preface - fsmsupremecourt.org · appendix a model code of judicial conduct (1972)* preface in 1924...

16
APPENDIX A Model Code of Judicial Conduct (1972)* PREFACE In 1924 the American Bar Association formulated the original Canons of Judicial Ethics. Those Canons, occasionally amended, were adopted in most states. In 1969 the Association determined that current needs and problems required revision of the Canons. The Code of Judicial Conduct, the product of almost three years of work by the Special Committee on Standards of Judicial Conduct, was adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association on August 16, 1972. Canon 3A(7) was amended on August 11, 1982, and the Commentary to Canon 2 was amended on August 8, 1984. A majority of jurisdictions have adopted the Code to regulate judicial conduct. The Code consists of statements of norms de- nominated canons, accompanying text setting forth specific rules, and com- mentary. The canons and text establish mandatory standards unless otherwise indicated. In June 1987, a Judicial Code Subcommittee of the Standing Com- mittee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility was formed to conduct a comprehensive review of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The Subcommittee has surveyed nationwide opinion on the Code and is considering the extent of revision needed. The response to the Subcommittee's survey indicated that the Code was in need of revision. The Code of Judicial Conduct was adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association on August 16, 1972. Canon 3A(7) was amended by the House of Delegates on August II, 1982. The Commentary to Canon 2 was amended on August 8, 1984. * Model Code of Judicial Conduct, copyright by the American Bar Association. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission. 511

Upload: trinhkhanh

Post on 02-Jul-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

APPENDIX A

Model Code of Judicial Conduct (1972)*

PREFACE

In 1924 the American Bar Association formulated the original Canons of Judicial Ethics. Those Canons, occasionally amended, were adopted in most states. In 1969 the Association determined that current needs and problems required revision of the Canons. The Code of Judicial Conduct, the product of almost three years of work by the Special Committee on Standards of Judicial Conduct, was adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association on August 16, 1972. Canon 3A(7) was amended on August 11, 1982, and the Commentary to Canon 2 was amended on August 8, 1984. A majority of jurisdictions have adopted the Code to regulate judicial conduct. The Code consists of statements of norms de­nominated canons, accompanying text setting forth specific rules, and com­mentary. The canons and text establish mandatory standards unless otherwise indicated.

In June 1987, a Judicial Code Subcommittee of the Standing Com­mittee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility was formed to conduct a comprehensive review of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The Subcommittee has surveyed nationwide opinion on the Code and is considering the extent of revision needed. The response to the Subcommittee's survey indicated that the Code was in need of revision.

The Code of Judicial Conduct was adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association on August 16, 1972. Canon 3A(7) was amended by the House of Delegates on August II, 1982. The Commentary to Canon 2 was amended on August 8, 1984.

* Model Code of Judicial Conduct, copyright by the American Bar Association. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.

511

CANON 1

A JUDGE SHOULD UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND

INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY

An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should participate in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing, and should himself observe, high standards of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved. The provisions of this Code should be construed and applied to further that objective.

CANON 2

A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF

IMPROPRIETY IN ALL HIS ACTIVITIES

A. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

B. A judge should not allow his family, social, or other relationships to influence his judicial conduct or judgment. He should not lend the prestige of his office to advance the private interests of others; nor should he convey or permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence him. He should not testify voluntarily as a character witness.

Commentary

Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or im­proper conduct by judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appear­ance of impropriety. He must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny. He must therefore accept restrictions on his conduct that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen and should do so freely and willingly.

It is inappropriate for a judge to hold membership in any organization that practices invidious discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion or national origin. Membership of a judge in an organization that practices invidious discrimination may give rise to perceptions by minorities, women, and others, that the judge's impartiality is impaired. Whether an organi-

513

JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS

zation practices invidious discrimination is often a complex question to which judges should be sensitive. The answer cannot be determined from a mere examination of an organization's current membership rolls but rather depends on the history of the organization's selection of members and other relevant factors. Ultimately. each judge must determine in the judge's own conscience whether an organization of which the judge is a member practices indivious discrimination.'

The testimony of a judge as a character witness injects the prestige of his office into the proceeding in which he testifies and may be misunder­stood to be an official testimonial. This Canon, however, does not afford him a privilege against testifying in response to an official summons.

CANON 3

A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE DUTIES OF HIS OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY

The judicial duties of a judge take precedence over all his other activities. His judicial duties include all the duties of his office prescribed by law. In the performance of these duties, the following standards apply:

A. ADJUDICATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES (I) A judge should· be faithful to the law and maintain professional com­

petence in it. He should be unswayed by partisan interests, public clamor, or fear of criticism.

