privacy and online education (apc 2015 panel)
TRANSCRIPT
AMSTERDAM PRIVACY CONFERENCE26 OCTOBER 2015
Privacy and Online Education: Top Down vs Bottom UpOlivier Oosterbaan & Gerrit-Jan Zwenne
@OOsterbaan @Zwnne
ONLINE EDUCATION“Make the most of every child”
log-in student
level test numbers
working with
numbers
add and subtract
multiply and divide
rules and tips
most points or awards last 7 days
how do you write eighteen-hundred in
numbers?
log-in teacher
progressoverview tests
percentage of students that completed the assignments
levelstudent time numberstotal geometry
average
tests
what's next?
https://static.skillshare.com/uploads/video/thumbnails/
e2bb6cd957eee7f50280fb68207cd3f8/original
what's next?
https://static.skillshare.com/uploads/video/thumbnails/
e2bb6cd957eee7f50280fb68207cd3f8/original
EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHERS INCIDENT
‘SNAPPET’ CASE
DISCUSSION
questions
• controller / processor• processing ground
consent?execution of a contract??
• purpose specification / limitation
‘scenario 1: optimistic’
providerparent
school(studen
t)
‘scenario 2 : realistic’
parentschool
provider
(student)
teachers
3rd party tools
data lives here
3rd party data
publisher
gov’t
admin
‘values of a context’
• aptitude• progress• scores and grades• intellect• disabilities• profiles…
special data…!
automated decision-making..?
purpose of data collection…
• students• parents• teachers• administrators• government• publishers• software developers• others…
to educate students, to monitor their progress and provide individual support, etc.
to monitor students progress and evaluate teachers, to recruit the right teachers, to get government subsidies, etc.
to evaluate schools, to monitor and improve the quality of schools, to allocate subsidies, etc.
to use pricing models based on usage of tools, to target, to develop improved tools, etc..
won’t somebody please think of the children!?
CONCLUSION
