program information and performance measures

8/3/2019 Program Information and Performance Measures

1/102

Program Information SummaryBRR0030Printed *********

FY- 2013 Budget Request

Agency: 40 Dept. of Agriculture, Food & Forestry

Administration

Legal Services

Ag Environmental Management Services

Statistical Reporting Services

Forestry Services

Animal Industries

Market Development

Consumer Protection Division

Wildlife Services

Priority

1

5

7

9

11

21

31

41

51

Program Name & Description

4,971

322

1,291

72

9,166

1,374

1,492

1,232

841

State $

6,826

121

69

44

4,846

666

944

3,110

667

Rev. Fd.$ Fed.Fds.$

45.0

5.4

15.3

2.0

148.0

25.9

18.6

52.8

15.0

FTE

Administrative Services: Finance, Human Resources, General Services, Information Technology, Audits &

Investigative Services, Aviation Surveillance Firefighters Pensions, Program specific pass-thrus.

Legal Services

Agriculture Environmental Management Services

Statistical Reporting Services

Forestry Services

Animal Industries

Market Development, Environmental and Sustainable Agriculture, Agritourism, Ag In the Classroom, Ag

Exhibits and Shows, Ag Enhancement and Diversification

Consumer Protection Division

Wildlife Services

11,797

443

1,360

116

14,012

2,040

2,436

4,342

1,508

Total $

FY-2011 Information

$000's

Program Info, Pg 1


2/102

Program Information SummaryBRR0030Printed *********

FY- 2013 Budget Request

Agency: 40 Dept. of Agriculture, Food & Forestry

25,860 20,076 411.7

Food Safety

Agriculture Laboratory

Priority

61

67

Program Name & Description

1,736

3,363

State $

1,513

1,270

Rev. Fd.$ Fed.Fds.$

50.2

33.5

FTE

Food Safety, Meat Inspection, Egg and Organic Testing, Dairy and Milk

Agricultural Laboratory Services

3,249

4,633

Total $

45,936

FY-2011 Information

$000's

Totals:

Program Info, Pg 2


3/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011

Program Information/Performance Measures

Program Info, Pg 3FY-2013 Budget Request

40Agency:

Administrative Services/Information TechnologyProgram Name:

Title 2 Section 1 - 2

Provide the statutory references for this program?

Dept. of Agriculture, Food & Forestry

Last Changed:10-05-2011

Administrative Services consists of seven primary sections: Human Resources, Budget, Finance,

Purchasing, General Services, Investigation/Audit Unit, and Information Technology. Provides

administrative support and fleet management for the agency. Livestock Market Auditors monitor,

license, and audit the custodial accounts of the livestock markets in the state. The investigators

inspect vehicles transporting livestock and are the first defense in finding animals infected or

exposed to various diseases that could devastate Oklahoma's livestock industry.

Please describe the purpose of this program, including a description of what you intend to

Tax dollars are tracked and managed properly; outside vendors are paid promptly; revenues are

deposited promptly; verify that commodities are properly stored and accounted for in public

warehouses; and investigate any theft or fraud involving livestock or farm equipment in the state.

What are the benefits of this program?

They receive prompt payment of invoices, and receive accurate and reliable information.

Also, assists other law enforcement agencies while performing duties in the Investigation/Audit

unit.

b. To other agencies:

a. Directly to society:

reduced funding for both FY- and FY- and discuss the programmatic impact of these budget changes:

The functions of the Public Information Division have been moved to Administration.

Please describe budget actions taken by agency management or by legislative actions that increased or2011 2012

accomplish.

Client Information:

Executive Office, divisions, employees of ODAFF, governor, state legislators, other state agencies and

all citizens of the State of Oklahoma.

4,000,000

a. Description of Clients:

b. Number of Potential Clients:


4/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

Percentage of claims paid within 30 days.



Performance Measure Description

PM # Agency Performance Measure

Monthly Sampling

2 years.

Client Information:

c. Number of Clients Served:

4,000,000

Agriculture employees are served by Human Resources when inquiring about merit protection rules,

applying for state jobs and insuring that benefits are administered correctly and that all employees

understand benefits coverage. Governor, Legislators, and Executive Office are served with up-to-date

information on funding, budget and fiscal impact on pending legislation. Other divisions are served by

providing payroll, payables, receivables, and other financial services, fleet management, including

vehicle maintenance and repair, and by data processing operational and programming support. Citizens

of the State of Oklahoma are served as they deal with payment for licenses, fees, and requestinformation on programs administered by ODAFF. Assurance to the public regarding the health of

livestock imported or exhibited and the quantity of agricultural commodities stored in public

warehouses or offered for sale at livestock auction markets.

d. How are the Clients Served?

