v o l u m e i i i , i s s u e i i iPRINCIPLESFaith and Marriage, Better Together?W. Bradford Wilcox

Over the next decade, count on the press, academics, and pop culture icons to take a more negative view of religion in American life. This opposition has been driven by a variety of factors, such as the rise of the “new atheism” and conservative Christian alliances with the Republican Party and with President Donald Trump. In particular, orthodox religious opposition to today’s new morality—on matters ranging from abortion to LGBTQ rights—has made religion a target of scorn, skepticism, or outright hostility on the part of many of the nation’s cultural elites. This negative view of religion extends to religion’s influence on family life.

Take, for instance, the media’s coverage of a recent University of Chicago study purporting to show that children raised by religious parents were less altruistic than children raised by secular parents. The study’s author, psychologist Jean Decety, claimed that his research showed “how religion negatively

About the Author

W. Bradford Wilcox, Ph.D., is professor of sociology at the University of Virginia, director of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia, visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and senior fellow at the Institute for Family Studies. His research has focused on marriage, fatherhood, and cohabitation, especially on the ways that family structure, civil society, and culture influence the quality and stability of family life in the United States and around the globe. Wilcox is the author of numerous books and articles. His work has been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic, Slate, National Review Online, NPR, NBC’s The Today Show, and many other media outlets.

influences children’s altruism” and that it challenged “the view that religiosity facilitates prosocial behavior,” calling into question “whether religion is vital for moral development—suggesting the secularization of moral discourse does not reduce human kindness. In fact, it does just the opposite.”1

The study had numerous methodological problems and limitations—it was based upon a non-random and non-representative sample of children watching cartoons and sharing stickers in a few cities around the globe—but received glowing, credulous coverage from numerous media outlets.2 As I noted in the Washington Post, a Daily Beast headline proclaimed “Religious Kids are Jerks,” and the Guardian reported “Religious Children Are Meaner than Their Secular Counterparts,” while Slate weighed in to say that “religious children are more selfish.”3 This was clearly a story that some in the media were more than happy to run with.

There is only one problem with this new, negative view of religion and family life: it misses the mark. In the United States, at least, religion is generally a positive force in the family. My own research, which has focused extensively on the connection between faith and family life, indicates that religion

generally fosters more happiness, greater stability, and a deeper sense of meaning in American family life, provided that family members—especially spouses—share a common faith. In simple terms, the old slogan—“the family that prays together, stays together”—still holds in 2017.

WEDDED BLISS

Consider Roberto, 37, and Marcia Flores, 35, who immigrated to the United States from Mexico when they were children. This Catholic couple are representative of some of the unique challenges and opportunities facing Latino couples. These San Diego residents met in their early twenties, lived together for a number of years, and had their daughter prior to getting married. In 1997, they wed and had a son shortly thereafter. For most of the early years of their relationship, Roberto struggled with drugs and alcohol, and spent many a weekend focused on soccer and friends rather than his family. “Before, I used to be in the world (‘del mundo’); I used a lot of drugs, I drank a lot, I didn’t care for my family, not my wife, my brothers, mother and father, I didn’t care about them,” he said, also noting, “when the weekend came, I left my wife and I would go play soccer with friends . . . and then go drinking, and that was my whole weekend.”

He also says he took a “macho” approach to family life, leaving domestic responsibilities to Marcia. “You come home and you boss people around,” he said, describing his macho ethic. “You force your wife and your kids to do things for you. And the woman had to take care of all the house one way or another, the man did nothing.” If he had kept up this approach to family

2 | V o l u m e I I I , I s s u e I I I

WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT!

Keep Principles free and help us share clear thinking with a culture in need. Visit getprinciples.com/gift or use

the attached envelope.

| 3

life, an approach characterized by intoxication and machismo, Roberto thinks his family would have fallen apart: “I’m sure my wife would have left me. I wouldn’t have my wife or kids anymore if I had stayed in that path.”

In 2000, Roberto took a detour. Some friends suggested that he and Marcia attend a retreat for couples at a local Catholic church, and, after some prodding from her, he decided to go. Much to his surprise, Roberto was overcome at the retreat, filled with remorse over his failings as a husband and father. What happened next was powerful: “That’s when I met God,” he said, adding, “I cried before God, which was something I never did. I never cry. But a lot of things I never did before I did on that day.” Besides crying at the retreat, Roberto felt “all the presence of God” and decided to give up drugs and alcohol and to stop treating his family so poorly.

