prevalence, risk factors and natural course fda … risk factors and natural course . fda workshop,...
TRANSCRIPT
-
De novo DSA and ABMR: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Natural Course FDA Workshop, Session 1 28 September 2015 Peter Nickerson, MD, FRCPC, FCAHS Flynn Family Chair in Renal Transplantation Professor of Internal Medicine and Immunology
-
Astellas consultant and core investigator providing central laboratory support for the FKC-014 Canadian clinical trial
AND
My presentation does not include discussion of off-label
or investigational use of drugs
Peter Nickerson, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Relevant Financial Relationship Disclosure Statement
-
De novo DSA Kidney Allograft Survival Consecutive Adult and Pediatric Kidney Transplants (n=508, 1999 to 2012)
11% Other GN+IFTA (n=20) 4% TCMR+IFTA (n=10) 2% IFTA (n= 8) 1.6% BK Nephro (n= 2) Other (n= 6) Not Bx (n=10)
76% Stable
9% Subclinical DSA
4% Clinical DSA
Years Post-Transplant Wiebe et al., AJT (2015) ePub
Death with Function 9% (n=46)
1% (n= 5)
-
Ref. 1st Tx
Defn to Rule out Pre-Tx DSA
de novo DSA Induction (Depletional) Race
1st Mo 1st Yr >1st Yr Thymo Campath Cauc AA Hisp Asian
Cooper n.a. FCXM 15.6% 27.0% 0% yr 2 66% 0% 69% 7% 17% n.a.
DeVos 93% >2000 MFI 8.0% 20.0% 5.0%/yr 61% 0% 42% 27% 24% n.a.
Heilman 91% >1000 MFI 8.2% 17.6% n.a. 26% 61% n.a. 5% n.a. n.a.
Everly 100% >1000 MFI 3.0% 11.0% 2.3%/yr 13% 0% n.a. 64% n.a. n.a.
Wiebe 95% >300 MFI 0.0% 2.0% 2.0%/yr 9% 0% 69% 2% 0% 11%
Evolution of de novo DSA Wiebe et al., AJT (2015) ePub DeVos et al., Transplantation (2014) 97:534
Years post-transplant
de novo DSA 2% per year
de novo DSA 5% per year(1-4)
de novo DSA 20% 1st year
-
STUDY Dominant
de novo DSA HLA
Mismatch Race Young Age of Recip
Donor Type
Imuran vs. MMF
CsA vs. Tac TCMR
I II I+II DR MM DQ MM Worthington et al. X
Hourmant et al. X X X X X
Piazza et al. X X
Lachmann et al. X X
Scornik et al. X
Lachmann et al. X
Hidalgo et al. X
Yabu et al. X
Fotheringham et al. X
Cooper et al. X HLA Mismatch X
Liefeldt et al. X HLA Mismatch X
Willicombe et al. X X X
Ginevri et al. X X
De Kort et al. X
Everly et al. X X none X DD
Wiebe et al. X X X X X
De Vos et al. X HLA Mismatch AA DD
Correlates of de novo DSA
Wiebe et al., Current Opinion Organ Transplant (2013) 18:470
-
Polymorphic amino acid
Tissue Antigens (2011) 77:525
Functional Epitope (3 radius Eplet)
Structural Epitope (15 radius Epitope)
-
1 DR MM
1 DQ MM
# of Epitope MM
CONTEXT ( Donor Recipient combination) Single HLA Antigen MM Range of Epitope MM
Wiebe et al., AJT (2013) 13:3114-3122
-
p
-
Early clinical TCMR (
-
Gibson et al., AJT (2008) 8:819
PTC 2
Patients with de novo DSA have early (0-6 month) TCMR with more intense PTC inflammation
TCMR PTC score
de novo DSA
No DSA
2.0
1.0 p
-
Non-Adherence is a major risk factor for de novo DSA
Adherent
19% at 12 years
Non-Adherent
72% at 12 years
p
-
Multivariate Model of de novo DSA Risk Factors