(2) A judge should maintain· order and decorum in proceedings before him.

(3) A judge should be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom he deals in his official capacity, and should require similar conduct of lawyers, and of his staff, court officials, and others subject to his direction and control.

Commentary

The duty to hear all proceedings fairly and with patience is not incon­sistent with the duty to dispose promptly of the business of the court. Courts can be efficient and businesslike while being patient and deliberate.

(4) A judge should accord to e~ery person who is legally interested in a

I. Amended August 8, 1984, American Bar Association House of Delegates, Chicago, Illinois. per Report No. 120.

514

MODEL CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (1972)

proceeding, or his lawyer, full right to ·be heard according to law, and~ except as authorized by law, neither initiate nor consider ex parte or other com­munications concerning a pending or impending proceeding. A judge, how­ever, may obtain the advice of a disinterested expert on the law applicable to a proceeding before him if he gives notice to the parties of the person consulted and the substance of the advice~ and affords the parties reasonable opportunity to respond.

Commentary

The proscription against communications concerning a proceeding in­cludes communications from lawyers, law teachers, and other persons who are not participants in the proceeding, except to the limited extent per­mitted. It does not preclude a judge from consulting with other judges, or with court personnel whose function is to aid the judge in carrying out his adjudicati ve responsibilities.

An appropriate and often desjrable procedure for a court to obtain the advice of a disinterested expert on legal issues is to invite him to file a brief amicus curiae.

(5) A judge should dispose promptly of the business of the court.

Commentary

Prompt disposition of the court's business requires a judge to devote adequate time to his duties, to be punctual in attending court and expe­ditious in determining matters under submission, and to insist that court officials, litigants and their lawyers cooperate with him to that end.

(6) A judge should abstain from public comment about a pending or impending proceeding in any court, and should require similar abstention on the part of court personnel subject to his direction and control. This subsec­tion does not prohibit judges from making public statements in the course of their official duties or from explaining for public information the procedures of the court.

Commentary

"Court personnel" does not include the lawyers in a proceeding before a judge. The conduct of lawyers is governed by DR 7-107 of the Model Code of Professional Responsibility and by Rule 3.6 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct.

(7) A judge should prohibit broadcasting, televising, recording or pho­tographing in courtrooms and areas immediately adjacent thereto during sessions of cour~ or recesses between sessions, except that under rules pre­scribed by a supervising appellate court or other appropriate authority, a

515

JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS

judge may authorize broadcasting, televising, recording and photographing of judicial proceedings in courtrooms and areas immediately adjacent thereto consistent with the right of the parties to a fair trial and subject to express conditions, limitations, and guidelines which allow such coverage in a manner that will be unobtrusive, will not distract the trial participants, and will not otherwise interfere with the administration of justice.2

B. ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES (I) A judge should diligently discharge his administrative responsibili­

ties •. maintain professional competence in judicial administration, and facil­itate the performance of the administrative responsibilities of other judges and court officials.

(2) A judge should require his staff and court officials subject to his direction and control to observe the standards of fidelity and diligence that apply to him.

(3) A judge should take or initiate appropriate disciplinary measures against a judge or lawyer for unprofessional conduct of which the judge may become aware.

Commentary

Disciplinary measures may include reporting a lawyer's misconduct to an appropriate disciplinary body.

(4) A judge should not make unnecessary appointments. He should ex­ercise his power of appointment only on the basis of merit, avoiding nepotism and favoritism. He should not approve compensation of appointees beyond the fair value of services rendered.

Commentary

Appointees of the judge include officials such as referees, commission­ers. special masters. receivers, guardians, and personnel such as clerks, secretaries, and bailiffs. Consent by the-p~rties to an appointment or an award of compensation does not relieve the judge of the obligation pre­scribed by this subsection.

C. DISQUALIFICATION (1) A judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his im­

partiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to in­stances where:

(a) he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or per­sonal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;

2. Amended August ) I, 1982. American Bar Association House of Delegates, San Fran­cisco, California, per Report No. 107.

516

MODEL CODE OF. JUDICIAL CONDUCT (1972)

(b) he sened as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it;

Commentary

A lawyer in a governmental agency does not necessarily have an as­sociation with other lawyers employed by that agency within the meaning of this subsection~ a judge formerly employed by a governmental agency, however. should disqualify himselfin a proceeding ifhis impartiality might reasonably be questioned because of such association.

