professor bjørn asheim, deputy director ,
DESCRIPTION
Constructing Regional Innovation Systems: Perspectives and development tendencies in European regional innovation research and policy. Professor Bjørn Asheim, Deputy Director , CIRCLE (Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy), Lund University, Sweden. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Constructing Regional Innovation Systems: Perspectives and development tendencies in European regional innovation research and policy
Professor Bjørn Asheim, Deputy Director,CIRCLE (Centre for Innovation, Research and
Competence in the Learning Economy),Lund University, Sweden.
Key note address at DIME International Workshop on‘Reconsidering the Regional Knowledge Economy’,
KITE, Newcastle, September 5th, 2008
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
CIRCLE (Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy)
New multidisciplinary centre of excellence in innovation system research at Lund University (July 2004)
CIRCLE is financed by the Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA), Lund University and Blekinge Technical University 2004-2010, and from 2006 for 10 years by the Swedish Research Council (Linnaeus grant)
In autumn 2007 co-location of research and teaching in innovation and entrepreneurship together with LUIS (Lund University Innovation System) at LUCIE (Lund University Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship)
Becoming one of the largest centres in Europe http://www.circle.lu.se/
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Some empirical observations I
Promoting Innovation Systems approach:
- Finland: Science and Technology Policy Council
- Sweden: VINNOVA (Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems)
Share of R&D:
- Finland: 3.5%
- Sweden: 4.0%
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Some empirical observations II
Economic performance: Global competitiveness
2004 2005 2006-7 2007-8
Finland: 1 1 2 6 Sweden: 3 3 3 4 Denmark: 5 4 4 3
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Nordic innovation strategies
The technology-based strategy of process innovations and complex product improvements, through R&D investments in large industries, characteristic of the Swedish economy
The science-driven high tech strategy focusing on radical product innovations, with Finland as the champion (NOKIA)
The market (user)-driven entrepreneurialism of Denmark characterized by non-R&D based, incremental product innovations especially within consumer goods sectors
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Different modes of innovation
’How Europe’s Economies Learn. Coordinating Competing Models’ : Different modes of innovation and forms of work organisation
1. STI (Science, Technology, Innovation) – high-tech (science push/supply driven) - LME
2. DUI (Doing, Using, Interacting) – Competence building and organisational innovations (learning work organisation) – market/demand/user driven - CME
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Finland’s National Innovation Strategy: New proposal
In order to meet global challenges, innovation policy must be broad-based and comprehensive:
Innovation activity in a world without borders Demand and user orientation (DUI mode of
innovation) Innovative individuals and communities
(creative class/talents) Systemic approach
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Key governance policy measures
The central government’s corporate steering renewed for the purpose of becoming a worldwide pioneer of systemic reforms:
The Science and Technology Policy Council to become a wider Research and Innovation Council (STI & DUI)
Content-oriented (strategic centres of science, technology and innovation) and regional centres of innovation (strategic strenghts of regions) driving renewal is to be formed (top down/bottom-up)
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
VINNVÄXT: Regional Growth through Dynamic Regional Innovation Systems
’To promote sustainable growth in the regions based on international competitive ability, by successively developing the functioning, dynamics and effectiveness of innovation systems in functional regions’
VINNVÄXT is competition based (top-down program design)
The winners receive 10M SEK per year under a 10-year period (50% co-financing)
Focus on (potential) regional strengths Triple-Helix based Ongoing process support, education, monitoring
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
What kind of support?
At least 50% R&D Development organisation and process
management Mobilisation of regional actors (bottom-up) Competence supply Brand creation Strategic work Follow-up
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
What is Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) – narrow definition (STI mode):
A RIS is constituted by two sub-systems and the systemic interaction between them (and with non-local actors and agencies):
The knowledge exploration and diffusing sub-system (universities, technical colleges, R&D institutes, technology transfer agencies, business associations and finance institutions)
The knowledge exploitation sub-system (firms in regional clusters as well as their support industries (customers and suppliers))
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
What is a RIS - broad defintion (DUI-mode):
A system of organisations and institutions supporting learning and organisational innovation, and their interactions with local firms (learning regions):
Developmental (creative) learning: competence building – learning work organisation
Reproductive (adaptive) learning: interactive learning (user-producer relationships) – inter-firm networks
A market/demand/user driven system mostly generating incremental innovations
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
From competitive to constructed advantage: Regional Policy Challenges in a Globalising Knowledge Economy
Imitation and adaptation is not any longer a sufficient strategy for regions in the long run (cost-based, low road strategy). Unique advantages have to be actively constructed (innovation-based, high-road strategy).
Industrial renewal takes place in-between and beyond existing sectors – need for transcending traditional sector policies (platform policy)
Innovation through combining existing knowledge, technologies and competencies with new generic technologies (IT, biotech (green and white))
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
What is Constructing Regional Advantage
New regional development strategy Advocating a more pro-active and
collaborative approach Addressing system failures of weak
connectivity within and between (regional) innovation systems
Promoting innovativeness on individual and systems levels to meet challenges of the globalising knowledge economy
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
From competitive to constructed advantage
Competitive advantage: too strong focus on markets and rivelry as selection mechanisms as well as a too narrow approach to the creation of endogenous capacity of regions to learn and innovate as primarily being based on co-location of firms in clusters and by placing the state in the same peripheral position as ’chance’ in Porter’s diamond model
Constructed advantage: acknowledges more the important interplay between industrial dynamics (knowledge bases) and institutional dynamics (i.e. different knowledge bases need different kinds of institutional support) as well as private-public complementarities in policy making by a stronger focus on actors, agencies and governance forms (addressing system failures – weak connectivity within and between IS).
