presented by: the ohio department of transportation 1 36 cfr part 800 protection of historic...
TRANSCRIPT
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
1
36 CFR Part 800Protection of Historic Properties
Section 106
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
2
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f) says:
“The head of any Federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed Federal or federally assisted undertaking in any State and the head of any Federal department or independent agency having authority to license any undertaking shall, prior to the approval of the expenditure of any Federal funds on the undertaking or prior to the issuance of any license, as the case may be, take into account the effect of the undertaking on any district, site, building, structure, or object that is included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register. The head of any such Federal agency shall afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation established under Title II of this Act a reasonable opportunity to comment with regard to such undertaking.”
The implementing regulations for Section 106 are those found at 36 CFR Part 800
What is Section 106?
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
3
Definition:
“…means any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places maintained by the Secretary of Interior. This term includes artifacts, records, and remains that are related to and located within such properties. The term includes properties of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe …and that meet the National Register criteria.”
(36 CFR Section 800.16[l][1])
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Historic Property
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
4
• Federal agencies
• Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
• Consulting parties
• Public
Participants in Section 106 Process
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
5
• Federal agency is responsible for complying with Section 106 and making all decisions required for compliance.
• The definition of “Federal agency” includes local and state governments that have been delegated responsibility for compliance with Section 106.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Federal Agencies
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
6
• It is an independent Federal agency composed of President-appointed council and professional staff.
• Issues regulations, guidance, and advice on Section 106 compliance and oversees Section 106 process.
• Consults with and provides comments to Federal agencies on the effect of programs and undertakings on historic properties.
ACHP
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
7
• State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
• Local governments and applicants for federal assistance, permits, licenses, and approval (includes ODOT)
• Federally recognized Native American Indian tribes and Native Hawaiian organizations
• Individuals/organizations with demonstrated legal, economic, or preservation interest who ask to participate, as agreed to by FHWA, ODOT, SHPO, and Council
• Other parties agreed to by FHWA, ODOT, SHPO, and Council
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Consulting Parties
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
8
• Public participation is important and required [36 CFR Section 800.2(d)].
• Basic requirement of Section 106 is to provide information on effects to historic properties and seek public input.
• Public views are “essential to informed Federal decision making.”
• Agencies may use established public involvement procedures where appropriate (e.g., NEPA public involvement process).
• Public may provide views at their own initiative.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
The Public
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
9
• Agency must ensure that all determinations, findings, and agreements reached through the Section 106 process are supported by adequate documentation to enable anyone, including the public, to understand the basis of all decisions.
• 36 CFR Section 800.11 provides details on documentation standards and guidance on the adequacy of documentation.
Documentation
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
10
ODOT’s Section 106 Process:
• 36 CFR Section 800.14(b) allows for the negotiation of a programmatic agreement to govern the implementation of a particular program
• In Ohio, we have a Programmatic Agreement between ODOT, FHWA, the SHPO, and ACHP for the implementation of ODOT’s program
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
ODOT’s Revised Section 106 Programmatic Agreement
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
11
• Executed November 30, 2011
• Signed by ACHP, FHWA, SHPO & ODOT
• Broad responsibilities delegated to ODOT, which functions on behalf of FHWA
• It is ODOT’s Section 106 Process
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
ODOT’s Revised Section 106 Programmatic Agreement
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
12
• The new agreement includes: Appendix A: Project types that may be cleared at
the District level (CE Exempt) Appendix B: Project types that may be cleared by
OES with no SHPO involvement
• SHPO receives all other findings issued by ODOT for either a 15-day non-objection period or 30-day formal review.
http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Planning/Environment/Cultural_Resources/Documents/Sec106PA-signed.pdf
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
ODOT’s Revised Section 106 Programmatic Agreement
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
13
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
14
• Establish undertaking
• Identify Appropriate SHPO/THPO
• Plan to involve the public
• Identify other consulting parties
(Refer to ACHP flow chart)
Step I: Initiate Section 106 process
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
15
FHWA & ODOT often use the NEPA public involvement process to achieve the Section 106 public involvement goal, but there can be separate meetings with Consulting Parties.
Step I: Initiate Section 106 process
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
16
FHWA & ODOT must determine:
• Whether the action meets the definition of undertaking in the NHPA
• And, if so, whether it is a type of activity that has potential to affect historic properties
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Establish Undertaking
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
17
Definition:
“project, activity, or program funded in whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal agency, including those carried out by or on behalf of a Federal agency; those carried out with Federal financial assistance; those requiring a Federal permit, license or approval; and those subject to State or local regulation administered pursuant to a delegation or approval by a Federal agency.” (36 CFR Section 800.16(y))
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Undertaking
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
18
• Remember that the definition of an undertaking is
necessarily broad.
• It is NOT determined solely on funding.
• A 100% State funded project that requires a federal permit (such as a waterway permit from the Army Corps of Engineers), or requires a federal agency approval or license would still be subject to Section 106 review and coordination under 36 CFR Part 800.
Undertaking (cont.)
