALIDATION

The QC requirements that were reviewed are listed in the following table

Sample Receipt, Preservation, and Holding Times Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) Initial Calibration (ICAL) 1 Field Duplicates Continuing Calibration (CCAL) Target Analyte List Laboratory Blanks 1 Reporting Limits 1 Field Blanks 2 Compound Identification 1 Surrogate Compounds 1 Reported Results Matrix Spikes/Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD) Stated method quality objectives (MQO) and QC criteria have been met. No outliers are noted or discussed. 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.

Initial Calibration

Initial calibration (ICAL) standards were analyzed at the required frequency and the percent difference (%D) values were within the control limit of 20%.


Continuing Calibration

All continuing calibration (CCAL) percent difference (%D) values were within the 20% control limit.

Laboratory Blanks

Method blanks were analyzed at the required frequency of one per batch of 20 or fewer samples. No analytes were detected in the method blanks.

Field Blanks

No field blanks were included with this data set.

Surrogate Compound

The surrogate compounds decachlorobiphenyl and tetrachloro-m-xylene were added to all samples. All surrogate recovery values were within the laboratory control limits with the following exception.

The %D value for decachlorobiphenyl exceeded the acceptance criteria for the second source initial calibration verification analyzed on 3/02/17. The associated Aroclor compounds were unaffected. No qualification was required.

Matrix Spikes/Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD)

Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) samples were analyzed at the appropriate frequency of one pair per batch of 20 or fewer samples. All MS/MSD recovery values were within the laboratory control limits.

Laboratory Control Samples

Laboratory control samples (LCS) were analyzed at the required frequency of one per batch of 20 or fewer samples. All LCS recovery values were within the laboratory control limits.

Field Duplicates

Samples DD5-E-022217 and DD5-E-022217-DUP were identified as field duplicates. All acceptance criteria were met.

Target Analyte List

Results were reported for all compounds on the target analyte list.

Reporting Limits

Most samples had elevated detection limits for Aroclor 1248.


Compound Identification

As required by the method, the laboratory analyzed any samples with positive detections on a confirmatory column. The results from the two analytical columns were compared for agreement. An elevated RPD value may indicate the presence of an interference resulting in a high bias. When an RPD value was greater than 40% but less than 60% the reported value was estimated (J-3). If the RPD value was greater than 60%, the result was qualified as a tentative identification (NJ-3). With the following exceptions, the second column confirmation RPD values (%D) values were less than 40%.

SAMPLE ID ANALYTE RPD ACTION DD3-W-022217 Aroclor 1260 46.4 J-3 DD1-W-022217 Aroclor 1260 52.1 J-3 DD2-E-022217 Aroclor 1260 63.5 NJ-3 DD5-M-022217 Aroclor 1260 43.6 J-3 DD5-W-022217 Aroclor 1260 123 J-3

Reported Results

The chromatograms for several samples indicated non-target background interference for Aroclor 1248. The RL for these analytes were flagged “Y” by the laboratory. These “Y” flagged results were qualified (U-22) to indicate that the reported value represents a non-detect at an elevated RL. Aroclor 1248 was qualified for the following samples:

DD3-M-022217 DD1-M-022217 DD2-E-022217 DD4-W-022217 DD4-E-022217 DD4-M-022217 DD5-E-022217

DD5-E-022217-DUP

IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT

As determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical method. Accuracy was acceptable as demonstrated by the surrogate, LCS, and MS/MSD percent recovery values. Precision was also acceptable as demonstrated by the MS/MSD and field duplicate relative percent difference values.

Detection limits were elevated based on matrix interference. Results were qualified due to secondary column confirmation RPD outliers.

All data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.

MPH 3/27/2013 MET - 1 EcoChem, Inc. Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\25105-2_Metals_Sediment.docx

DATA VALIDATION REPORT PSNS – Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling

Metals by EPA Methods SW6010C & SW7471A

This report documents the review of analytical data from the analyses of sediment samples and the associated laboratory and field quality control (QC) samples. Samples were analyzed by Analytical Resources, Inc., Seattle, Washington.

SDG NUMBER OF SAMPLES VALIDATION LEVEL 17B0342 16 Sediment EPA Stage 2B

I. DATA PACKAGE COMPLETENESS

The laboratory submitted all required deliverables. The laboratory followed adequate corrective action processes and all anomalies were discussed in the case narrative. The calibration information for the mercury analyses on 3/10/17 were missing from the laboratory report. The laboratory was contacted and submitted the missing calibration summary forms.

