prepaid in mobile telecommunications

8/7/2019 Prepaid in Mobile Telecommunications

1/31

Prepaid in MobileTelecommunications

(Deliverable D0.1c)


2/31


3/31

COPYRIGHT 2001 TELEMATICA INSTITUUT

PERSONAL USE OF THIS MATERIAL IS PERMITTED . HOWEVER, PERMISSION TO REPRINT/REPUBLISH THIS MATERIAL FOR ADVERTISING ORPROMOTIONAL PURPOSES OR FOR CREATING NEW COLLECTIVE WORKS FOR RESALE OR REDISTRIBUTION TO SERVERS OR LISTS , OR TO REUSE ANYCOPYRIGHTED COMPONENT OF THIS WORK IN OTHER WORKS MUST BE OBTAINED FROM OR VIA TELEMATICA INSTITUUT (HTTP://WWW.TELIN.NL).

Colophon

Date : January 23, 2002

Version : 1.0

Project reference : GigaABP/2001/D01.c

TI reference : TI/RS/2001/082

URL : http://gigaabp.telin.nl

Access permissions : Public

Status : Final

Editor : Arjen Bakker

Company : Atos Origin

Author : Arjen Bakker

Synopsis:

In this document, an overview is provided for

different concepts of prepayment in mobile

telecommunications.


4/31


5/31

G I G A A B P / 2 0 0 1 / D 0 . 1 C V

Preface

After a brief introduction on mobile telecommunications, this document describes different

concepts for prepayment. Two recharging concepts are described, and different fraud

scenarios have been recognised. The description of concepts in this document were obtained

from documentation and practice, and deal with current situations in second generation

mobile networks.

The presentation in this report is the result of, and input to the research performed within the

GigaPort Applications project Giga Accounting, Billing and Payment (GigaABP,

http://gigaabp.telin.nl) that has been performed within the Telematica Instituut in Enschede,

the Netherlands. As partners in the Telematica Instituut consortium TNO FEL (e-Business)and Atos Origin contributed to the GigaABP project.

More information with regard to the content of this report or on the GigaABP project can be

obtained from the project manager, Sander Hille (email: [email protected], or by phone:

+31-(0)53 4850485). Other reports that resulted from the project are available at

http://gigaabp.telin.nl (Publications), or through the GigaPort web site: http://www.gigaport.nl.

We would like to kindly thank the reviewer Paul Porskamp for the effort that he has put in

reviewing this document and providing feedback and additional comments.

Sander C. Hille

Project manager GigaABP.


6/31


7/31

G I G A A B P VII

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 9

2 Mobile Telecommunication Architectures 11

2.1 Introduction 11

2.2 Components explained 11

2.3 GPRS extensions towards third generation mobile networks 13

3 Prepaid Concepts 15

3.1 Handset based concept 15

3.2 Hot billing concept 163.3 Service Node Concept 17

3.4 Mobile Intelligent Network concept 18

4 Recharging concepts 21

4.1 Recharging vouchers 21

4.2 Recharching from a bank account 22

5 Fraud & abuse scenarios 23

6 Conclusions 25

The Classical IN Architecture 27

The IN evolution towards an open service-enabling architecture 28


8/31


9/31

G I G A A B P 9

1 Introduction

A prepaid service is a service for which the customer pays in advance. The ability to pay in

advance for services has become a global, multi-billion dollar business, used for fixed and

mobile telecommunications, Internet, pay TV and across other industries. Currently prepaid

telecommunication services are offered by over 90 % of European mobile operators, and

consist of approximately 60 % of all mobile communications in the year 2000. In the next

three years, a shift from prepaid voice to prepaid data services can be expected, driven by the

new and improved enabling technologies for mobile communications.

Two different perceptions can be distinguished:

1. The service provider perception:

The post-paid principle is based on a strong relationship between provider and customer. The

relationship must be able to provide the service provider with the assurance that all debts will

be paid. No matter how strong the relationship, there is always a large risk of bad debt. Based

on international whereabouts, and applicable laws, these debts can be issued, but there is

always a considerate amount of money involved in retrieving them.

