presenters: jootaek(juice) lee university of miami law library ([email protected]) kumar percy...
TRANSCRIPT
Presenters:Jootaek(Juice) Lee
University of Miami Law Library ([email protected])
Kumar Percy Jayasuriya Georgetown Law Library ([email protected])
Introducing and Integrating Free Internet Legal Research
Into Classroom
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Topics Lawyers Researching Using Internet Services
0102030405060708090
100ge
nera
l new
s(77
.8%
)
law
yers
(72.
9%)
com
pani
es(6
6.8%
)
lega
l new
s(65
.2%
)
publ
ic r
ecor
ds(6
2.1%
)
expe
rts(
41.3
%)
judg
es(3
9.9%
)
case
doc
kets
(38.
2%)
stat
ead
min
istr
ativ
e(36
.8%
)st
ate
legi
slat
ion(
35.9
%)
fede
ral
adm
inis
trat
ive(
30.6
%)
othe
r st
ate
legi
slat
ion(
29.6
%)
fede
ral
legi
slat
ion(
28.8
%)
othe
r st
ate
adm
inis
trat
ive(
27.6
%)
lega
l for
ms(
25.4
%)
othe
r st
ate
case
law
(22.
9%)
stat
e ca
sela
w(2
2.8%
)fe
dera
l cas
ela
w(1
5%)
lega
l Cita
tors
(11.
3%)
Topics<2008 Legal Technology Survey Report by ABA>
Per
cen
tag
e(%
)
Series1
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Table of ContentsI. Evaluating WebsitesII. Examples of Internet Legal ResourcesIII. Considerations for Incorporating Free
Research Tools into a Research Strategy
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
I. Evaluating Legal Research Tools
CoverageCurrencyAccuracyValue Added FeaturesAuthorityAppropriatenessCostPerspectiveDesign- Usability
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
CoverageWhat is the depth and breath of coverage
Does the source provide more than a few years of coverage?
Can you search for older cases?In a caselaw database are there missing
cases or missing courts?Are there statutes or regulations as well as
cases?
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
CurrencyIs the information up to date?
When was the code last updated?What is the most recent case loaded to the
database?What is the revision cycle of the database?
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
AccuracyCan you identify any missing documents?Does the secondary source provide
verifiable information with citations?Are there errors in the documents?Can you verify that the document has not
been altered since publication?GPO authentication signature on FDsys.gov
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Value Added FeaturesSearch Features
Search for a known citation (find a document)Search multiple databases (multiple jurisdictions)Table of Contents / Index / Popular Names TableCitator (or a way to search for all cases that cited
to a known case or statute or regulation).
Sort FeaturesControl how you review results
Document FeaturesPinpoint PaginationHyperlinks within document
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Authority
Can you identify:the authorthe qualifications of the authorhow to contact the publisher / producerverifiable citations to the documentation behind
the statements
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Other Ways to Evaluate a SourceAppropriateness
Is it clear who the intended audience isIs the language, illustrations, and format
adequate for the audiencePerspective
What is the goal of the sourceIs there a bias or is it objective
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
CostWhat is the overall costHow does the cost compare to other onlineHow does it compare to printConsider speed as a cost
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Presentation and Design
SourcesJakob Nielsen, Top Ten Mistakes in Web
DesignU.S. Department of Heath and Human
Services(HHS), Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines
Nielsen, F-Shaped Pattern for Reading Web Content
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Usability Mistakes• Lack of consistency
Not behaving the same, not easy to become familiar, and lots of distractions
• Lack of scannabilityNot providing lists or headings
• Bad searching design: Not visible and not simpleNot providing the search box, not showing the scope of
search, and not showing results by importance• Not changing color of visited links• PDF files for online searching• Opening new browser windows
<Jakob Nielsen, Top Ten Mistakes in Web Design & U.S. Department of Heath and Human Services(HHS), Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines >
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
SummaryUsing the previous factors will lead to
different answers for
Recommend for purchase
Recommend for use for a particular client
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
II. Examples of Internet Legal ResourcesReview a few specific free and low-cost
sources of legal informationConsider how to integrate them into a
research strategy
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Free Caselaw ResourcesAltlawFindlawJustiaLexisOnePreCYdentPublic Law Library
Each fully evaluated through the Georgetown Research Guide of Low-Cost and Free Legal Research Tools.
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Free Online Caselaw Sources Rich with recent caselaw
No site is really comprehensive
Limited search features
Secondary sources are severely limited
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
PreCYdentSample search:
http://www.screencast.com/users/kumarj/folders/Jing/media/9697b52b-74f7-4fe8-8e26-1225d71a3ecb
Sample results:http://www.screencast.com/users/kumarj/
folders/Jing/media/90f7b4d9-5e85-4d25-a7b1-72e5550621c0
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
PreCYdentCoverage,
Great for federal cases, weak for state law and statutes
CurrencyGood but hard to tell, especially for statutes
AccuracyHard to tell -- Cases look different from what we
are used to
AuthorityPro: Some information about the source of casesWeakness: No authority for statutes
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
PreCYdentValue added features:
Pro: West citationsPro: Pinpoint pagination pre 2004 fed casesPro: Some advanced search featuresPro: Find a citation featurePro: CitatorWeakness: cannot sort citator results by subject
level of analysis
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
PreCYdentAppropriateness
Useful for sophisticated researchersCost
Quick resultsPerspective Design Usability
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
JustiaPro: Great contentPro: Good Browse featuresWeakness: hard to identify search featuresWeakness: limited standardized or pinpoint
citationsWeakness: no easily identified citatorWeakness: no federated searchingWeakness: no way to sort results
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Low CostLow Cost
FastcaseLoislawlexisONEVersusLawCasemaker
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Low-Cost ServicesCurrency
Variable - Usually noted up frontAccuracyValue Added Features
Often better sorting features than Westlaw or Lexis
Enhanced search featuresSome pretty good citators
AuthorityAppropriatenessCostPerspective/Design- Usability
2009 CALI Conference for Law School Computing
Combining ResourcesUse free and low-cost databases early
on, along with print secondary sourcesTo learn the basics of an area of law
To try out search strings
Supplement with Westlaw and LexisUsing advanced features such as
annotated codes, headnote searches and citators