presentation: justification for wa sb5844

48
1 Justification for SB 5844 Authorizing Part-time Faculty to form their own unions Jack Longmate ([email protected]) Adjunct English Faculty Olympic College Justification for SB 5844

Upload: vanessa-vaile

Post on 13-Jun-2015

270 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

PPT Presentation by Jack Longmate, Washington PT Faculty Association, explaining justification for SB 5844, which would no longer oblige community and technical part-time faculty to be members of the same bargaining units as full-time tenured faculty.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

1

Justification for SB 5844

Authorizing Part-time Faculty to form their own unions

Jack Longmate ([email protected])Adjunct English FacultyOlympic College

Justification for SB 5844

Page 2: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Washington’s community and technical colleges employ about 3,500 full-time faculty and about 8,000 part-time or adjunct faculty (SBCTC, 2011-2012 Academic Year Report, p. 63).

http://www.sbctc.edu/college/studentsvcs/5staff_1112.pdf, pp. 58, 63.

Justification for SB 5844

Two-tiered Faculty Workforce

Page 3: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Washington’s community and technical colleges employ about 3,500 full-time faculty and about 8,000 part-time or adjunct faculty (SBCTC, 2011-2012 Academic Year Report, p. 63).

http://www.sbctc.edu/college/studentsvcs/5staff_1112.pdf, pp. 58, 63.

Justification for SB 5844

Part-time faculty teach 47 percent of all courses statewide (SBCTC, 2011-2012 Academic Year Report, p. 58). As such, part-time faculty are integral to the community and technical college system.

Two-tiered Faculty Workforce

Page 4: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Washington’s community and technical colleges employ about 3,500 full-time faculty and about 8,000 part-time or adjunct faculty (SBCTC, 2011-2012 Academic Year Report, p. 63).

http://www.sbctc.edu/college/studentsvcs/5staff_1112.pdf, pp. 58, 63.

Justification for SB 5844

Part-time faculty teach 47 percent of all courses statewide (SBCTC, 2011-2012 Academic Year Report, p. 58). As such, part-time faculty are integral to the community and technical college system.

Two-tiered Faculty Workforce

After 40 years of collective bargaining with full-time and part-time faculty in the same unions, it is clear that collective bargaining has failed part-time faculty.

Page 5: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Washington’s community and technical colleges employ about 3,500 full-time faculty and about 8,000 part-time or adjunct faculty (SBCTC, 2011-2012 Academic Year Report, p. 63).

http://www.sbctc.edu/college/studentsvcs/5staff_1112.pdf, pp. 58, 63.

Justification for SB 5844

Part-time faculty teach 47 percent of all courses statewide (SBCTC, 2011-2012 Academic Year Report, p. 58). As such, part-time faculty are integral to the community and technical college system.

Two-tiered Faculty Workforce

After 40 years of collective bargaining with full-time and part-time faculty in the same unions, it is clear that collective bargaining has failed part-time faculty. Consider two primary workplace conditions: Job Security and Compensation.

Page 6: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Collective Bargaining: Job security

Page 7: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Full-time tenured faculty are assured of their workload—even if enrollment in their classes does not fill, they have bumping rights to displace part-time faculty. Their tenured status protects them from layoffs; only under declaration of a financial emergency are tenured faculty jobs endangered.

Collective Bargaining: Job security

Page 8: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Full-time tenured faculty are assured of their workload—even if enrollment in their classes does not fill, they have bumping rights to displace part-time faculty. Their tenured status protects them from layoffs; only under declaration of a financial emergency are tenured faculty jobs endangered.

Part-time faculty, by contrast, are not assured of their jobs beyond the current term, are often not provided a contract until classes are well underway, and are typically hired on a term-by-term basis. While some colleges have a hiring preference for some part-time faculty (e.g, “Associate faculty,” “Priority Hiring List,” “Part-time File,” etc.), such status is not job security nor reasonable assurance of reemployment as testified by the fact that these part-time/adjunct faculty are eligible for unemployment between terms. Part-time/adjunct faculty are considered temporary, probationary employees even after decades of service.

