presentation file
TRANSCRIPT
When high-achieving women and minorities underperform:
The dangers ofstereotype threat
Talia Ben-Zeev
Psychology Department
San Francisco State University
With the collaboration of:
Cristina CarrasquilloKristen McDonaldDaniel NewhallGillian PattonDavid RogersTonya Stoddard
Alison ChingTattiya KliengklomTiffany Stewart
Dr. Michael Inzlicht, NYUDr. Steven Fein, Williams College
The Team
Poorer performancein a high achieving
population
Claude Steele (e.g., 1997) vs. Benbow & Stanley (1980)
Stereotype threat:A phenomenon, which occurs when an individual isplaced in a setting in which the individual is reminded thathe/she is at risk of confirming a negative stereotype abouthis/her group.
The experience of stereotype threat may, in turn, interfere with intellectual performance, especially whenindividuals are highly identified with success andachievement in the given domain.
Stereotype threat andthe environment
Condition 1: All Female Condition 2: Female Minority
Inzlicht & Ben-Zeev (2000)
Experiment 1: Subjects: 72 female undergraduates
Test Type
math verbal
Condition
All female
Femaleminority
same
same
higher
lower
same
same
Experiment 2aSubjects: Ninety-two male and female undergraduates
Sex
females males
Condition
Same sex
Minority
same
same
higher
lower
same
same
Experiment 2a: Results
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
females males
sex of participant
minority
same-sex
Experiment 2b
Females in the same-sex condition scored the highest(M = .70, SE = .04)
Females in the minority condition scored the lowest(M = .58, SE = .03),
Females in the mixed-sex majority conditionscored in the middle (M = .64, SE = .03)
We added a mixed-sex majority condition for females
A threatening environment can cause problem-solving
deficits
Simply placing a female in a test-taking situationwith males causes a decrease in her performance
The makeup of the social environment can induce problem-solving deficits but via which mediating processes?
The theoretical framework:Threat vs. Challenge
Appraisals
Stereotypeactivation
Threat
Challenge
Underperformance
IncreasedCatecholamines
IncreasedCortisol
Optimalperformance
Cognitiveappraisal
PhysiologicalEffects (arousal)
Performanceeffects
The Yerkes Dodson law
Robert M. Yerkes and John D. Dodson, The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation (1908)Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482).
Low Optimum High
Performance
Arousal
Experiment 3Experiment 3Mis-attribution of arousalBen-Zeev, Inzlicht, & Fein (under review)
“subliminal noise” control
Condition
Same sex
Minority
higher
lower
same
same
Experiment 3Experiment 3
“subliminal noise” control
Condition
Same sex
Minority32%
33% 44%
40%
Mis-attribution of arousalBen-Zeev, Inzlicht, & Fein (under review)
At our SFSU labWork in Progress:
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Daniel Newhall:Cortisol and Stereotype Threat
At our SFSU labWork in Progress:
Cristina Carassquillowith Kristen McDonald and Alison ChingThreat vs. Challenge in Asian American Females
At our SFSU lab:Work in Progress
Phoebe: “90% of a woman’s pheromones come out the top of her head. That’s why women are shorter, so that men will fall in love when they hug them.”
Tonya Stoddard and Tattiya Kliengklom:How subtle is stereotype threat?
At our SFSU labWork in Progress:
Tiffany Stewart and Gillian PattonWho is most susceptible to threat?
Our research agenda:Threat vs. Challenge
Stereotypeactivation
Threat
Challenge
Underperformance
IncreasedCatecholamines
IncreasedCortisol
Optimalperformance
Cognitiveappraisal
PhysiologicalEffects (arousal)
Performanceeffects