Prepaid services not only prevent the provider from handling bad debt situations, but in the

current situation, they also lower the incremental strain on resources. Today, around 50 % of

customer enquiries relate to the billing process alone.

Besides the claimed advantages, there is a downside. Prepaid service offering requires real-

time or almost real-time accounting, to prevent unauthorised use. This puts some serious

constraints on the system and the infrastructure used by the operator. Also the overall risk

profile is larger than with post-paid subscription based services, because of the variability in

revenues, and the unpredictability of these revenues.

2. The customer perception:

Customers typically associate prepaid with simplicity and transparency. Especially for

customers using new services, prepaid services offer the big advantage of predictability, and

prevent the customer from any surprises, when new services are being billed, and the bills are

presented.

Disadvantages for the customer are the additional effort for upgrading his account, and the

loss of interest because of the early payment.

This document will evaluate the four different prepaid concepts that are currently adopted in

the Telecommunications Industry. In practice, it appears that around 60% of the European

Telecom operators use some sort of hybrid form, instead of total devotion to one pure

concept.


10/31


11/31

G I G A A B P 11

2 Mobile Telecommunication Architectures

2.1 Introduction

In order to gain a good understanding of the practical and conceptual implementations of

prepaid services in mobile telecommunication networks, a limited but basic knowledge of the

current second generation mobile networks is needed. Second generation refers to current

GSM networks in Europe and different implementations with roughly the same functional

characteristics elsewhere. The upcoming UMTS and comparable standards are considered to

be the third generation mobile networks (3G). GPRS is an intermediate solution, commonly

referred to as a 2.5G mobile network.

Figure 1 shows a network architecture, in which the most common elements are shown. The

faded components illustrate the presence of multiple interconnected instances. For example,

it shows that multiple Mobile Switching Centres (MSCs) are interconnected, and that one

MSC is connected to multiple Base Station Controllers (BSCs), which in turn, are connected

to multiple Base Transceivers Stations (BTSs).

BSC

BTS

Phone

HLR

AuC

Solid Lines: Voice TrunkDashed Lines: Signaling

BTS: Base Transceiver StationBSC: Base Station Controller

MSC: Mobile Switching Centre

MSCBSC

VLR

PSTN

SSP

AuC: Authentication CenterHLR: Home Location Register

SSP: Service Switching PointVAS: Value added Service

VLR: Visitor Location Register

VAS

Platform

MSCMSC

SSP

SSP

Figure 1: Network architecture of second-generation mobile networks

2.2 Components explained

BTS: The Base Transceiver Station consists of all radio transmission equipment (transceiver,

antenna, etc.) and a link to the Base Station Controller (BSC). This link can be either a fixed

trunk, or a wireless link type of connection.

BSC: The Base Station Controller is the brain of the radio part of the network. It controls a

group of BTSs and controls the mobility of the Mobile Stations (MS) or handsets. This


12/31

12 G I G A P O R T

includes location detection and handovers (from one BTS to an other). During call set-up, the

BSC assigns a channel to the MS.

MSC: The Mobile Switching Centre plays a central role in the service part of the network. It

handles call set-up and termination, it routes traffic to the desired destination, and it provides

billing detail information in the form of Call Detail Records (CDRs). The MSC registers

unknown MSs that are visiting the network in the Visitor Location Register (VLR), and

provides necessary information to the home network to keep track of the MS. In the home

network, a Home Location Register (HLR) is the primary point of information for the related

MSs. Each MS is assigned to one HLR. The MSC interfaces with both other MSCs, and with

the fixed or wire line network. Value Added Services (VAS), like 0800 services, call-back

service, automatic redial etc, are provided on a VAS platform, that is most likely based on an

Intelligent Network (IN) platform.

HLR: The Home Location Register contains valuable information about permanently assigned

home users, and their handsets. Examples of the information that is stored here are: Which

services does the customer use (voice, data, prepaid), present location of the customer as

derived from other foreign MSCs, the International Mobile Subscriber Identification (IMSI)

number assignment, which is an internationally unique identifier for mobile communications.

AuC: The Authentication Centre is used for the verification of the identity of the users. It uses

information from the Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) located in the MS. The AuC is often

combined with the HLR.