Collective Bargaining: Job security

Page 9: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Full-time tenured faculty are assured of their workload—even if enrollment in their classes does not fill, they have bumping rights to displace part-time faculty. Their tenured status protects them from layoffs; only under declaration of a financial emergency are tenured faculty jobs endangered.

Part-time faculty, by contrast, are not assured of their jobs beyond the current term, are often not provided a contract until classes are well underway, and are typically hired on a term-by-term basis. While some colleges have a hiring preference for some part-time faculty (e.g, “Associate faculty,” “Priority Hiring List,” “Part-time File,” etc.), such status is not job security nor reasonable assurance of reemployment as testified by the fact that these part-time/adjunct faculty are eligible for unemployment between terms. Part-time/adjunct faculty are considered temporary, probationary employees even after decades of service, and after forty years of collective bargaining.

Collective Bargaining: Job security

Page 10: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Full-time tenured faculty are assured of their workload—even if enrollment in their classes does not fill, they have bumping rights to displace part-time faculty. Their tenured status protects them from layoffs; only under declaration of a financial emergency are tenured faculty jobs endangered.

Part-time faculty, by contrast, are not assured of their jobs beyond the current term, are often not provided a contract until classes are well underway, and are typically hired on a term-by-term basis. While some colleges have a hiring preference for some part-time faculty (e.g, “Associate faculty,” “Priority Hiring List,” “Part-time File,” etc.), such status is not job security nor reasonable assurance of reemployment as testified by the fact that these part-time/adjunct faculty are eligible for unemployment between terms. Part-time/adjunct faculty are considered temporary, probationary employees even after decades of service, and after forty years of collective bargaining.

Collective Bargaining: Job security

It is clear that with such differences in job security after 40 years, collective bargaining has not served part-time faculty.

Page 11: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Collective Bargaining: Compensation

Page 12: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Collective Bargaining: Compensation

Full-time faculty are placed on a salary schedule with the potential for advancement as they gain experience and increase their professional development. While Washington’s full-time faculty salaries are low compared to those of comparable states, Washington full-time faculty have the ability to teach overtime—called overloads or moonlighting—as a way of earning extra income.

Page 13: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Collective Bargaining: Compensation

Full-time faculty are placed on a salary schedule with the potential for advancement as they gain experience and increase their professional development. While Washington’s full-time faculty salaries are low compared to those of comparable states, Washington full-time faculty have the ability to teach overtime—called overloads or moonlighting—as a way of earning extra income.

Part-time faculty: Even though the grades and credits part-time faculty award have the same value as those of full-time faculty, part-time faculty pay is discounted (62%). The rational offered for this lesser pay rate is that full-time faculty teach, perform service, and research while part-time faculty “just teach,” though many part-time faculty perform the full range of teaching without compensation. Most colleges have not bargained a part-time faculty salary schedule with incremental pay steps, meaning that part-timers in their first or tenth years receive the same compensation. Part-time earnings are also often limited by a workload cap (e.g., no more than 85% of full-time).

Page 14: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Collective Bargaining: Compensation

Full-time faculty are placed on a salary schedule with the potential for advancement as they gain experience and increase their professional development. While Washington’s full-time faculty salaries are low compared to those of comparable states, Washington full-time faculty have the ability to teach overtime—called overloads or moonlighting—as a way of earning extra income.

Part-time faculty: Even though the grades and credits part-time faculty award have the same value as those of full-time faculty, part-time faculty pay is discounted (62%). The rational offered for this lesser pay rate is that full-time faculty teach, perform service, and research while part-time faculty “just teach,” though many part-time faculty perform the full range of teaching without compensation. Most colleges have not bargained a part-time faculty salary schedule with incremental pay steps, meaning that part-timers in their first or tenth years receive the same compensation. Part-time earnings are also often limited by a workload cap (e.g., no more than 85% of full-time).

It is clear that with such differences in compensation after 40 years, collective bargaining has not served part-time faculty.