In the wake of the retreat, Roberto and Marcia have seen a marked improvement in the quality of their marriage. “I started going to church and they taught me that the family is important and you have to care for it,” he said. “I never knew that before; I really didn’t think I had to put family first before.” At church, he has learned that God “has a plan for marriage,” that he must live “unity in all aspects” of his marriage. In practice, this meant temperance, and coming to embrace the notion that “you need a lot of love to raise a good family.”

This has translated into big changes in their marriage and family life. Roberto stopped abusing drugs and alcohol, curtailed his involvement with friends and soccer on the weekends, and took a more engaged approach to “helping in the house.” A religious perspective

and religious rituals became more common for Marcia and Roberto. Now, Roberto says, “time with my family is something spiritual to me,” and he and Marcia pray with their kids on the weekends. The changes he has experienced in his marriage and family, in turn, have further deepened Roberto’s faith: “That’s why I know there’s a God.”

The Flores’ experience is suggestive of how a shared faith can help a couple dealing with male misbehavior or other challenges. Their Catholic faith enabled Roberto to experience powerful, life-changing religious rituals, and to become integrated into a religious community that embraces a positive, family-oriented ethos. Their faith—especially Roberto’s—has given the couple a sense of hope. It has helped them make the changes needed to strengthen their marriage and family life. As suggested in Elizabeth Brisco’s The Reformation of Machismo, men’s religious faith can counter some of the misogynistic attitudes associated with machismo in the Latino community; in this case, Roberto has jettisoned his expectation that he could devote all his free time to friends, soccer, and drinking, and leave Marcia with full responsibility for the caretaking and housework that are part and parcel of family life.

4 | V o l u m e I I I , I s s u e I I I

Although the Flores’ particular story of faith and family life is emblematic of many of the challenges and opportunities facing Latino couples, my research suggests that the benefits of shared church attendance extend to American couples across racial and ethnic lines. Specifically, my work with Nicholas Wolfinger in Soul Mates: Religion, Sex, Love, and Marriage Among African Americans and Latinos indicates that couples

are substantially more likely to report being happy in their relationship when both partners attend church regularly than when neither partner does. This result holds equally for whites, blacks, and Latinos, as the figure above indicates.

Clearly, white, black, and Latino spouses who attend church together are about 9 percentage points more likely to say they are “very happy” or “extremely happy” than husbands and wives who do not. This may not seem like a huge boost to marital happiness, but in practical terms it means that almost everyone in a jointly religious marriage is at least “very

happy,” which is striking given the ups and downs of contemporary married life.4 In other words, religious couples are significantly more likely to enjoy wedded bliss than are their secular peers.

THE POWER OF PRAYER AND PEERS

Why does shared religious attendance lead to happiness? Part of the reason faith matters is that it fosters norms—such as a

commitment to marital permanence and fidelity—that strengthen marriages. My research indicates that two other mechanisms, one social and one devotional, also help explain the power of joint church attendance. First, almost half of jointly attending couples form the majority of their friendships with fellow parishioners.

Attending religious services with friends accounts for more than half of the association between church attendance and relationship quality, which means that couples who have many shared friends at their church are happier than other couples. Attending church with one’s friends appears to provide many role models of happy, healthy relationships. These friends can also offer support when an intimate relationship hits the inevitable speed bump, and such friends may encourage each other, by example or the threat of stigma, to resist the temptation of an affair. The figure to the right illustrates the link between shared religious friendships and relationship happiness.

62%

64%

66%

68%

70%

72%

74%

76%

78%

80%

82%

Both Partners Attend ChurchNeither Partner Attends Church

LatinoBlackWhite

% o

f re

spon

dent

s ha

ppy

in

thei

r re

latio

nshi

p

Relationship Quality by Race and Frequent Church Attendance

70%69%

71%

79%78%

80%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

YesNo

Does couple pray together almost every week or more?

Do friends attend religious services?

Second, couples in which both members attend church are more likely to say that they often pray together, and shared prayer also helps to account for the link between church attendance and a happy relationship. Previous studies show that prayer helps couples deal with stress, enables them to focus on shared beliefs and hopes for the future, and allows them to deal constructively with challenges and problems in their relationship, and in their lives. In fact, we find that shared prayer is the most powerful religious predictor of relationship quality among black, Latino, and white couples, more powerful than denomination, religious attendance, or shared religious friendships. In simple terms, as the figure below also

indicates, the couple that prays together, flourishes together.

