preparation of nanohybrid antibiotic from...
TRANSCRIPT
z
Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp 29-35, Winter 2018
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Preparation of nanohybrid antibiotic from levofloxacin and
determination its inhibitory efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus
isolated from diabetic foot ulcer
Sara M. AL-Hussaini1 , Ali Abdul Kadhim Al-Ghanimi1 and Hesham Ibrahim Kadhim2
1 Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Kerbala, Kerbala, Iraq. 2 Babil Health Directorate, Hilla, Iraq.
ARTICLE INFORMATIONS Article History:
Submitted: 29 December 2017 Revised version received:
15 January 2018
Accepted: 20 January 2018 Published online: 1 March 2018
Key words: Nanohybrid Layered double hydroxide
Levofloxacin
S.aureus
Corresponding author: Sara M. AL-Hussaini
Email: [email protected] Department of Biology
College of Science
University of Kerbala
Kerbala
Iraq.
ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to Prepare nano hybrid from levofloxacin antibiotic and evaluation of its inhibitory effect against Staphylococcus aureus from diabetic foot ulcer. Methods: A total 43 swab samples were collected from diabetic foot ulcer
patients hospitalized in AL-Hussein Teaching Hospital in Sacred Kerbala province, it has been obtained 9 isolates were Staphylococcus aureus. A nanohybrid antibiotic LEV-LDH was prepared using direct ion exchange between antibiotic levofloxacin (LEV) and layered double hydroxide (LDH). The new nano antibiotic was identified. FT-IR spectroscopy revealed the appearance of new groups in the LEV-LDH spectrum, which indicates the formation of a new compound. The X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) spectrum revealed the appearance of new diffraction planes in the nanohybrid antibiotic spectrum in compare with spectrum of layered double hydroxide. The two and three-dimensional image of the above compound in atomic force microscope confirmed the formation of new antibiotic with nano dimensions. The antimicrobial activity of the nanohybrid antibiotic was studied against 9 isolates of S. aureus. Results: The results showed that the highest inhibition was obtained
against isolate 3 with average inhibition zone of 34.642 mm. The combination between the antibiotics LEV-LDH and teicoplanin was studied against S. aureus bacteria, the results showed a synergistic inhibition effect against some isolates while others gave antagonist inhibition effect. Conclusion: The efficacy of the nanohybrid levofloxacin antibiotic in inhibition of isolated S. aureus.
Copyright©2018, Sara M. AL-Hussaini This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
INTRODUCTIONA global statistics refer to that 15% of people with
diabetes globally exposed to diabetic foot ulcer that is a
source of many diseases. Different types of
microorganisms contribute in an incidence of infections
of foot ulcer and bacteria stands in front of it by
possessing of different virulence firstly, and their
resistance to antibiotics secondly. Acute infections
almost limited to single type of Gram positive and
negative spherical bacteria, while chronic infections
characterized by presence of 3-5 types of coagulase-
negative Staphylococcus bacteria and Corynebacterium
species in colonization of soft tissue, as well as foot
ulcer may allow to the presence of some types of
anaerobic bacteria and fungi1.
Available online at http://www.sjomr.org
SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
OF MEDICAL RESEARCH Vo. x, Issue x, pp xx - xx, Winter
2018
Citation: AL-Hussaini S.M., Al-Ghanimi A.A. and Kadhim H.I. “Preparation of nanohybrid antibiotic from levofloxacin and determination
its inhibitory efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from diabetic foot ulcer”. Sci. J. Med. Res. 2018, 2 (5): 29-35.
ISSN: 2520-5234
Sci. J. Med. Res., Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp 29- 35, Winter 2018 29 .
Several studies have indicated the dominance of S.
aureus in the diabetic foot ulcers infections, as the
surface components of these bacteria adhere to the host
and then release many of the virulence factors that
invade the immune system such as α-hemolysin and
phenol soluble modulins and Panton-valentine
Leukocidin These factors can analyze host cells as well
as secretion Several factors inhibit the function of
neutrophils such as Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of
staphylococci These bacteria also have many antigens
(which activate T cells) such as (SE: enterotoxins , SEI:
enterotoxin –like protein and TSST: toxic shock
syndrome toxin) In addition, exfoliative toxins facilitates
the invasion of bacteria to host skin2.