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Content of policies for Constructing Regional Advantage
Proactive and trans-sectoral, platform oriented policies (transcending traditional industry or sector specific policies):
1. Related variety (spillover effects) 2. Differentiated knowledge bases (analytical,
synthetic and symbolic)3. Distributed knowledge networks4. Regional innovation systems as creative
knowledge environments
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Platform policies – Japan’s new cluster policy (2004):
Ex: Strengthening policies for advanced component/materials industries
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
1) Related variety (knowledge spillover effects)
Urbanisation economies – diversity promoting creativity? However, can knowledge spillover take place between sectors that are unrelated (portfolio vs. knowledge spillover effects)?
Related variety is defined as sectors that are related in terms of shared or complementary knowledge bases and competences
Acknowledge that generic technologies have a huge impact on economic development (e.g. green and white biotech)
Related variety combines the strength of the specialisation of localisation economies and the diversity of urbanisation economies
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
2) Differentiated knowledge bases (analytical, synthetic, symbolic)
Characterise the nature of the critical knowledge which the innovation activity cannot do without (hence the term ’knowledge base’ understood as an ideal type)
Makes it wrong to classify some types of knowledge as more advanced, complex, and sophisticated than other knowledge (e.g. to consider science based (analytical knowledge) as more important for innovation and competitiveness of firms and regions than engineering based (synthetic) knowledge or artistic based (symbolic) knowledge). Different knowledge bases should rather be looked upon as complementary assets (STI vs. DUI)
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Differentiated knowledge bases: A typology
Analytical (science based)
Synthetic (engineering based)
Symbolic (artistic based)
Developing new know-ledge about natural systems by applying scientific laws; know why
Applying or combining existing knowledge in new ways; know how
Creating meaning, desire, aesthetic qualities, affect, symbols, images; know who
Scientific knowledge, models, deductive
Problem-solving, custom production, inductive
Creative process
Collaboration within and between research units
Interactive learning with customers and suppliers
Learning-by-doing, in studio, project teams
Strong codified knowledge content, highly abstract, universal
Partially codified knowledge, strong tacit component, more context-specific
Importance of interpretation, creativity, cultural knowledge, implies strong context specificity
Meaning relatively constant between places
Meaning varies substantially between places
Meaning highly variable between place, class and gender
Drug development Mechanical engineering Cultural production, design, brands
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
3) Distributed knowledge networks – open innovation
More and more highly complicated More and more highly complicated combinationscombinations of of different knowledge types, e.g. codified and different knowledge types, e.g. codified and experience based, tacit knowledge, as well as experience based, tacit knowledge, as well as synthetic/analytical/symbolic knowledge basessynthetic/analytical/symbolic knowledge bases
As a result of the increasing complexity and diversity As a result of the increasing complexity and diversity of knowledge creation and innovation processes, of knowledge creation and innovation processes, firms need to acquire new, external knowledge to firms need to acquire new, external knowledge to supplement their internal, core knowledge base(s)supplement their internal, core knowledge base(s)
Transition from Transition from internalinternal knowledge base(s) within knowledge base(s) within firms to firms to distributeddistributed knowledge networks across a knowledge networks across a range of firms, industries and sectors locally and range of firms, industries and sectors locally and globallyglobally
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
4) Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) as Creative Knowledge Environments
Creative knowledge Environments (CKE) are: Environments where new knowledge is generated by people,
especially in their work settings (associating to the importance of talents (the creative class) and the policy implications of people climate complementing business climate)
CKE can be found on macro- (RIS), meso- (universities/firms) and micro-levels (research groups/work organisations)
Thus, the systemic interaction between the knowledge exploration (university) and exploitation (industry) subsystems of a RIS must be understood in a broader context and be embedded also on the meso and micro organisational levels
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Creative Knowledge Environments
CKE covers a void in innovation studies (traditionally focusing on how knowledge is exploited) by
Analyzing how creation of new knowledge occurs (i.e. on knowledge exploration), as well as
Focusing on what characterise the environments in which people carry out creative knowledge-producing activities (e.g. learning work organisations with autonomy in work and developmental (creative) learning in a RIS setting)
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Summing up: Broad-based innovation policy
User-driven innovation in addition to science driven (DUI+STI) Knowledge creation and innovation in all types of industries with
different knowledge bases Exploitation of different modes of innovation and forms of
learning Linking firms and regions with distributed knowledge networks
locally and globally (open innovation) Achievement of related variety within and between industries
(emerging as well as traditional) Improving connectivity in regional innovation systems (RIS) to
secure knowledge creation as well as knowledge exploitation Turning RIS into creative knowledge environments Platform oriented regional innovation policies transcending
traditional science, technology and sectoral policies
Bjørn Asheim, 2008
Principles of policiesTypes of Policy
Indirect, general(framework cond.)
Direct, general
Direct,specific
Science policy Basic research in universities and research institutes/ (T-H) - IPR policy
Technology policy
Specific ‘strategic’ technologies and sectors - public procurement policy
Innovation policy
SkatteFUNN(tax relief) -Norway
Vinnväxt (T-H)/
VINNOVA –
Sweden (CRA)
TYPOLOGY OF POLICIESTYPOLOGY OF POLICIES