presentation cosi slovenia - european commission · performance of boys and girls from slovenia in...

MEASURING CHILDREN'S PHYSICAL FITNESS FOR SCHOOLS, PARENTS AND PAEDIATRICIANS

University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Sport, Laboratory for Diagnostics of Physical and Motor Development [email protected] www.slofit.org

Gregor Starc

SLOfit

PHYSICAL FITNESS OF EU

POOR PHYSICAL FITNESSLOW WORK EFFECTIVENESS = LOW ADDED VALUEHIGH WORK ABSENTEEISM = HIGH NCD HEALTH BURDEN

POOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SITUATION

NO INTERVENTION = NO PROGRESS POORLY INFORMED INTERVENTIONS & POLICIES = WASTE OF PUBLIC MONEY

HIGH-QUALITY SCHOOL PHYSICAL EDUCATION

DIMINISHING OF CHILDREN’S HABITUAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

WHAT IS SLOfit?3 ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS

8 FITNESS TESTS

every April all Schoolsone Protocole

REGULARINTEGRATED

UNIFORM

SLOfit MILESTONES

1962 Physical Education

curriculum prescribes to teachers to follow

children’s physical and motor development

1970 Introduction of Physical Educational Chart in all

Slovenian Schools

1973 New Physical Education

curriculum prescribes to teachers to use Physical

Educational Chart

1981 Introduction of simplified

Physical Educational Chart in a sample of Slovenian

Schools

1984 New Physical Education

curriculum again prescribes to teachers to use Physical Educational

Chart

1987 Introduction of modified

Physical Educational Chart in all Slovenian Schools

starting with grade 1 and 5

1989 Physical Educational Chart introduced in all Slovenian

Schools for all grades

1991 Brake-up of Yugoslavia

1996 Adoption of Law on

Protection of Personal Data and introduction of active

consent of parents

1998 New Physical Education curriculum prescribes to

teachers to follow children’s physical and motor

development every year

1999 Introduction of active consent of pupils in secondary schools

2015 SLOfit system

introduced among university students

2007 Introduction of SLOfit

name, adoption of COSI

2016 Development of My

SLOfit web application

ORGANISATION OF SLOfit

SCHOOLS


SCHOOLS

FACULTY OF

SPORT

RAW DATA


SCHOOLS

FACULTY OF

SPORT

RAW DATA

SCHOOL REPORTS


SCHOOLS

PARENTS &

CHILDREN

FACULTY OF

SPORT

RAW DATA

INDIVIDUAL REPORTS

SCHOOL REPORTS


SCHOOLS

PARENTS &

CHILDREN

FACULTY OF

SPORT

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE &

SPORT

NATIONAL REPORT

RAW DATA

INDIVIDUAL REPORTS

SCHOOL REPORTS


SCHOOLS

PARENTS &

CHILDREN

FACULTY OF

SPORT


SPORT

NATIONAL REPORT

RAW DATA

INDIVIDUAL REPORTS

SCHOOL REPORTS

NATIONAL REPORT

THE MEDIA


SCHOOLS

PARENTS &

CHILDREN

FACULTY OF

SPORTSCHOOL

PHYSICIANS


SPORT

NATIONAL REPORT

RAW DATA

INDIVIDUAL REPORTS

SCHOOL REPORTS

INDIVIDUAL REPORTS

NATIONAL REPORT

THE MEDIA


SCHOOLS

PARENTS &

CHILDREN

FACULTY OF

SPORTSCHOOL

PHYSICIANS


SPORT

NATIONAL REPORT

RAW DATA

INDIVIDUAL REPORTS

SCHOOL REPORTS

INDIVIDUAL REPORTS

NATIONAL REPORT

EVALUATION

