preferred plan overview figure 3-1: preferred plan concept · 2015. 11. 15. · e r a d i u s 1 / 4...
TRANSCRIPT
Community Workshop #2 January 21, 2012
1/ 4
MI L E
R A D I U S
1/
4M
I LE
RA
DI U S
K ST
L ST
IMPERIAL AVE
COMMERCIAL ST
WEBSTER AVE
CLAY AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
25TH
ST
28TH
ST
24TH
ST
22N
D
ST
21ST
ST
20TH
ST
19TH
ST
26TH
ST
27TH
ST
29TH
ST
30TH
ST
31ST
ST
32N
D
ST
33RD
ST
33RD
ST
32N
D
ST
31ST
ST
30TH
ST
28TH
ST
OCEAN VIEW BLVD
IRVING AVE
IRVING AVE
EVERETT AVE
HARRISON AVEJULIAN AVE
KEARNEY AVE
CESAR CHAVEZ PKWY
DEWEY ST
S.EVANS ST
SAMPSON ST
EVA
NS
ST
HEN
LEY
ST
Ch
ol a
sC
re
ek
J ST
J ST
STEEL ST
J ST
K ST
L ST
DURANT ST
35TH
ST
GILLETTE ST
WEBSTER AVE
BAN
CRO
FT
ST
BEARDSLEY ST
COMMERCIAL ST
IMPERIAL AVE
ES
CO
ND
I DO
FR
EE
WA
YS
AN
DI E G
OF R E E W
A Y
5
15
Grant HillPark
ShermanE.S.
KimbroughE.S.
MartinLuther King
E.S.
PoliceStation
To Balboa Park
ToDowntown
To Waterfront/Coronado
Preferred Plan Concept
0 500 1000
FEET
300150
DY E T T & B HAT IA Urban and Regional P lanners
Park/Plaza
TOD Node
Orange Line Trolley
Trolley Platform
Street/Sidewalk Improvements
Planning Area
Overpass/Underpass
Retain industrial andemployment uses
Street and sidewalkimprovements
High Intensity Mixed Use Centers• Improved transit access• Pedestrian orientation• Open spaces and plazas
New trolley stop
Retain commercial andemployment uses
Figure 3-1:
1/ 4
MI L E
R A D I U S
1/
4M
I LE
RA
DI U S
K ST
L ST
IMPERIAL AVE
COMMERCIAL ST
WEBSTER AVE
CLAY AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
25TH
ST
28TH
ST
24TH
ST
22N
D
ST
21ST
ST
20TH
ST
19TH
ST
26TH
ST
27TH
ST
29TH
ST
30TH
ST
31ST
ST
32N
D
ST
33RD
ST
33RD
ST
32N
D
ST
31ST
ST
30TH
ST
28TH
ST
OCEAN VIEW BLVD
IRVING AVE
IRVING AVE
EVERETT AVE
HARRISON AVEJULIAN AVE
KEARNEY AVE
CESAR CHAVEZ PKWY
DEWEY ST
S.EVANS ST
SAMPSON ST
EVA
NS
ST
HEN
LEY
ST
Ch
ol a
sC
re
ek
J ST
J ST
STEEL ST
J ST
K ST
L ST
DURANT ST
35TH
ST
GILLETTE ST
WEBSTER AVE
BAN
CRO
FT
ST
BEARDSLEY ST
COMMERCIAL ST
IMPERIAL AVE
ES
CO
ND
I DO
FR
EE
WA
YS
AN
DI E G
OF R E E W
A Y
5
15
Grant HillPark
ShermanE.S.
KimbroughE.S.
MartinLuther King
E.S.