(cont)

1 Payment of claims within 30 days.Goal # Agency Goal

List your program performance goals and measures, include performance measures as well as the inputs,

outputs,outcome measures and efficiency measures that describe how you accomplish your goals. Identify/list in the following table, the appropriate yearly benchmarks you have reached in the past two years;hope to reach in the current year; and plan to reach in order to achieve the program goals in the next

Program Goals/Performance Measures(PM):


5/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

1

All revenue items are reported with correct division and revenue codes. All revenue items

requiring separate tracking are assigned unique codes. Percentage of revenue reported

correctly.

Number of cases initiated.

1

1

PM #

PM #

98%

100%

99%

98%

99%

100%

99%

100%

99%

100%

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted



Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014



PM #

PM #

Agency Performance Measure


Post Revenues Correctly

Criminal cases investigated.

2

3

Provide for accurate accounting of all revenues.

Criminal cases.

Goal #

Goal #

Agency Goal

Agency Goal

Program Goals/Performance Measures(PM): (Cont)

98%

99%

99%

99%

Original Estimate

Original Estimate


6/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


2

3

Number of criminal investigations completed.

Number of criminal charges filed.

1

2

3

PM #

PM #

PM #

227

154

365

250

200

400

300

200

200

300

200

200

300

200

200

Actual

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted

Budgeted



Estimated

Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014

FY-2014



PM #

PM #



Criminal invest. completed.

Criminal charges filed.

4 Livestock import checks.

Goal # Agency Goal


200

100

200

200

150

200

Original Estimate

Original Estimate

Original Estimate


7/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

1

Number of livestock transport stops. Only performed as a special request.

Number of incidents assigned for investigation. Complaints which do not result in criminal

investigation.

1

1

PM #

PM #

0

139

1

200

0

250

0

250

0

250

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted



Discuss the consequences that would occur if this program did not exist.

If Administrative Services didn't exist the functions that are carried out by finance, general

services, human resources and data processing would either fall to other divisions or to outside

contractors.

Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014



PM #

PM #



Livestock transport stops.

Incidents investigated.

5 Incidents investigated.

Goal # Agency Goal


0

100

0

100

Original Estimate

Original Estimate


8/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:




If this program is providing services that were not provided through this program prior to FY-2011,please describe those services here:

N/A

Discuss how much of the funding for this program is provided by user fees. If the fees charged for this

Does this program serve readily identifiable users? NO

Are the users able to pay for the services they receive? NO

Does the state require citizens to use this service? NO

If yes, do individual citizens otherwise benefit directly from the service? NO

Is the service targeted at low-income beneficiaries? NO

Do the states or municipalities charge for the service? NO

Are there any related services that could be offered on a fee-for-service basis?

NO

program do not cover an appropriate amount of the costs of the program, describe the changes or types of

user fees that should be considered. Describe any necessary waivers or special considerations. Provideappropriate comparisons to other fees charged by the private sector or other governmental entities

providing the same or similar services:

(If any exist, summarize service and related benefits to users and public.)

(If yes, please summarize their experience with charges)

User Fees:

Discuss your process of reviewing alternatives for cost savings and efficiencies.


9/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:

Agricultural Environmental Management Services (AEMS)Program Name:

Title 2 O.S. Sec. 20-1, et. seq.; Title 2 O.S. Sec. 10-9.1 et. seq.; 35:17-5; 35:17-11; 35:17-9;

35:17-7; 35:17-3.




To protect Oklahoma's water and environment from possible contamination from animal waste. The

citizens of Oklahoma receive protection from possible water pollution from animal waste because of the

Poultry and CAFO inspectors and Agricultural Environmental Management Services (AEMS) staff's

enforcement of the laws and rules pertaining to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO), Swine

Feeding Operations, Poultry Feeding Operations, Poultry Waste Applicators, Agricultural Compost and

animals.

To ensure all laws and rules are met prior to issuing licenses and to allow land owners within

specified distances of CAFOs to request hearings and present evidence for denial of licensure.