Levofloxacin antibiotic belong to the third generation of
fluoroquinolones and characterized by wide-spectrum
effect against bacteria. Its inhibitory effect affects both
gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria3. In recent
years, nanotechnology has tended to find solutions that
can effectively delivery the therapeutic compound to the
target site. The drugs have been loaded onto
nanocarriers. The latter are easily received by cells
compared to the larger molecules, so they have been
successfully used as delivery tools of vital active
compounds because the method of combining the drug
with a nanocarrier and the strategy of reaching the target
is very important for its use in treatment4.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of the nanohybrid antibiotic from
layared magnesium/ aluminum double hydroxide
(Mg / Al-NO3LDH) with the levofloxacin antibiotic
by direct ion exchange method:
The nanohybrid antibiotic was prepared according to the
method described by Bashi et al 5
, with some
modifications. Briefly, 50 ml of the levofloxacin were
added to layered double-hydroxide solution (resulting
from dissolving 1 g of the layered double-hydroxide
precipitate in 50 ml of deionized water) and the
mixture was magnetically stirred at room temperature
for 2 hours. The mixture was placed in shaking
incubator at 37 °C for 18 hours followed by incubation
in an incubator at 40° C for 24 hrs. The mixture was
centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 minutes, washed several
times with deionized water and dried at 50°C . It should
be noted that the tested nanohybrid antibiotic is given
the Mg / Al-LEV-LDH or LEV-LDH symbol.
Characterization of the nanohybrid antibiotic: The nanohybrid antibiotic under study was characterized
by using several methods including Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR); X-ray diffraction (XRD);
)Atomic Force Microscope, AFM) and precise analysis
of C, H and N elements. I. FT-IR
The infrared spectrum for each of nanohybrid
levofloxacin and levofloxacin free as well as the layered
double hydroxide (LDH) was assessed, by making disk
from the compound under study with potassium bromide
(KBr) after grinded well, and measuring the infrared
spectrum in a wave number range (400-4000)cm-1
.
II. XRD
X-ray diffraction spectrum was used to characterize the
nanohybrid levofloxacin. XRD explains the difference in
the thickness of the layer before and after the
intercalation process for levofloxacin antibiotic by using
Brack's low ( nλ = 2dSinθ).
III. Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)
In order to measure the diameters, sizes and aggregation
of the nanoparticles, The samples of the nanohybid
levofloxacin were characterized by AFM . Samples were
assessed by Dr. Abdul Karim Al Samarrai, College of
Science, University of Baghdad. IV. Precise analysis of C, H and N elements C, H and N percentages in the nanohybrid levofloxacin
and levofloxacin free were analyzed.
The inhibitory efficacy test of LEV-LDH and free
levofloxacin against S. aureus The inhibitory efficacy of nano antibiotic LEV-LDH and
free levofloxacin against S. aureus was tested according
to the Well Diffusion Assay method6. The minimum
inhibitory rate of the nano antibiotic against the bacteria
under study was also determined by using
concentrations antibiotic (0.005-3) mg / ml.
Statistical analysis
The results were analyzed statistically in order to find
out the significant differences among the rate of
inhibition factors studied against S. aureus isolates that
were isolated from diabetic foot ulcer these factors
resembled by (1) both levofloxacin antibiotic types free
and nanohybrid as well as the Teicoplanin free, (2)
bacterial isolates, (3) the concentrations of used
antibiotics and may select the significant differences at
the possibility level of 0.01 as included a statistical
analysis of experiments in two duplicates as has been
tested significant differences among averages using the
least significant difference test (LSD) and on the
possibility level of 0.017.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Characterization of nanohybrid levofloxacin
antibiotic 1- Characterization by using infrared spectrum FT-IR :
A- Infrared spectrum for free levofloxacin antibiotic
(LEV):
Figure 1 shows many of the unique bands of free
levofloxacin appeared. The two bands at frequencies
3416 and 3271 cm-1
indicate a stretch vibration of the
hydroxyl group (OH). The appearance of the bands at
frequencies (2929, 2848 and 2804) cm-1
, indicate to
presence of aliphatic ( C-H ) stretch. The appearance of
the band at 1724 cm-1
is due to stretch of the strong
carbonic acidic group (C=O), while the band appearance
at 1620 cm-1
indicates the stretch of ketone. It is also
evident that there is a structural stretch of benzene at the
frequencies (1527 and 1446) cm-1
. Finally, there is an
aromatic ( C-H ) flex at the frequency of 802 cm-1
8.
