privatising education. the corrosion of a societal good?€¦ · privatisation in education. met...
TRANSCRIPT
Privatising Education: the
Corrosion of a Societal Good?
CR-GES Panel
‗Festival of Education‘
12th June, 2012
Global Project
• Privatisation in Education Initiative
(PERI) funded by the Open Society
Foundation
• Explore different forms of privatisation
in/of education around the world
• Raise questions and generate a public
debate - http://www.periglobal.org
Setting the Context • Since the 1980s, national governments, and
international organisations like the OECD, the World
Bank, WTO, think-tanks, and small group of
education policy entrepreneurs, have been promoting
privatisation in education. Met with resistance.
• From 2000, Public Private Partnerships emerged as
the most prominent official policy discourse replacing
the term ‗privatisation‘. Over the past decade we
have seen an explosion of
• A series of different phenomena is now placed under
PPPs raising the question of what it means to talk
about the ‗public‘ and the ‗private‘.
Source: Verger (forthcoming - 2011)
Key group of transnational policy actors
What Do We Mean by Privatisation?
• Ball (2007) identifies two distinct processes at
work; privatisation in, and privatisation of
education.
• By in, we mean the injection into the learning,
school cultures, and management of
education institutions and sector of private
sector values (competition, efficiency,
outputs).
• Hidden privatisation (economic sovereignty)
Diverse Activity
• Low fee private schools
• Charter schools
• Academies
• Exclusive private schools
• Shadow schooling
• Private management of school administration
• Venture philanthropists (Gates, Hewlitt)
• Multi-stakeholder partnerships
(Patrinos, 2009)
Ball, (2007: 43)
From Ball, 2009
The Emergence of a Consultocracy
1. 6 big consulting firms control 25% of world
management consulting market (Saint Martin,
1998); by 2003, 4 firms (KPMG, Deloittes,
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Ernst and Young)
accounted for 45% of the global market - they have
large education portfolios. Others (MacKinsey and
Co, Creative Associates) have large education
investments
2. Proliferation of small and large ‗consultancy‘ firms
operating around the world (CfBT, Rand, Cognition
Education
Education as a Positional Good
• Yet education is also a positional good, and
as labour markets and social mobility have
either stalled, or competition has become
more intense, the pressure on education
credentials has resulted in pressure for the
marks of distinction.
http://www.periglobal.org/top-
carousel/video/video-profit-
schools-south-africa
Societal Good
• Cultivated capacities for critical thinking and reflection are
crucial in keeping democracies alive and wide awake. The
ability to think well about a wide range of cultures, groups and
nations in the context of the grasp of the global economy and of
the history of many national and group interactions is crucial in
order to enable democracies to deal responsibly with the
problems we face as members of an interdependent world. And
the ability to imagine the experience of another—needs to be
greatly enhanced and refined if we are to have any hope of
sustaining decent institutions across the many divisions that any
modern society contains
• (in Not for Profit by Martha Nussbaum, 2010: 10)
http://www.periglobal.org/role-
state/video/video-we-future
3 Axes of Social Justice (Fraser, 2010)
Redistribution – (economic) – the fair allocation of
divisible goods that are typically economic in nature
Recognition – (cultural) the recognition of cultural
differences such as gender, ethnicity, disability, class,
access to work, right to property and other forms of
ownership
Representation – (political) the organisation of
political space, and who can, where, and how,
advance claims
http://www.periglobal.org/top-
carousel/video/video-hong-
kongs-celebrity-tutors-turn-
millionaires
Corrosion of Character
• As Sennett remarks in The Corrosion of Character:
―The system [contemporary modern capitalism]
radiates indifference. In does so in terms of the
outcomes of human striving as in winner-take-all
markets, where there is little connection between risk
and reward. It radiates indifference in the
organization As to the absence of trust, where there
is no reason to be needed. And it does so through
the re-engineering of institutions in which people are
treated as disposable‖ (Sennett, 1998: 149).