II. EDD TO HARDCOPY VERIFICATION

A representative (10%) verification of the electronic data deliverable (EDD) sample and QC results was performed by comparison to the pdf laboratory data package. No errors were noted.

III. TECHNICAL DATA VALIDATION

The QC requirements that were reviewed are listed below.

Sample Receipt, Preservation, & Holding Times 2 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD) Initial Calibration 2 Laboratory Duplicates Continuing Calibration Verification 1 Field Duplicates ICP-MS Tune Interference Check Samples LLICV Standards Serial Dilutions 1 Laboratory Blanks 1 Reporting Limits (MDL and MRL) 1 Field Blanks Reported Results Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) Stated method quality objectives (MQO) and QC criteria have been met. No outliers are noted or discussed. 1 Quality control results are discussed below, but no data were qualified. 2 Quality control outliers that impact the reported data were noted. Data qualifiers were issued as discussed below.


Laboratory Blanks

Several instrument blanks had values greater than the method detection limit for cadmium, chromium, silver, and mercury. All associated sample results were greater than the 5X action level; therefore, no qualification was required.

Field Blanks

No field blanks were collected with this analytical data set.

Matrix Spikes

Matrix spike samples (MS) were analyzed at the proper frequency of one per 20 samples or one per batch. For accuracy, where analyte concentrations were less than 4x the spike amount, the percent recovery (%R) values were evaluated. If the percent recovery values indicate a potential low bias, associated results are estimated (J/UJ-8L). If the %R values indicate a potential high bias, only the associated positive results are estimated (J-8H). If one %R value indicates a potential low bias and the other %R value indicates a potential high bias, the data were estimated with no bias indication (J/UJ-8). In addition, no qualifiers were added for single outlier in the MS or MSD only.

Precision is indicated by the relative percent difference (RPD) between the MS and MSD values. RPD values outside the control limit of 20% indicate uncertainty in the measured results for the sample and positive results are estimated (J-9).

Although various elements exhibited recoveries outside the control limits, only the following required qualification in the associated samples:

PARENT SAMPLE ELEMENT MS %R

MSD %R RPD POTENTIAL

BIAS ACTION

DD3-E-02217 Mercury 132 227 33 High J-8H,9

Laboratory Duplicates

Laboratory duplicate (LD) samples were analyzed at the proper frequency of one per 20 samples or one per batch. Where analyte concentrations were less than 5x the reporting limit, the differences were calculated and evaluated. Where analyte concentrations were greater than 5x the reporting limit, the relative percent difference (RPD) values were calculated and evaluated with a control limit of 20%.

Laboratory duplicate RPD values greater than the control limit are listed below:

PARENT SAMPLE ELEMENT RPD ACTION

DD3-E-02217 Lead 24.3 J-9 Mercury 21.6 J-9


Field Duplicates

Samples DD1-E-022217 and DD1-E-022217-DUP were identified as field duplicates. All acceptance criteria were met.

Reporting Limits

Several samples were analyzed at required dilutions that affected method detection and reporting limits.

IV. OVERALL ASSESSMENT

As was determined by this evaluation, the laboratory followed the specified analytical methods. With the exceptions noted above, accuracy was acceptable as demonstrated by the laboratory control sample and matrix spike percent recovery values and precision was acceptable as demonstrated by the MS/MSD and laboratory and field duplicate RPD values.

Data were estimated based on matrix spike accuracy as well as matrix spike and laboratory duplicate precision outliers.

All data, as qualified, are acceptable for use.

W:\APPENDICES\APPENDIX A.docx

APPENDIX A

DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS

REASON CODES

AND CRITERIA TABLES

4/16/09 PM EcoChem, Inc. T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\Qualifiers & Reason Codes\NFG Qual Defs.docx

DATA VALIDATION QUALIFIER CODES Based on National Functional Guidelines

The following definitions provide brief explanations of the qualifiers assigned to results in the data review process.

U The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit.

J The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.

NJ The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte that has been “tentatively identified” and the associated numerical value represents the approximate concentration.

UJ The analyte was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. However, the reported quantitation limit is approximate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation necessary to accurately and precisely measure the analyte in the sample.

R The sample results are rejected due to serious deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and meet quality control criteria. The presence or absence of the analyte cannot be verified.

The following is an EcoChem qualifier that may also be assigned during the data review process:

DNR Do not report; a more appropriate result is reported from another analysis or dilution.

T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\Qualifiers & Reason Codes\Reason Codes-EcoChem rev2.docx EcoChem, Inc.