B- Infrared spectrum for magnesium / aluminum layered
double hydroxide:
As shown in Figure 2 the magnesium/aluminum layered
double hydroxide showed a number of specific bands at
certain frequencies. The band at 3527 cm-1
is due to the
OH bond stretch vibration, which is a transverse band
30 AL-Hussaini S.M. et.al., 2018 .
due to interference from different types of hydroxyl,
such as layered double hydroxide and physically
adsorbed water Hydroxyl9,10
. The distinctive band at
1383 cm-1
is attributed to the nitrates group (NO3)
between the layers11,12
, while the bands between 400-
600 cm-1
return to vibration of Mg-O and Al-O bond13
. C- Infrared Spectroscopy for nanohybrid levofloxacin
Mg/Al - LEV -LDH:
Figure 3 shows that the nano hybrid antibiotic shows
several new characteristic bands indicate the success of
antibiotic levofloxacin intercalation between the layered
double hydroxide. The appearance of the two bands at
frequencies (3477 and 3358) cm-1
refers to stretch of the
hydroxyl group (O-H) and had a shift towards a higher
frequency. The appearance of the band at 2897 cm-1
indicates the presence of the aliphatic (C-H) stretch. The
band appearance at 1672 cm-1
is due to stretch of the
Carbonyl Group (C=O) and has a shift to the lower
frequency. While stretch shift of the ketone bands was
observed at a lower frequency through the appearance of
a band at 1589 cm-1
. The structural stretch of benzene is
observed at 1481 cm-1
. The band at 1361 cm-1
frequency
returns to the stretch of nitrate group NO3, and the band
appearance at 765 cm-1
indicates a C-H aromatic flex8.
2- Characterization by using X-ray diffraction spectrum
(XRD( :
The X-ray diffraction spectrum of Mg/Al-LEV-LDH
and Mg/Al-NO3-LDH was studied to obtain the
differences in thickness of the layer before and after the
Levofloxacin intercalation between layered double
hydroxide by using the Brack's law.
Figure 4 shows the X-ray diffraction spectroscopy of
Mg/Al-NO3-LDH, observing the crystalline levels (003),
(006) and (009). The level (003) appears at the angle of
10.47 ° with crystalline distance of 0.84 nm. The level
(006) appears at 22.03 ° with crystalline distance is 0.41
nm, while the level (009) is at 34.44 ° with crystalline is
0.26 nm.
By observing the X-ray diffraction spectrum of the
Mg/Al-LEV-LDH in Figure 5 the intercalation process
appears to have been successful. The level (003) appears
at approximately 2° angle with a crystalline distance of
1.85 nm, while the level (006) at the angle 9.7 ° with a
crystalline distance of 0. 92 nm. The level (009) appears
to interfere with the level (006) of the layered double
hydroxide due to its proximity to the site, which cannot
be separated very clearly.
Figure 1: Infrared spectrum for magnesium/Aluminum layered
double hydroxide
Figure 2: Infrared spectrum for levofloxacin free (LEV free)
Figure 3: Infrared spectrum for nanohybrid levofloxacin antibiotic
(LEV-LDH)
Figure 4 : X-ray diffraction spectrum (XRD) for the
magnesium/Aluminum layered ( NO3-LDH Mg/Al-)double
hydroxide)
Figure 5 : X-ray diffraction spectroscopy of nano hybrid
levofloxacin Mg/Al-LEV-LDH
0
100
200
300
400
500
10 20 30 40 50
(009)0.28nm
(006)0.92nm
(003)1,85nm
2/degree
Inte
nsity
Sci. J. Med. Res., Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp 29- 35, Winter 2018 31 .