Page 15: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Collective Bargaining: Compensation

Consider the salary schedule that has been bargained by Olympic College and the Olympic College Association for Higher Education.

Page 16: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Lowest Olympic College full-time faculty annual salary, $37,261.

http://www.olympic.edu/NR/rdonlyres/2F796ECC-49D8-4D56-936B-72BD46EDFA81/0/faccba.pdf, p. 29.

Justification for SB 5844

Note: Per collective bargaining agreement in effect in 2010.

Page 17: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

http://www.olympic.edu/NR/rdonlyres/2F796ECC-49D8-4D56-936B-72BD46EDFA81/0/faccba.pdf, p. 30

Justification for SB 5844

Highest Olympic College full-time faculty annual salary, $64,813.

Note: Per collective bargaining agreement in effect in 2010.

Page 18: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

http://www.olympic.edu/NR/rdonlyres/2F796ECC-49D8-4D56-936B-72BD46EDFA81/0/faccba.pdf, p. 30

Justification for SB 5844

Highest Olympic College full-time faculty annual salary, $64,813.

Olympic College full-time faculty annual salary range is from $37,261 to $64,813.

Note: Per collective bargaining agreement in effect in 2010.

Page 19: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Collective Bargaining: Compensation

Consider the actual annual earnings of four Olympic College faculty—one part-time and three full-time instructors.

Page 20: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College part-time faculty Jack Longmate. Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

Justification for SB 5844 Example 1. Part-time instructor annual income

Page 21: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College part-time faculty Jack Longmate. Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$21,886

Justification for SB 5844 Example 1. Part-time instructor annual income

Page 22: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College part-time faculty Jack Longmate. Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$21,886

Justification for SB 5844

Note: This represents teaching 7 five-credit courses, which is close to the maximum allowable workload for an adjunct under the workload “cap” imposed by Olympic College. (9 five-credit classes is a full-time load).

Example 1. Part-time instructor annual income

Page 23: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College part-time faculty Jack Longmate. Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$21,886

Justification for SB 5844

Note: This represents teaching 7 five-credit courses, which is close to the maximum allowable workload for an adjunct under the workload “cap” imposed by Olympic College. (9 five-credit classes is a full-time load).

An annual income of $21,886 is a poverty-level income.

Example 1. Part-time instructor annual income

Page 24: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College part-time faculty Jack Longmate. Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$21,886

Justification for SB 5844

Note: This represents teaching 7 five-credit courses, which is close to the maximum allowable workload for an adjunct under the workload “cap” imposed by Olympic College. (9 five-credit classes is a full-time load).

An annual income of $21,886 is a poverty-level income.

Yet it is close to the maximum possible income for an Olympic College part-time instructor.

Example 1. Part-time instructor annual income

Page 25: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and current faculty union Head Negotiator .Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

Justification for SB 5844 Example 2. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 26: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

http://www.Washington-employees.findthedata.org

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and current faculty union Head Negotiator .Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$106,357

Justification for SB 5844 Example 2. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 27: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

http://www.Washington-employees.findthedata.org

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and current faculty union Head Negotiator .Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$106,357

Justification for SB 5844

Note: $64,813 is the topmost salary per the Olympic College full-time faculty salary schedule.

Example 2. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 28: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

http://www.Washington-employees.findthedata.org

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and current faculty union Head Negotiator .Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$106,357

Justification for SB 5844

Note: $64,813 is the topmost salary per the Olympic College full-time faculty salary schedule.

The difference between the topmost salary on the salary schedule ($64,813) and the actual earnings ($106,357) is extra income through teaching overtime, called overloads or moonlighting.

Example 2. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 29: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

http://www.Washington-employees.findthedata.org

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and current faculty union Head Negotiator .Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$106,357

Justification for SB 5844

$106,357- 64,813

Moonlighting Earnings (min.) $41,544

Note: $64,813 is the topmost salary per the Olympic College full-time faculty salary schedule.