DATA QUALIFIER REASON CODES

Group Code Reason for Qualification

Sample Handling 1 Improper Sample Handling or Sample Preservation (i.e., headspace, cooler temperature, pH, summa canister pressure); Exceeded Holding Times

Instrument Performance

24 Instrument Performance (i.e., tune, resolution, retention time window, endrin breakdown, lock-mass)

5A Initial Calibration (RF, %RSD, r2)

5B Calibration Verification (CCV, CCAL; RF, %D, %R) Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate

5C Initial Calibration Verification (ICV %D, %R) Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate

Blank Contamination

6 Field Blank Contamination (Equipment Rinsate, Trip Blank, etc.)

7 Lab Blank Contamination (i.e., method blank, instrument blank, etc.) Use low bias flag (L)1 for negative instrument blanks

Precision and Accuracy

8 Matrix Spike (MS and/or MSD) Recoveries Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate

9 Precision (all replicates: LCS/LCSD, MS/MSD, Lab Replicate, Field Replicate)

10 Laboratory Control Sample Recoveries (a.k.a. Blank Spikes) Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate

12 Reference Material Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate

13 Surrogate Spike Recoveries (a.k.a. labeled compounds, recovery standards) Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate

Interferences

16 ICP/ICP-MS Serial Dilution Percent Difference

17 ICP/ICP-MS Interference Check Standard Recovery Use bias flags (H,L)1 where appropriate

19 Internal Standard Performance (i.e., area, retention time, recovery)

22 Elevated Detection Limit due to Interference (i.e., chemical and/or matrix)

23 Bias from Matrix Interference (i.e. diphenyl ether, PCB/pesticides)

Identification and Quantitation

2 Chromatographic pattern in sample does not match pattern of calibration standard

3 2nd column confirmation (RPD or %D)

4 Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) (associated with NJ only)

20 Calibration Range or Linear Range Exceeded

25 Compound Identification (i.e., ion ratio, retention time, relative abundance, etc.)

Miscellaneous

11 A more appropriate result is reported (multiple reported analyses i.e., dilutions, re-extractions, etc. Associated with “R” and “DNR” only)

14 Other (See DV report for details)

26 Method QC information not provided

1 H = high bias indicated

L = low bias indicated

Table No.: NFG-PCBRevision No.: 5

Last Rev. Date: 12/21/14Page: 1 of 3

QC Element Acceptance Criteria (NFG) Source of Criteria Action for Non-Conformance Reason

Code Discussion and Comments

Sample Cooler/Storage TemperaturePreservation

4°C ± 2°CTissue/sediments (may be frozen -20°C)

NFG (1)

Method (2)If required by project:

J (pos)/UJ (ND) if greater than 6° C 1Use Professional Judgment (PJ) to qualify

for temperature outlier.Current SW846 criterion is ≤ 6° C (3)

Holding Time

Extraction Aqueous: 7 days from collectionExtraction Solid: 14 days from collection

Exraction Tissue/Sediment (frozen): 1 yearAnalysis (all matrices): 40 days from extraction

NFG (1)

Method (2)

If required by project:J (pos)/UJ (ND) if ext/analyzed > HTJ (pos)/R (ND) if gross exceedance

(> 2x HT)

1

Use PJ to qualify for holding time outlier.Current SW846 does not have an extraction holding time limit. (3)

Gross exceedance > 2x HT, as per NFG 1999


RetentionTimes

Surrogates: TCMX (± 0.05); DCB (± 0.10)Aroclors (± 0.07) NFG (1) NJ (pos)/R (ND) results for analytes with

RT shifts 24

Initial Calibration

Minimum 5 point with RSD ≤ 20% ORcorrelation coefficient (r-value) ≥ 0.995 OR

Minimum 6-point with co-efficient of determination (r2-value) ≥ 0.99

NFG (1)

Method (4)

J (pos) if %RSD greater than 20% ORr-value < 0.995 OR

r2-value < 0.995A

Refer to TM-01 for additional information.