VLR: The Visitor Location Register is co-located with each MSC. It stores information about

the present location of the visiting users. It also contains information about the current status

of the MS (power on/off, active/idle mode). To protect the IMSI number from fraudulent use,

the VLR assigns a Temporary Mobile Subscriber Id (TMSI) based on the IMSI, for use during

the session. (Reason for this is that the frequently changing TMSI is harder to catch for

misuse).

SSP: The Service Switching Point illustrates the interconnection point with the fixed switching

network or Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). Present switching networks are

based on Intelligent Networks (IN), where the traffic part of the network is separated from the

signalling part of the network1. The SSP is actually part of the IN architecture, and represents

the signalling application on the switch. Strictly speaking, the interconnection from the mobile

network infrastructure with the PSTN will take place via an interconnection device that

supports not only signalling, but is also capable of realising actual traffic throughput.

1

The signalling network takes care of call set-up and routing issues. A traffic connection will be realised after aconnection has been set-up by the signalling network. For a more detailed explanation, see Appendix A


13/31

G I G A A B P 13

2.3 GPRS extensions towards third generation mobile networks

This section deals with some extensions that are currently made to the second-generationmobile networks to support efficient data transport over the current circuit switched mobile

infrastructure. The General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) is an ETSI2

standard that is

targeted at reuse of the current mobile infrastructures by offering packet switched (always-on)

data connections. The concept is based on two basic ideas: first, assign some voice

channels to be used by the GPRS service; second, split the voice part and the data part in the

fixed network. The voice traffic will be handled by a typical voice network infrastructure

(optimised for point to point circuits), the data traffic will be handled by a typical data network

infrastructure (optimised for bursty packetised traffic).

The radio channels assigned to the typically bursty non-continuous communication will beshared amongst many different handsets demanding this service. Contrary to the situation

with plain old GSM, with GPRS there is no dedicated channel usage. Different users can use

this packet-channel for mutual concurrent use as long as this use is packet based.

GTP

backbone

BTS

Phone

HLR

AuC

MSCBSC

VLR

PSTN

SSP

SGSN GGSNIP

ISP

Corp.

Voice link

Data link

VAS

Platform

SGSN: Serving GPRS Support Node

GGSN: Gateway GPRS Support Node

Figure 2: Network architecture for GPRS extensions on second-generation mobile networks

The conceptual difference between GSM and GPRS data services is the always-on data

support. This is an important enabler for low bandwidth continuous data services like

messaging, buddy lists and small information services like address lookups and calendar

functionality. The former statement may seem paradoxical because of the use of the word

continuous. In the first case, continuous referred to the dedicated traffic link, while in the

second case, continuous referred to the service.

2

European Telecommunications Standards Institute


14/31

14 G I G A P O R T

GPRS-based services - and especially the network use involved - demand a revolutionary

change in the way telecommunications are charged. It is obvious that with the use of an

always-on network service, the time based billing concept does not apply. Different billingstrategies have to be explored to determine the most suitable billing concept, or a

combination of complementary concepts best suited for the situation. The concept that is

currently deployed by most of the telecom operators is volume based billing. The deployment

of volume based billing fits in with the strategy to correlate the usage costs with the most

restricted network aspect, capacity.


15/31

G I G A A B P 15

3 Prepaid Concepts

In this section the four most important prepaid billing services used in the mobile

telecommunications service will be discussed.

3.1 Handset based concept

Handset based systems are also called Advise of Charge (AoC) systems or SIM based

systems. In contrast to the other types of prepaid systems, the credit information is stored and

accounted on the mobile device (handset + SIM) itself. All other architectures register usage

in the network instead.

When the caller wishes to make a connection to a recipient, he dials the desired number, and

a request will be placed at the Mobile Switching Centre (MSC). The MSC checks the kind of

call at the Home Location Register (HLR), and detects that it involves a pre-paid caller. The

MSC uses the call details to determine the call rate, and sends "Advise of Charge" (AoC)

parameters back to the mobile device. Based on these parameters, the handset itself will

determine the maximum allowed call duration. After acknowledgement of the receipt of the

AoC, the MSC will realise the connection with the call recipient. The session is terminated

when either the call is manually ended by one of the parties, or the call duration reaches the

predetermined level from the AoC. In Figure 3, the process ofcall origination3

is il lustrated.

