previous examples of “pathological” bonding and the bh 3 molecule illustrate how a chemist’s...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
Previous examples of “pathological” bonding and the BH3 molecule illustrate how a chemist’s use of
localized bonds, vacant atomic orbitals, and unshared pairs to understand molecules compares with views
based on the molecule’s actual total electron density, and with computational molecular orbitals. This
lecture then focuses on understanding reactivity in terms of the overlap of singly-occupied molecular
orbitals (SOMOs) and, more commonly, of an unusually high-energy highest occupied molecular orbital
(HOMO) with an unusually low-energy lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). This generalizes the
traditional concepts of acid and base. Criteria for assessing reactivity are outlined and illustrated.
Chemistry 125: Lecture 15
Chemical Reactivity: SOMO, HOMO, and LUMO
Synchronize when the speaker finishes saying
“…what holds molecules together, that is on bonding.” Synchrony can be adjusted by using the pause(||) and run(>) controls.
For copyright notice see final page of this file
MissingBond ?
(e.g. 32nd of 33 occupied MOs)
Cf. Lecture 7 - Dunitz et al. (1981)
Experiment: Pathological Bonding
BentBonds ?
Would a Computer’s MOsProvide Understanding?
No! Far too complicated to answer “Why?”
But analysis in terms of pairwise bonding overlapof hybrid AOs provides
clear explanations.
Experiment: Pathological Bonding
MissingBond ?
BentBonds ?
BestOverlapPossiblefor 60°
C-C-C
Very PoorOverlap
>90°?
psp4.1sp1.4
Because sp4.1extendsto give best overlap
Why not p orbitals (90°)?
Rehybridizing to strengthen this
bond would weaken six others.
Three Views of BH3
2) Molecular Orbitals
1) Total Electron Density
3) Bonds from Hybrid AOs
(Nature)
(Computer)
(Student)
BH3
Total e-Density0.002 e/Å3
ElectrostaticPotential
Energy of a+ probe onthe surface
low (-) high (+)
H
BH3
8 low-energy AOs 8 low-energy MOs
B : 1s , 2s , 2px , 2py , 2pz
3 H : 1s
AO “basis”
set
MOLECULAR ORBITALS
noccupied
BH3
8 electrons / 4 pairs
B : 5 electrons3 H : 3 1 electron
••••
••
••
OMOs
UMOs
LUMO
HOMO(s) •• ••
ccupied
ighest
owest
MOLECULAR ORBITALS
We PartitionTotal e-Density
intoAtom-Pair Bonds
(and anti-bonds)
& Lone Pairs(and vacant atomic orbitals)
(à la Lewis)
usually
When thisdoesn't work,and we must
use moresophisticatedorbitals, wesay there is
RESONANCE
2pz
••
••
••
•••••• ••BHHB
Same Total e-Density!
Same Total Energy!
BH
HB
For Many Purposes Localized Bond Orbitals are Not Bad
Boron Core
And they are easy to think about; but beware of resonance.
The Localized Bond Orbital Picture(Pairwise MOs and Isolated AOs)
is our intermediate betweenH-like AOs and Computer MOs
When must we think more deeply?
When mixing of localized orbitals causes
Reactivityor
Resonance
Where are We?
MoleculesPlum-Pudding Molecules ("United Atom" Limit)
Understanding Bonds (Pairwise LCAO)"Energy-Match & Overlap"
Structure (and Dynamics) of XH3 MoleculesParsing Electron Density
Atoms3-Dimensional Reality (H-like Atoms)
HybridizationOrbitals for Many-Electron Atoms (Wrong!)Recovering from the Orbital Approximation
Recognizing Functional Groups
Payoff forOrganic
Chemistry!
ReactivitySOMOs, high HOMOs, and low LUMOs
Which MOMixings Matter
forReactivity?
••
••
••
••
etc.
••
••
••
etc.
UMOs
OMOsOMOs
B A
UMOs
Myr
iad
Pos
sibl
e P
airw
ise
Mix
ings
molecule molecule
Which MOMixings Matter
forReactivity?
••
••
••
••
etc.
••
••
••
etc.
UMOs
OMOsOMOs
••SOMO
SOMO••
B A
SOMO-SOMO(when they exist)
UMOs
many atoms"free radicals"
e.g. •H •Cl •CH3
not so common
ingly
molecule molecule
Which MOMixings Matter
forReactivity?
••
••
••
••
etc.
UMOs
••
••
••
etc.
UMOs
OMOsOMOs
••
••
B A
Nothing
Weak NetRepulsion
••
Negligible Mixing
because of Bad
E-match
molecule molecule
Which MOMixings Matter
forReactivity?
••
••
••
••
etc.
UMOs
••
••
••
etc.
UMOs
OMOsOMOs
B ABonding!
Unusually High
HOMOwith
Unusually Low
LUMO
••
molecule molecule
••
Negligible Mixing
because of Bad
E-match
Which MOMixings Matter
forReactivity?
••
••
••
••
etc.
UMOs
••
••
••
etc.
UMOs
OMOsOMOs
B A••
Bonding!
Unusually High
HOMOwith
Unusually Low
LUMO
BASE
ACID
molecule molecule
Most mixing of MOs affects neither overall energy nor
overall electron distribution for one (or more) of these reasons:
1) Electron occupancy 4 or 0
2) Poor energy match
3) Poor overlap BUT
Acid-Base TheoriesTHEORY ACID BASE
Lavoisier(1789)
OxidizedSubstance
Substance tobe Oxidized
Arrhenius(1887)
H+ Source OH- Source
Incr
easi
ng G
ener
ality
Brønsted/Lowry(1923)
H+ Donor H+ Acceptor
Lewis(1923)
e-Pair Acceptor"Electrophile"
e-Pair Donor"Nucleophile"
HOMO/LUMO(1960s)
unusually
High HOMOunusually
Low LUMO
••
sp3C 1sH
Unusual:Compared to What?
••
*CH
CH
"usual"LUMO
"usual"HOMO
(or *CC )
(or CC )
I. Unmixed Valence-Shell AOs
III. Unusual AO Energy in MO
Sources of weirdness:
IV. Electrical Charge
II. Poor Overlap of AOs
I. Unmixed Valence-ShellAtomic Orbitals
••
*CH
CH
••
sp3C 1sH
BH3
low LUMO
••
CH3
high HOMO
••
NH3
high HOMO
"usual"LUMO
"usual"HOMO
••
OH2
high HOMO
••
OHhigh HOMO
(or *CC )
(or CC )
H+
low “LUMO”
(energies qualitative only)
(Also IV: Electrical Charge)
End of Lecture 15Oct. 18, 2008
Copyright © J. M. McBride 2009. Some rights reserved. Except for cited third-party materials, and those used by visiting speakers, all content is licensed under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0).
Use of this content constitutes your acceptance of the noted license and the terms and conditions of use.
Materials from Wikimedia Commons are denoted by the symbol .
Third party materials may be subject to additional intellectual property notices, information, or restrictions.
The following attribution may be used when reusing material that is not identified as third-party content: J. M. McBride, Chem 125. License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0