Use bias flags (H,L)(5) where appropriate

Initial CalibrationVerification (ICV)

No NFG criteria.Project specific. Project J (pos) if > UCL

J (pos)/UJ (ND) if < LCL 5B Use bias flags (H,L) where appropriate


(Prior to each 12 hr. shift)

%D ± 20% Method (2) If > 20% (high bias): J (pos) If <20% (low bias: J (pos)/UJ (ND) 5B


Use bias flags (H,L) where appropriate

Blank Contamination

Method Blank (MB)

MB: One per matrix per batch of (of ≤ 20 samples)

No detected compounds > RL

NFG (1)

Method (2)

U (pos)if result is less than appropriate 5X action

level.7

Field Blank (FB) FB: frequency as per QAPPNo detected compounds > RL

NFG (1)

Method (2)


level.6

InstrumentBlanks (IB)

Analyzed at the beginning and end of every 12 hour sequence

No analyte > CRQLNFG (1)


level.7

PCB Aroclors by GC(Based on Organic NFG 2008 and SW-846 Method 8082A)

Hierarchy of blank review:#1 - Review MB and IB, qualify as

needed#2 - Review FB , qualify as needed

Note: Actions as per NFG 1999

Note: IB not required by method

Y:\EC Organize\EcoChem QA Program\SOPs_QMP_CT_WIN_TM Source Docs\Criteria Tables\ EcoChem NFG PCB_Rev5.xlsx Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.







MS/MSD(recovery)

One set per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples)AR1016 and AR1260: %R = 29% - 135%, or

project limits

NFG (1)

Method (2)

Qualify parent only unless other QC indicates

systematic problems.J (pos) if both %R > upper control limit

(UCL) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if both %R < lower control

limit (LCL)J (pos)/R (ND) if both %R < 10%

8

No action if only one spike %R is outside criteria.

No action if native analyte conc. > 5x the amount spiked.

Use bias flags (H,L) where appropriate.Actions apply to all Aroclors in parent

sample.

MS/MSD(RPD)

One set per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples)AR1016: RPD < 15%, AR1260: RPD < 20%

or project limits

NFG (1)

Method (2)

Qualify parent only unless other QC indicates

systematic problems.J (pos) if RPD > control limit

9 No action if parent is ND.

LCSOne per lab batch (of ≤ 20 samples)

AR1016 and AR1260: %R = 50% - 150%, or project limits

NFG (1)J (pos) if %R > UCL J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R

< LCLJ (pos)/R (ND) if %R < 10%

10Use bias flags (H,L) where appropriate.

Actions apply to all Aroclors in associated samples.

LCS/LCSD (RPD) if analyzed use MS/MSD RPD criteria NFG (1) J (pos) assoc. compound in all samples 9 LCSD not required by method or NFG


SurrogatesTCMX and DCBP added to every sample

%R = 30% - 150%or project limits

NFG (1)

Method (2)

J (pos) if either %R > UCL J (pos)/UJ (ND) if either %R < LCLJ (pos)/R (ND) if either %R < 10%

13If %R < 10% (sample dilution is a factor),

use PJ Use bias flags (H,L) where appropriate

Internal Standards(if used)

Acceptable Range: IS area = 50% to 200% of CCAL area

RT within 30 seconds of CC RTMethod (2)

J (pos) if area > 200%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if area < 50%J (pos)/R (ND) if area < 25%

RT > 30 seconds, narrate

19

Field Duplicates

Solids: RPD < 50%OR difference < 2X RL (for results < 5X RL)

Aqueous: RPD < 35%OR difference < 1X RL (for results < 5X RL)

EcoChemJ (pos)/UJ (ND)

Qualify only parent and field duplicate samples

9 use project limits if specified







Compound Identification/Quantification

Quantitation/Identification

Between two columns: RPD < 40% or %D < 25% Within Retention Time Windows on both

columns.

NFG (1)

Method (2)

J (pos) if RPD = 40% - 60% (25% - 60% for %D)

NJ (pos) if > 60%R (pos) if RTW criterion not met

3 See TM-08 for additional info.

Calibration Range on column concentration < high calibration standard

NFG (1)

Method (2)J (pos) if conc > high standard and

sample was not diluted 20

Dilutions, Re-extractions

and/or Reanalyses

Report only one result peranalyte

Standard reporting policy

Use "DNR" to flag results that will not be reported. 11 TM-04 Rev. 1 for additional info.

