professor tobi tabor summer 2014. “[t]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Preparing a Casenote Professor Tobi Tabor
Summer 2014
![Page 2: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
“[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about the law.” 1
“[L]egal scholarship is characteristically normative (informed by a social goal) and prescriptive (recommending or disapproving a means to that goal).”2
1 Elizabeth Fajans & Mary R. Falk, Scholarly Writing for Law Students 2 (4th ed. 2011).
2 Id. at 4.
Legal Scholarship is Critical Writing
![Page 3: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Factually Correct Logical Analysis
◦ well and sufficiently reasoned and divided into mutually exclusive, yet related sections
Clear and readable◦ Somewhat formal style◦ Not pompous or colloquial
Good Scholarly Writing
![Page 4: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Steps Involved¹Tasks Required ²1. Inspiration2. Research-
preliminary3. Research-close to
complete4. Drafting5. More research-fill
gaps6. Revising7. Polishing
¹ Fajans & Falk at 21.
1. Outline/rough draft
2. Complete draft3. Good draft4. Final product
Mary Barnard Ray & Barbara J. Cox, Beyond the Basics 406-20 (2d ed. 2003). You may not write all these stages, but you will need to address all tasks.
![Page 5: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1. Inspiration
2. Research-preliminary
3. Research-close to complete
4. DraftingOutline/Rough DraftComplete Draft
5. More Research6. Revising
Good Draft7. Polishing
Final Product
Steps & Tasks Integrated
![Page 6: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
For Competition you will be assigned a recent opinion to analyze
For this casenote previously unresolved or currently evolving areas of law provide most potential◦You will agree or disagree with all or part
of what the Court did Something worth writing about—new issue, rule
no longer practical, decision makes new law on old issue
Hone it down to manageable size and scope
Step 1-Your inspiration
![Page 7: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Original◦ Says something not said before
Comprehensive◦ “provides sufficient background [so] any law-school-educated
reader [can] understand . . . and evaluate the writer’s thesis.”◦ “takes the reader from the known (background) to the unknown
(the writer’s analysis).”³ Claim is your solution to a problem you have identified. Or
Dispute you have identified and rationale for why it was rightly/wrongly resolved.⁴ Topic must be narrowed to manageable proportions to formulate thesis.⁵
1 Fajans & Falk, supra at 14. 2 Eugene Volokh, Academic Legal Writing 10 (4th ed. 2010). 3 Fajans & Falk, supra at 14. ⁴Volokh, supra note 2. ⁵Id.
Inspiration: Developing a Thesis ¹; Finding a Claim ²
![Page 8: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
In Descriptive part of claim—the world as it was/is—the most plausible explanation of facts you have discovered²◦ Historical question◦ A claim about a law’s effects◦ A statement about how courts are interpreting the law
In Prescriptive part of claim—what should be done—the best solution you can suggest◦ How a law should be interpreted◦ What new statute should be enacted◦ How a statute or common-law rule should be changed
1 Volokh, supra at 10. ² Id. at 21.
Your Solution: Combine the Descriptive & Prescriptive ¹
![Page 9: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
You should be able to state your claim in In one sentence.¹“Statute X does not provide adequate
protection to those it was enacted to serve because ….”
“This [ruling] is likely to result in the following consequences . . . , and therefore should be modified to provide . . . .”
1 Volokh, supra at 9.
Your Claim
![Page 10: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Good Legal Scholarship should
(1) make a claim that is
(2) novel,
(3) nonobvious,
(4) useful,
(5) sound, and
(6) seen by the reader to be novel, nonobvious, useful, and sound.
¹ Volokh, supra at 21.
Characteristics of Claim¹
![Page 11: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Novel:◦ Add something to the state of expert knowledge about the field.◦ Nuance: ◦ 1. “[W]hat special factors—for instance, government interests or individual rights —are
present in some situations covered by your claim but not in others. Could you modify your claim to consider these factors?”
◦ 2. Do your arguments in support of your claim work well in some cases but badly in others? Can you limit your claim accordingly?
◦ 3. Simple “yes” and “no” answers in legal writing often attract more writing. Can you come up with a plausible “yes” in some cases, “no” in others?
Nonobvious:◦ Claims that “just apply settled law or well-established arguments to slightly new fact
patterns [] tend to look obvious.”