MSC SSP

4.

3

12

3 3

Solid Lines: Voice Trunk

MSC: Mobile Switching Center

Dashed Lines: Signaling

SSP: Service Switching Point

Figure 3: Prepaid Call origination in handset based approach

Steps involved in Prepaid Call Origination of a handset based system:

1. Prepaid customer initiates a Call (dials number)

2. MSC sends AoC to handset. AoC is based on rate plan and various parameters (such

as time and destination)

3. If the handset supports AoC, then the handset will acknowledge the receipt of the

AoC parameters. If no acknowledgement is received by the MSC the connection is

denied, otherwise the call is connected.

3

See terminology


16/31

16 G I G A P O R T

4. During the call, the handset uses the AoC parameters for tariff information. It

decrements the credit on the SIM card by incrementing the used units in the SIM

cards Accumulated call meter (ACM)

4

. If the SIM card determines that the ACM hasreached the maximum allowed ACM threshold value, the handset disconnects the

call. This AoC disconnection mechanism works automatically in the handset, without

any involvement from the network.

3.2 Hot billing concept

In case of the hot billing approach, like in the case of post-paid telephony, accounting will take

place based on Call Detail Records (CDR's). The credit adjustment will be done afterwards.

Although this concept is sometimes referred to as real-time billing, it isnt real-time. It can only

be considered as near-real-time compared to the bulk processing in Telecom's traditionalbilling systems. Because of the concept of using CDR's, the accounting takes place after the

call has been ended, and the CDR has been created. Directly after the termination of a call,

the CDR is created at the MSC, and sent to the prepaid billing platform. The prepaid Service

Centre (PSC) guards the status of the user "account". When the status of a prepaid account

has changed, most likely because exhaustion of credits, the PSC informs the HLR of the

changed status. The HLR, as the single source of status information for the mobile accounts,

guards the access to the network. Every time a MN (mobile node) sets up a call, the HLR is

consulted. If the prepaid account has been exhausted, no access will be allowed (except for

special numbers of course).

MSC SSP

PSCHLR

AuC

1

2/3

3 3

4

5

Solid Lines: Voice Trunk

Dashed Lines: SignalingAuC: Authentication CenterHLR: Home Location Register


PSC: Prepaid Service Center


Figure 4: Prepaid call origination in Hot Billing approach

Steps involved in the call origination for the Hot Billing approach:

1. The customer dials the desired number, and its IMSI number (ID) is sent to the MSC.

2. The MSC instructs the HLR to determine the validity of the service request based on

the IMSI number.

4

ACM stands for accumulated call meter. It is a specific data field on the SIM card that is used together with apredetermined maximum value (ACM*) determine the current credit level at any time.


17/31

G I G A A B P 17

3. If the verification is successful, the HLR downloads the customer data and a prepaid

tag to the MSC. The call is connected.

4. When the call terminates, a CDR is created and sent to the prepaid service centre.

5. The prepaid service centre decrements the prepaid credit based on the received

billing record. If the balance is negative, the prepaid service centre instructs the HLR

to suspend the prepaid service or to delete the customers record.

It is obvious that because of the delay involved in the processing of the CDR, there is always

the possibility that the user calls again directly after call termination, before the CDR is

processed. In this case the credit balance is not updated, and the connection can be granted

even if the user exceeds its credit limit. This one call exposure cannot be totally banned out,

but the risk can be limited by taking some measures. An example is the closure of CDRsbefore the end of the session if the amount of used credits exceeds some predetermined

value. This can result in multiple CDRs per session, and because of performance reasons,

the operator must define a well-considered rule to keep the balance between processing

costs and possible risks.

3.3 Service Node Concept

The Service Node concept uses distributed Service Nodes (SN) that are co-located with the

MSC's for call handling and charging. This concept is the most widely deployed prepaid

service solution in the initial stage of prepaid service provisioning. It is relatively easy to installbecause a phased approach can be used to add externally controlled prepaid services to the

existing post-paid service infrastructure. The SN is typically co-located with the MSC, and is

connected to the MSC using standard T1/E1 trunks. Service nodes are typically implemented

by using Computer Telephony Integration (CTI) techniques or PC-controlled private branch

exchange (PBX) techniques. The former is the most flexible because of the support of

standard API's, while the latter is better suited for large and cost effective solutions.

