printcomm's proposed structure
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PRintcomm's Proposed Structure](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022100521/5695d1141a28ab9b0295101c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
7/23/2019 PRintcomm's Proposed Structure
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/printcomms-proposed-structure 1/6
Home
Our Papers
Our Mission
Resources
Contact
Financial Management: Printicomm's
Proposed Acquisition of Digitech: NegotiatingPrice and Form of Payment
Printicomm was a company that handled electronic and paper submissions ofprint copy throughout the world. In December 1998, Jay Risher, VP ofPrinticomm, proposed an acquisition of Dig itech. Risher negotiated a letter ofintent for the exclusive rights to purchase Digitech; however, this would expirein two weeks. A discrepancy came when Risher believed the value of Digitechwas no greater than $30 million and the two leaders of Digitech valued theirfirm at $40 million. It was crucial for Risher to decide on the correct dealstructure as Risher hoped to maintain Digitech employees after the acquisition.Both companies would complement each other after the acquisition and offeredconsiderable growth potential...
The Case Papers
INTRODUCTION:
Printicomm was a company that handled electronic and paper submissions of
print copy throughout the world. In December 1998, Jay Risher, VP of
Printicomm, proposed an acquisition of Digitech. Risher negotiated a letter of
intent for the exclusive rights to purchase Digitech; however, this would
expire in two weeks. A discrepancy came when Risher believed the value of
Digitech was no greater than $30 million and the two leaders of Digitech
valued their firm at $40 million. It was crucial for Risher to decide on the
correct deal structure as Risher hoped to maintain Digitech employees after
the acquisition. Both companies would complement each other after the
acquisition and offered considerable growth potential.
Frank Greene, founder and owner of Digitech, hoped to sell Digitech and retire
within the next few years while its value was attractive. Greene compared the
sale of Digitech to many other recently sold firms that went for 10-12 times
EBITDA. The value of Digitech was said to be a function of Greene’s
involvement, which would soon cause another incongruity in the sale price.
Risher was only willing to pay a maximum of $30 million for Digitech and
remained firm on this price after his valuation calculation through a
discounted-cash-flow analysis. Bidding wars continued and the final offering
was $28 million for Digitech and a firm holding price by Greene of $40 million
for the company.
Risher was concerned he would lose the Digitech deal and other competitors
would quickly acquire them. As a result of this, he proposed an earnout for
the transaction. Two different earnout structures were proposed; one
extending payments to Greene and CEO Jep Buckingham over the next five
years based on Digitech earning certain operating-income targets. The second
earnout proposal offered contingent payments over the next three years.
After focusing on a fixed-price deal vs. an earnout-based deal, Risher felt both
parties could reach an suitable enterprise valuation. After both proposals,
Risher contemplated four strategic alternatives Printicomm could accept;
developing the same technology Digitech could offer on their own, find
another company to purchase, the fixed-price deal for the acquisition, and the
earnout. Printicomm’s exclusive right to negotiate price and form of payment
with Digitech ended in two weeks. Risher must recommend the most
attractive structure to Greene that will also benefit his company.
ETHICAL CONCERNS
Case Papers
APA Style Guides
The Owl at Purdue
APA Style.org
Coates Library
MLA Style Guides
The Owl at Purdue
What is MLA Style?
Our College Case Papers
Home
Solar Power
Non Profit
Creative Brief
Theology
Business Law
Startups
Business Finance
Kota Fibres
Printicomm (fake
company)
Jetblue
Four Seasons
Genzyme
![Page 2: PRintcomm's Proposed Structure](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022100521/5695d1141a28ab9b0295101c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
7/23/2019 PRintcomm's Proposed Structure
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/printcomms-proposed-structure 2/6
Ethical issues were not made apparent in the case; however, Risher is willing
to do whatever it takes to acquire Digitech. To do so, he is seeking an
alternative option of an earnout to help to resolve differences between himself
and Greene. Fisher must be careful to design the terms of the earnout so that
Printicomm is protected if the expected growth doesn’t happen but also
reward Greene if the expected future of this acquisition does end up occurring.
The completed discounted cash flow analysis and valuations of Digitech give
us two entirely different values. Risher must attempt to bridge the gap in the
two valuations through some form of fixed and contingent payments to
Greene.
