proceedings-escerts policy round table 6 august
DESCRIPTION
minutes of meeting on policy round tableTRANSCRIPT
Minutes of Poli y Roundta le on Effi ient Market for E“Certs in India on 6
th August 2015
at Bureau of Energy Efficiency, New Delhi
The Knowledge Exchange Platform was launched by the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) in partnership
with Institute for Industrial Productivity (IIP) on 26th February, 2015, for transfer of best practices in
industries covered under the Perform Achieve and Trade (PAT) scheme. As part of its mandate, KEP is
facilitating sustained periodic discussions and dialogue between BEE, Industry and other relevant
stakeholders on key policy issues to seek views and feedback from the industry, raising awareness
regarding policy directives and improving preparedness among the industry to implement energy
efficiency improvement targets and Energy Management Systems.
2. In line with this objective, KEP has i itiated a K o ledge “eries o ke poli a d the ati issues a d linked to them a series of papers on Poli ‘ou d Ta le with a focused group of stakeholders to seek
inputs, comments and feedback on some of the key recommendations made in these papers with the
intent to make them relevant to the tackling the issues and challenges currently facing the industry
sector. The first policy roundtable in this context was organised o Effi ie t Market for E“Certs i I dia on 6
th August 2015 (02.30pm - 05.30 pm) at Bureau of Energy Efficiency, New Delhi.
3. The meeting was attended by 63 participants with representation from key opinion leaders of all 8
PAT sectors (Aluminium, Cement, Chlor-Alkali, Fetilizer, Iron & Steel, Pulp & Paper, Textile and Thermal
Power Stations), relevant Industry associations (Alkali Manufacturers' Association of India, Cement
Ma ufa turers Asso iatio , Fertiliser Asso iatio of I dia, I dian Paper Manufacturers Association,
National Council for Cement and Building Materials and Northern India Textile Research Association,
Confederation of Indian Industry and Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry),
organizations associated with Trading mechanism of PAT (Central Electricity Regulatory Commission,
Central Electricity Authority, India Energy Exchange, PXIL, Power System Operation Corporation Ltd. and
Global Energy Pvt. Limited) and Government and Research Organizations (National Productivity Council,
The Energy and Resources Institute, and Petroleum Conservation and Research Association). The list of
the members of the Policy Roundtable is at Annexure-1 and the agenda of the meeting is at Annexure -
2.
4. The roundtable discussion was presided over by Dr. Ajay Mathur, Director General, Bureau of Energy
Efficiency. Dr. Mathur in his opening remark welcomed the participants and requested the participants
to actively participate in the discussion and not just keep it focussed on what is possible within the
existing/ proposed framework of ESCerts, but come out with suggestions and feedback on how the
trading mechanism can be made efficient. He particularly requested the participants to deliberate on
the following three key issues during the round table discussion:
a. Fixation of initial trading price viz. floor price and forbearance price: Forbearance price serves the
purpose of penalty, while floor price has a bearing on ESCerts trading. In this context, BEE has
currently not fixed the floor price with the thinking that the market would takes its own course to
price discovery. Dr. Mathur however, asked the participants to discuss the ways in which the initial
price can be defined.
b. Transaction cost involved in trading: There is a need for ease of operation for all the participants
during the trading of ESCerts, however, there is also a need for proper due diligence process to
make the transaction secure, which may make the process excessively bureaucratic. Also, high
security provisions may increase the transaction cost for the participants involved in buying and
selling. Dr. Mathur requested the participants to discuss the comparative trade-offs involved in
different options and the way forward on it.
c. Management of Registry: Dr. Mathur sought input from the participants on effective strategies for
maintenance of trading account, particularly understanding whether it would be a net seller or
buyer market and the uncertainties under which a market operates.
Dr. Mathur requested the participants to actively contribute to the discussions so that the round table
could come out with robust recommendations for making the ESCerts Trading more efficient.
Dr. Ajay Mathur, Director General, Bureau of Energy Efficiency delivering his opening remarks
5. In his address, Mr. Somnath Bhattacharjee, Director, Institute for Industrial Productivity (IIP),
highlighted the importance of having such interactions and the value of getting input from diverse
stakeholders in evolving innovative solutions on key policy issues like ESCerts trading.