MSC SSP

Service

Node PBP

1

2

3

4

4 4



PBP: Prepaid Billing Platform

Figure 5. Prepaid call origination in Service Node concept

Steps involved in the call origination for the Service Node approach:

1. The prepaid customer initiates a call.


18/31

18 G I G A P O R T

2. The MSC identifies that the caller is a prepaid customer. The MSC sets up the trunk

to the service node.

3. The service node authorises the call request by consulting the prepaid billing platform.

4. If the call request is granted, the service node sets up a trunk back to the MSC, and

the trunk is eventually connected to the called party. The service node starts credit

decrement.

3.4 Mobile Intelligent Network concept

The Mobile Intelligent Network (Mobile-IN) solution is considered to be the most complete

solution to prepaid service for mobile communications today. It is however, a very expensive

solution that can most likely only be afforded by large operators. This concept is based on acentralised Prepaid Service Control Point (P-SCP), that communicated with the MSC's

through an intelligent network protocol (e.g. CAMEL5) over the SS7 signalling network. All

billing information for a prepaid customer is stored in the P-SCP.

MSC SSP

Intelligent

PeripheralP-SCP

1 5 5

2,7

3,6,8

4

3

Solid Lines: Voice TrunkDashed Lines: Signaling


P-SCP: Prepaid Service Control Point


Figure 5. Prepaid call origination in Mobile-IN approach

Steps involved in the call origination for the Mobile Intelligent Network approach:

1. The prepaid customer initiates a call.

2. The MSC encounters the Mobile-IN call set-up trigger. The call set-up process issuspended, and a prepaid call request message is sent to the P-SCP. The message

includes the MSISDN (telephone number), location information of the MS, and the

called party telephone number. The P-SCP determines whether or not the customer

can make the call by querying its database. Based upon threshold processing

parameters defined by the prepaid billing system, the P-SCP may deny or accept the

call.

3. Optional (1): The P-SCP instructs the MSC to establish an ISDN (voice) link to the

intelligent peripheral.

5

See Appendix A


19/31

G I G A A B P 19

4. Optional (2): The P-SCP instructs the intelligent peripheral to provide account status

notification, such as the balance and the charging rate for the call to be made to the

prepaid customer.

5. The P-SCP asks the MSC to resume the call set-up procedure, and the call is

eventually connected. The P-SCP starts a countdown timer. The amount of credit

decrement (from the current balance) is derived from carrier-defined threshold

parameters, the rate plan, the destination, and time/date dependency.

6. The call terminates when either the balance runs out or the call completes. If the

countdown timer ends before the customer terminates the call, the P-SCP instructs

the MSC to terminate the call. For normal call completion, this step does not exist.

7. Once the call is terminated, the MSC encounters a WIN call-release trigger, which

sends a disconnect message to the P-SCP indicating the completion time of the call.

8. The P-SCP rates the completed call and updates the customers prepaid balance

accordingly. Then it sends the current balance and cost of the call to the MSC. The

MSC releases the call.

Although the Intelligent Network approach is the most expensive solution, it is the most

promising solution for the future. Current developments in the telecommunications industry

are targeted at functional separation between the technical network routing functionality, and

the intelligent functionality used for service creation, and service exploitation. The idea behind

this movement from expensive and Telco controlled service creation environments to a more

flexible and accessible service provider model is enabling faster and more cost effective value

added services by independent parties, and enabling control over the services to third party

service providers, including external billing providers. Appendix A provides more specific

information about Intelligent Networks, and the current developments.


20/31


21/31

G I G A A B P 21

4 Recharging concepts

The two main steps involved in recharging prepaid accounts are buying or payment, and

activation. The buying step can be a very basic exchange of money against service credits.

This transaction can be totally anonymous because no personal information is required. In the

next step, the acquired credits will have to be assigned to a prepaid account (phone number)

before the credits can actually be used.