Consequently, citizens' rights are heard and Oklahoma's waters and environment are protected from

possible animal waste contamination.

GOALS: 1) To assure a proper balance is maintained between the need for production agriculture to

exist and the need to protect Oklahoma waters and environment from possible pollution from animal

wastes. 2) Conduct complaint/discharge investigations on animal feeding and poultry operations.

Complete and file investigative reports. Conduct follow-up investigations on animal feeding and

poultry operations. Complete and file investigative reports. Levy fines when violations occur. 3)

Perform National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) unannounced annual inspections of alllicensed CAFO/LMFOs. 4) Perform annual inspections of all poultry operations and provide technical

assistance and outreach education on feeding operations and laws and rules dealing with animal wastes.

5) To conduct soil and/or water sampling when required to complete an investigation of

complaint/discharge or of an inspection. 6) To collect and test samples from all Licensed Managed

Feeding Operations (LMFO) monitoring wells, evaluate the test results and assure that the LMFOs are in

compliance with all statutes and rules. 7) To collect LMFO animal unit fees and CAFO license renewal

fees annually by July 1. 8) To register all poultry feeding operations annually by December 31.

9) To conduct CAFO pre-site inspections, carcass disposal inspections, inspections during and after

construction and provide technical assistance. 10) Enforce the poultry waste applicator regulations.

11) Technically review LMFO/CAFO applications for completeness and accuracy according to the statutes

Please describe the purpose of this program, including a description of what you intend toaccomplish.


10/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:




(cont)

and rules. 12) Conduct hearings (when requested) to ascertain if the LMFO/CAFO operation should

receive a license. 13) Grant a license to those meeting all qualifications. 14) Enforce the

agricultural compost regulations.


Protect Oklahoma's waters and environment from possible pollution from animal waste.


Help assure that Oklahoma's water and environment are not polluted by animal waste.




The following staff reductions/eliminations were required for FY 12 budget due to state-mandated cuts:

Environmental Programs Manager III position eliminated; Administrative Assistant II - position not

being refilled; Environmental Specialist position was eliminated; Hydrologist Soil Scientist - $36,250

less; two Soil Scientist positions were eliminated from state-funded positions; N Aldridge - $59,112

less. Additionally, FY 12staff reductions included: Professional Engineer - $36,000 less; two Soil

Scientists - $53,000 less and a secretary's position was not filled - $36,498 less. From FY 06

through FY 11, the AEMS Division reducted five techincal staff contracts due to reduced funding.

Those reduced contracts totaled $155, 476 and were as follows: Ed Abernathy - $27,000 less; R.C.

Brinless - $26,000 less; H.J. Thung - $36,000 reduction and position not filled; Jim Shirazi - $46,260

less; Harold Springer - $20,226 less; and Danny Hodges - position eliminated. Senate Bill 965

appropriated $115,000 to ODAFF AEMS to write Animal Waste Management Plants (AWMP) for poultry growers

in FY 2001. Consequently, two part-time soil scientists and two AWMP assessors were hired under

contract to compose and assess AWMPs. The AWMPs will assist in protecting Oklahoma's waters from

excessive poultry waste runoff and are required by the Poultry Act. The 2002 Legislature did not

approve this funding, but AEMS maintained contracts with these two soil scientists until June 30,

2003. These two part-time contracted soil scientists wrote 264 AWMP's in eighteen months. These

part-time soil scientist's contracts were renewed again on July 1, 2004 and they have written an

additional 614 plans. The legislature did not appropriate funding for these two critical positions

for FY 2011 AND FY2012.


accomplish.

Client Information:


11/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

The AEMS Division has several programs that are mandated by state statute. They are found

either in Title 2, Agriculture, or Title 27A, Environmental and Natural Resources. They are:

*Administering the Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations program.





Enforcement

2 years.

Client Information:

Agriculture corporations, contract farmers, and Oklahoma citizens.

c. Number of Clients Served:3,700,000

3,700,000

CAFO licenses, when granted, may allow nuisance lawsuit protection to the holder of the license, as

determined in a U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruling on July 30, 2008. The citizens of

Oklahoma receive protection from possible water pollution from animal and poultry waste through ODAFFAEMS inspections, investigations and enforcement of CAFO and poultry rules and regulations. Landowners

within specified distances of CAFOs/LMFOs may request a hearing and present evidence that can prevent

licensure of the LMFO/CAFO. Additionally, technical assistance is offered by ODAFF and NPDES annual

inspections (in conjunction with EPA) are conducted.