6. The round table discussion was
initiated with a background
presentation by Dr. Murali
Kanakasabai, Adjunct Professor,
Illinois Institute of Technology,
Chicago (USA). Dr Murali has also
developed a paper for the
knowledge series of KEP on
ESCerts Trading that captures the
learnings and experiences from
evolution of similar markets
globally and provides
recommendation on what can be adopted to make ESCerts trading effective.
Dr. Murali Kanakasabai giving his presentation
7. In his presentation, Dr. Murali highlighted the optimum seven stages process that are needed for
establishing an effective ESCerts trading platform drawing lessons from global experience on what has
worked and the key factors for their success particularly highlighting those that can be emulated for
developing a vibrant ESCerts trading platform. The presentation made by Dr. Murali is attached at
Annexure- 3.
8. The background presentation was followed by a presentation by Mr. Girja Shankar, Asst. Energy
Economist, BEE, on the key features of ESCerts trading scheme and the progress made so far, which
included Status of ESCerts Exchange Regulations, Roles and Responsibilities of entities involved,
Formulation of Business Procedures for ESCerts exchange on Power Exchanges and Up-gradation of
PATNet Portal including M & V process. Mr. Shankar also shared the contents of Draft ESCerts Exchange
Regulations and described the roles of all stake holders. He informed that the Central Electricity
Regulatory Commission will be the market Regulator and POSOCO as Registry of ESCerts. He also
explained the Process flow for Issuance of ESCerts and its Trading and the Adjudication Process. The
presentation made by Mr. Shankar is attached at Annexure- 4.
9. After the two background presentations, the house was open for discussion, where the participants
discussed the key issues highlighted by Dr. Mathur in his opening address and the suggestions made in
the background presentations. The summary of the key issues discussed by the participants are as
follows:
a) Participants expressed mixed reactions on the issue of the floor and forbearance price. Some
participants were in the favour of fixation of floor price and forbearance price as they felt that
leaving it open to the market, price may bring in uncertainties whereas others felt that fixing the
floor price will restrict the market to the lowest price. Some of the participants were of the opinion
that experiences of Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) trading shows that price fixation mechanism
has not been very effective in creating an effective market for RECs as almost 1.50 Cr RECs are
available for trading whereas only 1 to2% are being actually traded. It was suggested by BEE that the
DCs and industry Association may like to provide their feedback on the floor price of ESCerts to BEE
so that it can be taken up for consideration under the Next PAT Cycle.
b) It was suggested that, Government may consider creating a green fund which could be used to buy a
certain percentage of ESCerts from the industry with a purpose of 1) Regulating the market price for
ESCerts by ensuring liquidity/ demand in the market and 2) Create a mechanism to fund energy
efficiency initiatives within industries. It was agreed that, a draft proposal along these lines may be
developed jointly by Industry and BEE for consideration in the next PAT cycle.
c) Participants felt there was a need for capacity building on various aspects of ESCerts Trading like
management of registry, inter-sectoral trading, technical terminologies like floor price and
forbearance price for which BEE should organize regional interactive workshops. Further it was also
suggested that BEE should develop a FAQ on key queries being raised on ESCerts trading mechanism
by DCs and also consider creating a help-line to assist DCs particularly in the initial stages of setting
up the trading mechanism.
d) On the issue of frequency of trading, it was informed that trading of ESCerts may happen on weekly
basis and after the compliance period, it can be a monthly trade market.
e) Participants also raised the issue of management of ESCerts belonging to different DCs of one
company. They felt that such companies should be allowed to manage ESCerts of their DCs together
with a routing through Registry.
f) Currently there is a limit to the number of ESCerts that a DC can buy which has been pecked at their
target level which means that a DC cannot buy ESCerts more than what they need to achieve their
targets. They felt that this would constrict the market and would not help in creating liquidity in the
ESCerts Market. Necessary amendments in PAT Rules GSR 269 (E) may be incorporated.
g) Participants also raised the issue with regard to accounting of the sale-deed of ESCerts and the
manner in which it would get reflected in their Financial Report and type of taxes that it may be
subjected to. It was suggested that Government could consider providing fiscal incentives to offset
such tax burden on DCs. BEE suggested that they may take up this matter with Ministry of Power in
case the DCs and Industry Associations put up a proposal to them addressing the nature of tax
burden and the fiscal incentives they may need to offset the same.