Couples who attend religious services together are happier in their relationships than are their peers who don’t regularly attend church. This finding holds for whites, African Americans, and Latinos alike. It is true that most people are happy in their relationships irrespective of church attendance, but black, Latino, and white couples who attend together enjoy an added boost here. Part of the story here too may be due to selection (couples who are happier together may also be inclined to do many things together, including attending church). But selection probably isn’t the whole story. Our evidence for this contention is our identification

of two of the mechanisms through which religious participation improves relationship quality: religious friends and shared prayer. Couples who attend church together enjoy significantly happier relationships, in large part because they socialize with friends who share their faith and especially because they pray with one another. In other words, those couples who pray together are happiest together.

| 5

Principles is the free bimonthly periodical of Christendom College. Christendom embraces Blessed John Henry Newman’s vision of a liberal education that disciplines the intellect and thereby forms good members of society who will bring sound principles to their personal, professional, and civic endeavors. The ends of liberal education are thus both the flourishing of the individual and the renewal of the temporal order. At Principles, we publish essays that serve these ends, bringing the fruits of liberal education to bear upon contemporary questions.

ABOUT PRINCIPLES

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

YesNo

Does couple pray together almost every week or more?

Do friends attend religious services?

Adjusted Percentage of Individuals Very or Extremely Happy in Their Relationship, by

Congregational Friendships and Frequent Prayer

% v

ery/

extre

mel

y ha

ppy 78%

61%

76%

65%

6 | V o l u m e I I I , I s s u e I I I

TOGETHER FOREVER

But do higher-quality marriages founded on faith necessarily mean more stable marriages? Certainly, in the broader culture, many people think that Christians divorce just as much as their unaffiliated fellow Americans. Some would even argue that Christianity is actually bad for marital stability. Writing in The Nation, for instance, Michelle Goldberg asked: “Is Conservative Christianity Bad for Marriage?” Her affirmative answer was based on a study of red-state Protestant cultures where disapproval of premarital sex has led to earlier, less financially stable marriages.5 It is true that marital happiness is not perfectly correlated with freedom from divorce. Enjoying a happy marriage doesn’t eliminate your odds of divorce later on; it just reduces them. So does faith serve as a stabilizing force in American marriages?

New research from Harvard professor Tyler VanderWeele indicates the answer to that question is yes. In tracking a sample of thousands of middle-aged women across the United States, he found that women who regularly attended church were 47 percent less likely to divorce

than women who did not regularly attend church. He also noted that other research has come to a similar conclusion, generally finding that regular church attendance is associated with a reduction in divorce of more than 30 percent.6

So what accounts for the stabilizing power of religion when it comes to American marriages? VanderWeele offered four theories to explain how faith is linked to less divorce:

1. Religious teachings often indicate that marriage is something sacred—that an important bond is created in the exchange of marriage vows. Attending religious services reinforces that message.

2. Religious teachings also discourage or censure divorce to varying degrees across religious traditions, which may lead to lower rates of divorce; moreover, religious traditions also often have strong teachings against adultery, which is one of the strongest predictors of divorce.

3. Religious teachings often place a strong emphasis on love and on putting the needs of others above one’s own. This may also improve the quality of married life and lower the likelihood of divorce.

4. Religious institutions often provide various types of family support, including a place for families to get to know one another and build relationships, programs for children, marital and pre-marital counseling, and retreats and workshops focused on building a good marriage. Religious communities can provide

-50%

-45%

-40%

-35%

-30%

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

Depression Mortality Divorce

Percentage Reductions in Depression, Mortality, and Divorce From Regular

Religious Service Attendance

-33%-28%

-47%

christendom.edu | getprinciples.com | christendom.edu | getprinciples.com | christendom.edu |

getprinciples.com | christendom.edu | getprinciples.com | christendom.edu | getprinciples.com | important resources for a healthy marriage. 7

Regardless of how precisely religion fosters more stable marriages, however, this new research from Harvard suggests that the couple that attends together, stays together.

So the next time you come across an academic study or media story contending that faith plays a pernicious role in family life, be skeptical. So long as family life, and marriage in particular, are based on a common commitment to religious faith, it looks like religious faith lifts the fortunes of American families. And that’s good news in a nation where the fortunes of the family too often seem to be flagging.