(cont)

1 Enforce State Statutes/Rules pertaining to animals and poultry.

Goal # Agency Goal

List your program performance goals and measures, include performance measures as well as the inputs,outputs,outcome measures and efficiency measures that describe how you accomplish your goals. Identify/list in the following table, the appropriate yearly benchmarks you have reached in the past two years;hope to reach in the current year; and plan to reach in order to achieve the program goals in the next



12/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

*Seeking program assumption for EPA's NPDES CAFO program.

*Directing an animal waste enforcement program.

*Managing the poultry program.

*Overseeing general programs pertaining to animals and poultry.

Number of complaints investigated and inspections conducted.

In 1993, the Oklahoma Legislature passed the Oklahoma Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

Act authorizing the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) to seek delegation from

the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to administer the National Pollutant Discharge

Elimination System (NPDES) for all point and non-point source discharges within its

environmental jurisdiction. The next year, the Oklahoma legislature passed 27A O.S. Section 1-

3-102 that directs the Department of Agriculture to seek this delegation from EPA to administer

any and all of the NPDES programs for agricultural point and non-point source discharges. With

the creation of the Oklahoma Agriculture Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Act approved in

House Bill 1467 in 2005, ODAFF took a necessary step in the process toward receiving this

delegation.

1

PM #

9,813 13,473 9,500 9,500 9,500

Actual Budgeted



Estimated

FY-2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY-2013 FY-2014




Obtain EPA NPDES delegation.

2 EPA NPDES Delegation to ODAFF.

Goal # Agency Goal


(Cont)

6,725 9,800Original Estimate


13/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


With the NPDES delegation status, ODAFF would be the agency named to implement and enforce the

federal Clean Water Act for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) wastewater

discharges. ODAFF would then enforce both EPA's federal standards and Oklahoma's laws and

rules for CAFOS. The 2009 Oklahoma Legislature appropriated funding to ODAFF, AEMS for the

start-up of the EPA NPDES Delegation Program.

The purpose includes state autonomy. The ODAFF will regulate wastewater discharges from CAFOS

and egg washing, and storm water discharges for forestry silviculture, pesticide application,

etc. for the federal government and for the state. There are 275 licensed CAFO's, with 138 of

these possessing CAFO permits with EPA. It is estimated that more CAFOs may need EPA permits,

as follows:

1

PM #

0 4 97 90 5

Actual Budgeted




The negative impact of not having an ODAFF AEMS Division would be no effective enforcement of

regulations of animals, CAFOs or LMFOs or poultry operations. This could result in polluted water with

an increase of disease in humans and animals and a resulting loss of recreation areas. No program =

increased pollution of waters from animal and poultry waste. Also, the statutes would not be enforced.

The ODAFF, AEMS Division has assessed $1,085,808 (one million dollars plus) in fines to animal and

poultry operations for compliance violations.


The ODAFF, AEMS Division is required by the Statutes to annually investigate and lab analyze samples

from 1,083 monitoring wells at swine feeding operation CAFOs/LMFOs. This process was completed in 2011

Estimated

FY-2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY-2013 FY-2014



(Cont)

97 97Original Estimate


14/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:




If this program is providing services that were not provided through this program prior to FY-2011please describe those services here:

and 26 operations were required to submit plans for sixty-one (61) monitoring wells that showed

substantial increases of nitrate-nitrogen and electrical conductivity to ODAFF that included their

proposals to make assessments and evaluations of causative affects. Some of the multi-year submitted

evaluation plan, included, but are not limited to the following: Static water level measuring; isotopic

analysis; potentiometer surface mapping; site specific hydrologic reporting; utilization of a

resistivity imaging system; N-15 ratios of dissolved ions, trace elements, organic compounds and fecal

coliform; bacteria ribotyping; micorbial strain tracing using phenotypic micro-array technology;

fingerprinting using Trilinear and Stiff diagrams; Box and Whiskers plots using Sanitas WQ Stat Plus;

evaluations of antecedent land use; direct push technique ground water investigations and numerousadditional remediation actions have been required. This is part of enforcement and NPDES Delegation.

(cont)


The fees assessed to swine LMFOs/CAFOs and poultry operations/waste applicators are mandated in the

Oklahoma Statutes.

