preimplantation genetics: a 25-year perspective

32
Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective Alan H Handyside School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, The Bridge Centre, London and Illumina, Cambridge, UK [email protected]

Upload: professor-alan-h-handyside

Post on 12-Aug-2015

29 views

Category:

Healthcare


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Alan H Handyside

School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, The Bridge Centre, London and Illumina, Cambridge, UK

[email protected]

Page 2: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

SINGLE CELL GENETICS AND GENOMICS1987-

PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS1990-

PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC SCREENING1994-

COMMERCIAL PGD/PGS TESTS 2008-

Page 3: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

First Live Births Following PGD of Sex-linked DiseaseBorn July 1990

Gender identification and selective transfer of unaffected female embryos in X-linked disease

Handyside et al. Nature (1990) 344, 768

Page 4: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

• Single gene defectsDuchenne muscular dystrophyHaemophiliaAdrenoleukodystrophyCystic fibrosisSpinal muscular atrophyBeta-thalassaemiaSickle cell diseaseTay-Sachs diseaseGaucher diseaseBattens disease

• Late onsetHuntington’s diseaseEarly onset Alzheimer’s

Some PGD Indications Licensed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in the UK to date

• Cancer predispositionsFamilial polyposis coliRetinoblastomaLi-Fraumeni syndrome

• Chromosome abnormalitiesAneuploidyTranslocationsStructural

• ‘Saviour siblings’HLA matching

Page 5: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Fiorentino et al. (2005) Eur J Hum Genet 13, 953

Combined PGD for Beta Thalassaemia and HLA matching

Page 6: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Single cell genomics

Page 7: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Hou et al (2012) Cell 148, 873

2004

2012

2014

Handyside et al (2004) MHR 10, 767 Hellani et al (2004) MHR 10, 847

Hou et al (2014) Cell 155, 1492

Page 8: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)

Page 9: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Genome-wide genotyping of 300,000 SNP markers in 24h on a beadarray

Page 10: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Natesan et al. (2014) Genetics in Medicine 16, 838

Page 11: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Child

Chr 11 (0 – 135,007Kb)(a)

(b)

Embryo 1

Embryo 2

Embryo 3

Embryo 3

HBB

HBB

Chr 11p15.4 (3,047 – 7,451Kb)

Karyomapping provides thousands of informative markers across each chromosome in a single

universal assay for single gene defects

PGD of Beta Thalassaemia by Karyomapping

Paternal chromosome

Maternal chromosome

Beta globin gene on chr 11

Paternal SNP markers

Maternal SNP markers

Page 12: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)

Page 13: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

• 456 clinics176,275 cycles51,294 live births65,179 babies born

• >1% of all births• Average success rates:

28.45% per cycle35.45% per transfer38% multiple pregnancyrate in women <35

US IVF/ICSI Live Birth Rates 2012 (CDC)

<35 35-37 38-40 41-42 43-44 >440

10203040506070

Live Birth Rates 2012

per cycleper ET

Maternal age

%

Page 14: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44

%

Maternal age

Oocyte aneuploidy and maternal age

Aneuploidy (%)

Live birth (%)

Miscarriage (%)

US CDC/SART data

Page 15: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Genome-wide 24 chromosome screening:Revolutionising IVF practice

• Across all ages, about 50% of human preimplantation embryos are chromosomally abnormal and non-viable at later stages

• Main cause of IVF implantation failure and pregnancy loss

• Most chromosome copy number abnormalities (aneuploidy) arise in female meiosis and are inherited in oocytes

• Maternal meiotic errors increase exponentially with age in women in their 30’s

• All women (including younger women) are affected though the relationship with age varies

• Many oocytes in women in their 40’s have multiple aneuploidies

• Chromosome abnormalities also arise through abnormal fertilisation, syngamy, mitotic divisions following fertilisation and paternal meiotic errors

Page 16: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Applications of 24 chromosome screening• Elective single blastocyst transfer in young, good prognosis

patients• Embryo selection in women in their mid/late 30’s• Prognostic information for women in their 40’s to reduce

repeated treatment cycles with very low chance of pregnancy and live birth

• Specific indications in high risk couples eg severe male factor infertility and repeat pregnancy loss

• ?All eggs and embryos as routine to prevent transfer of non-viable genetically abnormal embryos

• First live birth following polar body biopsy and array CGH in 2009

• To date, an estimated 500,000 embryos have been screened by array CGH alone in approx 200 labs and clinics world-wide

Page 17: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

• 13 previous failed IVF cycles

• 7/9 first polar bodies aneuploid

September 2, 2009

New IVF test–Array CGHProduces baby Oliver,offering hope to infertile

Page 18: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Polar Body Biopsy With Follow Upat Cleavage Stages on Day 3