Example 2. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 30: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and former faculty union Head Negotiator.Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

Justification for SB 5844 Example 3. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 31: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and former faculty union Head Negotiator.Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$109,174

Justification for SB 5844 Example 3. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 32: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and former faculty union Head Negotiator.Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$109,174

Justification for SB 5844

$109,174- 64,813

Moonlighting Earnings (min.) $44,361

Note: $64,813 is the topmost salary per the Olympic College full-time faculty salary schedule.

Example 3. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 33: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and current faculty union Treasurer. Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

Justification for SB 5844 Example 4. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 34: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and current faculty union Treasurer. Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$109,982

Justification for SB 5844 Example 4. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 35: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

2010 Annual salary of Olympic College full-time faculty and current faculty union Treasurer. Per “FindTheData” at http://washington-employees.findthedata.org/. Retrieved on 22 February 2013.

$109,982

Justification for SB 5844

$109,982- 64,813

Moonlighting Earnings (min.) $45,169

Note: $64,813 is the topmost salary per the Olympic College full-time faculty salary schedule.

Example 4. Full-time instructor annual income

Page 36: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Statewide data on full-time and part-time faculty and implications

Page 37: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

http://www.sbctc.edu/college/studentsvcs/5staff_1112.pdf, p. 58

State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, 2011-12 Academic Year Report, p. 58

3,455 FTE-Ffull-time faculty

Page 38: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

http://www.sbctc.edu/college/studentsvcs/5staff_1112.pdf, p. 58

State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, 2011-12 Academic Year Report, p. 58

3,455 FTE-Ffull-time faculty

3,436 FTE-Fpart-time faculty (about 8,000 individuals)

Page 39: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

http://www.sbctc.edu/college/studentsvcs/5staff_1112.pdf, p. 58

State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, 2011-12 Academic Year Report, p. 58

3,455 FTE-Ffull-time faculty

434 FTE-F in moonlighting

3,436 FTE-Fpart-time faculty (about 8,000 individuals)

Page 40: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

http://www.sbctc.edu/college/studentsvcs/5staff_1112.pdf, p. 58

State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, 2011-12 Academic Year Report, p. 58

3,455 FTE-Ffull-time faculty

434 FTE-F in moonlighting

3,436 FTE-Fpart-time faculty (about 8,000 individuals)

Page 41: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

http://www.sbctc.edu/college/studentsvcs/5staff_1112.pdf, p. 58

State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, 2011-12 Academic Year Report, p. 58

3,455 FTE-Ffull-time faculty

434 FTE-F in moonlighting

3,436 FTE-Fpart-time faculty (about 8,000 individuals)

Whenever full-time faculty moonlight (teach courses “in addition to their contracted workload”), they displace part-time faculty jobs.

Page 42: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

It should be no surprise why full-time faculty have not bargained job security for part-time faculty.

Page 43: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

It should be no surprise why full-time faculty have not bargained job security for part-time faculty.

Job security for part-time faculty would interfere with the ability of full-time faculty to moonlight.

Page 44: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

It should be no surprise why full-time faculty have not bargained job security for part-time faculty.

Job security for part-time faculty would interfere with the ability of full-time faculty to moonlight, which can mean an extra annual income of over $40,000 for full-time faculty.

Page 45: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

It should be no surprise why full-time faculty have not bargained job security for part-time faculty.

Job security for part-time faculty would interfere with the ability of full-time faculty to moonlight, which can mean an extra annual income of over $40,000 for full-time faculty.

Job security for part-time faculty and moonlighting for full-time faculty constitute a conflict of interest.

Page 46: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Only when there is a community of workers with common interests and working conditions can a union function properly.

Page 47: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844

Justification for SB 5844

Only when there is a community of workers with common interests and working conditions can a union function properly.

SB 5844 would replace the dysfunctional arrangement of the status quo whereby all faculty, full-time tenured and part-time non-tenured, are obligated to belong to the same collective bargaining organization. It would enable collective bargaining units to be composed of those with a community of interests.

Page 48: Presentation: Justification for WA SB5844