Does this program serve readily identifiable users? YES

Are the users able to pay for the services they receive? YES




user fees that should be considered. Describe any necessary waivers or special considerations. Provideappropriate comparisons to other fees charged by the private sector or other governmental entities


User Fees:

Alternatives included conducting additional unfunded mandates with less staff time due to budget cuts.

AEMS Division budget cuts: From FY-06 through FY-12 reduction of $155,476 in staff cuts. The review

process by the Division and Agency resulted in staff reductions while increasing efficiencies in job

tasks completions.



15/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:





Do the states or municipalities charge for the service? NO


YES

Swine LMFOs are required to pay 80 cents per animal unit fee, plus CAFO license renewal fees, to the

Department. The total swine LMFO/CAFO fees received average $250,000 less per year than the total

dollars required to enforce the LMFO regulations.

Additionally, registered poultry operations are required to pay $10 per year for registration renewals

and poultry waste applicators pay $15 per year for applicator licenses. Poultry regulatory expenses

average $200,000 more per year than poultry revenue fees received by the Department.



User Fees: (Cont)


16/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:

Animal Industry ServicesProgram Name:

Title 2, Section 1 - 1 et seq., of the Oklahoma Statutes.




Animal Industry Services is responsible for the detection, eradication, prevention and control of

livestock, poultry, and aquaculture diseases and parasites. Specific responsibilities include

detecting, controlling and eradicating livestock diseases on farms and ranches, in auction markets and

slaughter plants, feedlots and other concentration points throughout the state; monitoring the

movement of animals and poultry into, through and out of Oklahoma to verify compliance with state and

federal laws and regulations; controlling the use of vaccines and biologics; preventing the spread of

diseases transmissible to man; to facilitate, inspect and license aquaculture operations; and being

prepared to respond quickly and appropriately in the event of a foreign animal disease emergency or an

agroterrorist attack on the states agriculture infrastructure.


Disease reduction in livestock, poultry, aquaculture and farmed cervidae ensures human safety as

well as maintaining the maximum economic benefit in national and international markets. Also the

ability to respond to emergencies quickly and efficiently.


Public Health Department: Detection of diseases transmissible to man;

Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation: Detection of diseases transmissible to nativeOklahoma wildlife;

Agriculture Statistics: Resource of import/export, market news and disease statistic for market

and census information;

USDA Veterinary Services: Partnership to reach national goals in disease eradication and control;

emergency preparedness and response.

USDA Wildlife Services: Partnership to reduce human exposure to disease transmissible to man and

avoid economic damage to livestock and poultry producers;

OSU College of Veterinary Medicine: Partnership in poultry disease issues and in disease control

and detection in the livestock, poultry, and aquaculture populations;

ation: Monitoring of drug, chemical and biological products licensed and used in the livestock,



accomplish.


17/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:




(cont)

(cont)


poultry, and aquaculture industry;

Federal Emergency Management Agency and State Emergency Management Agency: Responding to calls for

assistance in the event of an animal emergency situation such as sudden disease outbreaks and/or

natural or man-made disasters, and/or bioterrorist attacks on agricultural infrastructure.

Oklahoma Homeland Security: To assist with and facilitate training and exercise to respond to an

animal or all hazards emergency or disaster;

Other State's Animal Health Agencies: Through monitoring, diseases originating in other states are

found and reported to the appropriate state.



IIn FY 2010, we have solicited for federal dollars on the following cooperative agreements with USDA

Aphis Veterinary Services: Scrapie Eradication, Swine Health Protetion, Foreign Animal Disease, Avian

Influenza NPIP, Live Bird Market, Upland Game Bird, National Animal ID and Brucellosis.

In FY 2011, we have solicited for federal dollars on the following cooperative agreements with USDA

Aphis Veterinary Services: Scrapie Eradication, Swine Health, Classical Swine Fever, Foreign Animal

Disease, Johnes Tissue Residue Trace back, Avian Influenza High Path, Low Path, Live Bird Market -

High Path and Low Path, Upland Game Bird, Chronic Wasting Disease, National Animal ID and Viral

Hemorragic Septicemia.

In FY 2012, we have solicited for federal dollars on the following cooperative agreements with USDA

Aphis Veterinary Services; Scrapie Eradication, Swine Health, Classical Swine Fever, Foreign Animal

Disease, Notifiable Avian Influenza, Animal Disease Traceability, Pseudorabies Surveillance and Viral

Hemorragic Septicemia.