Common implementations for recharging prepaid accounts are:

Recharging vouchers

Direct debit from bank account

Electronic purses Credit card

Currently the first two implementations are the most used ones. They will be explained in an

example.

4.1 Recharging vouchers

In case of the use of recharging vouchers, the phone user buys a prepaid voucher that

represents a certain credit value. These vouchers are offered from local retailers, but specific

information has to be delivered by the telecom operator. The voucher contains a unique serial

number identifying the voucher as a unique item, and a hidden record number (HRN),

referring to a record in the prepaid administration system. This record represents a single

amount of payment units. It is very important for the integrity of the prepayment recharging

process, that both the serial number and the HRN number are used only once. If not, users

trying to activate their newly acquired credits can be confronted with empty records. The

situation where a user has acquired a voucher, with a HRN from a record that has already be

activated is referred to as a flat vouchersituation. In the next chapter we will see how this

situation can be caused by fraud activities. Issuing the vouchers (serial numbers) is registered

in the distribution chain, while the issuing of HRNs will be centralised at the service providers

responsibility.

Now what happens? A user goes to the local retailer, for example a supermarket or gas

station, and buys a voucher. Before he can access the number needed for the activation of

his credits, he has to break the seal. This usually means that he has to scratch to make the

number visible. Now that the number is known, he calls a special number from the service

provider and will be in contact with an interactive voice response system (IVR). This IVR will

guide him through the activation process, where the hidden number has to be entered. When

entering the number, the credit amount corresponding to this record number will be assigned

to the prepaid account of the subscriber. At the same time, the HRN in the administration

system will be marked as empty.


22/31

22 G I G A P O R T

4.2 Recharching from a bank account

In the second example, a bank account will be used to transfer value from the bank accountto the prepaid account. It is very important that there is a solid agreement between the

individual banks and the service provider. The user must have an account at one of the banks

that is involved. The concept behind this is that whenever a user is dialling in at the service

providers IVR with the intent of upgrading his account, an option is provided to redirect the

call to another IVR of a bank. This bank IVR offers the functionality to transfer value from the

users bank account to the prepaid account. The caller must identify himself to the bank with a

personal secure Personal Identification Number (PIN).


23/31


24/31

24 G I G A P O R T

Last Call exposure:Prepaid systems based on Hot Billing are subject to the abuse of last

calls. Because the accounting is not real-time, but instead is done just after termination of the

call, the chance of negative credit levels is huge. This is no big problem for normal situationswhere the credit will be topped up again, but intentional fraudsters can exploit this situation by

generating extensive use, for example by call forwarding mechanisms.

Simultaneous charging using same HRN: It has occurred that two mobile phones

connecting to the upload mechanism at the same instance of time, both upgraded their credit

by using the same HRN. Although there is no real confirmation for this at the moment, it

makes clear that this situation must be prevented by the organisation of the upgrading system

and processes.


25/31

G I G A A B P 25

6 Conclusions

Prepaid telecom services differ from post-paid services in numerous ways. This is not

because of the delivered service itself, but because of the way the delivery of the service is

experienced. Prepaid services offer both advantages and disadvantages, for the user as well

as the service provider. For the service provider, a prepaid service clearly decreases the

chance on bad debt. It broadens the market by opening up a new (partly overlapping) target

clientele, and it lowers the overhead on the processing of post-paid services. On the other

hand, it increases the financial risks because the income from prepaid sales is less

predictable than subscription6

based services. This is mainly because of the higher churn7

rates. Prepaid users, in contrast with subscription-based users, can easily decide to buy

credits from other service providers if they provide a better offer.

From the user perspective, the main advantages are budget control and, depending on the

service, possibly the lack of subscription fees. Considering the use of next generation

services, where pricing schemes probably will be even more complicated than the pricing

schemes of current telecom services, prepaid billing can provide some protection against

unintended high expenses. Downsides on prepaid for the customer can be introduced by

possible unfavourable pricing or recharging fuss.

We have discussed different implementation concepts for prepaid services in mobile

telecommunications. The most important differences are found in the location of the prepaid

balance info and counter mechanism. Concepts using central, network based credit

information and counters, can be better prepared against attacks from skilled hardware

hackers, but fraud and abuse can never be totally expelled.