(c) he knows that he, individually or as a fiduciary, or his spouse or minor child residing in his household, has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the pro­ceeding;

(d) he or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of rela­tionship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:

(i) is a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party;

(ii) is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding.

Commentary

The fact that a lawyer in a proceeding is affiliated with a law firm with which a lawyer-relative of the judge is affiliated does not of itself disqualify the judge. Under appropriate circumstances, the fact that "his impartiality might reasonably be questionedU under Canon 3C( 1), or that the lawyer­relative is known by the judge to have an interest in the law firm that could be "substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding" under Canon 3C( 1 )(d)(iii) may require his disqualification.

(iii) is known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;

(iv) is to the judge's knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding;

(2) A judge should inform himself about his personal and fiduciary fi­nancial interests, and make a reasonable effort to inform himself about the personal financial interests of his spouse and minor children residing in his household.

(3) For the purposes of this section: (a) the degree of relationship is calculated according to the civil law

system;

517

JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS

Commentary

According to the civil law system, the third degree of relationship test would. for example, disqualify the judge ifhis or his spouse's father, grand­father, uncle. brother. or niece's husband were a party or lawyer in the proceeding, but would not disqualify him if a cousin were a party or lawyer in the proceeding.

(b) "fiduciary" includes such relationships as executor, administra­tor. trustcc,and guardian;

(c) "financial interest" means ownership of a legal or equitable in­terest, however small" or a relationship as director, advisor, or other active participant in the affairs of a party, except that:

(i) ownership in a mutual or common investment fund that holds securities is not a "financial interest" in securities unless the judge participates in the management of the fund;

(ii) an office in an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organization is not a "financial interest" in securities held by the organilation;

(iii) the proprietary interest of a policy holder in a mutual in­surance company, of a depositor in a mutual savings association, or a similar propriety interest, is a "financial interest" in the organi­zation only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect the value of the interest;

(iv) ownership of government securities is a "fin~ncial interest" in the issuer only if the outcome of the proceeding could substan­tially affect the value of the securities.

D. REMITTAL OF DISQUALIFICATION A judge disqualified by the terms of Canon 3C(l)(c) or Canon 3C(l)(d)

may, instead of withdrawing from the proceeding, disclose on the record the basis of his disqualification. If, based on such disclosure, the parties and lawyers, independently of the judge's participation, all agree in writing that the judge's relationship is immaterial or that his financial interest is insub­stantial, the judge is no longer disqualified, and may participate in the pro­ceeding. The agreement, signed by all parties and lawyers, shall be incorporated in the record of the proceeding.

Commentary

This procedure is designed to minimize the chance that a party or lawyer will feel coerced into an agreement. When a party is not immediately available, the judge without violating this section may proceed on the writ­ten assurance of the lawyer that his party's consent will be subsequently filed.

518

MODEL CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (1972)

CANON 4

A JUDGE MAY ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE THE LAW, THE LEGAL SYSTEM, AND THE

ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

A judge, subject to the proper performance of his judicial duties, may engage in the following quasi-judicial activities, if in doing so he does not cast doubt on his capacity to decide impartially any issue that may come before him.

A. He may speak, write, lecture, teach, and participate in other activities concerning the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice.

B. He may appear at a public hearing before an executive or legislative body or official on matters concerning the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice, and he may otherwise consult with an executive or legislative body or official, but only on matters concerning the administration of justice.

C. He may serve as a member, officer, or director of an organization or governmental agency devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice. He may assist such an organization in raising funds and may participate in their management and investment, but should not personally participate in public fund-raising activities. He may make recommendations to public and private fund-granting agencies on projects and programs concerning the law, the legal system, and the adm,inistration 'of justice. .

Commentary

As a judicial officer and person specially learned in the law, a judge is in a unique position to contribute to the improvement of the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice, including revision of substantive and procedural law and improvement of criminal and juvenile justice. To the extent that his time permits, he is encouraged to do so, either inde­pendently or through a bar association, judicial conference, or other or­ganization dedicated to the improvement of the law.

Extra-judicial activities are governed by Canon 5.

519

JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS

CANON 5

A JUDGE SHOULD REGULATE HIS EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES TO MINIMIZE THE RISK OF CONFLICT WITH HIS JUDICIAL DUTIES

A. A VOCATIONAL ACTIVITIES A judge may write. lecture, teach, and speak on non-legal subjects, and

engage in the arts, sports, and other social and recreational activities, if such avocational activities do not detract from the dignity of his office or interfere with the performance of his judicial duties.