This essay is adapted, in part, from Soul Mates: Religion, Sex, Love, and Marriage Among African Americans and Latinos, co-authored with Nicholas Wolfinger. Follow Brad Wilcox on Twitter: @WilcoxNMP.

Endnotes

1. See Susie Allen, “Religious upbringing associated with less altruism, study finds,” UChicago News, November 5, 2015, http://news.uchicago.edu/article/2015/11/05/religious-upbringing-associated-less-altruism-study-finds.

2. For a critique of the study’s methods, see Robert D. Woodberry, “Are Non-Religious Children Really More Altruistic?,” Institute for Family Studies Blog, November 23, 2015, http://family-studies.org/are-non-religious-children-really-more-altruistic/.

3. Bobby Azarian, “Study: Religious Kids Are Jerks,” The Daily Beast, November 6, 2015, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/11/06/study-religious-kids-are-jerks.html; Harriet Sherwood, “Religious children are meaner than their secular counterparts, study finds,” The Guardian, November 6, 2015, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/06/religious-children-less-altruistic-secular-kids-study; Rachel E. Gross, “Are Religious Children More Selfish?,” Slate, November 6, 2015, http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/11/religious_children_are_more_selfish_in_a_sticker_study.html.

4. When only the wife attends, relationship quality is not higher for spouses than when neither attends. When only the husband attends, relationship quality is a bit higher than when neither attends but still not as high as when both attend.

5. Michelle Goldberg, “Is Conservative Christianity Bad for Marriage?,” The Nation, January 22, 2014, https://www.thenation.com/article/conservative-christianity-bad-marriage/.

6. Tyler J. VanderWeele, “Religious Service Attendance, Marriage, and Health,” Institute for Family Studies Blog, November 29, 2016; http://family-studies.org/religious-service-attendance-marriage-and-health/.

7. Ibid.

Sha

re a

FR

EE P

rin

ciPl

es s

ubsc

riptio

n w

ith a

frie

nd!

F

Yes,

you

may

use

my

nam

e w

ith th

ese

new

sub

scrib

ers.

F

No,

ple

ase

do n

ot u

se m

y na

me.

New

Sub

scrib

er: _

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

Subs

crip

tion

type

:

E-m

ail:

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

Prin

t E

-mai

l B

oth

Prin

t and

E-m

ail

Add

ress

: ___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___P

hone

: ___

____

____

- ___

____

____

- ___

____

____

____

_

City

: ___

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

Stat

e: _

____

Zip

: ___

____

____

__

New

Sub

scrib

er: _

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

Subs

crip

tion

type

:

E-m

ail:

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

Prin

t E

-mai

l B

oth

Prin

t and

E-m

ail

Add

ress

: ___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___P

hone

: ___

____

____

- ___

____

____

- ___

____

____

____

_

City

: ___

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

Stat

e: _

____

Zip

: ___

____

____

__

Do

not r

emov

e th

is fl

ap. R

emov

e en

velo

pe a

t per

fora

tion.

Plea

se c

ompl

ete

and

retu

rn th

is po

stag

e-pa

id e

nvel

ope

with

you

r do

natio

n an

d/or

ref

erra

ls to

Chr

isten

dom

Col

lege

. Tha

nk y

ou!

Plea

se s

end

me

FREE

in

form

atio

n o

n t

he

foll

owin

g to

pic

s:

F

Gift

and

Est

ate

Plan

ning

F

Chr

isten

dom

Adm

issio

ns

F

Hig

h Sc

hool

Sum

mer

Pr

ogra

m Supp

ort

w

ith a

n on

line

gift

at

getp

rinci

ples

.com

!H

AV

E Q

UES

TIO

NS

OR

SU

GG

ESTI

ON

S? E

mai

l us

at p

rinc

iple

s@ch

rist

endo

m.e

du

EDITORIAL BOARD Christopher J. Lane, Ph.D.

Andrew Beer, Ph.D. Christopher Shannon, Ph.D. Thomas Stanford III, Ph.D.

ART DIRECTOR Niall O’Donnell

PRODUCTION MANAGER Adam Wilson

Copyright © 2017 Christendom College

The opinions expressed in are not necessarily the views of Christendom College.

For copying and reprinting permission, see getprinciples.com/about.