3- Characterization by using Atomic Force Microscope
(AFM): The outer surface of the Mg/Al-LEV-LDH was studied
by using an atomic force microscope. Figure 6 a shows a
two-dimensional image of the nano antibiotic showing
molecular aggregation of spherical forms. Figure 6 b
shows a three-dimensional image of a section of the
nanohybrid antibiotic surface, where the elevation of
molecular assemblies of up to 5.15 nanometers indicates
the manufacture of a nanohybrid antibiotic from free
antibiotic and layered double hydroxide.
Table 1 shows that the means of particle size of the
Mg/Al-LEV-LDH is 94.83 nanometer. The preparation
process of this hybrid antibiotic resulted in 56.67%
nanoparticles of the total number of particles with a
diameters of (60-100) nanometer. The highest
percentage of these nanoparticles was 11.11% for 85 nm
and lowest was 1.11% for 60 nm, respectively.
The results of the current study are in agreement with
those found by Beherei et al 14
found. The results of
antibacterial nanoparticle were obtained at the rate of
diameters ranging between 95.5- 196 nanometer, while
the results of the current study are not in agreement with
AL-Hamdani15
and Al-Jubouri16
, where the means of
particles of Oxytetracyclin and Vancomycin loaded
between layered double hydroxide averaged 76.16 and
85.81 nm, respectively.
a
b Figure 6 : (a) Two-dimensional, (b) three-dimensional, image of the
nano hybrid antibiotic Mg\Al-LEV-LDH
Table1: Diameters, sizes, and assemblies of the nanocompound molecules Mg / Al-LEV-LDH after testing with a force microscope.
Diameter
(nm)<
Volume
(%)
Cumulation
(%)
Diameter
(nm)<
Volume
(%)
Cumulation
(%)
Diameter
(nm)<
Volume
(%)
Cumulation
(%)
60.00 1.11 1.11 85.00 11.11 31.11 110.00 12.22 77.78
65.00 5.56 6.67 90.00 10.00 41.11 115.00 8.89 86.67
70.00 2.22 8.89 95.00 7.78 48.89 120.00 6.67 93.33
75.00 7.78 16.67 100.00 7.78 56.67 125.00 2.22 95.56
80.00 3.33 20.00 105.00 8.89 65.56 130.00 4.44 100.00
Precise analysis of elements in levofloxacin antibiotic
The results of precise analysis of the elements shown in
Table 2 with the nanohybrid levofloxacin antibiotic and
levofloxacin free on the percentages of carbon, hydrogen
and nitrogen were (21.152, 3.168, 4.421)% and (48.141,
5.882, 8.985)% , respectively. Through these results
show that the percentage of levofloxacin that loaded
between layered double hydroxide was 43.93 %.
Table2: Precise analysis of elements carbon, hydrogen and
nitrogen in levofloxacin antibiotic.
Sample C% H% N%
Mg/Al-LEV-LDH 21.152 3.168 4.421
LEV Free 48.141 5.882 8.985
The inhibitory efficiency for nanohybrid LEV-LDH
against bacterial isolates of S.aureus
Table 3 indicates that the bacterial isolates 3 and 12
were the most affected by the inhibitory effect of the
free LEV with the inhibition diameters of (43 and 40.5)
mm, respectively, while the bacterial isolates 2 and 3
were the most affected by the inhibitory effect of the
nanohybrid antibiotic with 36 mm inhibition diameters,
for both of them.
The results of the statistical analysis confirm these
results, as the isolates were the most sensitive to the
studied subjects, given that they had the highest
inhibitory rate of mentioned isolates (34.642 and
32.785) mm, respectively, while (25.385 and 29.5) mm,
for the nanohybrid antibiotic, respectively.
