precession during merger r. o’shaughnessy (uwm) j. healy, l. london, d. shoemaker (georgia tech)...

19
Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Upload: pierce-warren

Post on 03-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Precession during merger

R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM)

J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech)

Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago

2012-09-28

arXiv:1209.3712

Page 2: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Key concepts of talkTitle

Translation• A: (GW) Polarization changes during, after merger

• B: Tracks a direction (and line of sight)

• C: It is detectable

• D: Simple interpretation (precession)

Encodes astrophysics (transverse spins) in merger, ringdown

“Precession during merger: Strong polarization changes are observationally accessible features of strong-field gravity during binary black hole merger”

Page 3: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Fiducial example

One of ~ 100 distinct precessing simulations

[Maya; Cactus+carpet+Einstein toolkit]

(total angular momentum)

time/M

log

am

plitu

de (

Wey

l)

Locations

InspiralMerger

Ringdown

Waveform (one direction)

(orbital angular momentum)

Page 4: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Fiducial example

Page 5: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Precession modulates GW

Features• L precessing around J• GW signal along +L, right or left handed

J

L

Right handed

Left handed

Analogy: Single-spin precession, early inspiral

Right handed(top view)

Left handed(bottom view)

Page 6: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Polarization changes during merger• Experiments see one line of sight

Measure R,L…if sensitive to both linear polarizations

• Polarization changes during merger

log

am

plitu

de (

Wey

l)

time/M

RL

J

Right handed

Left handed

Observer

Page 7: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

A: Polarization changes

B: Traces path of “L”

… each line of sight

… works after merger To include merger:

‘Peak’ or “L” -> ‘preferred location’

Polarization follows “peak”

Schmidt et al 2011ROS et al 2011 [arxiv: 1109.5224]Boyle et al 2012

RL

t/M

CalculatedPredicted

Page 8: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Detectable• A: Polarization changes during, after merger• B: Tracks a direction (and line of sight)

• C: It is detectable

– Argument 1: Direction changes significantly “in band”

– Argument 2: Waveform modulated (“clearly not like nonprecessing”)

Page 9: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Large, fast direction changesView from “above” final J

Before [0 M]

Path of “peak”

Little change over a few orbits

-500 M

Page 10: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Large, fast direction changesView from “above” final J

After [90 M]

Path of “peak”

Page 11: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

What is going on?“Precession” after merger

BH perturbation view:Multimodal (m=2,1,…),

quasi-coherent

• “Precession rate” [points]

QNM frequency differences

Final BH spin

Pre

cess

ion

rate

“precession rate”

Page 12: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Significant modulations• How significant?

– Fraction of amplitude lost

vs nonprecessing reference

– Compare with nonprecessing[BH-NS : Brown et al arXiv:1203.6060]

Lose amplitude in direct proportion

to precession–induced modulations

• What reference? Itself!– Go to corotating frame– Use (l,m) = (2,2) mode in corotating frame

Schmidt et al 2011ROS et al 2011 [arxiv: 1109.5224]Boyle et al 2012

Page 13: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Significant modulationsFigure key

• J• Gradient: “orbital plane” [estimate]• Contours: Fraction of power “lost”

– Comparison: > ~2% = detectable effect [SNR 10]

J

L

Right

Left

Most lines of sight - a nonprecessing search loses power - if detectable, enough lost to measure some precessing parameters

J

100 Msun; iLIGO - higher harmonics weak

Page 14: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Summary

• A: Polarization changes during, after merger

• B: Tracks a direction (and line of sight)

• C: It is detectable

• D: Simple interpretation (precession)

Encodes astrophysics in merger, ringdown

(spin-orbit misalignment, …)

Page 15: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Conclusions• Short precessing merger signals modulated

– Measurable

– Precession = “natural” coordinate/parameter

• Implications– Simulation placement

– Searches and parameter estimation• Phenomenological precession fitting

– Astrophysics• Spin-orbit misalignment from merger, ringdown?

– Testing GR • Strong field dynamics …even with short merger signal alone

Page 16: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Equation support

• Complex overlap– Maximize over time and polarization

• Preferred orientation

• Polarization projection: Frequency domain

• (Complex) polarization amplitude

• An estimate of the peak location O, from line of sight frame (n,x,y)

Rotation group generators

Page 17: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Spin and waveformsGeneric precession:Misaligned binaries precess [ACST]

…often around nearly-constant J direction

(Leading order): Propagation of L modulates waveform

J loss decreases L:

More spin-dominated

More “freedom” for L at late times…

less freedom early on

Other spin effect: Duration (=SNR,amplitude) Angular momentum “barrier”, more emission

Page 18: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Precession: modulated waveSecular part: - phase:

chirps, but at different rate

depends on line of sight(somewhat)

Modulating part:

- magnitude depends on opening cone only,

not mass, spin (once cone known) - good approx: precession cone opens slowly

- model:

complex (fourier) amplitude z

- usually several cycles in band

- number depends on mass, spin, NOT

geometrySeparation of timescales:

…+ use LIGO-like detectors (relatively) narrowband

-> a) ignore increasing opening angle (usually suppressed below radiation time)

b) average SNR across the lighthouse

c) factor overlap: masses, geometry

Am

plitu

de (

of t

(f))

frequency

Pha

se

e.g., Brown et al arXiv:1203.6060

Page 19: Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago 2012-09-28 arXiv:1209.3712

Measurable effects

• Each path (& modulation) distinct…if you precess (in band), measurable

…need one loud or many faint

• Different regimes: – BH-NS : Many L cycles, each faint.

Can be strongly modulated

Measurable: ~ “mean” precession path of L

– BH-BH (>100 Msun) :

Any at cycles at all? Too short?

Merger epoch, so no precession?

[Brown et al arXiv:1203.6060]