Commentary

Complete separation of a judge from extra-judicial activities is neither possible nor wise: he should not become isolated from the society in which he lives.

B. CIVIC AND CHARITABLE ACfIVITIES A judge may participate in civic and charitable activities that do not

reflect adversely upon his impartiality or interfere with the performance of his judicial duties. A judge may serve as an officer, director, trustee, or non­legal advisor of an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic or­ganization not conducted for the economic or political advantage of its mem­bers, subject to the following limitations:

(l) A judge should not serve if it is likely that the organization will be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before him or will be regularly engaged in adversary proceedings in any court.

Commentary

The changing nature of some organizations and of their relationship to the law makes it necessary for ajudge regularly to reexamine the activities of each organization with which he is affiliated to determine if it is proper for him to continue his relationship with it. For example, in many juris­dictions charitable hospitals are now more frequently in court than in the past. Similarly. the boards of some legal aid organizations now make policy decisions that may have political significance or imply commitment to causes that may come before the courts for adjudication.

(2) A judge should not solicit funds for any educational, religious, char­itable, fraternal, or civic organization, or use or permit the use of the prestige of his office for that purpose, but he may be listed as an officer, director, or

520

MODEL CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (1972)

trustee of such an organization. He should not be a speaker or the guest of honor at an organization's fund-raising events, but he may attend such events.

(3) A judge should not give investment advice to such an organization, but he may serve on its board of directors or trustees even though it has the responsibility for approving investment decisions.

Commentary

A judge's participation in an organization devoted to quasi-judicial activities is governed by Canon 4.

C. FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES (I) A judge should refrain from financial and business dealings that tend

to reflect adversely on his impartiality, interfere with the proper perf'Ormance of his judicial duties, exploit his judicial position, or involve him in frequent transactions with lawyers or persons likely to come before the court on which he serves.

* (2) Subject to the requirements of subsection (I), a judge may hold and manage investments, including real estate, and engage in other remunerative activity, but should not serve as an officer, director, manager, advisor, or employee of any business.

Commentary

The Effecti ve Date of Compliance provision of this Code qualifies this subsection with regard to a judge engaged in a family business at the time this Code becomes effective.

Canon 5 may cause temporary hardship in jurisdictions where judicial salaries are inadequate and judges are presently supplementing their in­come through commercial activities. The remedy, however, is to secure adequate judicial salaries.

* [Canon 5C(2) sets the minimum standard to which a full-time judge should adhere. Jurisdictions that do not provide adequate judicial salaries but are willing to allow full-time judges to supplement their incomes through commercial activities may adopt the following substitute until such time as adequate salaries are provided:

(2) Subject to the requirement of subsection (I), a judge may hold and manage investments, including real estate, and engage in other remunerative activity including the operation of a business.

Jurisdictions adopting the foregoing substitute may also wish to pro­hibit a judge from engaging in certain types of businesses such as that of banks, public utilities, insurance companies, and other businesses affected with a public interest.]

(3) A judge should manage his investments and other financial interests

521

JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS

to minimize the number of cases in which he is disqualified. As soon as he can do so without serious financial detriment, he should divest himself of investments and other financial interests that might require frequent dis­qualification.

(4) Neither a judge nor a member of his family residing in his household should accept a gift, bequest, favor, or loan from anyone except as follows:

(a) a judge may accept a gift incident to public testimonial to him; books supplied by publishers on a complimentary basis for official use; or an invitation to the judge and his spouse to attend a bar-related function or activity devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice;

(b) a judge or a member of his family residing in his household may accept ordinary social hospitality; a gift, bequest, favor, or loan from a relative; a wedding or engagement gift; a loan from a lending institution in its regular course of business on the same terms generally available to persons who are not judges; or a scholarship or fellowship awarded on the same terms applied to other applicants;

(c) a judge or a member of his family residing in his household may accept any other gift, bequest, favor, or loan only if the donor is not a party or other person whose interests have come or are likely to come before him, and, if its value exceeds $100, the judge reports it in the same manner as he reports compensation in Canon 6C.

Commentary

This subsection does not apply to contributions to a judge's campaign for judicial office, a matter governed by Canon 7.

(5) For the purposes of this section "member of his family residing in his household" means any relative of a judge by blood or marriage, or a person treated by a judge as a member of his family, who resides in his household.

(6) A judge is not required by this Code to disclose his income, debts, or investments, except as provided in this Canon and Canons 3 and 6.