Sample Clean-up

GPC/Sulfur/Florisil/Acid

No criteria - cleanups are optional

NFG (1)

Method (2) Use Professional Judgment 14

special cleanups may be required for project

cleanup standards may be associated with GPC/florisil cleanups

1 National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review, June, 20082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography USEPA Method SW846 8082A, Feb 2007, Rev. 13 SW846, Chapter 4, Organic Analytes4 Determinative Chromatographic Separations , Method 8000C , March 2003, Rev.35 "H" = high bias indicated; "L" = low bias indicated


DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table: NFG ICP-AES Revision: 1


QC Element EcoChem Acceptance CriteriaSource of Criteria

EcoChem Action for Non-ConformanceReason Code

Discussion and Comments

Sample Handling

Cooler / Storage TemperaturePreservation

Solid: Cooler temperature 4°C±2°CAqueous: Nitric Acid to pH < 2

Dissolved Metals: 0.45 µm filter,preserve to pH < 2 after filtration

NFG (1)

Method (2)

Cooler Temps: If required by projectJ (pos)/UJ (ND) if greater than 6° CAqueous: J (pos)/UJ (ND) if pH > 2

1

Use PJ to qualify for temperature outlier.Current SW846 criterion is ≤ 6° C (4)

No quals for pH if samples preserved by lab upon receipt and within 1 day of collection.

Holding TimeAll matrices: 180 days from date sampled

Frozen soils, sediments, tissues (-20°C) - HT extended to 1 year

NFG (1)

Method (2)

EcoChem standard policy

J (pos)/UJ (ND) if holding time exceeded 1


Initial Calibration (ICAL)

Based on instrument requirements, blank + 1 standard minimum requirement for calibration

If more than 1 standard used, r ≥ 0.995

NFG (1)

Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if r < 0.995 5A


Independent source analyzed immediately after calibration

%R within ± 10% of true value

NFG (1)

Method (2)

R (pos/ND) if %R < 75%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R 75% - 89%

J (pos) if %R >111% 5A (H,L)3 Qualify all samples in run

Reporting Limit (RL) Standard

Low Level ICV/CCV

concentration at RL %R = 70%-130%

Method (2)J (pos) < 2x RL / R (ND) if %R <50%

J (pos) < 2x RL / UJ (ND) if %R 50 - 69% J (pos) < 2x RL if %R > 130%

5A (H,L)3 Qualify all samples in run

Continuing CalibrationVerification (CCV)

Immediately following ICV/ICB,then every two hours or ten samples, and at end

of run.%R within ± 10% of true value

NFG (1)

Method (2)

R (pos/ND) if %R < 75%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R 75% - 89%

J (pos) if %R >111% 5B (H,L)3 Qualify samples bracketed by CCV outliers

Interference Check Samples

(ICSA / ICSAB)

ICSAB %R 80% - 120% for all spiked elements| ICSA | < MDL for all unspiked elements

NFG (1)

Method (2)

For samples with Al, Ca, Fe, Mg > ICS levels:ICSAB: J( pos)/R (ND) if %R < 50%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R = 50% - 79%

J (pos) if %R > 120% ICSA: J (pos)< 2x ICSA/UJ (ND) for ICSA <Neg

MDLJ (pos) < 2x ICSA for ICSA > MDL

17 (H,L)3Use PJ and inter-element correction factors toevaluate ICSA to determine if bias is present.Refer to TM-09 for additional information.

Metals by ICP-AES(Based on Inorganic NFG 2010 and SW-846 6010C)

T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\EcoChem Default Criteria Tables\EcoChem NFG ICP-AES_Rev 1.xlsxICP Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.







Blank Contamination

Method Blank (MB)One per matrix per batch of (of ≤ 20 samples)

Blank conc < MDLNFG (1)

Method (2)

U (pos) if result is < 5X method blank concentration

7Refer to TM-02 for additional information.

Blank Evaluation based on NFG 1994

Instrument Blanks(ICB/CCB)

After each ICV & CCV| blank concentration | < MDL

NFG (1)

Method (2)

Action level is 5x absolutevalue of blank conc.For positive blanks:

U (pos) results < action levelFor negative blanks:

J (pos)/UJ (ND) results < action level

Pos Blanks: 7

Neg Blanks:

7L3

Use blanks bracketing samples for QualificationRefer to TM-02 for additional information.

Hierarchy of blank review:#1 - Review MB, quaify as needed#2 - Review IB , qualify as needed#3 - Review FB , qualify as needed

Field Blank (FB) Blank conc < MDLEcoChem

standard policyU (pos) if result is < 5x action level,

as per analyte.6

Qualify in associated field samples only.Refer to TM-02 for additional information.


LCS(recovery)

One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples); LCSD not required

%R between 80-120%Method (2)

J (pos)/R (ND) if %R <50% J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R 50% - 79%

J (pos) if %R > 120% 10 (H,L)3

Qualify all samples in batchQAPP may have overriding accuracy limits.

NFG Limits 70% -130% (50% - 150% Ab, Ag)

LCS/LCSD(RPD)

LCSD not required, if analyzed:RPD ≤ 20%

Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% 9Qualify all samples in batch

QAPP may have overriding precision limits.