Bisht et al17
tested the inhibitory efficacy of levofloxacin
loaded on a group of polymers against S. aureus
bacteria. The results showed that the NF1 polymer-
loaded antibiotic was the most effective against the
bacteria with an inhibitor diameter 25.9 mm.
In another study by Bagga et al18
to study the inhibitory
efficacy of the nanohybrid antibiotic Levofloxacin
against S. aureus bacteria showed that the minimum
inhibitory concentration of this antibiotic was 0.128
μg/ml.
The synergistic inhibitory action of nanohybrid
antibiotic against S. aureus
The synergistic inhibitory activity of nanohybrid
antibiotic prepared in this study was tested against S.
32 AL-Hussaini S.M. et.al., 2018 .
aureus isolated from diabetic foot ulcer in the sacred
Kerbala province.
Antimicrobial combination therapy is usually used to
reduce treatment time and prevent the appearance of
microorganisms resistance to drugs as well as to expand
the drugs therapeutic spectrum19, 20, 21, 22, 23
.
Table1: The inhibitory efficacy of nanohybrid antibiotic LEV-LDH and free LEV against S. aureus isolated from diabetic foot ulcer.
The synergistic inhibitory activity between the nano
hybrid antibiotic LEV-LDH and free antibiotic
Teicoplanin against S. aureus isolates was studied. The
results in Table 4 has already shown a synergistic effect
against some isolates while actually showing antagonist
effect against others. The synergistic effect was against
isolates 3, 12, 14c, 20a, 20b, 20c, 21a and 21b,
respectively, with inhibition diameters of (37.5, 28,
23.25, 24. 5, 31, 29, 22.75 and 23) mm, respectively by
using 3 mg/ml concentration. While the antagonism
effect was against the bacterial isolate 2 with an
inhibition diameter of 27.5 mm by using the same
concentration of the antibiotics.
The results of the statistical analysis are identical to the
results above, as the isolates referred to it above are the
most sensitive to the combination of studied antibiotics.
In a study by Xu et al 24
to identify the synergistic effect
of nano-loaded antibiotics on silver against S. aureus
bacteria, the nano antibiotic LEV had the highest
An
tibio
tic
Bacte
rial
isola
te
Antibiotic concentration(mg/ml)
LSD0.01 for
antibiotic con. 3 1 0.5 0.25 0.1 0.01 0.005
Diameter of inhibition in mm
LE
V-F
ree
2 37 35 34 31.25 26.5 17 15
0.205
3 43 40.25 38.5 37.25 35 26 22.5
12 40.5 38 37 34.5 33 26 20.5
14c 29.5 22.5 17 0 0 0 0
20a 25 20.5 15.25 10 0 0 0
20b 28 26.75 25 22.5 17.5 0 0
20c 27.5 25 21 17.5 16 0 0
21a 27.5 22.5 17 12.25 0 0 0
21b 29 26.75 24 21.5 20 19.25 0
LE
V-L
DH
2 36 35 29 26.5 24 14.5 12.5
3 36 34.5 34 31.5 30 21 19
12 20 18.5 17 15.5 0 0 0
14c 14 12.25 0 0 0 0 0
20a 20 18.5 17 16.25 0 0 0
20b 21 19 17.5 15 0 0 0
20c 19.5 18 15.5 11 0 0 0
21a 13.5 12 11 0 0 0 0
21b 13 12 11.75 0 0 0 0
LSD0.01 for
Isolates
0.109
LSD0.01 For
isolates 21b 21a 20c 20b 20a 14c 12 3 2 Isolate
0.232
20.071 11.321 15.285 17.107 10.107 9.857 32.785 34.642 27.964 Rate for free
5.25
5.214 9.142 10.357 10.25 3.75 10.142 29.5 25.285 Rate for nano
Sci. J. Med. Res., Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp 29- 35, Winter 2018 33 .
inhibitory effect of the minimum inhibitory
concentration (8-16) μg/ml.
The mechanism of action of the antibiotic Teicoplanin is
shown by inhibiting the synthesis of peptidoglycan in
the bacterial cell wall via the non-specialized link and
the saturation of the outer layers of the bacterial
peptidoglycan. Teicoplanin is bound to the end-D-Ala-
D-Ala terminals of the peptidoglycan precursors via the
cleft found in the Teicoplanin molecule25
.
