prof. dr. philipp harms - uni-mainz.de€¦ · prof. dr. philipp harms, exchange rates and...

Prof. Dr. Philipp Harms, Exchange Rates and International Capital Markets

17.07.2012 EvaSys Auswertung Seite 1

Prof. Dr. Philipp Harms

Exchange Rates and International Capital Markets (Harms_SoSe12_01)Erfasste Fragebögen/number of questionnaires analyzed = 66

Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen FragenAuswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen

LegendeFragetext Rechter PolLinker Pol n=Anzahl

mw=Mittelwerts=Std.-Abw.E.=Enthaltung

25%

1

0%

2

50%

3

0%

4

25%

5

0%

6

0%

7

Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert

Skala Histogramm

1. The course is coherently structured. does not applyfully applies n=64mw=1.77s=0.66

35.9%

1

51.6%

2

12.5%

3

0%

4

0%

5

0%

6

0%

7

2. Individual lectures are coherently structured. does not applyfully applies n=65mw=2.02s=0.84

27.7%

1

47.7%

2

21.5%

3

1.5%

4

1.5%

5

0%

6

0%

7

3. The course has a clear objective. does not applyfully applies n=66mw=2.06s=0.93

27.3%

1

50%

2

13.6%

3

7.6%

4

1.5%

5

0%

6

0%

7

4. The lecturer uses examples to illustrate the materialpresented.

does not applyfully applies n=65mw=1.82s=1.16

53.8%

1

26.2%

2

10.8%

3

4.6%

4

3.1%

5

1.5%

6

0%

7

5. The relevance and practical importance of thematerial have been made clear.


30.8%

1

40%

2

20%

3

6.2%

4

3.1%

5

0%

6

0%

7

6. The lecturer encourages students to critically assessthe material presented in class.


28.8%

1

45.5%

2

21.2%

3

4.5%

4

0%

5

0%

6

0%

7

7. The overall presentation is clear. does not applyfully applies n=65mw=1.74s=0.71

41.5%

1

43.1%

2

15.4%

3

0%

4

0%

5

0%

6

0%

7

8. The lecturer is well prepared. does not applyfully applies n=66mw=1.44s=0.56

59.1%

1

37.9%

2

3%

3

0%

4

0%

5

0%

6

0%

7

9. The lecturer speaks clearly. does not applyfully applies n=66mw=1.48s=0.68

60.6%

1

31.8%

2

6.1%

3

1.5%

4

0%

5

0%

6

0%

7



10. The lecturer uses didactical tools (e.g.transparencies, blackboard, projector) in a useful way.


46.2%

1

40%

2

10.8%

3

3.1%

4

0%

5

0%

6

0%

7

11. Students are provided with useful teaching materials(handouts, lecture notes, references, etc.).


30.8%

1

38.5%

2

20%

3

7.7%

4

1.5%

5

1.5%

6

0%

7

12. The lecturer is highly motivated. does not applyfully applies n=64mw=1.55s=0.62

51.6%

1

42.2%

2

6.3%

3

0%

4

0%

5

0%

6

0%

7

13. The lecturer is able to motivate course participants. does not applyfully applies n=64mw=1.97s=0.87

34.4%

1

39.1%

2

21.9%

3

4.7%

4

0%

5

0%

6

0%

7

14. The lecturer is cooperative and open-minded. does not applyfully applies n=65mw=1.58s=0.63

49.2%

1

43.1%

2

7.7%

3

0%

4

0%

5

0%

6

0%

7

15. Compared to other courses, the students attendingthis lecture have a high skill level.


27.3%

1

40.9%

2

16.7%

3

12.1%

4

0%

5

1.5%

6

1.5%

7

16. The course substantially contributed to improving myknowledge on this topic.

does not applyfully applies n=65mw=2s=0.88

27.7%

1

50.8%

2

18.5%

3

1.5%

4

0%

5

1.5%

6

0%

7

17. I have learned something meaningful and important. does not applyfully applies n=66mw=2.05s=1.13

37.9%

1

31.8%

2

24.2%

3

3%

4

1.5%

