Project:Energy Home

Prof. Williams, MBM, MPM

PM 342 Procurement and Contract Management

Christian Gonzalez, Project Manager

Tamika Roland, Project Coordinator

Alex Torres, Quality Assurance Manager

Teria Edwards, Research & Development Manager

Table of Contents Cost of Bills Scope TQM/QFD Risk categories Risk chart Cost Breakdown WBS Breakdown EVM/S-curve Project EVM Projected Labor Efficiency Breakdown ROI(Return on Investment) Green Technology Lessons Learned Work Cited

Cost of Bills

Scope Innovative contractors will upgrade Rafael and Catalina Gonzalez house’s efficiency with a budget of $205,000, a completion time of 2 months, and a start day of April 11, 2011. Innovative techniques and technology will be utilized to reduce utility bills and certify the Gonzalez’s home a 15 rating on the LEED energy rating scale. The procured house will be systematically upgraded with energy efficient materials and appliances:

WindowsHVAC SystemSolar panelsTank less water heatersInsulatingUpgrading appliancesGeothermal unitWater heating system Water recycling systemH2O floor heatingDrip Irrigation System

Natural gas generator

The procured materials will be allocated from multiple manufacturers and experts will have to be contracted for certain instillations such as the solar panels, insulation, water heating system, and water recycling system.

This allowed for the homeowners to become more acquainted with their monitoring system.

QFDQuality Functional Deployment

Necessary to acquire the best;

-Energy efficiency

-Up-to date technology

-Communication

TQMTotal Quality Management

Risk Categories

Type of risks Description Cost

Macroeconomic Cost Inflations(Gas, Shipping) +$1,2000-2 days

Political Permits, Regulations +$1,200< 1 week

Commercial Cost and schedule completion, Performance +$2,0002-5 days

Contractual Equipment supply, Licenses, and Sales agreements

+$2,0002-5 days

Environmental Inclement weather +$1,0001-4 days

Team Resignations, Unmotivated workers +$3,0001-4 days

Risk Risk ChartWeek 3Water Recycling System install

• Malfunctioning valve

Week 5Electrical update

• Mislabeling of electrical cables

Cost: $85.00Time: 45 min.

Cost:$145Time: 3 hr 30 min

Total $ 2301 Macroeconomic 2 Political3 Commercial 4 Contractual5 Environmental 6 Team

Key

1 2 3 4 5 60

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Project Risks

ActualPlanned

Cost BreakdownSolar Panels 72,000 Contract type: Cost- Reimbursable

Anderson 100 series windows 34,796 Contract type: Cost- Reimbursable

Geothermal Unit 8,339.44 Contract type: Cost- ReimbursablePermits 3,200High efficiency HVAC 6,000 Contract type: Cost- ReimbursableDemolition 2,800 Contract type: Firm FixedAppliances 16,000 Contract type: Firm FixedDumpster 500 Contract type: Firm FixedSpray Insulation 8,402.56 Contract type: Cost- ReimbursableDrywall 7,000 Contract type: Cost- Reimbursablewater recycling system Drip irrigation system

6,325.12 Contract type: Cost- Reimbursable

Natural gas generator 2,050 Contract type: Cost- ReimbursableTankless water heater 4,000H20 Floor heating System 5,000 Contract type: Cost- ReimbursableEnergy Test 3,200 Contract type: Firm Fixed

Electrician $ 3,000 Contract type: T & M

Plumber(Backup) $ 1,500 Contract type: T & M

WBS Breakdown 1.0 Research

New Energy Technology Local Sellers Building Restrictions

2.0 Preparations Bidding process Procuring

3.0 Execution

4.0 Efficiency testing Energy Test Cooling & Heating Test

5.0 Closing Contract Closing Payoff Open Accounts Document Updates

Project Start Date: April 11, 2011

Project End Date: May 26, 2011

Project Duration: 2 months

Project EVM

Projected Labor

Water Valve had small affectElectrical had Larger affect

Efficiency BreakdownSolar Panels

Anderson 100 series windows

Geothermal UnitHigh efficiency HVACAppliancesMaterialsSpray InsulationDrywallwater recycling system

Drip irrigation system

propane generator connectionTankless water heaterH20 Floor heating System

Design 7

Location 8

Sustainablilty 16Water Efficiency 12Energy and Atmosphere. 38

Sustainable Sites 12Awareness and Education 3

Indoor Environmental Quality 21

Grand Total 117

Return On Investment

Return of 112% efficiency

Customer Satisfaction Return On Investment(ROI)

6 years Rebates and tax Credits

9% of completion cost

Attention to Detail:

Green TechnologyThere is $2.6 billion in grants available.

Amount of grants used in 2010, <$1 million

-U.S Dept. of Energy Feb. 2011

Recycled Roofing Wood Plastic Smog Eaters

LED Bulbs Insulation

Olive Oil Recycled Plastic Denim Paper

Thermostat radient barrier heating “Green” ammunition

Team Innovative ContractorsLessons Learned

http://687842294512203611.weebly.com/index.html

Work Cited http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/13/energy-efficient-building_n_343922.html

http://www.apowersolutions.com/

http://www.hgtvpro.com/hpro/bp_green_building/article/0,3140,HPRO_29336_5499975,00.html

http://www.geocomfort.com/products/model/gtc-two-stage-split-series

http://www.GE.com

Expert Judgment Christian Gonzalez Alex Torres