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
19
• If there is no undertaking or if the undertaking has minimal potential to cause effects to historic properties under Appendix A or B of the Section 106 PA, the Section 106 process is complete.
• Document this finding to respond to questions or inquiries by public or other parties.
• Include discussion in NEPA document.
• If undertaking could cause effects, go to next step.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Conclusion of Step I
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
20
Step I: Initiate Section 106
ProcessEstablish undertaking
Identify appropriate SHPO/THPO
Plan to involve the public
Identify other consulting parties
No Undertaking/Minimal Potential To Cause Effects
Public involvement
Undertaking Might Affect Historic Properties
Step I: Initiate Section 106 Process
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
21
Determine scope of efforts
Identify historic properties
Evaluate historic significance (National Register eligibility status)
(Refer to ACHP flow chart)
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Step II: Identify Historic Properties
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
22
36 CFR Section 800.4(b)(1):
“The agency official shall make a reasonable and good
faith effort to carry out appropriate identification
efforts…within the area of potential effects”
Flexibility in Identification Effort
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
23
Definition from 36 CFR Section 800.16(d):
“geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist.”
• Informally based on the size, scope, context, and visual intrusiveness of a project.
• In ODOT’s process, “APE” basically equates with “Study Area.”
• Determined in consultation with SHPO
• May change over the life of a project.
Area of Potential Effects
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
24
FHWA & ODOT efforts to identify Historic Properties must consider:
Magnitude and nature of undertaking
Degree of Federal involvement
Past studies
Nature and extent of potential effects
Likely nature and location of historic properties
Applicable standards and guidelines
Confidentiality concerns
Flexibility in Identification Effort
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
25
Is the property already listed in the National Register of Historic Places?
If not, apply National Register criteria to determine eligibility.
Have to have consensus determination of eligibility.
Properties have to have integrity.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Evaluation of Significance
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
26
Listing of resources identified as worthy of recognition and preservation.
Nomination process distinct from Section 106 evaluation decision and process
Threshold tests: Age and Integrity
Four Eligibility CriteriaA: events in history
B: significant person or group of people C: architecture, engineering, or artistic qualities D: ability to yield important information (usually
associated with archaeological sites)
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
National Register of Historic Places
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
27
Authenticity of a property’s historic identity, based on surviving physical characteristics.
It is a composite of seven qualities: * Location * Design * Setting * Materials * Workmanship * Feeling * Association
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
NRHP Definition of Integrity
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
28
Integrity enables a property to illustrate significant aspects of its past.
Must resemble its historic appearance, retaining physical materials, design features & aspects of construction.
For archaeological resources, its based on the degree to which remaining evidence can provide important information.
All seven do not need to be present for eligibility as long as the overall sense of time & place is evident.
A resource can be important to a community, but unless it has a certain amount of integrity, it CANNOT be considered eligible for the NRHP.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
NRHP Integrity (cont.)
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
29
NR boundaries are needed to determine EFFECT in Section 106, not ELIGIBILITY!
We may never need to have a boundary determination for an eligible property for the purposes of Section 106.
However, a boundary determination may be needed to comply with Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act
Boundaries are determined based on what makes the property eligible under the NRHP criteria.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
NRHP Property Boundaries
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
30
After historic properties have been identified:
ODOT & FHWA apply definition of effect: “alteration to the characteristics of a historic property qualifying it for inclusion in or eligibility for the National Register” [36 CFR Section 800.16(i)]
At the conclusion of Step II, ODOT makes a formal finding of either “no historic properties affected” or “historic properties may be affected”
Conclusion of Step II
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
31
Appropriate when: ODOT and FHWA have
determined that no historic properties are present in the APE; or
Historic properties are present but the undertaking will have no effect
“No Historic Properties Affected” Finding
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
32
ODOT provides documentation to the SHPO, notifies consulting parties, and makes documentation available to the public.
SHPO may disagree with ODOT and FWHA, triggering next step
Per Section 106 PA, if no objection within 15 days, Section 106 compliance is complete
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Review of “No Historic Properties Affected” Finding
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
33
Step II: Identify Historic
Properties
Determine scope of efforts
Identify historic properties
Evaluate historic significance
Historic Properties May Be Affected
No Historic Properties Affected
Public involvement
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Step II: Identify Historic Properties
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
34
If historic properties are affected:
FHWA and ODOT notify consulting parties and invite their views
ODOT applies criteria of adverse effect and notifies SHPO
ODOT and FHWA must consider views provided by other consulting parties & public
(Refer to ACHP flow chart)
Step III: Assess Adverse Effects
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
35
Adverse effect: when undertaking will cause the integrity of a historic property to be diminished
ODOT and FHWA must consider: both direct and indirect effects reasonably foreseeable effects: cumulative,
later in time, or at a distance all qualifying characteristics of a property
Criteria of Adverse Effect
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
36
physical destruction or damage alteration not consistent with the Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards relocation change of use or change to physical features of a
property’s setting visual, atmospheric, or audible intrusions neglect resulting in deterioration
Examples of Adverse Effect
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
37
ODOT can propose “No Adverse Effect” finding and notify consulting parties. If no objection by SHPO, Section 106 is complete.