As this business deal hasn’t yet played out, ethics can play a large factor innegotiation. Risher is eager to acquire Digitech and his needs and wants may
easily become more important than treating Greene in a socially acceptable
manner. In this circumstance, Risher will attempt to establish a plan to only
pay $30 million for Digitech that doesn’t directly state this to Greene. It isn’t
unethical to propose an earnout but more so a happy medium between both
parties. Risher will most likely act with high moral and ethical standards as he
hopes to have Greene’s involvement after the acquisition as well as maintain
all of the loyal employees of Digitech who have worked for the company for
quite some time.
Leadership Analysis/Recommendation
Two main leaders stood out in proposed acquisition of Digitech; Jay Risher, VP
and controller of Printicomm, and Frank Greene, founder and owner of
Digitech. Risher is an extremely wise leader. From the beginning, he
recognized that much of Digitech’s success was due to their two main leaders.
Along with this, he decided that after acquiring Digitech, he would like these
two individuals to remain with Printicomm for five years to manage the
operations of Digitech. Risher’s leadership style can be characterized as
democratic. He makes the final choices in the business yet includes several
others are included during the decision-making process. He values the
knowledgeable and skillful employees at both Printicomm and Digitech and
believes the smoothness of the acquisition will in turn result in hard working
and satisfied employees. This leadership style permits Risher’s employees to
become part of the decision team, allowing the company to make better
decisions which are more likely to be profitable.
Frank Greene founded Digitech close to 10 years prior. This company was built
on hard work, knowledge, and expertise. Greene had a strong emotional bond
with company and his loyal employees. He wanted to sell the company andretire, yet was in no rush to wait for the right offer as he knew Digitech had a
high value. His leadership style can be easily characterized as a charismatic
leader, leading by infusing energy and eagerness into his team members. A
charismatic leader is also one who is committed to their company for the long
run. Greene is willing to continue running day-to-day operations of Digitech
until his day of retirement although he was financially stable to sell the
company several years prior.
Coincidentally, even Risher acknowledges Greene as a charismatic leader,
stating he wasn’t comfortable providing a financial forecast for the next five
years for Digitech because of Greene’s relationship with his employees.
Greene and Buckingham, another Digitech leader, agreed to have continued
involvement for the following five years after the sale after Risher’s request.
Overall, Greene is extremely wise and willing to wait for the right offer if the
acquisition with Printicomm doesn’t play out as planned. It is ideal for Greene
to retire but easily determinable that he’s willing to work until his company is
in good hands and with the dollar amount he requires.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Printicomm’s strategy was to grow through acquisitions. Jay Risher, Vice
President and Controller of Printicomm believed the acquisition of Digitech
would have a significant and positive impact on the performance of their
Journal Services and Point of Purchase divisions.
Risher had to decide from several alternatives:
Develop Digitech’s technology in-house if a purchase price could not be
![Page 3: PRintcomm's Proposed Structure](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022100521/5695d1141a28ab9b0295101c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
7/23/2019 PRintcomm's Proposed Structure
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/printcomms-proposed-structure 3/6
reached.
Printicomm may try to find another company to purchase.
Secure a fixed price (easiest alternative) - This only required a standard
purchase and sale agreement; however, the two companies remained
far apart on the fair valuation for Digitech. If Printicomm paid a
premium price, then the management of Digitech may not stay to
grow the business. It was essential to have the business knowledge
passed from Digitech to Printicomm.
Pursue an earnout - this was an acquisition payment mechanism
whereby some portion of the purchase price of the acquired company(Digitech) would be paid by the acquisition company (Printicomm) only
if the agreed upon goals were reached.
There were three elements for a successful earnout: the earnout should be
based on achievable performance goals for Digitech after closing: Digitech’s
management should receive adequate compensation; Digitech’s management
should receive adequate resources and freedom to achieve these goals.
The first earnout structure would extend payments to Greene and
Buckingham, two employees of Digitech, over the next five years (Exhibit I).
These payments would be based on achieving certain operating income
targets. The targets were as follows:
Plan1 EarnoutTargets Plan2 EarnoutTargets
1999 $2.5 million 1999 $2.0 million
2000 $3.0 million 2000 $2.5 million
2001 $3.0 million 2001 $2.5 million
2 00 2 $ 3.5 million
2 00 3 $ 3.5 million
The second plan would only offer contingent payments over the next three
years. The amounts would be lower as there was less uncertainty (Exhibit II).