MS/MSD(recovery)

One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples); MSD not required

%R between 75-125%

NFG (1)

Method (2)

J (pos) if %R > 125%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R <75%J (pos)/R (ND) if %R < 30%,

unless post digestion spike analyzed,J (pos)/UJ (ND) if post digestion spike %R OK

8 (H,L)3


NA if parent concentration >4x the amount spiked.

Qualify all samples in batch.QAPP may have overriding accuracy limits.








Precision and Accuracy con't

Post Digestion SpikesIf MS is outside 75-125%, post-spike should be

analyzed%R 80%-120% (method); 75%-125% (NFG)

NFG (1)

Method (2)

Only used to support MS qualification decisions

NANo qualifiers assigned based solely on this

element.

MS/MSD(RPD)

MSD not required, if analyzed:RPD ≤ 20%

NFG (1)

Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% 9 QAPP may have overriding precision limits.

Laboratory Duplicate

One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples)RPD ≤ 20% for results ≥ 5x RL

Solids: difference < 2X RL for results < 5X RLAqueous: difference < 1X RL for results < 5X RL

NFG (1)

Method (2)

J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% orif difference > control limit

9 Qualify all samples in batch.


Reference Material(RM, SRM, or CRM)

Result ±20% of the 95% confidenceinterval of the true value for analytes


J (pos)/UJ (ND) if < LCL J (pos) if > UCL

12 (H,L)3QAPP may have overriding accuracy limits.

Some manufacturers may have different RM control limits

Serial DilutionAnalyze one sample per matrix at a 5x dilution%D <10% for original sample conc. > 50x MDL

NFG (1)

Method (2)

J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %D > 10% and native sample concentration > 50x MDL


Field Duplicate

Solids: RPD <50% (for results ≥ 5x RL)OR difference < 2X RL (for results < 5X RL)

Aqueous: RPD <35% (for results ≥ 5x RL)OR difference < 1X RL (for results < 5X RL)


Qualify only parent and field duplicate samples

J (pos)/UJ (ND)9

QAPP may have overriding precision limits.Client/QAPP may not require qualification

based on field precision.








Compound Quantitation

Total and Dissolved Comparison

Total > DissolvedEcoChem

standard policy

J (pos)/UJ (ND) if Dissolved > Total andresults fall outside of standard duplicate

precision criteria14

Calibration Range Results < instrument linear rangeNFG (1)

Method (2)

J (pos) if result exceeds linear range and sample was not diluted

20


and/or Reanalyses

Report only oneresult per analyte


Use "DNR" to flag results that will not be reported.

11TM-04 EcoChem Policy for Rejection/Selection

Process for Multiple Results

1 National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review, January 2010. (pos): Positive Result2 Method SW846 6010C Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES), Revision 3, February 2007. (ND): Not Detected3 "H" = high bias indicated; "L" = low bias indicated4 SW846, Chapter 3, Inorganic Analytes


DATA VALIDATION CRITERIA Table No.: NFG-HgRevision No.: 1


QC Element Acceptance Criteria Source of Criteria Action for Non-ConformanceReason Code


Sample Handling

Cooler / Storage TemperaturePreservation

Solid: Cooler temperature 4°C±2°CAqueous: Nitric Acid to pH < 2

Dissolved Metals: 0.45 µm filter,preserve to pH < 2 after filtration

NFG (1)

Method (2)

Cooler Temps: If required by projectJ (pos)/UJ (ND) if greater than 6° CAqueous: J (pos)/UJ (ND) if pH > 2

1

Use PJ to qualify for temperature outlier.Current SW846 criterion is ≤ 6° C (4)

No quals for pH if samples preserved by lab immediately upon receipt and within

1 day of collection.

Holding Time28 days from date sampled

Frozen solids and tissues HT extended to 6 months

NFG (1)

Method (2)


J (pos)/UJ (ND) if HT exceeded 1


Initial Calibration (ICAL)

Daily CalibrationBlank + 5 standards, one ≤ RL

Correlation coefficient (r) ≥ 0.995

NFG (1)

Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if r < 0.995 5A (H,L)3


Independent source analyzedimmediately after ICAL


NFG (1)

Method (2)

R(pos/ND) if %R <70% J(pos)/UJ(ND) if %R = 70-84%

J(pos) if %R = > 116% 5A (H,L)3 Qualify all samples in run

Reporting Limit (RL) Standard

Conc = RL%R = 70-130%

Method (2)J (pos) < 2x RL / R (ND) if %R <50%

J (pos) < 2x RL / UJ (ND) if %R 50 - 69% J (pos) < 2x RL if %R > 130%

5A (H,L)3 Qualify all samples in run


Verification (CCV)

At beginning of run, every ten samples,and again after last sample.