Wiebe et al., AJT (2013) 13:3114-3122
-
At onset of de novo DSA 76% have ABMR(Banff 2013)
Wiebe et al., AJT (2015) ePub
Banff Grade 0 1 2 3
TCMR(Banff 2007) common (91% with ABMR) 32% Borderline 29% Grade 1
Transplant glomerulopathy uncommon
IFTA common
At DSA onset 18% have no TCMR or ABMR
-
Time to Graft Loss from de novo DSA Onset Consecutive Adult and Pediatric Kidney Transplants (n=508, 1999 to 2012)
Mean time to graft failure from 1st detection of de novo DSA
~ 3.3 to 8.3 years
Wiebe et al., AJT (2015) ePub
-
De Novo DSA and Graft Dysfunction Estimated eGFR Rate of Decline (ml/min/1.73m2/year)
Pre dnDSA Post dnDSA
Rowe et al. J. Genontology (1976)
Healthy Men (n=293)
Age eGFR decline (Years) (ml/min/1.73m2/year) 17-84 -0.90 3.08 ________________________________________________________________
25-34 -1.09 3.13 35-44 -0.11 2.88 45-54 -0.73 2.92
Stable
Wiebe et al., AJT (2015) ePub
For each 1.0 ml/min/1.73m2 decrease in eGFR at 3 years post-subclinical dnDSA onset, the risk of graft loss increased (HR 1.06 [1.03-1.09], p
-
Clinical Predictors for Graft Loss at DSA onset Consecutive Adult and Pediatric Kidney Transplants (n=508, 1999 to 2012)
DGF
MNA
DSA Titer
Wiebe et al., AJT (2015) ePub
-
Univariate Multivariate
76% ABMR(Banff 2013) at biopsy for de novo DSA
Biopsy Predictors for Graft Loss at DSA onset Consecutive Adult and Pediatric Kidney Transplants (n=508, 1999 to 2012)
Tubulitis
CG
Wiebe et al., AJT (2015) ePub
-
Independent Predictors of Banff Chronic Scores
Banff cg score increases 1 grade per 3 years of post de novo DSA follow-up (R2 = 0.36, p=0.0018)
Wiebe et al., AJT (2015) ePub
-
Working Model of Kidney Allograft Loss
Under Immunosupression Non-adherence Physician guided
HLA MM
DGF
TCMR Clinical Subclinical
ABMR Clinical Subclinical
dnDSA CG
IFTA
Graft Loss
Class II Epitope MM
(Immunodominant)
IRI
CNI Toxicity Brain Death
eGFR
Stable Graft
Subclinical DSA (mixed rejection)
Clinical DSA (mixed rejection)
Time Post-Transplant
Proteinuria: Rate of 0.004 0.09 0.21 0.48 (p=0.003) (g/day/year)
Wiebe et al., AJT (2015) ePub
-
Acknowledgements
Transplant Manitoba Adult & Pediatric Kidney Programs
David Rush Chris Wiebe
Julie Ho Martin Karpinski
Leroy Storsley Patricia Birk
Aviva Goldberg
Transplant Immunology Laboratory (DSM)
Denise Pochinco
Manitoba Centre for Proteomics & Systems Biology
John Wilkins
Department of Pathology Ian Gibson
Department of Immunology Kent HayGlass
Universitt Basel Stefan Schaub
Patricia Hirt-Minkowski Gideon Hnger
CTOT Consortia Peter Heeger
Don Hricik Robert Fairchild Richard Formica Emilio Poggio Nancy Bridges
David Ilke
DeKAF Consortia Arthur Matas Robert Gaston
Sita Gourishankar Joseph Grande
Lawrence Hunsicker Bert Kasiske
Michael Cecka Roslyn Mannon Fernando Cosio
Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Evolution of de novo DSA Correlates of de novo DSASlide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Working Model of Kidney Allograft LossSlide Number 20