preparedness of cez to new builds -...

19
PREPAREDNESS OF CEZ TO NEW BUILDS 11 th Annual Conference on Nuclear Energy November 7 th , 2018 Prague, Kaiserštejn Palace Petr Závodský Director; New nuclear construction [email protected]

Upload: duongkien

Post on 16-Aug-2019

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

PREPAREDNESS OF CEZ

TO NEW BUILDS

11th Annual Conference on Nuclear Energy

November 7th, 2018 – Prague, Kaiserštejn Palace

Petr Závodský

Director; New nuclear construction

[email protected]

MAIN TOPICS

1

➢ State Energy Policy

➢ New Nuclear build in the Czech Republic

➢ Summary & discussion

CZECH ENERGY SECTOR STRATEGIC GOALS

Security of supply – provision of necessary power supply for consumer

in regular operation and at leap change conditions (failures supplies

prime sources, variations in prices on markets, disturbances and

attacks) in the EU context;

Competitiveness (energetics and social acceptability) – final costs of

electricity for industrial consumer and for homes comparable at region

and next straight forward competitors + power utilities able in the long

term create economic added value;

Sustainability (sustainable development) – structure energy industries,

that is in the long term sustainable from the point of view of

environment (no worsening qualities of environment), moneywise -

economic (financial stability power companies and ability ensure

needed investment in renewal and development), human resources

(intelligence) and social impact (employment rate) and primary

resources (accessibility).

2

3

High consum. scenario

NPP Dukovany till 2027

Keeping limits at ČSA

Low scenario of renewables

No new nuclear

Import of electricity

Natural gas

Gas scenario with limited self sufficiency

Low consum. scenario

NPP Dukovany till 2027

No new nuclear

Keeping limits at ČSA

High scenario of renewables

Renewables

Import of electricity

Green scenario with limited self

sufficiency

Electricity consumption

NPP Decom.

New Nuclear

Lignite mining limits

Renewables development

Key source

Energy balance

Reference scenario

NPP Dukovany till 2037

Three units (2033-2037)

Keeping limits at ČSA

Realistic RES scenario

Nuclear

Full self sufficiency

Optimized scenario according to SEP

Reference scenario

NPP Dukovany beyond 2040

Two units (2030,2032)

Prolomení ÚEL

Realistic RES scenario

Combination

Export remainder

Secure and sefl sufficient

Reference scenario

NPP Dukovany beyond 2040

One unit (2038)

Breaking mining limits

Low scenario of renewables

Possible Import

Conventional sources

Conventional and Economical

Low consum. scenario

NPP Dukovany till 2034

Two units (2033,2038)

Keeping limits at ČSA

High PV, wind

Full self sufficiency

Low carbon sources

Decarburization scenario

STATE ENERGY POLICY HAS BEEN APPROVED

IN 2015

SEP – GAS AND GREEN SCENARIO

Gas scenario with limited self sufficiency:

• With reference to default none of criteria triad strategic objective of SEP – security of supply , sustainability and competitiveness, this scenario is not recommended.

• Nevertheless this scenario is not at all unrealistic. Practically it will be materialized if there is no start of new nuclear project in the following 3 ÷ 5 years.

Green scenario with limited self sufficiency:

• This scenario is in principle contrariety to security of supply as well as to competitiveness.

4

46%

Nuclear

11%

Coal (hard and lignite) 5%

Natural Gas

18%

Renewables

58%21% 15%

25%

Relative minimum

Relative maximum

GOAL CORRIDORS OF FUTURE POWER

GENERATION ACCORDING TO SEP

* Source: State Energy Policy

THERE WILL OCCUR SIGNIFICANT ENERGY

DEFICIT LATEST IN 2035 (EVEN WITH EXPECTATION OF

STRONG DEVELOPMENT OF RES)