PoliceStation
To Balboa Park
ToDowntown
To Waterfront/Coronado
Preferred Plan:Land Use and Transportation
0 500 1000
FEET
300150
DY E T T & B HAT IA Urban and Regional P lanners
Park/Plaza
TOD Node
Orange Line Trolley
Trolley Platform
Planning Area
Overpass/Underpass
Community Village
Neighborhood Village
Community Commercial
Residential Medium - High
Residential Medium
Light Industrial
Opportunity Site
Commercial Frontage Required
Existing Bus Routes
Potential New Bus Route on 28th Street
Existing Bicycle Lanes/Routes
Proposed Bicycle Paths/Lanes/Routes
Figure 3-2:
Preferred Plan Overview
Concept
Land Use and Transportation Plan
Community Workshop #2 January 21, 2012
Land Use Designation Description
General Plan Density Range Examples
Residential Medium
Single- and multi-family housing. 15-29 du/ac
Residential Medium - High Multi-family housing. 30-44 du/ac
Community Commercial
Shopping areas with retail, service, civic, and office uses for the community at large. Multi-family residential uses may be appropriate in transit corridors.
0-74 du/ac
Light Industrial
Light manufacturing, R&D, storage, distribution, accessory office, and commercial uses. Heavy industrial uses with significant nuisance effects excluded.
N/A
Neighborhood Village
Provides housing in a mixed-use setting with convenience shopping, and civic uses.
15-44 du/ac
Community Village
Provides housing in a mixed-use setting with commercial needs of larger community, including industrial and business areas. Retail, office, civic, and recreation, are permitted.
30-74 du/ac
Source: San Diego General Plan, Land Use and Community Planning Element. March 2008. Table LU-4.
Land Use Designations and Development Potential
Land Use Designations
CategoryOffice
(Sq. Ft.)Light industrial
(Sq. Ft.)Commercial
Retail (Sq. Ft.)Park/Plaza
(Acres)Housing
Units
A. Preferred Plan (Net New) 34,300 18,800 23,100 1.0 480
B. Development Project (Comm22) 10,000 0 17,800 250
C. Subtotal (A+B) 44,300 18,800 40,900 1.0 730
D. Existing Development 27,400 404,600 346,600 1.5 460
Total (C+D) 71,700 423,400 387,500 2.5 1,190
Source: Dyett & Bhatia, 2011; Center City Development Corporation, 2011; City of San Diego, 2011.
Development Potential Resulting from the Preferred Plan
Community Workshop #2 January 21, 2012
1/ 4
MI L E
R A D I U S
1/
4M
I LE
RA
DI U S
K ST
L ST
IMPERIAL AVE
COMMERCIAL ST
WEBSTER AVE
CLAY AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
25TH
ST
28TH
ST
24TH
ST
22N
D
ST
21ST
ST
20TH
ST
19TH
ST
26TH
ST
27TH
ST
29TH
ST
30TH
ST
31ST
ST
32N
D
ST
33RD
ST
33RD
ST
32N
D
ST
31ST
ST
30TH
ST
28TH
ST
OCEAN VIEW BLVD
IRVING AVE
IRVING AVE
EVERETT AVE
HARRISON AVEJULIAN AVE
KEARNEY AVE
CESAR CHAVEZ PKWY
DEWEY ST
S.EVANS ST
SAMPSON ST
EVA
NS
ST
HEN
LEY
ST
Ch
ol a
sC
re
ek
J ST
J ST
STEEL ST
J ST
K ST
L ST
DURANT ST
35TH
ST
GILLETTE ST
WEBSTER AVE
BAN
CRO
FT
ST
BEARDSLEY ST
COMMERCIAL ST
IMPERIAL AVE
ES
CO
ND
I DO
FR
EE
WA
YS
AN
DI E G
OF R E E W
A Y
5
15
Grant HillPark
ShermanE.S.
KimbroughE.S.
MartinLuther King
E.S.
