principals’ forum secondary support september 2011
TRANSCRIPT
Principals’ Forum
Secondary SupportSeptember 2011
Introduction
Martin Clery
Meeting focus:
Senior Secondary Pathways
Russell Dyer
2010 Enrolment Data
• Approximately 4500 Year 12 public school students
left school without attaining either an ATAR or completing a VET qualification.
2010 Enrolment Data
• Approximately 4500 Year 12 public school students
left school without attaining either an ATAR or completing a VET qualification.
• Stage 1 WACE unit participation across sectors
DoE Independent Catholic schools
46.9% 16.4% 32.2%
2010 Enrolment Data
• Approximately 4500 Year 12 public school students
left school without attaining either an ATAR or completing a VET qualification.
• Stage 1 WACE unit participation across sectors
• 60% of schools had Stage 1 participation rates above 50%
DoE Independent Catholic schools
46.9% 16.4% 32.2%
2010 VET Full Qualification Achieved
3233
3914
697
164
7590
1997
2547
31834
4903
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Cert I Cert II Cert III Cert IV Total
AQF certificate levels
Nu
mb
er o
f st
ud
ents
State-wideGovernment 2010
VET Achievement Data
Stage Participation Data
46.9
17
36.2
50.1
13.2
36.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
stu
de
nts
2010
2011
46.9
17
36.2
0.0 0.0 0.00
10
20
30
40
50
60
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
stu
de
nts
2010
2011
DoE VET Qualifications
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Cert I Cert II Cert III Cert IV Total
Nu
mb
er
of
stu
de
nts
Achievement 2010
Enrolments 2011
VET Achievement Data
2010 Enrolment Data
• The mean attainment rate for public schools was 58.6%
• Note: attainment rate does not currently capture student participation in School Based Traineeships, the School Apprenticeship Link program or students working towards portfolio entry.
2010 Enrolment Data
• Approximately one third of schools had a greater proportional enrolment in Stage 1 units in 2010 than they had in Wholly School Assessed subjects in 2007.
2010 Enrolment Data
• Approximately one third of schools had a greater proportional enrolment in Stage 1 units in 2010 than they had in Wholly School Assessed subjects in 2007.
• Approximately one quarter of schools had a greater proportional enrolment in Stage 1 units in 2010 than the proportion of the same cohort that achieved either a satisfactory or limited in the WALNA testing in 2007.
2010 Enrolment Data
Enrolment patterns in English
Compulsory exams and 15 mark bonus
introduced
91% obtained A, B or C grades
93% obtained A, B or C grades
96% obtained A, B or C grades
2010 Enrolment Data
Enrolment patterns in English
92% obtained A, B or C grades
87% obtained A, B or C grades
96% obtained A, B or C grades
74% of the students obtained an A, B or C at Stage 2 or 3.
2010 Enrolment Data
Enrolment patterns in English
52% of the students obtained an A, B or C at Stage 2 or 3.
74% of the students obtained an A, B or C at Stage 2 or 3.
2010 Enrolment Data
Enrolment patterns in Media Production and Analysis
Compulsory exams and 15 mark bonus
introduced
84% obtained A, B or C grades
83% obtained A, B or C grades87% obtained A, B or C grades
Expected Standards
Michelle Ostberg
English work samples
Stage 1 C grade < Year 9 C grade
2007 Year 9: D/E = 2 442 students
2010 Year 12: Stage 1 = 4 923 students
The data suggests that ~2 500 students demonstrated a higher standard 3 years earlier
Expected Standards Mathematics content
Unit 1E content ≈ Years 7-9, Aust Curric ≈ Years 8-9, K-10
Syllabus(NB No networks, number patterns and minimal chance and data in AC)
2007 Year 9: D/E = 3 375 students2010 Year 12: Stage 1 = 5 275 students
At least 1 900 students were successful with much of this content 3 years earlier
Curriculum Council
Update
Allan Blagaich
© 2009 Curriculum Council
National Curriculum & Curriculum Council Update
Pathways for Senior Secondary Students
© 2009 Curriculum Council
Current Status of National Curriculum
• 8 December 2010 MCEEDYA Min - ACARA• Establish a national common approach to the
achievement standards, trial and validate the approach
• Finalise a clear and overarching framework for the AC that assures the place and integrity of all learning areas
• Develop the curriculum content and achievement standards as required to meet the needs of special education students
© 2009 Curriculum Council
WA Position
• Minister has stated until fully developed and with content, validated achievement standards, annotated work samples linking achievement standards to grading, assessment and reporting, WA will not commence implementation.
