preparing the college writer issues, problems, proposed solutions
DESCRIPTION
Preparing the College Writer Issues, Problems, Proposed Solutions. Dr. Fred Kemp Texas Tech University 5060, Fall 2011. Two Problems with Incoming Freshman. They dislike writing They lack a “ critical consciousness ”. Two Problems with Incoming Freshman. They dislike writing - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Preparing the College WriterPreparing the College WriterIssues, Problems, Proposed SolutionsIssues, Problems, Proposed Solutions
Dr. Fred KempTexas Tech University
5060, Fall 2011
Two Problems with Incoming Freshman
• They dislike writing• They lack a “critical consciousness”
Two Problems with Incoming Freshman
• They dislike writing– The “minefield effect”– The “Hemingway” solution– The 5-paragraph “training wheels” approach– They see writing as a performance, not an act of
communication
• They lack a “critical consciousness”
Two Composition Problems with Incoming Freshman
• They dislike writing• They lack a “critical consciousness”– They don’t “see” dysfunction in the text– They are unaware of alternative expressions– They are unaware of the “rhetorical nature” of
writing (audience awareness)
Writing as Performance, NOT as Communication
• The student writer is a novice writing to an expert
• The document is intended to be graded, not read
• The “rhetorical impulse” is lacking, and so is motivation (Moffett’s “drama”)
Are students inherently non-rhetorical? Are they simply anti-writing? Do they reject modes of written communication?
Are you kidding?
The Kinneavy Rhetorical Triangle
The Kinneavy Rhetorical Triangle
Subjective Transactional
Objective Language(aesthetic)
The Kinneavy Rhetorical Triangle
ExpressiveDiaries, personal
RhetoricalPersuasive
Referentialinformative
LanguageLiterary
The Kinneavy Rhetorical Triangle
Sincerity and honesty
Peer Interaction
Accuracy and evidence
Style
Recapturing the Rhetorical Nature of Writing
• Give students a reader not a grader
Recapturing the Rhetorical Nature of Writing
• Give students a reader not a grader • Teach the characteristics of effective
writing as a review process, not a generative process
Recapturing the Rhetorical Nature of Writing
• Give students a reader not a grader • Teach the characteristics of effective
writing as a review process, not a generative process• Write often, but eschew formalisms
Really Hard Advice to Follow
Really Hard Advice to Follow
• Do not use reading anthologies or reading assignments.
Really Hard Advice to Follow
• Do not use reading anthologies or reading assignments.• Do not use a textbook.
Really Hard Advice to Follow
• Do not use reading anthologies or reading assignments.• Do not use a textbook. • Use argument and research for the
latter part of the course.
Really Hard Advice to Follow
• Do not use reading anthologies or reading assignments.• Do not use a textbook. • Use argument and research for the
latter part of the course. • Have students turn in some writing
every class period. Frequency is key.
How, Dad, How?• Assign many short pieces related to events
within the students’ universe of discourse.• Work with multiple drafts.• Share these with classmates, who are given
specific writing elements to critique.• Grade the critiquers on these early drafts, not
the writers.• Do “quick and dirty” peer edits on the day of
turn-in.
I can’t follow this advice. What’s the Bottom Line? What do College writers need to know how to do?
I can’t follow this advice. What’s the Bottom Line? What do College writers need to know how to do?• Think critically: challenge their own
assertions and defend them with viable logic and evidence.
I can’t follow this advice. What’s the Bottom Line? What do College writers need to know how to do?• Think critically: challenge their own
assertions and defend them with viable logic and evidence.
• Manage sentence boundaries and avoid Connors and Lunsford’s 20 common errors.
FIN