◦ Add a twist—more nuance: e.g., if leading precedent in the field doesn’t squarely support your claim, acknowledge and fill in support with other precedent and policy arguments
¹The concepts and descriptions of novelty, nonobviousness, utility, & soundness on this and the following slides are excerpted from Volokh at 21-35.
Characteristics¹
![Page 12: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Some readers should find idea professionally valuable◦ Questions left open or created by decision: how
should they be resolved?◦ Apply to other jurisdictions (e.g., conduct violates
4th amendment; also violate state constitutions?)◦ Include prescriptive implications◦ Avoid language, examples, & jargon that will
unnecessarily alienate readers, “anti-choice,” “gun lobby,” “fanatic.” “[I]n general, don’t weaken your core claim by picking unnecessary fights.”1
1 Volokh, supra at 28.
Useful
![Page 13: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
“Avoid ◦ excessive mushiness”◦ reliance on legal abstractions”
e.g., “single-sex educational programs should be legal if controlled studies show them to be more effective than co-ed programs” probably more defensible than “single-sex educational programs should be legal if they are reasonable.”
Sound
![Page 14: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
You are given specific case Read all separate opinions As you read, formulate reaction to court’s
reasoning (majority, concurrence, dissent), and from there, formulate your claim/original thesis.
You should read all the cases cited by the court in starting your research, and you may need to read them before you formulate your claim.
Write-on Competition
![Page 15: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Narrow thesis/claim?1st: Interdisciplinary/law only ¹Then:Macro-microComparisonsCausationQuestions
Research sources?◦ Who has authority◦ Where find sources
Lines of analysis?
¹ These techniques are discussed in Fajans & Falk, supra at 20-22.
Where would you start?
![Page 16: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
How to Narrow Topic¹: Bullying, Children, Adolescents, and the Roles of Schools
Decide whether primarily legal or primarily interdisciplinary◦ What are the implications of the decision for some or all of children, parents,
schools, area service providers?◦ What federal and state laws and regulations govern rights and protection of
students in schools? What entities are responsible for enforcing?◦ If children are consistently bullied, how effectively can they integrate into further
education and then into the workforce?
Up and down ladder of abstraction: macro focus (greatest level of generality) to micro focus (greatest detail & specificity)◦ In what venues does court address bullying? What effect on venues not
specifically included? What remedies?◦ What is frequency and type of public school vs. private school bullying by bullies’
ages, school grade, gender?◦ What gender and age group(s) are most susceptible to bullying, what assistance
is available?
¹ Fajans & Falk, supra at 20-22.
![Page 17: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Bullying
Make comparisons◦ How does decision affect states’ laws? School districts’ rules?◦ Is bullying more prevalent in the United States than in foreign jurisdictions (those
consistently subject to violence vs. those generally peaceful), in certain states than in others?
◦ Are bullies more likely to succeed in the workforce (have to define “succeed”) than their victims, their acolytes, the bystanders?
Determine Causation◦ How will the court’s decision impact state and school district budgets?◦ What is the long-term impact of bullying on the bully, the victim?◦ Are bullies, victims, bullies’ acolytes, bystanders at higher risk than the
remaining school population to physically harm themselves?
Ask series of questions◦ What acts constitute bullying?◦ Who does the bullying: gender, age, etc.?◦ What obligations do schools have to prevent or penalize bullying, help victims?◦ Differences in amount of bullying in public and private schools, middle and high
schools?◦ What influence does media have?◦ What role can pediatricians, psychologists play to prevent bullying, help victims?
![Page 18: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Check to see if your original thesis has already been addressed.
Has someone else looked into some aspects? List major points—roadmap for research Develop search terms No specific starting point
◦ Secondary sources Known case or statute Annotated statutes Shepardize—headnote numbers Key Cite—Key numbers legislative history
Step 2-Preliminary Research
![Page 19: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
What courts, governments, branches of government have authority to speak on the issues?
Different places to find that authority? Build checks into your research so you don’t stop
too soon Logical and orderly documentation of what you
have done
Research Plan
![Page 20: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Take good notes so you don’t lose your original reactions to material.
Don’t read just to summarize. Ask questions-
◦ Implications & consequences of writer’s position?◦ Writer’s inferences & conclusions—adequately supported?◦ Purpose of the text well-stated, justifiable?¹
Find the holes in what you’re reading, the inconsistent reasoning, conflict with precedent (will help you focus on thesis and analyze topic critically).
¹ These and critiquing techniques found in Fajans & Falk, supra at 28-30.
Read critically while researching
![Page 21: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
As you write, research to fill analytical gaps, provide examples, etc.