Client Information:

Every business and animal owner in Oklahoma that breeds, raises, processes, trades, feeds or trains

livestock, poultry, farmed cervidae and aquaculture as well as individuals who keep these animals as

pets. Other state's citizens are affected also because of disease free animals shipped out of state.



18/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

Percent of livestock, poultry and aquaculture population under surveillance.

1

PM #

99% 99% 99% 99% 99%

Actual Budgeted



Estimated

FY-2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY-2013 FY-2014



Disease & Parasite Surv.

2 years.

Client Information:


3,700,000

Through a variety of surveillance and inspection procedures which ensure a livestock, poultry, and

aquaculture population with reduced disease status that is safe to humans and other livestock, poultry,

and aquaculture populations. Through licensing of alternative agriculture such as farmed cervidae and

to control the acquisition and harvest of feral swine. Also through implementation of emergency

response plan and training staff for quick and efficient response to emergencies.



(cont)

1 Detection, eradication, prevention and control of livestock, poultry, cervidae and aquaculture

diseases and parasites.

Goal # Agency Goal

List your program performance goals and measures, include performance measures as well as the inputs,

outputs,outcome measures and efficiency measures that describe how you accomplish your goals. Identify/list in the following table, the appropriate yearly benchmarks you have reached in the past two years;hope to reach in the current year; and plan to reach in order to achieve the program goals in the next


99% 99%Original Estimate


19/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


2

1

1

Percent of market/sales facilities inspected.

Percent of animals destroyed with positive test results for disease or parasites.

2

1

PM #

PM #

100%

100%

99%

100%

99%

100%

99%

100%

99%

100%

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted



Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014



PM #

PM #

PM #




Insp. of Mrkt/Sales Facility

Animals destroyed w/ disease

Vaccines & Biologics Records

2

3

To eliminate diseased livestock, poultry and aquatic animals

Approval and monitoring the use of vaccines and biologics.

Goal #

Goal #

Agency Goal

Agency Goal


100%

100%

99%

100%

Original Estimate

Original Estimate


20/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

1

Percent of vaccine and biologic requests approved and monitored.

Percent of presentations performed for the intent of public education.

1

1

PM #

PM #

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted



Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014




PM #

PM #



Presentations performed

Emergency Response Training

4

5

To provide education for the public, producers and veterinarians on livestock, poultry and

aquatic related issues.

To respond quickly and efficiently to animal emergency situations.

Goal #

Goal #

Agency Goal

Agency Goal


100%

100%

100%

100%

Original Estimate

Original Estimate


21/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


2

Percent of staff members trained.

To develop interagency agreements with Oklahoma counties and Oklahoma Indian tribes. Percent of

counties and tribes with interagency agreements.

1

2

PM #

PM #

100%

30%

100%

30%

100%

30%

100%

30%

100%

30%

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted




Program must exist to allow exportation of livestock, poultry, farmed cervidae and fish to other states

and countries. Restrictions would be placed on Oklahoma by other states due to a lack of disease

status verification. The States work cooperatively to ensure disease is not spread from one state or

country to another. Some diseases would spread from animal to animal at a high rate which would affect

Oklahoma's economy due to illness and death of animals which could have been marketed. Potential for

the spread of diseases transmissible to man. Misuse of biologics and/or vaccines would cause

unneccessary animal loss for Oklahoma producers and could be hazardous to consumers. Loss of interface

between the farmed cervidae and Oklahoma native whitetail deer and elk population. The continued loss

Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014




Interagency Agreements


(Cont)

100%

30%

100%

30%

Original Estimate

Original Estimate


22/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:





of tillable lands and spread of disease by feral swine.


New cooperative agreements with USDA-APHIS VS have been initiated. Surveillance has begun with our

licensed aquaculture operations. Restaurants, cafeterias, and schools are being contacted about food

waste for swine feeding. The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) project is fully functional

and currently registering premises. We currently have three Avian Influenza cooperative agreements.

All are called "Notifiable AI" NPIP; Live Bird Market (LBM); Upland Game Bird. There has been an

increase in Swine Health Plan inspections, Scrapie Inspections, and individual Ewe genotyping.