PoliceStation
To Balboa Park
ToDowntown
To Waterfront/Coronado
Preferred Plan:Circulation Plan
0 500 1000
FEET
300150
DY E T T & B HAT IA Urban and Regional P lanners
TOD Node
Orange Line Trolley
Trolley Platform
Planning Area
Overpass/Underpass
Existing Bus Routes
Potential New Bus Route on 28th Street
Existing Bicycle Lanes/Routes
Proposed Bicycle Paths/Lanes/Routes
Figure 4-1:
K ST
L ST
IMPERIAL AVE
COMMERCIAL ST
WEBSTER AVE
CLAY AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
25TH
ST
28TH
ST
24TH
ST
22N
D
ST
21ST
ST
20TH
ST
19TH
ST
26TH
ST
27TH
ST
29TH
ST
30TH
ST
31ST
ST
32N
D
ST
33RD
ST
33RD
ST
32N
D
ST
31ST
ST
30TH
ST
28TH
ST
OCEAN VIEW BLVD
IRVING AVE
IRVING AVE
EVERETT AVE
HARRISON AVEJULIAN AVE
KEARNEY AVE
CESAR CHAVEZ PKWY
DEWEY ST
S.EVANS ST
SAMPSON ST
EVA
NS
ST
HEN
LEY
ST
Ch
ol a
sC
re
ek
J ST
J ST
STEEL ST
J ST
K ST
L ST
DURANT ST
35TH
ST
GILLETTE ST
WEBSTER AVE
BAN
CRO
FT
ST
BEARDSLEY ST
COMMERCIAL ST
IMPERIAL AVE
ES
CO
ND
I DO
FR
EE
WA
YS
AN
DI E G
OF R E E W
A Y
5
15
Grant HillPark
ShermanE.S.
KimbroughE.S.
MartinLuther King
E.S.
PoliceStation
To Balboa Park
ToDowntown
To Waterfront/Coronado
Preferred Plan:Potential Congestion Areas
0 500 1000
FEET
300150
DY E T T & B HAT IA Urban and Regional P lanners
Potential Congestion Areas
TOD Node
Orange Line Trolley
Trolley Platform
Planning Area
Overpass/Underpass
Figure 4-2:
Mobility Strategy and Potential Impacts #1
Circulation Plan
Potential Congestion Areas
K ST
L ST
IMPERIAL AVE
COMMERCIAL ST
WEBSTER AVE
CLAY AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
25TH
ST
28TH
ST
24TH
ST
22N
D
ST
21ST
ST
20TH
ST
19TH
ST
26TH
ST
27TH
ST
29TH
ST
30TH
ST
31ST
ST
32N
D
ST
33RD
ST
33RD
ST
32N
D
ST
31ST
ST
30TH
ST
28TH
ST
OCEAN VIEW BLVD
IRVING AVE
IRVING AVE
EVERETT AVE
HARRISON AVEJULIAN AVE
KEARNEY AVE
CESAR CHAVEZ PKWY
DEWEY ST
S.EVANS ST
SAMPSON ST
EVA
NS
ST
HEN
LEY
ST
Ch
ol a
sC
re
ek
J ST
J ST
STEEL ST
J ST
K ST
L ST
DURANT ST
35TH
ST
GILLETTE ST
WEBSTER AVE
BAN
CRO
FT
ST
BEARDSLEY ST
COMMERCIAL ST
IMPERIAL AVE
ES
CO
ND
I DO
FR
EE
WA
YS
AN
DI E G
OF R E E W
A Y
5
15
Grant HillPark
ShermanE.S.
KimbroughE.S.
MartinLuther King
E.S.