The inhibitory effect of drug combination can be greater
or smaller than expected from their individual effects,
according to synergistic or antagonistic interactions
between drugs, respectively26
.
Table4: The synergistic inhibitory activity of the antibiotic LEV-LDH against S. aureus isolated from the diabetic foot ulcer.
Conclusions The efficacy of the nanohybrid levofloxacin antibiotic in
inhibition of isolated S. aureus. The combination
between nanohybrid levofloxacin and free teicoplanin
antibiotics has shown a synergistic inhibition effect
against some isolates, while showing antagonistic
inhibition effect against others.
REFERENCES 1. Lipsky B.A., Berendt A.R., Deery H.G., Embil J.M., Joseph W.S.,
Karchmer A.W., Lefrock J.L., Lew D.P., Marder J.T., Norden
C.and Tan J.S. "Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot
infection". Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2006; 117(7): 212S-238S.
DOI:10.1097/01.prs.0000222737.09322.77.
2. Dunyach-Remy C., Essebe N.C., Sotto A. and Lavigne J.P.
"Staphylococcus aureus Toxins and Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Role in
Pathogenesis and Interest in Diagnosis". Toxins (Basel). 2016;
8(7): 1-20. DOI:10.3390/toxins8070209.
3. Sarisaltik D. and Teksin Z.S. "Bioavailability File: Levofloxacin".
FABAD J. Pharm. Sci. 2007; (32) : 197-208.
4. Suri S.S., Fenniri H. and Singh B. "Nanotechnology – based drug
delivery systems". J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2007; 2 :16.
doi:10.1186/1745-6673-2-16.
5. Bashi A.M., Haddawi S.M. and Mezaal, M.A. "Layered Double
Hydroxide Nanohybrid Intercalation with Folic Acid Used as
Delivery System their Controlled Release Properties". Arab J Sci
Eng . 2013; 38(7): 1663-1680.
6. Egorove N.S. "Antibiotics ascientific approach". Mir Publishers,
Moscow. 1985.
7. AL-Imam M.M. "Design and analysis of experiments". Dar AL
Marikh Publishing . Kingdom of Saudi Arabia . 2007 .
8. Silverstein R.M., Webster F.X. and Kiemle D.J. "Spectrometric
Identification of organic compounds". 7th Ed. John Wiley and
Sons . INC. Printed in the United States of America. 2005.
9. Cheng D.R., Zhu S.Y., Yin Z.H., Ding W.W., Mu Z.X., Su Z.R.
and Sun H.C. "Prevalence of bacterial infection responsible for
bovine mastitis". African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2010;
4(11) : 1110-1116.
10. Parida K.M., Sahoo M. and Singha S. "Synthesis and
characterization of a Fe (III)- Schiff base complex in a Zn-Al LDH
host for cyclohexane oxidation". Journal of Molecular Catalysis A
: Chemical . 2010; 329 : 7-12 .
11. Arizaga G.G., Gardolinski J.E., Schreiner W.H. and Wypych F.
"Intercalation of an oxalatooxoniobate complex into layered
double hydroxide and layered zinc hydroxide nitrate". Journal of
Colloid and Interface Science. 2009; 330(2): 352–358.
DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2008.10.025 .
12. Chai H., Xu X., Lin Y., Evans D.G. and Li D. "Synthesis and UV
absorption properties of 2,3-dihydroxynaphthalene-6-sulfonate
anion-intercalated Zn–Al layered double hydroxides". Polymer
Degradation and Stability . 2009; 94(4):744–749.
doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.09.007 .
13. Feng Y., Li D., Wang Y., Evans D.G. and Duan X. "Synthesis and
characterization of a UV absorbent-intercalated Zn–Al layered
double hydroxide". Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2006;
91(4):789–794. doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.06.006 .