THE MEDIAINTERVENTION PROGRAMMES

2017

SLOfit DATABASE

1982 7,000,000 + SETS OF MEASUREMENTS

1,000,000 + INDIVIDUALS

40 + COHORTS

220,000 + MEASUREMENTS EVERY YEAR 13 YEARS

OF TRACKING EACH INDIVIDUAL’S DEVELOPMENT 6 to 19 AGE-SPAN

SLOfit DATA MANAGEMENT PERSONAL CHART

SLOfit DATA MANAGEMENTCLASS CHART

SLOfit DATA MANAGEMENT CLASS REPORT

SLOfit DATA MANAGEMENTMY SLOfit WEB PROFILES

SLOfit LEARNED LESSONS11

.6%

12.2%

13

.3%

11.9%

13

.2%

13.7%

14

.1%

14.6%

14

.4%

14.8%

15

.0%

15.5%

15

.8%

15.6%

15

.6%

16.3%

16

.8%

17.6%

17

.9%

18.5%

18

.4%

18.8%

19

.1%

19.4%

19

.8%

20.1%

20

.4%

20.7%

21

.0%

21.3%

21

.7%

22.0%

2.1%

2.3%

2.6%

2.2%

2.6%

3.0%

3.2%

3.5%

3.5%

3.7%

3.9%

4.0%

4.3%

4.3%

4.2%

4.7%

5.1%

5.5%

5.9%

6.3%

6.3%

6.7%

6.9%

7.1%

7.3%

7.5%

7.7%

8.0%

8.2%

8.4%

8.6%

8.8%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

% o

f po

pula

tion

6 to

19

yrs

Obesity

Preobesity

Prediction obesity 2010-2020

Prediction preobesity 2010-2020

Source: SLOfit database 1989-2017N > 7.2 million

11.6%

12

.2%

13.3%

11

.9%

13.2%

13

.7%

14.1%

14

.6%

14.4%

14

.8%

15.0%

15

.5%

15.8%

15

.6%

15.6%

16

.3%

16.8%

17

.6%

17.9%

18

.5%

18.4%

18

.8%

18.6%

18

.6%

18.4%

18

.0%

17.7%

17

.8%

17.4%

17

.2%

17.0%

16

.8%

6.7%

6.5%

6.6%

6.4%

6.2% 6.4

%

6.2%

6.1%

6.0%

6.0%

19.1%

19

.4%

19.8%

20

.1%

20.4%

20

.7%

21.0%

21

.3%

21.7%

22

.0%

2.1%

2.3%

2.6%

2.2%

2.6%

3.0%

3.2%

3.5%

3.5%

3.7%

3.9%

4.0%

4.3%

4.3%

4.2%

4.7%

5.1%

5.5%

5.9%

6.3%

6.3%

6.7%

6.9%

7.1%

7.3%

7.5%

7.7%

8.0%

8.2%

8.4%

8.6%

8.8%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

% o

f po

pula

tion

6 to

19

yrs

Obesity

Preobesity

Prediction obesity 2010-2020

Prediction preobesity 2010-2020

SLOfit LEARNED LESSONS


6.0%

5.4%

5.3%

4.5% 5.1%

4.9%

5.1%

5.2%

5.0% 5.5%

5.8%

6.2%

6.5%

6.5%

6.8%

6.9% 7.4%

7.7%

8.0%

8.4%

8.6%

8.7%

8.8%

9.0%

9.1%

9.2%

9.4%

9.5%

9.7%

9.8%

9.9%

10.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1% 0.1

% 0.1

% 0.1

% 0.1

% 0.1

% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%

0.2% 0.2%

0.3% 0.3

% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4

% 0.3

% 0.4

% 0.4

% 0.4

% 0.4

% 0.5

% 0.5

% 0.5

% 0.5

% 0.5

% 0.5

% 0.5

%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

% o

f po

pula

tion

6 to

19

yrs

Poor physical fitness

Low physical fitness

Prediction poor physical fitness 2010-2020

Prediction low physical fitness 2010-2020



6.0%

5.4%

5.3%

4.5% 5.1%

4.9%

5.1%

5.2%

5.0% 5.5%

5.8%

6.2%

6.5%

6.5%

6.8%

6.9% 7.4%

7.7%

8.0%

8.4%

8.6%

8.7%

9.0%

8.9%

8.5%

8.3%

7.9%

8.1%

7.7%

7.5%

7.3%

7.1%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4% 8.8

% 9.0

% 9.1

% 9.2

%

9.4%

9.5%

9.7%

9.8%

9.9%

10.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1% 0.1

% 0.1

% 0.1

% 0.1

% 0.1

% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2%