PoliceStation
To Balboa Park
ToDowntown
To Waterfront/Coronado
Preferred Plan:Potential Congestion Areas
0 500 1000
FEET
300150
DY E T T & B HAT IA Urban and Regional P lanners
Potential Congestion Areas
TOD Node
Orange Line Trolley
Trolley Platform
Planning Area
Overpass/Underpass
Figure 4-2:
K ST
L ST
IMPERIAL AVE
COMMERCIAL ST
WEBSTER AVE
CLAY AVE
FRANKLIN AVE
25TH
ST
28TH
ST
24TH
ST
22N
D
ST
21ST
ST
20TH
ST
19TH
ST
26TH
ST
27TH
ST
29TH
ST
30TH
ST
31ST
ST
32N
D
ST
33RD
ST
33RD
ST
32N
D
ST
31ST
ST
30TH
ST
28TH
ST
OCEAN VIEW BLVD
IRVING AVE
IRVING AVE
EVERETT AVE
HARRISON AVEJULIAN AVE
KEARNEY AVE
CESAR CHAVEZ PKWY
DEWEY ST
S.EVANS ST
SAMPSON ST
EVA
NS
ST
HEN
LEY
ST
Ch
ol a
sC
re
ek
J ST
J ST
STEEL ST
J ST
K ST
L ST
DURANT ST
35TH
ST
GILLETTE ST
WEBSTER AVE
BAN
CRO
FT
ST
BEARDSLEY ST
COMMERCIAL ST
IMPERIAL AVE
ES
CO
ND
I DO
FR
EE
WA
Y
SA
N
DI E G
OF R E E W
A Y
5
15
Grant HillPark
ShermanE.S.
KimbroughE.S.
MartinLuther King
E.S.
PoliceStation
To Balboa Park
ToDowntown
To Waterfront/Coronado
Preferred Plan:Potential Congestion Areas
0 500 1000
FEET
300150
DY E T T & B HAT IA Urban and Regional P lanners
Potential Congestion Areas
TOD Node
Orange Line Trolley
Trolley Platform
Planning Area
Overpass/Underpass
Figure 4-2:
Daily AM Peak PM Peak
Existing 35,500 2,570 3,590
Preferred Plan (Net New) 5,800 480 600
Total 41,300 3,050 4,190
% Increase 16% 19% 17%
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2011.
Trip Generation
Community Workshop #2 January 21, 2012
New Trolley Stop at 28th Street
Potential Benefits Potential Impacts and Feasibility
• More convenient access/shorter walking distances for transit users
• Potential additional transit-oriented development opportunities
• Trolley may not pick up enough speed between stations (approximately 2,000 feet distance to 25th Street station)
• Need additional right of way to
install trolley platforms (total ROW is 80 feet; compared with 92 feet at 25th Street station)
• Length of station platform would
obstruct and eliminate access to/from Hensley Street
One-Way Couplet on Commercial Street and Imperial Avenue
Potential Benefits Potential Impacts and Feasibility
• Eliminating left-turn lane/median on Imperial Avenue provides opportunities for bicycle lanes and wider side-walks
• Commercial Street would have operational/safety issues at intersections if it becomes two lanes travelling in the same direction with a center-running trolley. In order to avoid collision, one lane would have to prohibit left-turn movements while the other prohibits right-turns.
• Potential capacity issues when combining directional volumes at peak hours.
Class I Bike Path on Commercial Street (as shown in Bicycle Master Plan)
Potential Benefits Potential Impacts and Feasibility
• A separated bike path would provide a safe biking route
• Convenient bicycle linkage between the corridor and the MLK, Jr. Promenade and Downtown
• ROW is too narrow with trolley and driving lanes to construct a separated bicycle path; would need ROW in addition to existing 80-foot ROW.
• Sharrows (marked shared lanes) could be considered along this corridor.
Source: Fehr & Peers, Dyett & Bhatia, 2011.
