presentation call, tell, ict as resources for material design

20
CALL, TELL, ICT AS RESOURCES FOR MATERIAL DESIGN

Upload: edgar-lucero

Post on 07-Dec-2014

1.087 views

Category:

Education


3 download

DESCRIPTION

This paper intends to provide language teachers with reflective points of reference to think of how, what, and where to start when technology comes into play in the process of language teaching. The discussion begins with the most common beliefs that authors in the field have stated when approaching technology for language teaching purposes. Subsequently, the discussion establishes the main objectives for the application of technology for language learning. Finally, it will present the most pertinent justifications and points of reference for the use of technology in language teaching and learning in accordance with learner, teacher, content, and context level

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

CALL, TELL, ICT AS RESOURCES FOR MATERIAL

DESIGN

Page 2: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

AGENDA Definitions Beliefs Purposes Justifications Conditions Pedagogical implications

CALLICT

TELL

Page 3: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

DEFINITIONS - CALLCALL (Computer-assisted Language

Learning) An approach in ILT (Information and

Language Technology) to language teaching and learning in which the computer is used as a substantial interactive aid for reinforcement and assessment in applications for language teaching and learning. (Levy, 1997)

Page 4: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

DEFINITIONS - ICTICT (Information and Communications

Technologies)The merging of telephone networks with

computer networks likened to an individual able to interact purposefully with its surrounding realities which are perceived and modified by various receptors and effectors. (Semenov, 2005)

Page 5: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

DEFINITIONS - TELLTELL (Technology Enhanced Language

Learning)The possibilities offered by the Internet

and communication technology for reinforcement in applications for language learning and teaching. (Levy, 1997)

Page 6: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

DEVICES AND APPLICATIONSCALL ICT TELLComputer RoomCompanion softwareLanguage SoftwareCD ROMsEditorsPrint Graphics

VCRCD / DVD TV setVideo BeamVideo RoomAudio RoomRecorders CamcordersAudio PlayersCompanion WebsitesInternet Applications (see TELL)

WebsitesKeypalBlogs / V-logsPodcastsForumsWeb questsCourse waresE-mailChatsMessengersWikisScavengersWeb search machines

Page 7: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

SOME TIPS TO REMEMBER…(LUCERO, 2011)

Consider clearly the use of tech in your language class, it must not be used simply because it is in vogue.

Don’t think that just for using tech your students will be more language proficient.

Tech does not solve your problems with language teaching and learning. It is only a complement to enhance classroom work.

Page 8: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

WHAT JUSTIFIES THE USE OF CALL, ICT, AND TELL?

Consider then…The learnersThe teacherThe content The context(Lucero, 2011)

Page 9: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

WHAT JUSTIFIES THE USE OF CALL, ICT, AND TELL? Learner’s levelAllow learners to work individually, at

their own pace, with their own needs.Allow learners to experience new

language and contexts.Provoke motivation and interaction with

multimedia.Promote self-monitor and self-assessment

for the activities and the learning process.

Page 10: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

Teacher’s levelIntroduce a great variety of contexts,

language, activities, tasks, exercises.Exemplify authentic language in use in

natural situations and settings.Contribute to create in the learners new

perspectives of life and interests.

Page 11: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

Content and Context levelProvide more content dynamism and context

attractiveness.Work with situational-visual contexts and

contents.Present verbal and non-verbal elements of

language.Allow geographical dispersed communication.Allow mobile technology (class, on foot,

home)

Page 12: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

EXCELLENT JUSTIFICATIONS, BUT…

Where to start at?

Page 13: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

TO START, MAKE YOURSELF THESE QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR LEARNERS?

How many learners use CALL, ICT, TELL daily?

What CALL, ICT, TELL do your students use daily, and what for?

How often / long do your learners get in touch with CALL, ICT, TELL?

What abilities do your learners display when using CALL, ICT, TELL?