0.2% 0.2%

0.3% 0.3

% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4

% 0.3

% 0.4

% 0.4

% 0.4

% 0.4

% 0.5

% 0.5

% 0.5

% 0.5

% 0.5

% 0.5

% 0.5

%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

% o

f po

pula

tion

6 to

19

yrs

Poor physical fitness

Low physical fitness

Prediction poor physical fitness 2010-2020

Prediction low physical fitness 2010-2020





All schools

Every April

Managed by University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Sport

On-line individual access


-1.8%

6.6%

11.7% 14.5%

17.4% 19.4% 19.9% 19.7%

0.0%

0.7%

5.7%

10.1% 13.8%

16.8% 18.2% 18.7%

INITIAL STATUS YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7

GIRLS

Schools in Healthy Lifestyle

Other Schools-0.6%

6.0%

11.0% 13.4%

16.2% 19.5%

22.4% 26.4%

0.0%

0.5%

5.8% 9.8%

13.0% 15.8%

18.3% 21.8%

INITIAL STATUS YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7

BOYS

Cost of Healthy Lifestyle per child/year = 50 EURAnnual working hours in SLO = 1688 hoursAverage cost of work hour in SLO = 11.2 EURScenario = Increase of work capacity for 1 %

1 % of working hours in SLO = 16.9 hoursCost of 16.88 hours in SLO = 190 EUROutcome = 190 EUR – 50 EUR = 140 EUR surplus per year

EXAMPLE OF USE: Planning, monitoring and evaluating nation-wide physical activity intervention Healthy Lifestyle

2011-2017

SLOfit LEARNED LESSONSEXAMPLE OF USE:

Planning, monitoring and evaluating nation-wide physical activity intervention Healthy Lifestyle 2011-2017

492

494

496

498

500

502

504

2006 2009 2012 2015

PISA

ave

rage

of

scie

nce,

mat

hem

atic

s an

d re

adin

g (p

oint

s)

BOYS

Academic performance

509

511

513

515

517

519

2006 2009 2012 2015PI

SA a

vera

ge o

f sc

ienc

e, m

athe

mat

ics

and

read

ing

(poi

nts)

GIRLS

Academic performance

Performance of boys and girls from Slovenia in PISA tests.

In the meantime, what was going on with physical fitness?

51.5

51.7

51.9

52.1

52.3

52.5

492

494

496

498

500

502

504

2006 2009 2012 2015Ph

ysic

al F

itnes

s In

dex

PISA

ave

rage

of

scie

nce,

mat

hem

atic

s an

d re

adin

g (p

oint

s)

BOYS

Academic performance Physical fitness

51.2

51.4

51.6

51.8

52.0

52.2

52.4

509

511

513

515

517

519

2006 2009 2012 2015

Phys

ical

Fitn

ess

Inde

x

PISA

ave

rage

of

scie

nce,

mat

hem

atic

s an

d re

adin

g (p

oint

s)

GIRLS

Academic performance Physical fitness

The trends are almost overlapping!





14.1% 13.9%

13.1% 13.0%

11.2% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Share of children, included in Healthy Lifestyle Program with acute illnesses.

20152016TRANSFERABILITY OF SLOfit

ADOPTABLE TEST BATTERY

2017INFORMATION SYSTEM TRANSLATION

SCHOOL EQUIPMENTTEACHER TRAINING

UTILISATION OF EXISTING NETWORK OF SCHOOLS AND

TEACHERS

2014

SUSTAINABILITY

1987

LEGISLATIVE SOLUTIONS

THANK [email protected]

www.slofit.org

presentation cosi slovenia - european commission · performance of boys and girls from slovenia in...

Documents