Christopikou et al. (2013) Hum Reprod 28, 1426

Page 19: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Euploid

Array CGH on single blastomeres biopsied fromcleavage stage embryos

+16

Complex

Page 20: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

24 chromosome copy number detection by blastocyst biopsy andreal time quantitative PCR

n = 15,169

Incidence of Euploid Human Blastocysts withMaternal Age

Modified from Franasiak et al. (2014) Fertil Steril 101, 656

Aneuploid and non-viable

Page 21: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

30–34 35–37 38–40 41–420%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Implant (Sac) Aneuploidy Rate Sacs Lost

Blastocyst Biopsy (Day 5) and PGS by Array CGH:Reduced maternal age effect on CPR per transfer

Harton et al (2013) Fert Stert 100, 1695

Page 22: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

RCTs of 24 chromosome copy number screening

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation (array CGH)(1) Yang et al (2012) Mol Cyto 5, 24

• Good prognosis patients (n=103), maternal age < 35 yr (average 31 yr)

• Blastocyst biopsy on day 5 and array CGH vs morphological selection for single blastocyst transfer on day 6

• 191/425 (44.9%) blastocysts aneuploid• Ongoing pregnancy rate 69.1% vs 41.7% (p = 0.009)• No twins

CPR per oocyte retrieval and 0% multiple pregnancies in young, good prognosis patients with

elective single embryo transfer (eSET)

Page 23: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

36 nucleotides

1 2

24 chromosome copy number analysis by low cost, low read depth (0.1x)next generation sequencing (NGS) and mapped fragment counting

Page 24: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Chr.

1

Chr.

2

Chr.

3

Chr.

4

Chr.

5

Chr.

6

Chr.

7

Chr.

8

Chr.

9

Chr.

10

Chr.

11

Chr.

12

Chr.

13

Chr.

14

Chr.

15

Chr.

16

Chr.

17

Chr.

18

Chr.

19

Chr.

20

Chr.

21

Chr.

22

Chr.

X

Chr.

Y

Euploid Control Embryo sample

Trisomy 22

Counts of sequenced fragments mapping to selected regions of each chromosome: linear relationship with copy number

Page 25: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Array CGH NGS

Samples analysed by array CGH and NGS highly concordant

Fiorentino et al. (2014) Fertility and Sterility 101, 1375Fiorentino et al. (2014) Human Reprod 29, 2802

Page 26: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Trisomy 13

Trisomy 13

Trisomy 21

1

2

3

Increased ratio change as relationship between mapped fragment countsand copy number is linear

Page 27: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

24 chromosome copy number analysis by NGS

• WGA using the same PCR-library based protocol• Sample to report in 12h• Almost 100% concordance with array CGH• Similar resolution to array CGH• Linear relationship between displacement and copy number• Low read depth (0.1x) allows multiplexing of up to 24 samples

reducing cost (currently equivalent to array CGH)• Multiplexing up to 96 samples available soon• First birth reported in 2013• Possibility of testing for other features eg mitochondrial DNA

Page 28: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

• Women ages 25-40 years with at least 2 blastocysts on Day 5• Trophectoderm biopsy on Day 5 and PGS by NGS• Comparator arm – standard morphological assessment• All embryos will undergo vitrification prior to single embryo

transfer• Pregnancy status will be followed up to 20 weeks gestation• 600 patients with embryos transferred• For consenting patients at 10+ weeks gestation, a maternal

blood sample will be drawn for non-invasive prenatal aneuploidy testing

Multi-center, international randomized controlled trial (RCT)of blastocyst biopsy and PGS by NGS with eSET (STAR)

www. clinicaltrials.com NCT02268786 started August 2014

Page 29: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

... the next 25 years

Page 30: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Rapid Advances in Single Cell Genomicsby Next Generation Sequencing

• High throughput and reduced cost• Equipment combining high throughput NGS and

microarray scanning for high resolution cytogenetics

• Simplified protocols and lab automation• Targeted NGS-based strategies for chromosome

copy number and sequence level testing for combined PGS/PGD

Page 31: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

Revolution in Assisted Conception:The Power of Genomics and NGS

• Increased patient screening for karyotype abnormalities and pathological copy number variants, carrier status of thousands of serious single gene disorders and fertility related genes for advanced diagnostics

• Routine genetic screening of all human eggs and embryos using high throughput, low cost NGS for combined testing of genetic imbalance and when necessary PGD of inherited single gene defects

Page 32: Preimplantation Genetics: A 25-Year Perspective

<35 35-37 38-40 41-42 43-44 >440

10203040506070

Live Birth Rates 2012

per cycleper ET

Maternal age

%

<35 35-37 38-40 41-42 43-44 >440

10203040506070

Live Birth Rates with PGS

per cycleper ET

Maternal age

%

<5% multiple pregnancies!