Service providers should decide on the degree of centralisation of the credit information, and

credit decreasing operations. This decision will be based on the security policy, and the

lifecycle phase of the service delivery. At the start of the service lifecycle, service providers

can easily start with one or more decentralised service delivery units. When the service

matures, and the delivery grows, a more centralised service management architecture is

preferred.

6

Note that for post-paid services, an existing relationship between the user and the service provider (in the form of asubscription) is required.7

Churn is used to indicate the number of users that leave a service provider to go to a competitor.


26/31


27/31

G I G A A B P 27

Appendix A: Intelligent Network Concept

This section will provide a brief overview of Intelligent Network (IN) concept. The IN is more

than a network architecture, it is a complete framework for the creation, provisioning and

management of advanced communication services. The IN is a telecommunications network

service control architecture that is a generic platform for open, distributed, service-

independent communication. The availability of services, and the flexibility of the service layer

are influenced by the implementation choices made by the operator and the IN technology

supplier.

The Classical IN Architecture

Intelligent networks are based upon the principle of separation of the network routing

functionality and service intelligence. Upon service request, the network takes care of the

creations of the connection, based on the information provided by the overlaying intelligence.

Whenever the network has claimed a route from A to B, the actual connection is realised. This

way the expensive network circuits are not claimed by the call set-up procedure when there

is still a chance of failure (e.g. B is not available). This is in fact just a sample of what IN can

do. In fact a whole lot of Value Added Service can be realised on IN platforms.

- - - signall ing____ datalink

___ voicelink

DB: Database

SCE: Service Creat ion E nvirornmentSMS: Service Management SystemSCP: Service Controll PointSSP: S ervice S witching P ointSTP: Service Transfer PointSS7: Signal l ing System 7

Signalling network

SSPSSP/STP

SSP

Telephone Telephone

VLR

VLR

SCP

SMS

SCE

SS7

Figure 6: Intelligent network concept and components for wire line network


28/31

28 G I G A P O R T

For the signalling part of the network, the SS78

protocol standard is used. The SS7 network

sets up and tears down the call, handles all the routing decisions and supports all modern

telephony services such as 0800 numbers, call forwarding, caller ID and Local NumberPortability (LNP). The voice switches, known as Service Switching Points (SSPs), query

Service Control Point (SCP) databases. Connections are made directly or via packet switches

known as Signal Transfer Points (STPs). Accessing databases using a separate signalling

network enables the system to more efficiently obtain static information such as the services a

customer has signed up for and dynamic information such as ever-changing traffic conditions

in the network. In addition, a voice circuit is not tied up until a connection is actually made

between both parties. There is an international version of SS7 standardised by the ITU, and

national versions determined by each country. Which services are actually provided by the IN,

is determined by the Capabilities of the Intelligent Network Application Part (INAP), that

operates as a protocol on top of SS7. The service capabilities are organized in Capability setsCS-1 to CS-3, defined by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU). CS-1 defines

standard single ended, single point of control services, like number portability, call forwarding,

free phone en much more. CS-2 adds enhanced IN services, such as mobility and broadband

services, IN interworking, to provide international service provisioning.

For European mobile networks, two application technologies are used. The first is INAP that is

also used in fixed IN technology on top of the SS7 network. The second is the Customized

Applications for Mobile network Enhanced Logic (CAMEL), specifically for GSM networks.

Both INAP and Camel are based on the Intelligent Network Conceptual Model (INCM), a

conceptual layered framework for design and capabilities for IN design and is represented bya Service Plane, Global Functional Plane, Distributed Functional Plan and the Physical Plane.

Camel is an important enabler for Value Added Services (VAS) in mobile networks.

Comparable to the INAP capability sets, the capabilities are dependant on the CAMEL phase

(I to III), and include services as automatic voice response, and prepaid services. The future

of CAMEL depends on its ability to adapt to the integrated voice and data services for 2,5+

mobile networks. The IETF is currently working to define capabilities for hybrid IN + IP

networks. These capabilities aim at close integration between advanced telephony and

Internet services. Examples of initiatives on hybrid capabilities are PINT and SPIRIT.