SUBSCRIPTION FREE UPON REQUEST.

christendom.edu | getprinciples.com | christendom.edu | getprinciples.com | christendom.edu | getprinciples.com | christendom.edu |

getprinciples.com | christendom.edu | getprinciples.com | christendom.edu | getprinciples.com | christendom.edu | getprinciples.com

Don

or S

mith

Addr

ess

Line

1Ad

dres

s Li

ne 2

City

, ST

1234

5

No

N-P

rofi

t

U.S.

Po

StAG

EPA

iDH

untin

gton

, IN

Perm

it #

832

Fron

t Roy

al, V

irgin

ia

Your first-class stamp helps us save valuable funds!

BUSIN

ESS REPLY M

AIL

FIRST-C

LASS MAIL

PERM

IT NO

.

USPS BR

M Tem

plate #8-5/8 Envelope 3-5/8" x 8-5/8" W

orking LayerJanuary 2001 File N

ame: b858.pdf

POSTAG

E WILL BE PAID

BY ADD

RESSEE

NO

POSTAG

EN

ECESSARY

IF MAILED

IN TH

EU

NITED

STATES

CH

RISTEND

OM

EDU

CATIO

NA

L CO

RPORATIO

N

CH

RISTEND

OM

CO

LLEGE

134 CH

RISTEND

OM

DR.

FRON

T ROYA

L, VA 22630

MK1705PR

Tear here to remove tab before returning envelope to Christendom College.

PERM

IT N

O. 81 FR

ON

T R

OY

AL, V

A

Paym

ent M

etho

d F

Che

ck p

ayab

le to

Chr

isten

dom

Col

lege

(firs

t che

ck e

nclo

sed)

F

Plea

se c

harg

e m

y cr

edit

card

: Car

d #

:

Sign

atur

e: _

____

____

____

____

____

____

_ Ex

p: _

____

_ / _

____

_ C

VC _

____

___

F V

isa

F M

C

F D

isc.

F A

mEx

13

2-

--

For m

onth

ly d

onat

ions

, Chr

isten

dom

will

cha

rge

your

cre

dit c

ard

on th

e 15

th d

ay o

f th

e m

onth

of

the

paym

ent.

If th

e 15

th fa

lls o

n a

wee

kend

, you

r car

d w

ill b

e ch

arge

d th

e fo

llow

ing

Mon

day.

Chr

isten

dom

Col

lege

is a

501

(c) (

3) o

rgan

izat

ion.

You

r gift

is ta

x de

duct

ible

to th

e ex

tent

allo

wed

by

law.

Th

an

k y

ou

!

YES

, I w

ant

to h

elp

ed

uca

te t

he

nex

t ge

ner

atio

n o

f C

ath

olic

lea

der

s at

Ch

rist

end

om C

olle

ge!

MK1

705P

R

I wish

to m

ake

the

follo

win

g gi

ft:

F

One

-tim

e gi

ft o

f: $

____

____

____

F

Mon

thly

don

atio

n of

: F

$25

F $

50 F

$ _

____

___

Plea

se u

se m

y gi

ft fo

r: F

Prin

cipl

es F

Whe

re N

eede

d M

ost

F O

ther

: ___

____

____

____

____

____

If you’re invested in the stock market, I’m sure you’ve noticed its explosive growth over the last year. Many of you might have noticed that some of your stock has significantly appreciated as well. Did you know that donating your appreciated stock directly to Christendom could enable you to deduct the full value of the stock and avoid capital gains tax?

Contact me to learn about the ways your stock gift can put your money to work.

May Our Lord continue to bless you and your good work,

Your

Nam

e: _

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

_

Add

ress

: ___

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

_

City

: ___

____

____

____

__ S

tate

: ___

_ Zi

p: _

____

__

Emai

l: __

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

Phon

e: _

____

____

_-__

____

____

_-__

____

____

____

_

John Ciskanik Executive Director Office of Planned Giving 540-551-9160 ciskanik@christendom.edu

NEW! WATCH OR LISTEN NOW: Christendom College professor Dixie Lane examines the recent history of cooperation between local public school systems and homeschooling families.

The Market Is Up!Avoid Capital Gains Tax

g e t p r i n c i p l e s . c o m / l e c t u r e s

YOU CAN GIVE THE WORLD SOMETHING THAT IT SORELY NEEDS: HOPE. 

Remember Your Loved Ones in the Christ the King Chapel.Contact Paul Jalsevac at 540-551-9171 or pjalsevac@christendom.edu or visit

campaign.christendom.edu.

A C a l l t o G r e a t n e s sTHE CAMPAIGN FOR CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE