professor hugh bigsby, dean faculty of agribusiness and ......faculty of agribusiness and commerce...
TRANSCRIPT
Strategic collaboration for increasing food value
Professor Hugh Bigsby, Dean
Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce
Lincoln University, New Zealand
Strategic collaboration for increasing food value
• Why collaborate?
• How to collaborate?
• How to make collaboration work?
Agricultural Value Chains
• Urbanisation
• Globalisation• Key driver for agribusiness value chain development
• Changes in trade and policy regimes (WTO, FTA’s)
Agricultural Value Chains
• Urbanisation
• Globalisation
• Increased market demands• Quality assurance
• Food safety
• Consumer acceptance
• Regulations
• Just-in-time delivery
• Regional credence characteristics
Agricultural Value Chains
• Urbanisation
• Globalisation
• Increased market demands
• Changes in distribution channels and technology• New channels of distribution: short chains vs. long chains
Agricultural Value Chains
• Urbanisation
• Globalisation
• Increased market demands
• Changes in distribution channels and technology
• Changes in industrial organisation• Consolidation / concentration in part as a reaction to drivers
What is collaboration?
• Typology of collaboration
• Different focus, objectives and payoffs
Transaction Operational level decisions, transactional data exchange
Event Tactical decisions, joint planning for solving specific issues
Process More strategic involvement, fully integrated processes
Collaboration versus cooperation
• Collaboration• Strategic and constructive way
for parties to engage
• Parties work with each other
• Ownership of outcomes shared
• Jointly develop capabilities for both the customer and supplier• Reduced cost
• Process improvements
• Innovation in products or services
• Collaboration is not only with external organisations• Observed increasingly in internal
organizations
• Cooperation• Parties bound by regular
commercial agreements
• One party delivers a service or goods to the next
Why create strategic relationships?
• Access to competencies or capabilities• Technical capability
• Organisational capability
• Innovative capability
• Flexibility
• Reliability
• Knowledge
• Network position
• International presence
• Low risk of discontinuity
Why create strategic relationships?
• Access to competencies or capabilities
• Relationship-specific assets• Tangible
• Specialised machinery
• Improved quality and efficiency
• New products and technologies
• Intangible• Relational assets like trust
• Exchange of knowledge and joint learning
• Lower transaction costs
Why create strategic relationships?
• Access to competencies or capabilities
• Relationship-specific assets
• Long-term supply chain partnerships can create a competitive advantage
• Relational rents• Profits achieved through
collaboration not able to be produced by each individual firm in isolation
Relationships in the value chain
• Key considerations• Who decides what is produced• How are the rules of trade determined• What is the relationship between participants• Role of associations/institutions• Coordination mechanisms (contracts, market sales)• Extent of chain “power”
• Relative size of a particular actor• Share of chain profits• Control over a key technology
• Value chain hierarchy
PRICE
Sellers
Buyers
Relationships in the value chain
Market-based• Spot transactions• (Generally) anonymous and
ad-hoc• Based on the prevailing price
Source: Gereffi et al (2005). Review of International Political Economy 12:1, pp. 78–104
Buyer
Supplier
Modular• Some level of input by the buyer
• Made-to-order • Custom design
• Based on existing technologies or capabilities of the supplier
• Coordination purely through buyer specifications
• Buyer does not have any specific stake in the supplier
Relationships in the value chain
Source: Gereffi et al (2005). Review of International Political Economy 12:1, pp. 78–104
Buyer
Supplier
Relational• More complex transactions
between buyer and supplier• Mutual dependence
• Can include social, ethnic, or other informal ties
Relationships in the value chain
Source: Gereffi et al (2005). Review of International Political Economy 12:1, pp. 78–104
Buyer
Supplier
Captive• Characterised by dependence of
the supplier on the buyer• Inputs• Materials• Markets
• Significant supervision and monitoring by buyer
Relationships in the value chain
Source: Gereffi et al (2005). Review of International Political Economy 12:1, pp. 78–104
Buyer
Supplier
Hierarchy• Supplier directly owned by
the buyer• Transactions between buyer
and supplier conducted within the firm
Relationships in the value chain
Source: Gereffi et al (2005). Review of International Political Economy 12:1, pp. 78–104
PRICE
Buyer
Supplier
Buyer
Supplier
Buyer
Supplier
Buyer
Supplier
End Use
Materials
Market Modular Relational Captive Hierarchy
Low HighDegree of Explicit Coordination
Degree of Power Asymmetry
Types of relationships
Spot-Markets
Verticalintegration
Relational contracts / repeated transactions
Captivecontracts
Production contracts
Marketing contracts
Hybrids
Increased intensity of vertical coordination
Hierarchy / RelationalMarket
Zespri
• Need for year round supply
• Develop partnerships with growers in other regions• South Korea, China, Italy
• License plant variety rights to local growers
• Supply chain management• Fruit quality management
• Pre-harvest certification activities
• Supply chain relations
• Fruit packaging management
• Shipping logistics and coordination
• Supply chain planning
• Farmer/Marketer partnering
Types of relationships
Spot-Markets
Verticalintegration
Relational contracts / repeated transactions
Captivecontracts
Production contracts
Marketing contracts
Hybrids
Increased intensity of vertical coordination
MarketHierarchy / Relational
Pāmu deer milk
• State-owned enterprise
• Development of the deer milk industry• Special characteristics of
deer milk as a moisturiser
• Partnership with Yuhan in South Korea• Cosmetics business• Moisturiser product
• Farmer partnering up the value chain
Types of relationships
Spot-Markets
Verticalintegration
Relational contracts / repeated transactions
Captivecontracts
Production contracts
Marketing contracts
Hybrids
Increased intensity of vertical coordination
MarketHierarchy / Relational
BRAINZ
• Small coffee growers in Aroponga, Brazil• Normally sell bulk beans to large buyers
• Desire for control and to be closer to consumers
• New Zealand market channel – BRAINZ• Online marketing
• Marketing the grower and attributes
• Farmer/marketer partnering