The free cash flows are shown in exhibits I and II. The rationale is the (EBIT),
earnings before interest and taxes, is the income the company earns without
regard as to how the business is financed. If the management were to runthe business into the ground then they could distribute the cash flow to
owners and creditors. Most companies; however, retain some of the cash flow
to pay for capital expenditures. So, the free cash flow is what is available for
distribution to creditors and this is the amount after taxes, depreciation,
capital expenditures and working capital.
The operating ratio which is total expenses/sales is between 88 and 90% on
both the projections by Printicomm and Digitech. This ratio indicates the
expenses are almost equal to the sales revenue for the product.
The profit margin, which is net income/sales, is each sales dollar that is
filtered into income. Based on profit margins of similar companies, the profit
margins are in the medium range. The net income is at the low end based on
industry comparability.
Also capital expenditures increase significantly on both exhibits. Capital
expenditures are large expenditures which are depreciated over time and this
may also indicate an increase in long-term debt. This is really indicated in the
case.
If the earnout targets were based on operating income only, then the targets
would be achieved for all years for both structures. However, if it’s based on
income after taxes, then the targets in 2001 and 2002 for the Digitech
projections would be achieved. Per the Printicomm projections, only the 2001
target in the second structure would be achieved. Also based on the earnout
ratios below, assuming a rate of 5%, the net present values for the four year
payout is obviously more due to the time value of money. The purchasing
power of a dollar is worth more today than tomorrow due to inflation and
other factors.
![Page 4: PRintcomm's Proposed Structure](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022100521/5695d1141a28ab9b0295101c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
7/23/2019 PRintcomm's Proposed Structure
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/printcomms-proposed-structure 4/6
Present value data
Earnout
targets $2,500,000.00 $3,000,000.00 $3,000,000.00 $3,500,000.00
Net
present
value
$2,380,952.38 $2,857,142.86 $2,857,142.86 $3,333,333.33
Earnout
targets-
2ndstructure
$2,000,000.00 $2,500,000.00 $2,500,000.00
Net
present
value
$1,904,761.90 $2,380,952.38 $2,380,952.38
CURRENT EVENTS:
At the time of the case there were approximately 52,000 printing
establishments throughout the United States. The majority of the printing
companies serviced local, state and regional areas. Printicomm was a national
entity with more than 70 cities across the U.S. utilizing its services. The case
events take place in 1998; a time when the internet was evolving as the
premier place to do business. Between 1995 and 2001 an event referred to asthe “dot-com bubble” surfaced. This “bubble” was a time when internet- and
technology-based companies raced to the web to secure their position as the
dominant leader in their respective industry. The “bubble”, however, burst in
2000 when the bottom dropped out of the internet IPO market, causing the
majority of the companies to either go out of business, or be acquired by
larger, unscathed firms.
Risher, a wise businessman, was aware of the explosive growth and value the
internet offered his company. He also knew that unless Printicomm was able
to evolve in parallel to the internet, it would not survive. Therefore, his
pursuit of acquiring Digitech was integral for the company’s long-term
existence. Digitech owned a software product which converted photographs
and print materials into electronic formats, cataloged the materials, and
stored them in a message-and-data repository linked to a template for later
reproduction and retrieval; this was the birth of Printicomm’s EnterpriseContent Management (ECM) solution.
In 1999 Risher and Greene reached an agreement for Printicomm’s
acquisition of Digitech. The 3 year earnout agreement was favorable to both
parties involved, and gave Printicomm the ability to compete directly with its
internet- and technology-based competitors. Risher and Greene continued to
develop the Marketelegence ECM product over the next 12 months. The ECM
product became the industry standard for business-grade digital asset
management solutions. The ECM product continued to out perform the other
services offered by Risher’s company. In 2000 Risher and Greene worked
together to evaluate the existing divisions of the company. The goal of this
evaluation was to identify under-performing divisions and either grow them,
combine them with a successful division, or remove them altogether.
Based on historic and forecasted growth pattern, as well as factors expected to
support the growth of the U.S. printed-product output over the next five
years, Risher and Greene decided on the following (Bruner 2007):
Dissolve the Printicomm Graphics Solutions division – this segment
was the lowest performing area of the company; reporting losses for 3
consecutive years.
