Program Evaluation: Alternative Approachesand Practical Guidelines, 4e

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.All rights reserved.

Program EvaluationAlternative Approaches and Practical

Guidelinesby

Jody L. Fitzpatrick, James R. Sanders, Blaine R. Worthen

PowerPoint Presentation

by

Gerri Spinella, Ed.D.

Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4e

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.All rights reserved.6 -2

Chapter 6Chapter 6

Program-Oriented Evaluation Approaches

Program-Oriented Evaluation Approaches

Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4e

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.All rights reserved.6 -3

Chapter 6 Concepts

ObjectivesOriented Approach

DefinitionsKey Terms

Logic ModelsProgram Theories

Theory-based Evaluation

Goal-free Evaluation

Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4e

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.All rights reserved.6 -4

Essential Questions

Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4e

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.All rights reserved.6 -5

Objectives-Oriented Approach

Ralph Tyler

Malcolm ProvusContinuous Information Management Process

Discrepancy Evaluation Model

Logic Model

Theory-based or Theory-Driven Evaluation

Huey Chen – Peter Rossi

Program-Oriented Evaluation

Goal-Free Evaluation

Key Terms/Leader

Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4e

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.All rights reserved.6 -6

Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4e

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.All rights reserved.6 -7

LOGIC MODEL

Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4e

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.All rights reserved.6 -8

Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4e

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.All rights reserved.6 -9

Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4e

© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.All rights reserved.6 -10

Chapter 6 Reflection

All evaluation approaches has strengths and areas of weaknesses. In your inquiry group, compare and contrast the key characteristics of each model and determine which you would use in your own program evaluation?