14. Beherei H.H., El-Magharby A. and Abdel-Aal M.S. "Preparation
and characterization of novel antibacterial nano-ceramic-
Antibiotic LEV – LDH/ Teico Free LSD0.01
For antibiotic
con.
Con.Antibiotic
(mg/ml) 3 1 0.5 0.25 0.1 0.01 0.005
Bacterial isolate Diameter of inhibition in mm
2 27.5 25 22 20 18 0 0
0.515
3 37.5 35.5 32.5 30 27 12.25 0
12 28 26.5 21.5 13.25 0 0 0
14c 23.25 21 19.5 17 14 0 0
20a 24.5 23 19 16.75 14.5 0 0
20b 31 27.5 25.5 24 21 15 0
20c 29 25.5 24 23.5 20.5 16.5 0
21a 22.75 19.5 18 16 14 0 0
21b 23 20 17.5 15.25 13.5 0 0
LSD0.01
For isolates 0.616
34 AL-Hussaini S.M. et.al., 2018 .
composites for bone grafting". Der Pharma Chemica. 2011;
3(6):10-27.
15. AL-Hamdani M.S. "Inhibitory efficiency determination of Nano
prepared Oxytetracyclin and Tylosin antibiotics against bacterial
cows mastitis in sacred Karbala province". MSc. Thesis. 2015.
16. Al-Jubory N.A. "Evaluation of inhibitory efficiency of some free
and nano antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus locally
isolated". MSc. Thesis. 2016.
17. Bisht N., Goswami L. and Kothiyal P. "Preparation and
evaluation of in-situ oral topical gel of levofloxacin by using
combination of polymers". Indian Journal of Drugs. 2014; 2(4):
142-151.
18. Bagga P., Ansari T.M., Siddiqui H.H., Syed A., Bahkali A.H.,
Rahman M.A. and Khan M.S. "Bromelain capped gold
nanoparticles as the novel drug delivery carriers to aggrandize
effect of the antibiotic levofloxacin". EXCLI Journal. 2016;
(15):772-780. DOI:10.17179/excli2016-710 .
19. Dancey J.E. and Chen H.X. "Strategies for optimizing
combinations of molecularly targeted anticancer agents". Nat Rev
Drug Discovery. 2006; 5(8): 649 – 659. DOI:10.1038/nrd2089 .
20. Hopkins A.L. "Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug
discovery". Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008; 4(11): 682 – 690.
DOI:10.1038/nchembio.118 .
21. Fischbach M.A. and Walsh C.T. "Antibiotics for emerging
pathogens". Science. 2009; 325(5944): 1089 – 1093.
DOI:10.1126/science.1176667 .
22. Bush K., Courvalin P., Dantas, G., Davies J., Eisenstein B.,
Huovinen P., Jacoby G.A., Kishony R., Kreiswirth B.N., Kutter
E., Lerner S.A., Levy S., Lewis K., Lomovskaya O., Miller J.H.,
Mobashery S., Piddock L.J., Projan S., Thomas C.M. and
Tomasz A. "Tackling antibiotic resistance". Nat. Rev. Microbiol.
2011; 9(12): 894-896. DOI:10.1038/nrmicro2693 .
23. Worthington R.J. and Melander C. "Combination approaches to
combat multidrug-resistant bacteria". Trends Biotechnol. 2013;
31(3): 177 – 184. DOI:10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.006 .
24. Xu N., Cheng H., Xu J., Li F., Gao B., Li Z., Gao C., Huo K., Fu
J. and Xiong W. "Silver-loaded nanotubular structures enhanced
bactericidal efficiency of antibiotics with synergistic effect in vitro
and in vivo". International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2017; 12
(1): 731-743. DOI:10.2147/IJN.S123648 .
25. Reynolds P.E. "Structure, biochemistry and mechanism of action
of glycopeptide antibiotics". Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989;
8(11):943-50.
26. Keith C.T., Borisy A.A. and Stockwell B.R. "Multicomponent
therapeutics for networked systems". Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.
2005; 4(1): 71–78. DOI:10.1038/nrd1609 .
Sci. J. Med. Res., Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp 29- 35, Winter 2018 35 .