What sources might you be looking for? Statutes and regulations: U.S. & foreign Treaties, Conventions, Protocols Cases Secondary sources: academic perspective
◦ Comparisons, critiques, rationales◦ Policies
practical/discipline perspective
Step 3—Research can be close to complete, but is a continuous process
![Page 22: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Organize your materials into issues, lines of cases and commentary, pro and con
If you have a good grasp of a thesis, start with an outline
Try a non-linear outline if you can’t decide how concepts fit together
If you’re not ready for an outline, do “freewriting”—just “dump” all the thoughts you have onto the paper—from there you can derive an outline
Step 4-Preparation for Writing: How Do the Materials Fit Together?
![Page 23: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Madman Architect Carpenter Judge
Flowers’ Paradigm: "How Writers Write”
![Page 25: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Fill in content in organizational structure Let creativity flow minimize rewriting—keep the Judge at bay—
this is Madman’s opportunity to have “one more idea”
Try to get most ideas down before rewriting
First Complete Draft
![Page 26: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Scholarly papers have a basic four-part structure ◦ Introduction◦ Background ◦ Analysis◦ Conclusion
The Parts of Your paper: start writing anywhere—end with 4 parts
![Page 27: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Goal--persuade people to read further
Introduce topic & why it’s important Describe subject of paper
◦Give enough background to make significance of your subject obvious
State your claim Provide an explicit roadmap 5-7.5% of paper
Introduction
![Page 28: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Organization of General Section◦ Topically re issue/strand of analysis◦ Chronologically w/in topic◦ Jurisdictionally w/in topic
Courts Branches of government
General background◦ Origin of subject◦ Changes during development◦ Reasons for changes◦ How things are now
Background: Two parts —General Section & Specific Case Description
![Page 29: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Specific case description◦ Issue court considered◦ Facts as relevant to the issue◦ Viewpoint of each member of the Court
Organization of specific case section◦ Each separate opinion
Decision Reasoning
Background: Specific Case Description
![Page 30: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Have to assume law-educated reader is relatively uninformed in the area
Not tedious with detail but specific as to what is necessary for topic
Be comprehensive judiciously Synthesize precedents No commentary, critique
Background: Both Parts
![Page 31: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The most important section◦(1) original thoughts◦(2) tightly, logically, and creatively reasoned
Keep reader’s interestBuild to a conclusion
Analysis
![Page 32: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Your critique and commentary
Assess development of relevant case law: how law got where it is, where it should go, why, how?
Usually several strands of analysis
Background & Analysis 85-90% of paper: split 40/60 up to 50/50
Analysis
![Page 33: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Prove your prescriptive proposal both doctrinally and as a matter of policy.
Be concrete. Confront contrary arguments, but focus on
your own.
Volokh, supra at 35-38.
Prove your thesis
![Page 34: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Large-scale◦ Divide into major issues/strands of analysis—
use informative headings◦ Subdivide--subheadings◦ Order logically—headings & subheadings should
be logical outline Small-scale
◦ Introduce and conclude on each issue◦ Focus on your arguments◦ Rebut major opposing arguments
Organization of Analysis
![Page 35: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Restate thesis Summarize major points “[M]ay suggest related issues or
ramifications, inviting the reader to further reflection.”¹
5-7.5% of paper
¹ Fajans & Falk at 9.
Conclusion
![Page 36: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
As you write, research to fill analytical gaps, provide examples, etc.
Continuous process
Don’t let research prevent or interrupt writing
Step 5—More Research
![Page 37: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
A failure to review and familiarize yourself with these guidelines and how they apply to the assignment you have before turning in even a draft of a covered paper constitutes a violation of the University of Houston Law Center Honor Code, and that is so even if the paper ends up not violating this policy. In other words, there is no acceptable excuse for preparing a paper covered by this policy without having first reviewed this policy carefully and determining how it applies to the project in which you are engaged.
UHLC Honor Code & Plagiarism Policy
![Page 38: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
intent not required
plagiarism is still plagiarism, even when it is inadvertent product of careless research (i.e., save those pages from which you expect to quote, note pinpoint cites)
Plagiarism
![Page 39: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
“[A] writer may not appropriate in his writing either the language or the ideas of another without giving due credit to the source of such language or ideas, except as otherwise specifically provided [in the policy].”
Plagiarism Policy
![Page 40: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
“What constitutes giving credit to the source of borrowed language or ideas ‘in a way that clearly indicates the nature and extent of the source’s contribution to the student’s work’ varies . . . [,]” and the Plagiarism Policy has examples.
“Giving Due Credit to the Source”
![Page 41: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Putting another’s ideas and words into your own words
Get the essence of the statements and rephrase in your own words.
Not just changing a few words here and there, even if you cite the source
Write paraphrase relying on your memory, without looking at the original.
Then compare for content, accuracy, and mistakenly borrowed phrases.
What is a paraphrase?
![Page 42: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
A quote will be part of a textual sentence or will be a block quote.
Always provide an introduction that reflects significance of a block quote:◦Not “court held,” “commentator said”◦ Instead, “The concurring justice criticized the
policy implications of the majority position”: Minimize use of quotes, particularly block quotes. Quotes supplement text; they don’t supplant, i.e.,
if you take the quotes out, you still have clear, logically developed text.
How Do I Use Quotes?
![Page 43: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
The text and footnote excerpts on the following slides are all quoted from the following student note:Adam K. Nalley, Note, Did Student Speech Get Thrown Out with the Banner? Reading “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” Narrowly to Uphold Important Constitutional Protections for Students, 46 Hous. L. Rev. 615 (2009).
Student Note
![Page 44: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Under the standard put forth by the Court, a school’s control extends over student expression in the context of any activity that, “students, parents, and members of the public might reasonably perceive to bear the imprimatur of the school." [Nally, footnote omitted]
Quotes: in a sentence (49 or fewer words)-Rule 5
![Page 45: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
FN 105. Maring, supra note 72, at 688-89. See generally Charles C. Haynes, et al., The First Amendment in Schools 59.65 (2003) (identifying and explaining the “three tests” developed by the Supreme Court from the landmark student speech cases: Tinker, Fraser, and Hazelwood). Justice Alito, while sitting on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, provided a good summary of the types of speech these cases allow schools to prohibit:
To summarize: Under Fraser, a school may categorically prohibitlewd, vulgar or profane language. Under Hazelwood, a school mayregulate school sponsored speech (that is, speech that a reasonableobserver would view as the school's own speech) on the basis ofany legitimate pedagogical concern. Speech falling outside of these categories is subject to Tinker's general rule: it may be regulated only if it would substantially disrupt school operations or interfere with the right of others.
Saxe v. State Coll. Area Sch. Dist., 240 F.3d 200, 214 (3d Cir. 2001).
Quotes: block (50 or more words)-Rule 5, Nally
![Page 46: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
provide authority for assertions
attribute borrowed ideas & words to a source
Provide discursive commentary to supplement text
Footnotes have three functions:
![Page 47: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
substantiate every borrowed proposition in text—not your own ideas and opinions◦ No common knowledge in legal writing◦ background sections need fewer and more general footnotes
see generally and see, e.g.,
use appropriate signals when necessary◦ be sure signal choice is not misleading
do not quote work out of context
use parenthetical explanations to make clear the relevance of citations
Authority Footnotes--the general rules
![Page 48: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Paramount and MTV films are currently producing a film about “a young man standing up for his rights” after he was suspended for flying a fourteen-foot banner the phrase “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” outside his school. [FN 1] The movie is based on the real life story of Joseph Frederick, who made national headlines when he challenged his suspension all the way to the Supreme Court. [FN 2] It is the story of a high school senior who, in an effort to show he would not “bow down in submission before an authority,” created a banner with a large piece of paper, three dollars worth of duct tape, and a peculiar phrase that would become the subject of a Supreme Court case. [footnote omitted].
FN 1 Jeff Giles, Paramount, MTV Doing Bong Hits 4 Jesus, Rotten Tomatoes, Oct. 22, 2007, http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jesus_loves_me_lets_sing_about_doing_your_best_in_school/news/1682499/.The film’s producers compare it to the classic Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. Id.
FN 2 Id.; see, e.g., Linda Greenhouse, Court Hears Whether a Drug Statement is protected Free Speech for Students, N.Y. Times, Mar. 20, 2007, at A16 (describing the interactions between the attorneys and the Supreme Court Justices during oral arguments).
Authority Footnotes, Nally
![Page 49: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Phrases not quoting authority, one of three formats:
Present participial phrase: (concluding the evidence was insufficient)
Short, non-quoted statement appropriate in context: (health-related water quality)
Quoted sentence: (“We are a legalized culture.”)