10. Based on the discussions, feedback and inputs from the participants, the recommendations made by
the expert/ resource person in the background paper developed on making ESCerts Trading efficient
were reviewed and accordingly the following suggestions were made for consideration of BEE in the
current and future cycles of PAT.
1. Standardization of ESCerts: An enabling condition for an efficient ESCert market would require that
tradeable instrument is clearly defined and standardized1. As ESCert already fits well with the
requirement of being a standardized compliance instrument with various elements of efficient
standardization already considered in current ESCert design such as standard grade metrics,
centralized issuance authority and delivery mechanism. A further definition on the specific class of
tradable instruments (commodity, equity or new class) would provide clarity for product innovation,
participants and exchange venue in future cycles of PAT.
2. Delivery Mechanism for ESCerts: A delivery mechanism in the form of a single centralized electronic
registry/depository is vital for the success of the program, which has already been established by
BEE in the form of centralized National ESCert electronic registry in which the following minimum
features are proposed for the current and future cycle of PAT:
a. Secure internet-based access by participants to their own accounts
b. ESCerts must be tagged with unique, individualized serial numbers according to International
standards
c. Direct interface with trading platform and clearing mechanism
d. Enable 24/7 views and transfers between accounts and account management
1 Standardization refers to specifying characteristics of the tradable instrument, allowing seller and buyers to know
with clarity what is being sold and bought. Standardization allows market participants not to worry about grade
and focus on price negotiation, thereby reducing transaction costs.
e. Expandable to include other energy efficiency attributes
In addition to above access, tracking and security features, BEE may consider 1) allowing diverse
participants to maintain accounts, 2) DC s to o su -accounts for better internal management
etc. as added features.
3. Trading Mechanism: Provision of flexibility mechanism in ESCert trading is recommended. PAT Rules
2012 already allow for Escerts from cycle I to be banked for 2nd
cycle. In addition, BEE may consider
other market flexibility mechanism including netting, and bubble provisions to be included in ESCert
trading framework. The banking provision allows DCs flexibility across time to manage their PAT
compliance. Netting and bubbles would allow DCs the flexibility to manage their PAT compliance
goals across sources and production units. This recommendation suggests that compliance be
o sidered for DC s as o e legal e tit , but this needs to be seen in terms of provisions of EC Act and
PAT Rules
4. Advance issuance of ESCerts: Under PAT Rules 2012 there is a provision to allocate future stream of
ESCerts in advance, following the general practice in similar markets. Theoretically, once the energy
baseline and energy saving targets are established, program guidelines can allow for allocation of
sufficient ESCerts equivalent to the energy savings targets. This allows designated consumers to plan
inter temporally their ESCert balances, improve market liquidity and provide price discovery over
compliance periods. Allowing for ESCert allocation in advance can also allow designated consumers
to source capital for energy saving improvements through the sale of future ESCerts. Potential
reason for not being adopted by DC may have been lack of efficient market and price discovery. As
PAT o es i to its e t phase ith a a ti e arket, DC s a ie this pro isio differently.
5. Market sequencing: Optimal market sequence for initiating an ESCert market could first involve an
exchange traded spot market, followed by a derivatives market, if required. It is proposed that BEE
may consider establishing a full-fledged daily spot market through regulated exchanges in India
(subject to provisions of PAT Rules and trading volumes). While it is expected that a liquid and
mature daily spot market will take time to evolve, building the market under that framework would
have several advantages. A fully fledged daily spot market provides for continuous pricing of EScerts
allo i g DC s a d others to etter a age the asset/lia ilit aspe t of the E“Cert ala es. I conjunction with a live daily market for ESCerts, periodic auctions at least prior to an active market
emerging could be very useful. These periodic auctions (monthly or quarterly) would help in
ensuring deliverable supply and price discovery to designated consumers. A descending price Dutch
auction method has been employed in other similar markets.
6. Participation of other Actors: Although trading of Escerts is between DCs, participation from non-
compliance and financial participants, including proprietary traders, banks, hedge funds, etc. can
foster liquidity in the ESCert marketplace and price discovery. Diverse set of market participants
take on specific roles and risks and hence important for market efficiency. This can also lead to
assuring capital flows to the most cost effective energy saving solutions under PAT (This may need
amendment in PAT Rules).