NFG (1)

Method (2)

R(pos/ND) if %R <70% J(pos)/UJ(ND) if %R = 70-84%

J(pos) if %R = > 116% 5B (H,L)3 Qualify samples bracketed by CCV

outliers

Blank Contamination

Method Blank (MB)One per matrix per batch of (of ≤ 20 samples)

Blank conc < MDLNFG (1)

Method (2) U (pos) if result is < 5X method blank concentration 7Refer to TM-02 for additional

information.Blank Evaluation based on NFG 1994

Mercury by CVAA(Based on Inorganic NFG 2010 and SW846 7470A & 7471B)

T:\aa_EcoChem Controlled Docs\EcoChem Default Criteria Tables\EcoChem NFG Hg_CVAA_Rev1.xlsxHg CVAA Copyright 2014 EcoChem, Inc.






Instrument Blanks(ICB/CCB)

After each ICV & CCV| blank concentration | < MDL

NFG (1)

Method (2)

Action level is 5x absolutevalue of blank conc.For positive blanks:

U (pos) results < action levelFor negative blanks:

J (pos)/UJ (ND) results < action level

Pos Blanks:

7Neg

Blanks:

7L3

Use blanks bracketing samples for Qualification


Hierarchy of blank review:#1 - Review MB, quaify as needed#2 - Review IB , qualify as needed#3 - Review FB , qualify as needed

Field Blank (FB) Blank conc < MDL EcoChem standard policyU (pos) if result is < 5x action level,

as per analyte.6

Qualify in associated field samples only.Refer to TM-02 for additional

information.Precision and Accuracy

Laboratroy Control Sample

(recovery)

One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples); LCSD not required

%R between 80-120%Method (2)

J (pos)/R (ND) if %R <50% J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R 50% - 79%

J (pos) if %R > 120% 10 (H,L)3

Qualify all samples in batchQAPP may have overriding accuracy

limits.NFG does not address LCS

LCS/LCSD(RPD)

LCSD not required, if analyzed:RPD ≤ 20%

Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% 9Qualify all samples in batch


Matris Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate

MS/MSD(recovery)

One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples); MSD not required

%R between 75-125%

NFG (1)

Method (2)

J (pos) if %R > 125%J (pos)/UJ (ND) if %R <75%J (pos)/R (ND) if %R < 30%

8 (H,L)3


NA if parent concentration >4x the amount spiked.

Qualify all samples in batch.QAPP may have overriding accuracy

limits.

MS/MSD(RPD)

MSD not required, if analyzed:RPD ≤ 20%

NFG (1)

Method (2) J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% 9QAPP may have overriding precision

limits.

Laboratory Duplicate

One per matrix per batch (of ≤ 20 samples)RPD ≤ 20% for results ≥ 5x RL

Solids: difference < 2X RL for results < 5X RLAqueous: difference < 1X RL for results < 5X RL

NFG (1)

Method (2)

J (pos)/UJ (ND) if RPD > 20% or if difference > control limit









Reference Material(RM, SRM, or CRM)

Result ±20% of the 95% confidenceinterval of the true value for analytes

EcoChem standard policyJ (pos)/UJ (ND) if < LCL

J (pos) if > UCL12 (H,L)3

QAPP may have overriding accuracy limits.

Some manufacturers may have different RM control limits

Field Duplicate

Solids: RPD <50% (for results ≥ 5x RL)OR difference < 2X RL (for results < 5X RL)

Aqueous: RPD <35% (for results ≥ 5x RL)OR difference < 1X RL (for results < 5X RL)

EcoChem standard policyQualify only parent and field duplicate samples

J (pos)/UJ (ND)9


Client/QAPP may not require qualification based on field precision.