Explanatory Parentheticals-R. 1.5
![Page 50: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
footnote for borrowed language, facts or ideas 7 consecutive words – use quotation marks if distinctive language, term of art – use quotation marks 50 or more words – follow block quote rules footnote citing or quoting source “A” that in turn quotes
or cites “B”◦ Only one level of “quoting” or “citing” is necessary,
unless second level particularly relevant. Rule 10.6.2 reference source and significance as you introduce a
quote◦ The Shasta concurrence criticized the majority’s
construction of the phrase as veering too far afield from established law : “ . . . .”
Attribution Footnotes--the general rules
![Page 51: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Tinker, therefore, provides a strong safeguard under the First Amendment for student speech in a school setting. [FN 81] Under Tinker, a student’s expressive activity or speech is protected as a First Amendment right if it does not materially disrupt a school activity, but school authorities maintain “broad authority to restore order” when the student’s speech or expressive conduct does result in a material and substantial disruption. [footnote omitted].
FN 81 See Chemerinsky, supra note 73, at 532 (declaring that the protection of student speech under the First Amendment is a core theme of the majority opinion); see also Cambron-McCabe et al., supra note 76, at 118 (noting that Tinker allows students to express opinions on controversial issues in the classroom, cafeteria, playing field, or any other place).
Attribution Footnote, Nally
![Page 52: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
supplement your text◦ clarify or qualify an textual assertion ◦ raise potential criticisms or complications◦ explain/distinguish contrary theory◦ relate anecdotes pertinent to text
Use to enrich the theme of your argument
Textual Footnotes
![Page 53: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Paramount and MTV films are currently producing a film about “a young man standing up for his rights” after he was suspended for flying a fourteen-foot banner the phrase “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” outside his school. [FN 1]
[FN 1] Jeff Giles, Paramount, MTV Doing Bong Hits 4 Jesus, Rotten Tomatoes, Oct. 22, 2007, http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jesus_loves_me_lets_sing_about_doing_your_best_in_school/news/1682499/.The film’s producers compare it to the classic Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. Id.
Textual Footnotes, Nally
![Page 54: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
2. Justice Thomas’s Concurrence: Students Have No FreeSpeech Rights. [FN 43] Justice Thomas joined the majority in decidingthat a public school may prohibit speech that advocates illegaldrug use. [footnote omitted]
FN 43. A full analysis of Justice Thomas's concurring opinion is beyond the scope of this Note. His opinion alone is worth an entire article. For example, did the Founders truly intend for the government to compel children to attend a government school and then afford those children no right to disagree with government policy in a nondisruptive manner? See id. at 2630 (Thomas, J., concurring) (opining that, as originally understood, the First Amendment does not extend to student speech in public schools). Did Justice Thomas manipulate originalism to reach a desired political result that children should be seen and not heard? See id. at 2631 (“[I]n the earliest public schools, teachers taught, and students listened.”). How does this opinion reflect Justice Thomas's First Amendment jurisprudence? [additional citations omitted].
Textual Footnote, Nally
![Page 55: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
The majority . . . also held that the banner could be reasonably interpreted as promoting illegal drug use. [FN 107]
[FN 107]. Morse, 127 S. Ct. at 2624-25; see also supra Part II.C.1 (discussing potential meanings on the banner). It is worth noting that the Court could have dismissed the school’s appeal if it found the meaning of the sign impossible to determine. See Brief of the Liberty Legal Institute as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent at 3-5, Morse, 127 S. Ct. 2618 (No. 06-278) [hereinafter Brief of the Liberty Legal Institute]. The sign, instead of being interpreted as promoting illegal drug use, could have been interpreted in a variety of constitutionally protected manners—for example, it could plausibly have been construed as “anti-religious” and thus “clearly protected.” Id. at 3. . . . See infra Part III.C (discussing the impact of the Court’s holding in Morse on student speech rights).
Adam K. Nalley, Did Student Speech Get Thrown Out with the Banner? Reading “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” Narrowly to Uphold Important Constitutional Protections for Students, 46 HOUS. L. REV. 615, 632-33 & n.107 (2009).
Textual Footnotes
![Page 56: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Citation Sentences◦ If the unlicensed individual answers difficult or
doubtful legal questions, she has committed the unlawful practice of law.¹¹ Gardner v. Conway, 48 N.W.2d 788, 796 (Minn. 1951).