• From announcement WA has said 3 years for implementation
• ACARA has flagged 2014 NAPLAN to be based on Australian Curriculum
© 2009 Curriculum Council
F (pre-primary) – Year 10
• Achievement Standards validation has commenced
• Initial phase engaged teachers to confirm – coherence, developmental progression, consistency of expectation and usability.
• 80 teachers cross sectoral• All states• October MCEEDYA
© 2009 Curriculum Council
Nationally consistent assessment and reporting
• Because of variation in assessment and reporting, ACARA has proposed that there be a transition period as states move to more consistent assessment and reporting arrangements
• This means that over the next two years as states implement English, mathematics, science and history, teachers will be expected to use current state approaches to assessment and reporting
• Steering committee (DG, CEO, AISWA, CC) has stated that this is unacceptable and advised the minister accordingly
© 2009 Curriculum Council
Framework for F-10 Curriculum
• Rationale, role in overall curriculum, treatment of the LAs, general capabilities, cross curriculum priorities and fit to Melbourne Declaration
• Assumes that for any year of schooling AC is written for up to 80% of total teaching time – peaking at 7&8 and reducing at 9&10 as core expectations are reduced
• Time allocations, organisation and delivery rest with education authorities and schools
© 2009 Curriculum Council
Provision of curriculum for students with disability
• Provides a position on how published curriculum is designed to help the learning
• Content descriptions and achievement standards for school age students with intellectual and developmental disability
• Initial work is focused on literacy and numeracy personal and social competence
• Particular focus will also be paid to Health and Physical Education area
© 2009 Curriculum Council
Senior Secondary Curriculum
• Advice provided on first 14 through CACs• ACARA presented a model and development
process for levels of achievement• ACARA is consulting with jurisdictions on the
model and proposed changes for developing, checking and refining levels of achievement
• Development of levels of achievement is planned to occur during the remainder of 2011 and early 2012
© 2009 Curriculum Council
Senior Secondary Curriculum
• English, mathematics, science and history should be ready for endorsement last quarter 2012
• Implementation timeline has yet to be completed
• Baccalaureate –ACARAS initial paper proposes it sits alongside existing senior school qualifications as voluntary credential that will build on AC
© 2009 Curriculum Council
Senior Secondary Curriculum
• ARTS – paper released F-12
• Paper has been prepared cross sectorally
• CC providing feedback
© 2009 Curriculum Council
Languages
• Consultation has occurred
• ACARA is reviewing the feedback received from teachers and students and will inform him our practice.
• CC coordinated a WA response
© 2009 Curriculum Council
Technologies and Physical Education
• Position paper for Technologies and draft position paper for H&PE have been presented for discussion
• Papers raise issues in relation to subject composition, relationship to other learning areas
© 2009 Curriculum Council
What needs to be considered• Location of 7’s and NAPLAN 2014
• Amendments to CC Act - Curriculum Framework – data – standards review
• National Curriculum Senior Secondary = four units 1&2 not linked, 3&4 scoped to follow and exit with examination. – Units1&2 map to stage 2 and – Units 3&4 map to stage 3
• Australian Baccalaureate – possible impact of
• Stage 3, Stage 2, Stage 1, VET stand alone, VET embedded, endorsed units
© 2009 Curriculum Council
What needs to be considered
• Disproportionate enrolments in – Stage 1 50.1% compared to – Stage 2 13.2% & – Stage 3 36.2%
• Only state not to accredit VET for ATAR• Loading of stage 3 units as a disincentive • University – enrolment caps off, stage 1
insufficient for alternative pathway entry
© 2009 Curriculum Council
Where to from here?
• School Curriculum and Standards Authority New Board (7 members)– New Statutory Committees
• Standards (5 members)• Curriculum and Assessment (13 members)
• National Curriculum – October and implementation
• Current enrolments and decisions re viability and cost
• Exams and Blog. Facebook and Twitter