Dissolve the Specialty Packaging and Promotional Printing division – the
internet reduced the need for physical promotional printing and allowed
sellers to bid on the lowest cost distribution and packaging center;
therefore decreasing Printicomm’s position in the market significantly.
Combine the Financial Communications and Point-of-Purchase divisions
![Page 5: PRintcomm's Proposed Structure](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022100521/5695d1141a28ab9b0295101c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
7/23/2019 PRintcomm's Proposed Structure
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/printcomms-proposed-structure 5/6
– this merger gave Printicomm a more powerful placement in the
market by combining financial and retail point of purchase systems.
Combine parent division, Printicomm with its Technology Solutions
division to form a new parent company, Printicomm Technology
Solutions (PTS) – focuses on electronic technology solutions; simplifies
organizational structure.
Economic Impact
The new company structure, the reliability and speed of the internet, and the
increase in revenue related to the success so the ECM product, all provided
PTS with means to continued positive growth. As forecasted in the company’s
financial statements, sales rose by 35% between 1999 and 2000, and into
2009 have realized an average of 11% growth each year. Since the
acquisition and restructuring of 1999 and 2000, PTS has acquired many
smaller niche companies, and partnered with many large entities to expand its
business operations. A brief timeline is shown below:
2001 - Risher and Greene take company public with an IPO of $12 per
share (comparable to industry competitors listed in case). Offering 8
million shares to investors, the return is over $90 million.
2001 – dot com bubble bursts, PTS acquires several internet-based
technology companies (cheaply) to build on their existing Point of Sales
division. These acquisitions offer PTS on-line commerce engines for
internet selling and procurement.
2002 – Risher takes over as CEO, Greene is anointed COO.
2003 – PTS partners with Kodak to provided online photo sharing and
print sales.
2004 – PTS is awarded with the ECM product of the year by Microsoft
Corporation. That same year, Marketelegence is purchased by Microsoft
for $3.2 billion.
2007 – PTS is awarded contracts with the U.S. government to manage
all digital assets of the military.
2008 – PTS acquires Kinko’s Copy Centers and begins to sell franchises
to local businesses overseas.
Today, PTS (formerly Printicomm), under the direction of Jay Risher and Paul
Greene, continues to grow and expand its global presence. The company has
developed a strong management team and is guided by their mission:
“PTS will operate in an ethical manner, growing our digital print and
technology offerings through internal research and development, acquisition
and sound business decisions in favor of our employees, stakeholders and
customers. The company will strive to give back to our community, to protect
our environment, and sustain a safe and healthy place for our employees.”
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the alternatives presented above, we would recommend the earnout
over three years to the Digitech management in order to keep the
management and expertise in the company. This alternative would enable
Printicomm to establish goals for the earnout and the three year payout
would be less costly to the company.
Risher realizes that if Printicomm were to lose the Digitech acquisition that
another company, most likely a competitor, would quickly approach Digitech
with a more appealing price. In addition, Printicomm is in need of expanding
its internet- and technology-based offerings. Digitech’s Marketelengence
product is a “must-have” for Risher. The product is aligned with the way the
industry is moving; less focus on hardcopy print, more focus on converting to
digital asset management.
REFERENCES
Higgins, Robert C. (2007). Analysis for Financial Management. (pp.67-71,250-
252,354). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2007).
Bruner, Robert F. (2007). Case Studies in Finance. (pp. 680, 681). New York:
McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2007)
![Page 6: PRintcomm's Proposed Structure](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022100521/5695d1141a28ab9b0295101c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
7/23/2019 PRintcomm's Proposed Structure
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/printcomms-proposed-structure 6/6
"Kodak, Leader in Digital Imaging, Announces Unique Partnerships that Place
Interactive..." Reuters.com - World News, Financial News, Breaking US &
International News. Retrieved 13 Apr. 2009.
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS39239+10- Jul-
2008+PRN20080710>.
** Casepapers.com is not responsible for your grade, or liable for any student being accused of, or found guilty of plagiarism. In other words, if you purcha
a paper, be smart enough to modify the wording and information to make it your own.
contact me @ [email protected] for questions
Copyright © 2009 Casepapers.com