5

0%

6

1.5%

7

18. The course content overlaps with the content ofother courses.


9.5%

1

17.5%

2

20.6%

3

17.5%

4

7.9%

5

20.6%

6

6.3%

7

19. I was interested in the topic of this course. does not applyfully applies n=65mw=1.91s=0.9

38.5%

1

38.5%

2

16.9%

3

6.2%

4

0%

5

0%

6

0%

7

20. The lecturer gives helpful feedback on students'contributions.


26.2%

1

50.8%

2

16.9%

3

3.1%

4

3.1%

5

0%

6

0%

7

21. The overall support for this course is good. does not applyfully applies n=64mw=2.58s=1.17

14.1%

1

43.8%

2

20.3%

3

17.2%

4

1.6%

5

3.1%

6

0%

7

22. I regularly prepare and follow up on this course. does not applyfully applies n=66mw=3.08s=1.3

10.6%

1

24.2%

2

31.8%

3

18.2%

4

10.6%

5

4.5%

6

0%

7



23. The work load associated with this course is largerthan for other courses.


23.1%

1

21.5%

2

29.2%

3

20%

4

1.5%

5

3.1%

6

1.5%

7

24. The lecturer encourages students to ask questionsand to actively participate.


31.8%

1

43.9%

2

21.2%

3

1.5%

4

0%

5

1.5%

6

0%

7

25. The lecturer does a good job in moderatingdiscussions (encouraging contributions, commenting oncontributions, timing, etc.).

does not applyfully applies n=52mw=2.33s=1.02E.=13

25%

1

30.8%

2

32.7%

3

9.6%

4

1.9%

5

0%

6

0%

7

26. The course enhanced my interest in studying. does not applyfully applies n=65mw=2.23s=1.18

33.8%

1

30.8%

2

18.5%

3

12.3%

4

4.6%

5

0%

6

0%

7

27. The course encouraged me to further delve into thesubject.


21.5%

1

33.8%

2

21.5%

3

16.9%

4

4.6%

5

1.5%

6

0%

7

28. The course suffered from noise, students'conservations, etc.


0%

1

7.6%

2

10.6%

3

1.5%

4

4.5%

5

31.8%

6

43.9%

7

29. Conditions in the lecture room (e.g. room size,equipment) were appropriate.


37.9%

1

33.3%

2

21.2%

3

3%

4

3%

5

1.5%

6

0%

7

30. How would you assess your personal performancein this course?

insufficientexcellent n=64mw=3.09s=1.05

6.3%

1

20.3%

2

40.6%

3

25%

4

6.3%

5

1.6%

6

0%

7

31. The amount of material presented was... far too extensivefar too small n=66mw=4.7s=0.8

0%

1

0%

2

1.5%

3

43.9%

4

40.9%

5

10.6%

6

3%

7

32. The pace of the lecture was... far too slowfar too quick n=66mw=3.5s=0.81

1.5%

1

9.1%

2

33.3%

3

50%

4

6.1%

5

0%

6

0%

7

33. The skill requirements were... far too highfar too low n=64mw=4.48s=0.94

1.6%

1

1.6%

2

3.1%

3

46.9%

4

35.9%

5

9.4%

6

1.6%

7

34. In order to follow the lecture, my previous knowledgewas...

far too extensive (noattendance necessary)

far too small n=66mw=3.58s=0.9

1.5%

1

10.6%

2

27.3%

3

51.5%

4

7.6%

5

1.5%

6

0%

7



35. All in all, I would grade the lecture with: insufficientexcellent n=63mw=1.67s=0.51

34.9%

1

63.5%

2

1.6%

3

0%

4

0%

5

0%

6

36. What is your gender?n=65Male 72.3%

Female 27.7%

37. Please insert your age:n=660 - 19 3%

20 - 39 97%

38. Your exam grade when leaving school: n=54mw=2.3s=0.47

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

39. I am studying in the...n=633. 1.6%

4. 6.3%

5. 44.4%

6. 31.7%

7. 3.2%

8. 3.2%

10. 1.6%

11. 3.2%

13. 1.6%

> 14. 3.2%



40. Which program are you enrolled in? (Multiple answers possible)n=66B.Sc. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 75.8%