7. Product innovation by exchanges: At present the trading platform is envisaged to occur through
regulated Power exchanges. These exchanges should be given the option of carrying out Contract
design and product innovation for ESCert spot, futures and options contracts in case they wish to list
ESCert products. This will help in adding to the maturity and efficiency of the market. Competition
and innovation by individual Exchanges through such processes would also accrue benefits to entire
market place and address the differentiated needs of market participants.
8. Taxation and Accounting Issues: In order to fully integrate sound and efficient management of
ESCert into the operations of designated consumers and for it to be treated as full-fledged financial
asset, appropriate accounting principles and tax issues regarding ESCert trading must be resolved.
BEE may consider coordinating this function with appropriate government agencies and
independent tax experts to address these issues for industry.
Shri K. K. Chakarvarti concluded the meeting with a vote of thanks to Chair and all the members who
participated and requested the DCs and Industry Associations to come up with relevant proposals and
suggestions to enable BEE to take up their issues and concerns with relevant agencies/ authorities which
would also help in making ESCerts Trading Mechanism more effective.
-----------
ANNEXURE 1
Participants of 1st Policy Roundtable on Effi ient Market for E“Certs In India 6th August 2015 (2.30pm - 5.30 pm) at Bureau of Energy Efficiency, 4th Floor, Sewa Bhawan,
R K Puram Sector 1, New Delhi -110066
S. No. Name Designation Organization
1. Dr. Ajay Mathur Director General and
Chairperson Bureau of Energy Efficiency
2. Shri K. K.
Chakarvarti Expert Consultant Bureau of Energy Efficiency
3. Shri S. K. Khandare Energy Economist Bureau of Energy Efficiency
4. Shri G. Shankar Asst. Energy Economist Bureau of Energy Efficiency
5. Shri Somnath
Bhattacharjee Director Institute for Industrial Productivity, India
6. Ms. Ritu Bharadwaj Senior Program Manager Institute for Industrial Productivity, India
7. Dr. Murali
Kanakasabai Adjunct Professor Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago
8. Shri Biswajit Dhar Sr. Vice President Ultratech Cement Ltd
9. Dr. S. Nand Dy. Director General Fertiliser Association of India
10. Shri Pandurang S.
Jalkote Asst. Vice President Dahanu Thermal Power Station
11. Ms. Adritha
Subbiah
Policy Advisor, Low Carbon
Growth British High Commission
12. Shri Udit Mathur Senior Policy Advisor British High Commission
13. Shri Vikas Sharma Principal Scientific Officer Northern India Textile Research
Association
14. Shri Debasish
Ghosh Hindalco - Technology
15. Shri Vivek K. Singh AVP and Functional Head -
Engineering Grasim Bhiwani Textiles Limited
S. No. Name Designation Organization
16. Shri R. K. Upadhyay DGM Power Plant Grasim Bhiwani Textiles Limited
17. Shri Sanjay Jain Asstt. Executive Director Dalmia cement (Bharat) Limited
18. Shri B. P. Bhandary Director & Group Head (EM) National Productivity Council
19. Shri R. Bhargava Vice President Shree Cement Limited
20. Shri Sanjay Singh Energy Manager Shree Cement Limited
21. Shri Abhijit Pati Chief Executive Officer Vedanta Aluminium Business
22. Shri Niranjan Gupta CFO Vedanta Group
23. Shri Deepak Prasad Vice President BALCO
24. Shri B. K. Sharma Chief Engineer Central Electricity Authority
25. Shri Govind Kumar
Mishra
Superintending Engineer &
Energy Manager Anpara Thermal Power Station
26. Shri K. S.
Venkatagiri Deputy Executive Director Confederation of Indian Industry (CII)
27. Shri Rohit Pandit Secretary General Indian Paper Manufacturers Association
(IPMA)
28. Shri S. S. Sodhi Dy. General Manager (Elect.
& Instt.)
Ballarpur Industries Ltd;Unit: Shree
Gopal -BILT
29. Shri R. K. Wadhwa Dy. Manager (Electrical) Ballarpur Industries Ltd;Unit: Shree
Gopal -BILT
30. Shri Jayant Joshi General Manager (Engg) Raymond Limited
31. Shri Dominic
Fernandes General Manager ACC Limited
32. Shri Mohan Patil Director Federation of Indian Chambers of
Commerce & Industry
33. Shri M N Girish Additional Director Federation of Indian Chambers of
Commerce & Industry
S. No. Name Designation Organization
34. Shri Rajiv Kumar
Chittrey
Senior Manager - Fuel
Management Department M/s. Tata Steel Limited
35. Ms. Harjeet Kaur
Anand Jt. Director (Tech.)
