probing the reheating with astrophysical observations

41
Probing the Reheating with Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations Astrophysical Observations Jérôme Jérôme Martin Martin Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP) Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP) 1 collaboration with K. Jedamzik & M. Lemoine, arXiv:1002.3039, arXiv:1002.32 and C. Ringeval, arXiv:1004.5525]

Upload: sal

Post on 31-Jan-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations. Jérôme Martin. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP). [In collaboration with K. Jedamzik & M. Lemoine, arXiv:1002.3039, arXiv:1002.3278 and C. Ringeval, arXiv:1004.5525]. Outline. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

Probing the Reheating with Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations Astrophysical Observations

Jérôme Jérôme MartinMartin

Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP)Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP)

1

[In collaboration with K. Jedamzik & M. Lemoine, arXiv:1002.3039, arXiv:1002.3278 and C. Ringeval, arXiv:1004.5525]

Page 2: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

2

Outline

Introduction

A brief and naive description of reheating

Constraining the reheating with the CMB observations

Preheating: can it affect the behaviour of cosmological perturbations?

Production of gravitational waves during preheating

Conclusions

Page 3: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

322/04/23

Inflation is a phase of accelerated expansion taking place in the very early Universe. The scale factor is such that

This assumption allows us to solve several problems of the standard hot Big Bang model:

•Horizon problem

•Flatness problem

•Monopoles problem …

Usually +3p>0 (eg p=0) and the expansion is decelerated. Inflation requires negative pressure

Hot Big Bang problems

Page 4: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

4

Field theory is the correct description at high energies.

A natural realization is a scalar field slowly rolling down its flat potential

Inflation ends by violation of the slow-roll conditions or by instability

After inflation, the field oscillates at the bottom of its potential: this is the reheating

Inflation in brief

Inflation in a nutshell

Large field

Small field

Hybrid inflation

Page 5: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

5

End of Inflation (I)

Slow-roll phase

Oscillatory phase

p=2

p=4

p=2 p=4

Violation of Slow-roll

Page 6: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

6

End of Inflation (II)

Oscillatory phase

p=2 p=4

The field oscillates much faster than the Universe expands

Equation of state

For p=2

Page 7: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

7

End of Inflation (III)

The previous model cannot describe particle creation

Γ is the inflaton decay rate

Page 8: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

8

End of Inflation (IV)

Page 9: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

9

Reheating era

Oscillatory phase

Radiation-dominated era Matter –dominated era

p=2 p=4

Page 10: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

10

Reheating era (II)

So far we do not know so much on the reheating temperature, ie (can be (improved – the upper bound- if gravitinos production is taken into account)

end<reh<BBN

The previous description is a naive description of the infaton/rest of the world coupling. It can be much more complicated.

Theory of preheating, thermalization etc …

How does the reheating affect the inflationary predictions?

It modifies the relation between the physical scales now and the number of e-folds at which perturbations left the Hubble radius

Can the oscillations of the inflaton affect the behaviour of the perturbations?

Consequences of reheating

Page 11: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

11

Probing the reheating with CMB observations

Page 12: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

12

Inflationary Observables

Page 13: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

13

Parameterizing the Reheating (I)

Oscillatory phase

p=2 p=4

One needs two numbers, the mean equation of state and the energy density at reheating.

In fact, for the calculations of the perturbation power spectrum, one number is enough, the reheating parameter

Describing the reheating

Page 14: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

14

The reheating epoch can be described with a single parameter, the so-called reheating parameter; it appears naturally in the equation controlling the evolution of the perturbations

Parameterizing the Reheating (II)

Page 15: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

15

- Either one uses the constraint on the energy density at the end of reheating to constrain N*

If we are given a model, then the reheating epoch is constrained

- Or we consider Rrad as a new free parameter and we try to constrain it using Bayesian techniques

Parameterizing the Reheating (III)

Page 16: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

16

Constraining the reheating (I)

Large field inflation

Page 17: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

17

Large field inflation

Constraining the reheating (II)

Page 18: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

18

Small field inflation

Constraining the reheating (III)

Page 19: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

19

Small field inflation

Constraining the reheating (IV)

Page 20: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

20

Small field inflation

Constraining the reheating (V)

Page 21: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

21

Large field inflation

Constraining the reheating (VI)

Mean likelihoodsMarginalized posterior probability distributions

(flat prior) p2 [0.2,5]

Flat prior:

Page 22: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

22

Large field inflation

Constraining the reheating (VII)

(flat prior) p2 [1,5]

(flat prior) reh 2 [nuc,end]

Page 23: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

23

Small field inflation

Constraining the reheating (VIII)

(flat prior) p2 [2.4,10]

(flat prior) ln(/MPl) 2 [-1,2]

Page 24: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

24

Small field inflation

wreh=0_

wreh=-0.1_

wreh=-0.2_

wreh=-0.3_

Constraining the reheating (IX)

Page 25: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

25

Probing the reheating with Gravitational Waves Observations

Page 26: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

26

Cosmological Perturbations

Oscillatory phase

p=2 p=4

The cosmological perturbations are described by the quantity (curvature perturbation)

The Mukhanov variable obeys the equation of a parametric oscillator

The power spectrum is directly linked to CMB anisotropy

Page 27: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

27

CMB window 1st order sr

2nd order sr

Exact (numerical)

Inflationary Power Spectrum

Page 28: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

28

Are perturbations affected by (pre)heating?

Equation of motion during preheating

Mathieu Equation

with

Page 29: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

29

Are perturbations affected by (pre)heating?

stable

unstable

Mathieu Instablity Card

Page 30: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

30

Are perturbations affected by (pre)heating?

stable

unstable

Mathieu Instablity Card

Page 31: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

31

Resonance band

Page 32: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

32

Are perturbations affected by (pre)heating?

Solution: Floquet theory

Constant curvature perturbation

Early structure formation

μ=q/2 is the Floquet index

Page 33: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

33

Solution in the resonance band

Page 34: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

34

Haloes Formation

Page 35: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

35

no

Non-linearities become important

Virialization

Inflaton halo evaporation

Linear radius

Haloes Formation (II)

A halo of mass M collapses when

Page 36: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

36

GW Emission

At virialization, the halo emits GW with a frequency

Dynamical timescale at collapse ( is the density of the halo at collapse)

Page 37: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

37

GW Emission (II)

Energy density energy emitted during the collapse of perturbations corresponding to mass between M and M+dM

Number density of halos of massbetween M and M+dM

Luminosity

Page 38: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

38

Gravitational Waves Production (II)

Page 39: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

39

Gravitational Waves Production (III)

Page 40: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

40

Conclusions

Reheating can affect the inflationary predictions

The reheating temperature can be constrained with the CMB Observations; one obtains a lower bound.

Preheating can affect the perturbations on small scales, even in the single field slow-roll case

Production of gravitational waves; potentially observable

Production of black holes?

Many things remain to be studied

Page 41: Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations

41