0

10 000

20 000

30 000

40 000

50 000

60 000

70 000

80 000

90 000

100 000

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

20

20

20

21

20

22

20

23

20

24

20

25

20

26

20

27

20

28

20

29

20

30

20

31

20

32

20

33

20

34

20

35

20

36

20

37

20

38

20

39

20

40

20

41

20

42

20

43

20

44

20

45

GW

h

Hnědé uhlí Černé uhlí

Zemní plyn Ostatní plyny

Ostatní paliva Obnovitelné a druhotné zdroje energie

Jádro Jádro nové

Referenční scénář spotřeby Vysoký scénář spotřeby

Nízký scénář spotřeby Bez recertifikace JEDU

* Optimised scenario of Czech energy strategy6

Brown coal

Natural gas

Other

Nuclear

Reference scenario

Low scenario

Hard coal

Other gases

Renewables

New Nuclear

High scenario

Decomm. EDU in 2025-27 + new NPP in 2035

CO2 FOOTPRINT

7

SYSTEM COSTS

8

ELECTRICITY PRICES IN EU

9

CENY ELEKTŘINY V EU

1010

EUROPE

Finland

OL3, prep 2 new

units

Rusia

New construction

+ plans

Bulgaria & Romania

Kozloduy, Cernavoda

Hungary

New unit at Paks

France

Construction at

FLA3, Life

Extension

England

Preparation of new

construction / new

legislation / HPC

Slovenia

New unit at Krsko

Germany

Phase out till 2022

Sweden

Replacement of

old units

Italy

No nuclear in

referendum

Spain

Life Extension

Ukraine

Plans for new

units

Slovakia

Construction at

Mochovce,

Preparation at

Jaslovské Bohunice

Belorusia

2 new unitsLithuaniaNew BWR in

cooperation with

Baltic countries

Turkey

Plans for 6 units

Switzerland

No new nuclear

Belgium

Phase out ??

Poland

Prep. of new 6

GWe

Czech R.

New units

ČEZ NUCLEAR NEW BUILD PROJECTS

11

New NPP Temelín

➢ SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) established

➢ Fulfilment of conditions from permission and licenses

issued (EIA, Initial Safety Report/nuclear siting, …)

➢ Related investments (at site, in the region)

➢ Other preparatory works (ČEPS, …)

New NPP Dukovany

➢ SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) established

➢ Feasibility study approved

➢ EIA process ongoing

➢ Site investigation under progress

New NPP Jaslovské Bohunice (SK)

➢ JV company (JESS) established in 2009

➢ Joint Czech / Slovak team established

➢ Feasibility study approved

➢ EIA process completed

➢ Site investigation under progress

51

%

49

%

100

%

ČEZB

ČEZ

Critical path

SCHEDULE

Činnost / MilníkPoč Kon

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2031

2032

2033

2034

2035

2036

2037

2038

2039

2040

2041

Government

decision06/2015

02/2018

07/2018

EIA01/2015

04/2019

01/2020

Supplier

selection03/2018

03/2023

05/2023

Nuclear sitting01/2017

03/2021

10/2021

Site permit02/2020

05/2022

02/2024

Nuclear

construction

permit

09/202205/2027

06/2028

Civil construction

permit08/2026

02/2028

11/2030

Transportation

route ready09/2016

11/2029

10/2032

Grid ready 10/2033

01/2038

Fist nuclear

concrete06/2028

11/2029

10/2032

Construction and

commissioning

(PAC)

08/202605/2035

11/2039

✓ Výběr EPC dodavatele mimo zákon o

zadávání veřejných zakázek

✓ Short-list EPC dodavatelů po hodnocení

(vyjednávání smlouvy pouze s 1)

✓ Dodržení lhůt pro vydání různých povolení

✓ Objednání komponent s dlouhou dodací

lhůtou (rozhodnutí o investici) v okamžiku

vydání povolení k výstavbě (SÚJB)

✓ Včasné dokončení transportní trasy a

opatření na přenosové soustavě (PS)

✓ Změna legislativy – možnost obálkového

územního řízení hotovo

✓ Řízení dle AZ nejsou navazujícími

řízeními dle zákona EIA hotovo

conditions:

05/2035

02/2028

05/2027

05/2022

03/2023

02/2018

Non critical path Current real schedule

11/2029

10/2033

11/2029

3/2021

04/2019

11/2018

01/2020

05/2023

10/2021

02/2024

06/2028

11/2030

10/2032

10/2032

01/2038

11/2039

05/2034 11/2038

Color – „no-risk“ schedule

Grey – real schedule including risks

ELECTRICITY PRICE

Strike-price [EUR/MWh]

Náklady financování (nominální WACC v %)

Financování investorem při CfD

Financování státem při CfD

9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4%

60 let 92 79 68 59 51 44

35 let 99 86 75 66 58 52

15 let 128 114 103 92 83 76

▪ UK – Hinkley Point C - EdF –

CfD: 110€/MWh (35 years)

▪ Turecko – Akkuyu –

Rosatom: 91€/MWh (15 years)

Hungary – Pakš – MVM II

(100% state owned)

estimation of price 55€MWh

Assumptions: 4200 EUR/kW, construction phase 7 let

0

5

10

15

20

25

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

INVESTMENT INTO 1200MW UNIT

Preparation, selection:

~ 2,5 bilion LWA phase: ~ 17,5 bil Construction: ~ 120 bil

Investice (pro variantu reálného harmonogramu, výstavby pomocí SPV, výběr dle ZVZ)

mld. Kč, v cenách roku 2014, CAPEX 4500 EUR/kW

Po

dp

is E

PC

sm

lou

vy

Ro

zh

od

nu

tí o

za

jen

í výsta

vb

y

Pro

jekt vyčle

n d

o S

PV

drž

ný b

od

–ú

ze

mn

í ro

zh

od

nu

Zádrž

ný b

od –

Povoln

í k v

ýsta

vbě

▪ O celkové investici se

rozhoduje až po roce 2025

▪ Do té doby se rozhoduje

pouze o nákladech na

rozvoj / udržení investiční

příležitosti (viz. šipky)

Preparation phase Construction

1 5 10 15 20

14

15

PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE

68%

47%

63%58% 59%

56%

52%

54%

59%

59%

67%71%

54%

64%67%

59% 58%54% 56% 58% 59%

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

* No research in 2010

Fukushima

NPP

Temelín

start-up

NPP Temelín

in opperation

Public tender

for new NPP

Cancelation of

the tender,

welding

issues

42%41% 40%42%17%17%

opponents

11/20175/2017

supporters ambivalent

11/20175/2017 11/20175/2017

CONCLUSION

16

Could we afford to ignore nuclear energy if we seriously thing

about:

- Decarbonization / air quality protection?

- Energy security?

- Sustainability?

- Competitiveness?

- Opportunities for local industry?

- Price stability?

Germany is razing a 12,000-year-old forest to make way for a coal mineHad California and Germany invested $680 billion into new nuclear power plants instead

of renewables like solar and wind farms, the two would already be generating 100%

or more of their electricity from clean (low-emissions) energy sources, according

to a new analysis by Environmental Progress.

NASA - Offshore Wind Farms Make Wakes

Wind Farms Want Permission To Kill More Bats — A Lot More

Each wind energy project submitted its own take request, but if all are approved,

the original limit of 92 would increase to 483.No, We can‘t!

DISCUSSION

➢What are the alternatives we have, compared to nuclear. How real are they in the

Czech Republic conditions?

➢Which criteria we are taking into the account (is the current spot price the only

criterion we should take into the account)?

➢What is the social price of the security of supply?

➢Will we be able to buy electricity at competitive price, if there are no new

sources in the Czech Republic?

➢ How the energy sector will look like in 2035 without the investment into new

sources?

➢What is the cost of a black-out in the Czech Republic? How real is the risk?

➢What is socially acceptable price for electricity and what is current price?

➢Will not lead postponement of decision on build - up / unsupported build - up

new sources to problems, which will be heavy, or impossible manageable in the

future?

17

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

18