The IN evolution towards an open service-enabling architecture

Classical INs are evolving towards more open service delivery platforms. Integration of

telecommunication services and Internet services, and the adoption of new service

provisioning models is gaining momentum. This results in new requirements for intelligence in

telecom networks. Some important initiatives aiming at these needs are:

8Signalling System 7is the protocol used in the public switched telephone system (the "intelligent network" or

"advanced intelligent network") for setting up calls and providing services. SS7 is a separate signalling network that isused in Class 4 and Class 5 voice switches.


29/31

G I G A A B P 29

IN Forum (IN-CT and IN-IP groups):

IN Forum (INF) CT-IN Integration WG and IN/IP Integration WG. During 1998, the IN/CT

workgroup has been developing a positioning paper to define the opportunities and theservices enabled by the convergence of IN and Computer Telephony. The mission of the

IN/SS7-Internet Protocol Working Group is to facilitate the broader application of Intelligent

Network (IN) capabilities in the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) to access Internet

functionality and vice-versa for providing synergistic arrangements for existing and new

services. The Working Group will define interoperability requirements, identify any protocol

shortfalls, strive to resolve any such shortfalls through influencing appropriate standards, and

develop implementation agreements that meet industry opportunities for inter-networking IN/

SS7 and Internet capabilities.

3GPP OSA:3GPP (3

rdgeneration partnership project) was conceived some two to three years ago with

the express purpose of accelerating work on mobility. Existing standards organisations such

as the ITU-T and ETSI had been successful in producing a vast array of international

standards for different technologies; however, the speed with which this was attained was

slow, especially when compared to bodies such as the IETF. It therefore remained a target of

the mobile industry to produce coherent specifications in a time frame that was ahead of

those within the standards industry -hence the formation of 3GPP. At the end of 1998 and the

beginning of 1999 3GPP formed a group known as OSA, open service architecture. The

purpose of this group was to focus 3GPP's efforts on defining an architecture in support of the

virtual home environment (VHE) the need here being to provide mobile users with accessto their service offerings irrespective of their position within or outside the home network

environment.

Parlay Project:

The Parlay project, large players from both telecommunications and IT industries are

combining their strengths to create an open network API for telecommunications networks.

The API will allow secure access to core and advanced capabilities embedded in the networks

of todays telephone companies while being sufficiently adaptable to address similar

capabilities in future communication technologies. The scope of the activity includes all kinds

of communication capabilities such as telephone technologies (wire line, wireless, and IP

telephony), as well as video and data communications. The API will not directly open up the

networks' signalling for public usage. Rather, network capabilities will be encapsulated and

made visible using object technology in a secure, manageable, and billable manner. Client

access to these capabilities will be realised using object access technologies such as COM or

CORBA.In the industry, Parlay is seen as an important step towards network independent

service provisioning. It is also considered an important enabler for third party Billing providers.

In 2001 the first Bil ling implementations based on Parlay technology have been launched. The

current members of the Parlay Group are AT&T, BT, Cisco Systems, Ericsson, IBM, Lucent

Technologies, Microsoft, Siemens AG and Ulticom.

Java IN (JAIN):

Organized by Sun in 1998, the JAIN initiative addresses the needs of next-generation telecom


30/31

30 G I G A P O R T

networks by developing a set of industry-defined APIs for Integrated Networks. JAIN is a Java

Beans based industry framework for the Java-based IN service implementation. Sun joint

forces with the Parlay project and developed a JAIN API specifically for the Parlay 2.1specification.


31/31

References

[BiCh01] Yi-Bing Lin, Imrich Chlamtac, Wireless and Mobile Network Architectures,

Wiley Computer Publishing, 2001: ISBN 0-471-39492-0

[MaPo96] T. Magedanz, R. Popescu-Zeletin, Intelligent Networks, Basic Technology,

standards and Evolution, International Thomson Computer Press, London 1996.

ISBN 1-85032-293-7

Available at: http://www.wiley.com/compbooks/

[AMS01] American Management Systems, The Next Generation of Prepaid Services, results

of an industry survey, March 2001.

[Sube01] Subex Systems Limited, Whitepaper on pre-paid fraud, 2001

prepaid in mobile telecommunications

Documents