B.Sc. Wirtschaftspädagogik 0%

M.Sc. Management 0%

M.Sc. International Economics and Public Policy 1.5%

M.Sc. Wirtschaftspädagogik 0%

LL.M. Medienrecht 0%

MBA Business Administration 0%

Staatsexamen 0%

Rechtswissenschaft/Jura 0%

Diplom 9.1%

Magister 0%

different program, not listed here 18.2%

41. The reason for attending this course: (Multiple answers possible)n=66compulsory lecture 31.8%

lecturer 45.5%

timing 16.7%

interest, topic 78.8%

42. How often did you miss lectures?:n=64never 40.6%

once or twice 37.5%

3-4 times 14.1%

5-6 times 6.3%

more than 6 times 1.6%



ProfillinieTeilbereich: FB 03 - WirtschaftswissenschaftenName der/des Lehrenden: Prof. Dr. Philipp HarmsTitel der Lehrveranstaltung:(Name der Umfrage)

Exchange Rates and International Capital Markets (Harms_SoSe12_01)

1. The course is coherently structured. fully applies does not applyn=64mw=1.77

2. Individual lectures are coherently structured. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=2.02

3. The course has a clear objective. fully applies does not applyn=66mw=2.06

4. The lecturer uses examples to illustrate the material presented. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=1.82

5. The relevance and practical importance of the material have been made clear. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=2.11

6. The lecturer encourages students to critically assess the material presented inclass.

fully applies does not applyn=66mw=2.02

7. The overall presentation is clear. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=1.74

8. The lecturer is well prepared. fully applies does not applyn=66mw=1.44

9. The lecturer speaks clearly. fully applies does not applyn=66mw=1.48

10. The lecturer uses didactical tools (e.g. transparencies, blackboard, projector) ina useful way.


11. Students are provided with useful teaching materials (handouts, lecture notes,references, etc.).


12. The lecturer is highly motivated. fully applies does not applyn=64mw=1.55

13. The lecturer is able to motivate course participants. fully applies does not applyn=64mw=1.97

14. The lecturer is cooperative and open-minded. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=1.58

15. Compared to other courses, the students attending this lecture have a high skilllevel.


16. The course substantially contributed to improving my knowledge on this topic. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=2

17. I have learned something meaningful and important. fully applies does not applyn=66mw=2.05

18. The course content overlaps with the content of other courses. fully applies does not applyn=63mw=3.84

19. I was interested in the topic of this course. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=1.91

20. The lecturer gives helpful feedback on students' contributions. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=2.06

21. The overall support for this course is good. fully applies does not applyn=64mw=2.58

22. I regularly prepare and follow up on this course. fully applies does not applyn=66mw=3.08

23. The work load associated with this course is larger than for other courses. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=2.71

24. The lecturer encourages students to ask questions and to actively participate. fully applies does not applyn=66mw=1.98

25. The lecturer does a good job in moderating discussions (encouragingcontributions, commenting on contributions, timing, etc.).




26. The course enhanced my interest in studying. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=2.23

27. The course encouraged me to further delve into the subject. fully applies does not applyn=65mw=2.54

28. The course suffered from noise, students' conservations, etc. fully applies does not applyn=66mw=5.74

29. Conditions in the lecture room (e.g. room size, equipment) were appropriate. fully applies does not applyn=66mw=2.05

30. How would you assess your personal performance in this course? excellent insufficientn=64mw=3.09

31. The amount of material presented was... far too small far tooextensive

n=66mw=4.7

32. The pace of the lecture was... far too quick far too slown=66mw=3.5

33. The skill requirements were... far too low far too highn=64mw=4.48

34. In order to follow the lecture, my previous knowledge was... far too small far tooextensive (noattendance ne-

n=66mw=3.58

35. All in all, I would grade the lecture with: excellent insufficientn=63mw=1.67

38. Your exam grade when leaving school: 1 (Note 1.0 bis5.0)

5n=54mw=2.3



Auswertungsteil der offenen FragenAuswertungsteil der offenen Fragen

What are the three aspects of this lecture that you liked most (TOPS)?



What are the three aspects of this lecture that you disliked most (FLOPS)?

prof. dr. philipp harms - uni-mainz.de€¦ · prof. dr. philipp harms, exchange rates and...

Documents