Incident command system training is ongoing project, after successful completion five ICS 420 Commandand General Staff courses; the state of Oklahoma now boosts two additional Type 2 USDA certified

incident response teams. The Farm Cervidae act was enacted by the 2006 State Legislative session. This

act gave the Department of Agriculture direct oversight of Farmed Cervidae. The Feral Swine Control Act

was enacted in 2007 State Legislative session. This Act gave ODAFF direct oversite of feral swine

control.

(cont)


A. The Aquaculture program includes inspection and licensing of individual operations. It also provides

vehicle decals for licensed dealers vehicles that transport product. These licenses and decals are

provided at Animal Industry Services cost. Currently, aquaculture producers are paying $10.00 for

licenses and $1.25 for decals. This licensing fee could be raised to cover administrative and decal

costs.

B. The Feral Swine handling license fees range from $75 to $500 dependent on the type of operation and


user fees that should be considered. Describe any necessary waivers or special considerations. Provide

appropriate comparisons to other fees charged by the private sector or other governmental entities


User Fees:



23/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:




new license vs renewal.

C. The Farmed Cervidae license annual fee is $125 with an annual renewal of $75.

D. The Biologics Registration fee of $200 annually per product is required which inlcudes product

distribution, sales, offered for sale or used in Oklahoma or interstate or intrastate transportation of

the products.

E. The National Poultry Improvement Plan participants pay an annual fee of $5.00. Other programs that

could charge a nominal fee for licensing or certification, etc. are listed in the fee-for-service

response.

F. AIS will investigate the implementation of a small fee for service in the Equine Infectious Disease

Testing and Eradication program. A $3 fee for each EIA test would cover program costs of approximately$120,000 per year for this testing which is a vital program that protects the state's horse industry.



Does the state require citizens to use this service? YES

If yes, do individual citizens otherwise benefit directly from the service? YES


Do the states or municipalities charge for the service? YES

Fourteen of the sixteen western states now charge for certain services. According to a survey of like

divisions, these fees are well accepted by stakeholders.


NO

The National Poultry Improvement Plan participants pay an annual fee of $5.00. Other programs that could

charge a nominal fee are:

Tuberculosis Accredited Free Herd for cattle, goats and cervidae



User Fees: (Cont)


24/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:




Qualified Swine herds

Validated Swine herds

Monitored Swine herds and Cervidae herds

Equine Passports

Brucellosis Certified Free Herd for cattle, swine, goats, and cervidae

EIA testing fee

Voluntary disease free monitoring programs do not lend themselves to a "fee-for-services" basis.

(cont)(If any exist, summarize service and related benefits to users and public.)

User Fees: (Cont)


25/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:

Consumer Protection ServicesProgram Name:

2 O.S. Section 5-301 through 5-307; Title 2 O.S. Section 3-1 through 3-220; 2 O.S. Section 5-21

through 5-29; 2 O.S. Section 5-61(a-l) and section 62; Title 2 O.S. Section 8-21 through 8-74; Title

2 O.S. Section 9-20 through 9-47.4;Title 2 O.S. Sections 1701 through 1713; Title 2 O.S. Sections

1451 through 1460; Public Law 91-597.




Provide consumer protection services to citizens, in the following major areas:

a. Consumer protection laws, concerned with , pesticides, package weights, pricing, apiary inspection,

agricultural liming materials, animal feeds, fertilizers, ornamental plants inspected for insect and

plant diseases, seed, soil amendments. Secure official samples of the listed products for laboratory

analysis, which are processed, manufactured, sold, offered for sale or distributed within Oklahoma.

b. Environmental quality programs protecting surface and ground water, pollution prevention programs

through Best Management Practices, endangered species, worker protection. Complaints of improper

pesticide use are investigated and compliance action taken where appropriate. Commercial pesticide

applicators are trained, certified, and companies licensed.

c. Inspecting and testing the accuracy of commercial scales measuring devices ; inspecting anhydrous

ammonia fertilizer equipment for safety. Auditing of state licensed grain warehouses.

d. In addition, Consumer Protection Services has cooperative agreements with the Food and Drug

Administration to enforce BSE and medicated feed manufacturing standards; conduct Country Origin

Labeling inspections; the U.S. Environmental Protection agency for pesticide enforcement, pollution

prevention programs and surface and ground water protection programs; the U.S. Department ofAgriculture for insect and disease control programs, pest surveys, private pesticide applicator record

checks, and the Oklahoma State University for education and research on pollution prevention programs,

pesticide applicators and pest surveys.