Compound Quantitation

Total and Dissolved Comparison

Total > Dissolved EcoChem standard policyJ (pos)/UJ (ND) if Dissolved > Total and

results fall outside of standard duplicate precision criteria

14

Calibration Range Results < instrument linear rangeNFG (1)

Method (2)

if result exceeds linear range and sample was not diluted J (pos)

20


and/or Reanalyses

Report only oneresult per analyte

EcoChem standard policy Use "DNR" to flag results that will not be reported. 11TM-04 EcoChem Policy for

Rejection/Selection Process for Multiple Results

1 National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review, January 2010. (pos): Positive Result2 Method SW846 7470A Mercury in Liquid Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor Technique), Revision 1, September 1994. (ND): Not Detected

Method SW846 7471B Mercury in Solid or Semisolid Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor Technique), Revision 2, February 2007.3 "H" = high bias indicated; "L" = low bias indicated4 SW846, Chapter 3, Inorganic Analytes


W:\APPENDICES\APPENDIX B QDST.docx

APPENDIX B

QUALIFIED DATA SUMMARY TABLE

Qualified Data Summary Table Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Distrubution Piping Replacement


SDG Sample_ID Laboratory ID Method Analyte Result Units Lab FlagValidation Qualifier

Validation Reason Code

DD3-W-022217 17B0342-03 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 [2C] 332 ug/kg dry P1 J 3DD1-W-022217 17B0342-07 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 [2C] 104 ug/kg dry P1 J 3DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 [2C] 181 ug/kg dry P1 NJ 3DD5-M-022217 17B0342-17 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 [2C] 54.0 ug/kg dry P1 J 3DD5-W-022217 17B0342-18 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1260 [2C] 80.0 ug/kg dry P1 J 3DD3-M-022217 17B0342-02 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 29.0 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD1-M-022217 17B0342-08 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 27.7 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 39.9 ug/kg dry Y1, U U 22DD4-W-022217 17B0342-12 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 37.8 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD4-E-022217 17B0342-13 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 29.4 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD4-M-022217 17B0342-14 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 39.2 ug/kg dry Y1, U U 22DD5-E-022217 17B0342-15 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 28.8 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD5-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-16 EPA 8082A Aroclor 1248 29.0 ug/kg dry Y1 U 22DD1-E-022217 17B0342-05RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 66.2 mg/kg dry D J 9DD1-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-06RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 76.3 mg/kg dry J 9DD1-M-022217 17B0342-08RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 103 mg/kg dry J 9DD1-W-022217 17B0342-07RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 152 mg/kg dry J 9DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 219 mg/kg dry D J 9DD2-M-022217 17B0342-10RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 79.7 mg/kg dry J 9DD2-W-022217 17B0342-11RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 70.4 mg/kg dry J 9DD3-E-02217 17B0342-01RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 28.4 mg/kg dry D J 9DD3-M-022217 17B0342-02RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 136 mg/kg dry J 9DD3-W-022217 17B0342-03RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 546 mg/kg dry D J 9DD4-E-022217 17B0342-13RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 54.3 mg/kg dry D J 9DD4-M-022217 17B0342-14RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 90.0 mg/kg dry J 9DD4-W-022217 17B0342-12RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 105 mg/kg dry J 9DD5-E-022217 17B0342-15RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 73.6 mg/kg dry J 9DD5-M-022217 17B0342-17RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 101 mg/kg dry J 9DD5-W-022217 17B0342-18RE1 EPA 6010C Lead 75.6 mg/kg dry J 9DD1-E-022217 17B0342-05RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8374 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD1-E-022217-DUP 17B0342-06RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.9885 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD1-M-022217 17B0342-08RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 1.237 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD1-W-022217 17B0342-07RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 1.395 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD2-E-022217 17B0342-09RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 1.392 mg/kg dry J 8H,9

17B0342

4/13/2017Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\sidx_qdst.xlsx Page 1 of 2 EcoChem, Inc.

Qualified Data Summary Table Pre-Construction Sediment Sampling for Saltwater Distrubution Piping Replacement


SDG Sample_ID Laboratory ID Method Analyte Result Units Lab FlagValidation Qualifier

Validation Reason Code

DD2-M-022217 17B0342-10RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8605 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD2-W-022217 17B0342-11RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8313 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD3-E-02217 17B0342-01RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.3191 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD3-M-022217 17B0342-02RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.4909 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD3-W-022217 17B0342-03RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 1.822 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD4-E-022217 17B0342-13RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8149 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD4-M-022217 17B0342-14RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8845 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD4-W-022217 17B0342-12RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 1.450 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD5-E-022217 17B0342-15RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.7495 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD5-M-022217 17B0342-17RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.8146 mg/kg dry J 8H,9DD5-W-022217 17B0342-18RE1 EPA 7471B Mercury 0.7062 mg/kg dry J 8H,9

17B0342

4/13/2017Y:\EC Final Docs\Kane 251\Sed Pre-Con PSNS\sidx_qdst.xlsx Page 2 of 2 EcoChem, Inc.

pre-construction sediment sampling report for saltwater

Documents