Commentary

Canon 3 requires a judge to disqualify himself in any proceeding in which he has a financial interest, however small; Canon 5 requires a judge to refrain from· engaging in business and from financial activities that might interfere with the impartial performance of his judicial duties; Canon 6 requires him to report all compensation he receives for activities outside his judicial office. A judge has the rights of an ordinary citizen, including the right to privacy of his financial affairs, except to the extent that limi­tations thereon are required to safeguard the proper performance of his

522

MODEL CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (1972)

duties. Owning and receiving income from investments do not as such affect the performance of a judge's duties ..

(7) Information acquired by a judge in his judicial capacity should not be used or disclosed by him in financial dealings or for any other purpose not related to his judicial duties.

D. FIDUCIARY ACTIVITIES A judge should not serve as the executor, administrator, trustee, guard­

ian, or other fiduciary, except for the estate, trust, or person of a member of his family, and then only if such service will not interfere with the proper performance of his judicial duties. "Member of his family" includes a spouse, childs grandchild, parent, grandparent, or other relative or person with whom the judge maintains a close familial relationship. As a family fiduciary a judge is subject to the following restrictions:

(1) He should not serve ifit is likely that as a fiduciary he win be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before him, or if the estate, trust, or ward becomes involved in adversary proceedings in the court on which he serves or one under its appellate jurisdiction.

Commentary

The Effective Date of Compliance provision of this Code Qualifies this subsection with regard to a judge who is an executor, administrator, trustee, or other fiduciary at the time this Code becomes effective.

(2) While acting as a fiduciary a judge is subject to the same restrictions on financial activities that apply to him in his personal capacity.

Commentary

A judge's obligation under this Canon and his obligation as a fiduciary may come into conflict. For example, a judge should resign as trustee if it would result in detriment to the trust to divest it of holdings whose retention would place the judge in violation of Canon 5e(3).

E. ARBITRATION A judge should not act as an arbitrator or mediator.

F. PRACTICE OF LAW A judge should not practice law.

G. EXTRA-JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS A judge should not accept appointment to a governmental committee,

commission, or other position that is concerned with issues of fact or policy on matters other than the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice. A judge, however, may represent his country, state, or locality on ceremonial occasions or in connection with historical, educa­tional, and cultural activities.

523

JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS

Commentary

Valuable services have been rendered in the past to the states and the nation by judges appointed by the executive to undertake important extra­judicial assignments. The appropriateness of conferring these assignments on judges must be reassessed. however. in light of the demands on judicial manpower created by today's crowded dockets and the need to protect the courts from involvement in extra-judicial matters that may prove to be controversial. Judges should not be expected or permitted to accept gov­ernmental appointments that could interfere with the effectiveness and independence of the jUdiciary.

CANON 6

A JUDGE SHOULD REGULARLY FILE REPORTS OF COMPENSATION

RECEIVED FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL AND EXTRA-JUDICIAL ACTIVITIES

A judge may receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses for the quasi-judicial and extra-judicial activities permitted by this Code, if the source of such payments does not give the appearance of influencing the judge in his judicial duties or otherwise give the appearance of impropriety, subject to the following restrictions.

A. COMPENSATION Compensation should not exceed a reasonable amount nor should it

exceed what a person who is not a judge would receive for the same activity.

B. EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT Expense reimbursement should be limited to the actual cost of travel,

food, and lodging reasonably incurred by the judge and, -where appropriate to the occasion, by his spouse. Any payment in excess of such an amount is compen~ation.

C. PUBLIC REPORTS A judge should report the date, place, and nature of any activity for

which he received compensation, and the name of the payor and the amount of compensation so received. Compensation or income of a spouse attributed to the judge by operation of a community property law is not extra-judicial compensation to the judge. His report should be made at least annually and should be filed as a public document in the office of the clerk of the court on which he serves or other office designated by rule of court.

524

MODEL CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (1972)

CANON 7

A JUDGE SHOULD REFRAIN FROM POLITICAL ACTIVITY INAPPROPRIATE TO

HIS JUDICIAL OFFICE

A. POLITICAL CONDUCT IN GENERAL (1) A judge or a candidate for election to judicial office should not:

(a) act as a leader or hold any office in a political organization; (b) make speeches for a political organization or candidate or pub­

licly endorse a candidate for public office;

Commentary

A candidate does not publicly endorse another candidate for public office by having his name on the same ticket.

(c) solicit funds for or pay an assessment or make a contribution to a political organization or candidate, attend political gatherings, or pur­chase tickets for political party dinners, or other functions, except as authorized in subsection A(2).