Alkali Manufacturers' Association of
India
36. Shri Vibhav Nuwal Director REConnect Energy Solutions Pvt. Limited
37. Shri Anuj Hemant
Xess
Manager-Consulting &
Operations REConnect Energy Solutions Pvt Limited
38. Shri Ashutosh
Saxena Joint Director
National Council for Cement and
Building Materials
39. Shri Akhilesh
Awasthy Head, Market operations IEX
40. Ms. Rashmi Nair Deputy Chief (Regulatory
affairs) CERC
41. Shri N A
Viswanathan Secretary General
Cement Manufacturer Association
(CMA)
42. Dr. S.K. Handoo Advisor (Technical) Cement Manufacturer Association
(CMA)
43. Shri Vikas Kumar Deputy Manager Indo Gulf Fertilizers
44. Shri R. K
Manchanda Chief Of Maintenance TATA Sponge Iron Limited
45. Shri A. K. Chauhan Dy. Genaral Manager
(Technical Services) KRIBHCO Shyam Fertilizers Limited
46. Shri S. R. Mohanty AGM(Elect) NALCO, Damanjodi
47. Shri B. P. Naik Dy. GM(Finance), Corp. NALCO
48. Shri S. K. Jena AGM(Mech), Smelter NALCO
49. Shri B. Kar AGM(TQM), Corp. NALCO
50. Shri Girish Sethi
Director and Senior Fellow,
Industrial Energy Efficiency
Division
The Energy and Resources Institute(TERI)
51. Shri Niraj Kumar VP - Business Development Global Energy Pvt. Ltd.
S. No. Name Designation Organization
52. Ms. Minaxi Garg DGM (NLDC) Power System Operation Corporation
Ltd.(POSOCO)
53. Shri Amit Mursania Sr. Officer Petroleum Conservation & Research
Association
54. Shri D. Kumar Director & HOD( Industry &
IS)
Petroleum Conservation & Research
Association
55. Shri K M Tandon SFC , Kota
56. Shri Victor Vanya Assistant Manager IEX
57. Shri K K Roy
Choudhary Technical Officer Cement Ma ufa turers Asso iatio
58. Shri Akshay
Dhawan Assistant Manager PXIL
59. Shri Alok Mittal Deputy Manager, EM Group National Productivity Council
60. Shri Nayyara
Hossain Executive Vice President Global Energy Private Limited, New Delhi
61. Shri Shailendra
Verma
Power System Operation Corporation
Ltd.(POSOCO)
62. Shri Ullas Kumar
Mishra
Sr. Manager, Corporate
Affairs DCW Limited
63. Ms. Vinni Program Associate Knowledge Exchange Platform
Secretariat
ANNEXURE 2
1st
POLICY ROUNDTABLE ON EFFICIENT MARKET FOR E“CERT“ IN INDIA
6th
August 2015 (2.30pm - 5.30 pm) at Bureau of Energy Efficiency, 4th
Floor, Sewa Bhawan,
R K Puram Sector 1, New Delhi -110066
PROGRAM AGENDA
2.30pm – 2.45pm
2.45pm – 3.00 pm
Opening Remarks by Dr. Ajay Mathur, Director General, Bureau of Energy
Efficiency
Introduction of KEP by Shri Somnath Bhattacharjee, Director, Institute for
Industrial Productivity (IIP) India
3.00pm - 3.45pm
3.45pm - 4.15pm
4.15pm - 5.15pm
5.15pm - 5.30pm
Background Presentation on Effi ie t arket for E“Certs i I dia
Prese tatio o E“Certs Tradi g BEE
Open Discussion
Concluding Remarks by Shri K. K. Chakarvarti, Expert Consultant, Bureau of
Energy Efficiency
ANNEXURE 3
Presentation made by Dr. Murali Kanakasaba, Adjunct Professor, Illinois Institute of Technology,
Chicago
ANNEXURE 4
Presesentation made by Mr. Girja Shankar, Asst. Energy Economist, Bureau of Energy Efficiency