SHPO can respond with a request for changes to the undertaking in order to avoid an adverse effect. If ODOT and FHWA agree, Section 106 is complete.
If SHPO or another party disagrees, FHWA either resolves or asks the Council to review.
ODOT and FHWA must keep record of finding.
Conclusion of Step III
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
38
Step III: Assess
Adverse Effects
Apply criteria of adverse effect
Historic Properties Are Adversely Affected
No Historic Properties Adversely Affected
Public involvement
Step III: Assess Adverse Effects
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
39
ODOT can propose an “adverse effect” finding to SHPO
ODOT and FHWA continue consultation with SHPO and other consulting parties to explore alternatives that may avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate adverse effects
(Refer to ACHP flow chart)
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Step IV: Resolve adverse effects
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
40
For all adverse effect findings, the Federal agency must notify the Council by providing this documentation for consultation [36 CFR 800.11(e)] given to consulting parties, which includes description of:
undertaking and APE identification steps and affected historic
properties project effects and why the criteria of adverse
effect are applicable views of consulting parties and public
Agency Notification to Council
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
41
Council has 15 days to respond when notified of project by the Federal agency or requested to enter consultation by another party
When entering process, Council now must: document that criteria for Council involvement are
met advise the Federal agency or agency with delegated
authority, such as ODOT
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Council Decision to Participate in Resolution of Adverse Effects
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
42
FHWA and ODOT must seek views of the public
To resolve adverse effects, FHWA’s and ODOT’s public involvement efforts have to take into account: the magnitude of undertaking the nature of its effects upon historic properties the likely effects on historic properties public participation efforts at earlier steps confidentiality concerns
Public Participation During Resolution of Adverse Effects
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
43
If FHWA, ODOT, SHPO and Council agree on how adverse effects will be resolved, they execute a Memorandum of Agreement.
The MOA defines the steps to mitigate the adverse effect.
When the Council does not participate, the Federal agency must submit a copy of executed MOA to the Council
Federal agency must ensure the undertaking is carried out in accordance with the MOA.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Conclusion of Step IV
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
44
Signatories: Required signatories: Agency (FHWA), SHPO/THPO, and
ACHP if they have joined in consultation. Must sign and their approval is needed to amend or
terminate
Invited signatories: ODOT and local agency with legal involvement, such as a City or County Not required to execute MOA, but if they do sign, their
approval is needed to amend or terminate
Concurring parties: additional signatories (could be a local historical society, community organization, private citizen, etc.) Do not have the same rights as signatories—approval is
not needed to execute, amend, or terminate.
Memorandum of Agreement
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
45
To specify the mitigation or alternatives agreed to by the consulting parties.
To identify who is responsible for carrying out the specified measures.
To render Council comment (if necessary). To serve as acknowledgement by the signatories that, in
their collective view, the Federal agency has taken into account the effects of the undertaking on historic properties.
Purposes of the MOA
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
46
• If agency and SHPO cannot agree, Council must be invited to participate
• Council may consult or choose to comment
• If further consultation not productive, Federal agency, SHPO, or Council can terminate
• Federal agency MAY ultimately decide to proceed without SHPO and/or Council agreement (this is not common.)
(Refer to ACHP flow chart)
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Failure to Resolve Adverse Effects
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
47
Failure To Agree
Memorandum of Agreement
Council Comment
Public involvement
Step IV: Resolve Adverse Effects
Continue consultation
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Step IV: Resolve Adverse Effects
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
48
• Most projects do not involve historic properties, however, the simplest projects can.
• The Federal agency is ultimately responsible for all decisions
• Everything is documented.
• Notify the public and seek comment when required.
• Properties determined eligible for the NRHP receive the same level of consideration as those already listed in the NRHP.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Principles To Remember
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
49
• Most cases can be resolved at the state level between FHWA/ODOT and SHPO.
• The process has no predetermined outcome.
• The process is based on good faith effort.
• Section 106 of the NHPA does NOT require preservation of historic and/or archaeological resources, only that the projects effects on them be considered.
More Principles To Remember
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
50
Advisory Council’s web site: www.achp.gov
• New guidance is published by Council periodically.
• Read the regulations; print additional guidance from the Council’s website.
AASHTO Practitioner’s Handbook:“Consulting Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act” (February 2007)
http://environment.transportation.org/pdf/PG06.pdf
CEQ NEPA Citizen’s Guide:http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/Citizens_Guide_Dec07.pdf
More information
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation
51
ODOT Section 106 Toolkit: http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Planning/Environment/training/Pages/Section106Toolkit.aspx
SHPO: www.ohiohistory.org/resources/histpres
NRHP: www.cr.nps.gov/nr
FHWA: www.fhwa.dot.gov/histpres/index.asp
AASHTO: http://environment.transportation.org/environmental_issues/historic_cultural
• Call the Cultural Resource Section staff (contact information located on our website)
• There is information on OES’ website and in the Cultural Resources Manual regarding report requirements, agreements, publications, historic bridges, general guidance and related links.
Additional Information:
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process