Citation ClausesThe courts have suggested that the drafting of a testamentary will by a nonlawyer is the unauthorized practice of law, Peterson v. Hovland, 42 N.W.2d 59, 63 (Minn. 1950), as is the preparation of complicated tax returns, Gardner v. Conway, 48 N.W.2d 788, 796 (Minn. 1951).
Citation Placement in Footnotes
![Page 57: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Quoting, paraphrasing, or otherwise using another's words or ideas--must credit the source in a way that clearly indicates the nature and extent of the original source's contribution to your article
What Requires Citation?
![Page 58: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (19th Edition)
Locate the Pertinent Rules◦ Use Quick Reference Pages inside front & back
covers)◦ Use the Index◦ Use the Table of Contents
Read the Main Rules Covering Your Source: switch to white pages
Consult Applicable Tables
Proper Citation Form
![Page 59: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Typeface: main text, footnote text, and footnote citation
Abbreviations Source material: case, book, statute,
periodical Date Page: beginning and pinpoint Court/author
Different Parts of a Citation
![Page 60: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Typeface & Abbreviations: Case names in textual sentence & citations
Textual Sentences Citations
In main text: In Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen,¹ Justice McReynolds stressed the value of uniform laws.¹ 244 U.S. 205 (1917).
In footnote text: . In Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U.S. 205 (1917), Justice McReynolds stressed the value of uniform laws.
One of the values stressed by the Supreme Court is uniform application of the law to persons similarly situated.¹¹ See, e.g., S. Pac. Co. v.
Jensen, 244 U.S. 205 (1917).
![Page 61: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Rule 12.3: Current Official & Unofficial Codes◦ Large & small caps
Table 1: ◦ Abbreviations for federal and state codes◦ Which code to cite for each state
Typeface & Abbreviations: Statutes
![Page 62: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Rule 15.1: Author◦ large & small caps
Rule 15.3: Title◦ no abbreviations◦ large & small caps◦ Rule 8(a):Capitalization in Titles
Typeface & Abbreviations: Books
![Page 63: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Rule 16.1: Author◦ Ordinary roman
Rule 16.2: Title of article◦ Ordinary roman◦ No abbreviations◦ Italics
Rule 16.3: consecutively paginated Rule 16.4: nonconsecutively paginated Tables T.10 & T.13: Abbreviations Periodical Title
◦ Large & small caps
Typeface & Abbreviations: Periodicals
![Page 64: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Rule 18.2: cite to print source when available unless there is available a digital copy that is authenticated, official, or exact copy of printed source
Rule 18.2.1: (a) sources that can be cited as if to original print source: authenticated, official, exact copies; (b) when URL should be appended; (c) sources using “available at.”
Rule 18.2.2: direct citations to internet sources
Internet, Electronic media, other nonprint resources: Rule 18
![Page 65: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Rule 18.3.1: Cases-unreported but available on widely used database
Include case name, docket number, database identifier, court name, full date, unique database identifier
Gibbs v. Frank, No. 02-3924, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 21357, at *18 (3d Cir. Oct. 14, 2004).¹
Shelton v. City of Manhattan Beach, No. B171606, 2004 WL 2163741, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 28, 2004).²
¹ This citation is in a footnote. If it were in a textual sentence, the case name would be italicized.
² This citation is in a footnote. If it were in a textual sentence, the case name would be italicized.
Cases
![Page 66: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Rules 11 and 12 for print sources Rule 18.3.2
◦ After citation through section number, give parenthetically Name of database Currency of database (rather than year in 12.3.2) Publisher, editor, or compiler of database (unless
state or federal officials)
Constitutions and Statutes
![Page 67: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
General: Rule 4 Cases: Rule 10.9 Statutes: Rule 12.10 Books: Rule 15.10 Periodicals: 16.9 Electronic: Rule 18.8
Short Forms
![Page 68: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Table 6: Abbreviations for Case Names in citations
For case names in textual sentences—main text or footnote text–Rule 10.2.1 (c) & Rule 6.1 (b)
Table 7: Court names Table 10: Geographical Locations Table 13: Periodicals
Particularly Helpful Tables
![Page 69: Professor Tobi Tabor Summer 2014. “[T]he purest form of critical writing is scholarly writing—the sharing within the legal community of new ideas about](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062712/56649c9d5503460f9495cfa6/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Rule 3.5 “supra” and “infra” See supra notes 44-47 and accompanying
text. See infra pp. 55-61. Supra also used for other sources.
Rule 4.2
Internal Cross References