(2) A judge holding an office filled by public election between competing candidates, or a candidate for such office, may, only insofar as permitted by law, attend political gatherings, speak to such gatherings on his own behalf when he is a candidate for election or re-election, identify himself as a mem­ber of a political party, and contribute to a political party or organization.

(3) A judge should resign his office when he becomes a candidate either in a party primary or in a general election for a non-judicial office, except that he may continue to hold his judicial office while being a candidate for election to or serving as a delegate in a state constitutional convention, if he is otherwise permitted by law to do so.

(4) A judge should not engage in any other political activity except on behalf of measures to improve the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice.

B. CAMPAIGN CONDUCT (1) A candidate, including an incumbent judge, for a judicial office that

is filled either by public election between competing candidates or on the basis of a merit system election:

(a) should maintain the dignity appropriate to judicial office, and should encourage members of his family to adhere to the same standards of political conduct that apply to him;

525

JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS

(b) should prohibit public officials or employees subject to his di­rection or control from doing for him what he is prohibited from doing under this Canon; and except to the extent authorized under subsection 8(2) or 8(3), he should not allow any other person to do for him what he is prohibited from doing under this Canon;

(c) should not make pledges or promises of conduct in office other than the faithful and impartial performance of the duties of the office; announce his views on disputed legal or political issues; or misrepresent his identity, qualifications, present position, or other fact. (2) A candidate, including an incumbent judge, for a judicial office that

is filled by public election between competing candidates should not himself solicit or· accept campaign funds, or solicit publicly stated support, but he may establish committees of responsible persons to secure and manage the expenditure of funds for his campaign and to obtain public statements of support for his candidacy. Such committees are not prohibited from soliciting campaign contributions and public support from lawyers., A candidate's com­mittees may solicit funds for his campaign no earlier than (90) days before a primary election and no later than (90) days after the last election in which he participates during the election year. A candidate should not use or permit the use of campaign contributions for the private benefit of himself or mem­bers of his family.

Commentary

Unless the candidate is required by law to file a list of his campaign contributors. their names should not be revealed to the candidate.

[Each jurisdiction adopting this Code should prescribe a time limit on soliciting campaign funds that is appropriate to the elective process therein.]

(3) An incumbent judge who is a candidate for retention in or re-election to office without a competing candidate, and whose candidacy has drawn active opposition, may campaign in response thereto and may obtain publicly stated support and campaign funds in the manner provided in subsection B(2).

COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Anyone, whether or not a lawyer, who is an officer of a judicial system performing judicial functions, including an officer such as a referee in bank­ruptcy, special master, court commissioner, or magistrate, is a judge for the purpose of this Code. All judges should comply with this Code except as provided below.

526

MODEL CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (1972)

A. PART-TIME JUDGE A part-time judge is a judge who serves on a continuing or periodic basis,

but is permitted by law to devote time to some other profession or occupation and whose compensation for that reason is less than that of a full-time judge. A part-time judge:

(I) is not required to comply with Canon 5C(2), D, E, F, and G, and Canon 6C;

(2) should not practice law in the court on which he serves or in any court subject to the appellate jurisdiction of the court on which he serves, or acts as a lawyer in a proceeding in which he has served as a judge or in any other proceeding related thereto.

B. JUDGE PRO TEMPORE A judge pro tempore is a person who is appointed to act temporarily as

a judge.

(l) While acting as such, a judge pro tempore is not required to comply with Canon 5C(2), (3), D, E, F, and G, and Canon 6C.

(2) A person who has been a judge pro tempore should not act as a lawyer in a proceeding in which he has served as a judge or in any other proceeding related thereto.

C. RETIRED JUDGE A retired judge who receives the same compensation as a full-time judge

on the court from which he retired and is eligible for recall to judicial service should comply with all the provisions of this Code except Canon 5G, but he should refrain from judicial service during the period of an extra-judicial appointment not sanctioned by Canon 5G. All other retired judges eligible for recall to judicial service should comply with the provisions of this Code governing part-time judges.

EFFECTIVE DATE OF COMPLIANCE

A person to whom this Code becomes applicable should arrange his affairs as soon as reasonably possible to comply with it. If, however, the demands on his time and the possibility of conflicts of interest are not sub­stantial, a person who holds judicial office on the date this Code becomes effective may:

(a) continue to act as an officer, director, or non-legal advisor of a family business;

(b) continue to act as an executor, administrator, trustee, or other fiduciary for the estate or person of one who is not a member of his family.

527