Mobility Strategy and Potential Impacts #2
Potential Transportation Improvements and Their Impacts/Feasibility
Class III bicycle lanes, indicated by “sharrows”, may be considered for
both sides of Commercial Street
Platform would
eliminate access to/from Hensley Street
Existing 80-foot right-of-way is
too narrow to install trolley
platforms
Community Workshop #2 January 21, 2012
Imperial Avenue Streetscape Concepts
Imperial Avenue between 24th and 25th Streets
S P U R L O C K P O I R I E R
L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t s
C O M M E R C I A L A N D I M P E R I A L C O R R I D O R M A S T E R P L A N
C I TY OF SAN D I EGO
1/8” = 1 ’ - 0” OC TOBER 6 , 2011
IMPER I A L AVENUE EX I S T ING COND I T IONS S TREE T S EC T ION
S P U R L O C K P O I R I E R
L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t s
C O M M E R C I A L A N D I M P E R I A L C O R R I D O R M A S T E R P L A N
C I TY OF SAN D I EGO
1/8” = 1 ’ - 0” OC TOBER 6 , 2011
IMPER I A L AVENUE CONCEPT 1 S TREE T S EC T ION
S P U R L O C K P O I R I E R
L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t s
C O M M E R C I A L A N D I M P E R I A L C O R R I D O R M A S T E R P L A N
C I TY OF SAN D I EGO
1/8” = 1 ’ - 0” OC TOBER 6 , 2011
IMPER I A L AVENUE CONCEPT 2 S TREE T S EC T ION
S P U R L O C K P O I R I E R
L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t s
C O M M E R C I A L A N D I M P E R I A L C O R R I D O R M A S T E R P L A N
C I TY OF SAN D I EGO
1/8” = 1 ’ - 0” OC TOBER 6 , 2011
IMPER I A L AVENUE CONCEPT 3 S TREE T S EC T ION
S P U R L O C K P O I R I E R
L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t s
C O M M E R C I A L A N D I M P E R I A L C O R R I D O R M A S T E R P L A N
C I TY OF SAN D I EGOOCTOBER 6 , 2011
IMPER I A L AVENUE CONCEPT 2 S TREE T S EC T ION
14 ’ S i d ewa l k 14 ’ S i d ewa l k8 ’ P a r a l l e l P a r k i n g
8 ’ P a r a l l e l P a r k i n g
5 ’ B i k eL ane
5 ’ B i k eL ane
13 ’ Tr a v e l L a ne 13 ’ Tr a v e l L a ne
80 ’ R i g h t O f Way
S P U R L O C K P O I R I E R
L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t s
C O M M E R C I A L A N D I M P E R I A L C O R R I D O R M A S T E R P L A N
C I TY OF SAN D I EGOOCTOBER 6 , 2011
IMPER I A L AVENUE CONCEPT 1 S TREE T S EC T ION
14 ’ S i d ewa l k 14 ’ S i d ewa l k13 ’ - 6” Tr a v e l L a ne
8 ’ P a r a l l e l P a r k i n g
13 ’ - 6” Tr a v e l L a ne
17 ’ D i a gona l P a r k i n g
80 ’ R i g h t O f Way
S P U R L O C K P O I R I E R
L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t s
C O M M E R C I A L A N D I M P E R I A L C O R R I D O R M A S T E R P L A N
C I TY OF SAN D I EGOOCTOBER 6 , 2011
IMPER I A L AVENUE CONCEPT 3 S TREE T S EC T ION
20 ’ S i d ewa l k 14 ’ S i d ewa l k
80 ’ R i g h t O f Way
8 ’ P a r a l l e l P a r k i n g
8 ’ P a r a l l e l P a r k i n g
4 ’ B i k eL ane
4 ’ B i k eL ane
11 ’ Tr a v e l L a ne11 ’ Tr a v e l L a ne
Existing Conditions
Concept 1: Diagonal Parking One diagonal parking aisle and one parallel parking aisle; no bicycle lanes.
Concept 2: Bike Lanes with Existing SidewalksTwo parallel parking aisles; bicycle lanes.
Concept 3: Pedestrian PromenadeTwo parallel parking aisles; one widened sidewalk; narrowed travel and bicycles lanes.
Mark your preference by placing a dot in one of the boxes below:
Community Workshop #2 January 21, 2012
Imperial Avenue between 25th and 26th Streets
Before
After
Before
After
Photo Illustrations of Community Character and Design
Imperial Avenue at 30th Street