(McKay, 2000; Mayorga, 2006; Dudeney & Hockly, 2007, Lucero, 2011)

Page 14: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

NOW, MAKE YOURSELF THESE QUESTIONS ABOUT TEACHERS? How proficient are teachers with CALL,

ICT, TELL? How often / long do teachers get learners

into the use of CALL, ICT, TELL? What CALL, ICT, TELL do teachers use for

language learning and use? How do teacher use those CALL, ICT, TELL

for language learning and use?(McKay, 2000; Mayorga, 2006; Dudeney & Hockly, 2007, Lucero, 2011)

Page 15: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

THEN, MAKE YOURSELF THESE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CONTENT? What language is being portrayed in the

CALL, ICT, TELL used? What situational-visual context is

displayed in the CALL, ICT, TELL used? How authentic and variable is the

content shown in the CALL, ICT, TELL used?

How accountable is the content of the CALL, ICT, TELL used?

Page 16: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

FINALLY, MAKE YOURSELF THIS QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR CONTEXT?

How equipped is the institution you work for to use CALL, ICT, TELL?

How much available is this equipment? How CALL, ICT, TELL use is evaluated? By whom? What cognitive and socio-affective

conditions for language teaching and learning are taken into account for using CALL, ICT, TELL?

Who evaluates them?(McKay, 2000; Mayorga, 2006; Dudeney & Hockly, 2007, Lucero, 2011)

Page 17: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

PEDAGOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS(STEPP-GREANY, 2002)

Teacher’sLearner’s

ImplementingResistanceproficiency

To technologyDigital immigrant / TechnogeekTechnophobeDigital native / techsavvy

1. What is the teacher/learner perception of technology?

How and when the outside e-world is putting into the classroom (Dudeney & Hockley, 2007)

What sequence is used for this (Pre-use, using, post-use)Who controls what to do and with what methodology

Page 18: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

PEDAGOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

2. What is the nature of the multimedia equipment?

Interactivebut impersonal

Stimuli-ActionRepetitive tasks

Passive Learning (Jonassen, 2000)

Considerations •Teacher•Learner•Content•Context

3. WhoHowHow often

CALL, ICT, TELL tasks are evaluated?Under what criteria?TeacherLearnerAnswer keyWorksheet

InterviewsSurveysPortfolioTest

CompletenessQuality /QuantitySelf-correction

Page 19: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design
Page 20: Presentation  call, tell, ict as resources for material design

REFERENCESAntonini, M. (2004). Designing activities for video materials. Workshop presented at the 22nd annual TESOL

convention. Caracas, Venezuela.Barbero, M.J. (1987). Innovación tecnológica y transformación cultural, TELOS, N-9, Madrid.Clavijo, A. and Quintana, A. (2004). Maestros y Estudiantes escritores de Hiperhistorias. CALJ, Universidad Distrital

Francisco Jose de Caldas.Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.Dudeney, G. and Hockly, N. (2007). How to Teach Englihs with Technology. England: Longman.Jonassen, , D.H. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking. 2nd Edition. Upper Saddle

River, NJ: Prentice Hall.King, A. (1993). From Stage on the Stage to Guide on the Side. College Teaching, 41(1).Levy, M. (1997). CALL: Context and Conceptualisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Long, M. and Doughty, C. (2003). Optimal Psycholinguistic Environments for distanced foreign language learning.

Language Learning and Technology 7(3): 50-80.Lucero, E. (2011). Refelctive points in the application of technology in the language classroom. 2nd International

Colloquium in Teaching Foreign Languages. Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas, Universidad de la Salle. La Salle Publicaciones.

Mayorga, C. (2006). Integrating Multimedia Technology in a High School EFL program. English Teaching Forum 44 (3):14-21.

McLuhan, M. (1967). The Medium is the Message. Penguin books, USA.McKay, P. (2000). The Bilingual Interface Project: The relationship between L1 development and SLA as students

begin learning English in the context of schooling. Qweensland University, August 31, 2010 (http://www.iier.org.au/qjer/qjer15/mckay.html )

Murphy, S.M. (1986). Children’s comprehension of deictic categories in oral and written language. Reading Research Quarterly, 21:118-131.

Reis, L. (1995). Putting the computer in its proper place –inside the classroom. English Teaching Forum 33 (4):28-29.Semenov, A. (2005). Information and Communication Technologies in Schools. Unesco. August 31, 2010 (

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001390/139028e.pdf).Shanaham, T. (1990). Reading and Writing together: What does it really mean? In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Reading and

Writing together: New Perspectives for the Classroom. Pp. 1-18. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for

the new millennium. Language Learning and Technology 6 (1): 165-180.