Consumer protection and food safety through the routine inspection, sampling and analyzing of

products. Also, by responding to citizen's complaints involving pesticides, seed, feed, ag-lime,

fertilizer, package weights and pricing with a high priority on complaints related to protecting

human health, and the environment. Additionally with the auditing of state chartered grain



accomplish.


26/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:




(cont)

(cont)

warehouses CPS insures the integrity of grains stored by Oklahoma producers.


This division assists Federal Agencies by performing critical public safety work for them through

contracts, grants and cooperative agreements. CPS has a contract with the FDA to inspect 150

animal feed manufacturing facilities for compliance with federal regulations regarding ruminant

animal feed; 49 County of Origin Labeling Inspections; a grant with EPA for pesticide applicator

training, certification & enforcement, pollution prevention programs, surface water and groundwater

protection; cooperative agreements with USDA for insect pest and plant disease survey work.




During FY11 we filled 2 positions left vacant by employees that left the agency and did not fill 2

vacancies because of anticipated budget cuts. The Africanized Bee (otherwise known as Killer Bee) in

Oklahoma continues to be an unfunded program and requires four employees part time in order to help

control this pest for public safety. The Musk Thistle program remains unfunded by the legislature even

though there are increasing consumer complaints, 15 in FY11, to be investigated and resolved by

pesticide inspectors. Information regarding Musk Thistle control is mailed to landowners with thistle

problems. The CPS overall revenue budget for FY-11 exceeded our projections by $622,562.00. The

divisions appropriated budget was cut by 4% or $39,398.00 for FY2012.


Client Information:

General Public and Agricultural Industry

c. Number of Clients Served:

Everyone in Oklahoma

Providing inspections, sampling & testing of Ag Products. Responding to consumer complaints






27/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

2

Package and/or labels checked (Weights and Measures)

Inspections for pesticide, nursery, fertilizer and feed sections.

1

PM #

124,000 410,232 400,000 400,000 400,000

Actual Budgeted



Estimated

FY-2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY-2013 FY-2014



PM #

PM #



Labels and Packages Checked

Inspections Performed

2 years.

1

2

Identify and remove products which do not meet label quantities

Ensure consumers are provided insect and disease free plants, products meet stated guarantee,

facilities are adequate to provide services licensed for, ensure acceptable sanitation, safety

standards and best management practices are followed at regulated facilities.

Goal #

Goal #

Agency Goal

Agency Goal



Original Estimate


28/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


3

4

Scales, scanners and/or meters checked (Weight's and Measures)

Registrations for pesticide, soil amendments, Ag lime and fertilizer sections.

2

3

PM #

PM #

7,000

14,000

7,570

14,377

7,000

14,000

7,000

14,000

7,000

14,000

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted



Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014



PM #

PM #



Scales and Scanners Checked

Registrations

3

4

Identify and/or remove from use or service inaccurate or fraudulent scanners, weighing and

measuring devices.

Registrations for AG products or firms providing a service.

Goal #

Goal #

Agency Goal

Agency Goal


Original Estimate

Original Estimate


29/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


5

6

Samples from pesticide, nursery, fertilizer, feed and seed sections.

Number of complaints investigated and resolved, number of days average.

4

5

PM #

PM #

14,742

7,662

15,194

11,752

15,000

11,000

15,000

11,000

15,000

11,000

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted



Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014



PM #

PM #



Samples Tested

Complaints resolved/investig

5

6

Sampling of AG products to identify and remove those found to be adulterated and/or

contaminated, ensure AG producers receive a fair market value and the buyer receives a qualityproduct.

Investigate and resolve consumer complaints within 180 days.

Goal #

Goal #

Agency Goal

Agency Goal


Original Estimate

Original Estimate


30/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


7

8

Fertilizer, Ag lime, Feed, Seed, Pesticide Applicators, Private Applicators, Nursery, and

Weight's and Measures licenses issued.

6

7

PM #

PM #

592Avg52days

10,261

340Avg13days

11,060

340Avg13days

11,000

340Avg13days

11,000

340Avg13days

15,000

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted



Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014


PM #

PM #



Licenses Issued

Seminars Conducted

7

8

License firms selling AG products or providing a service.

Conduct seminars, compliance meetings, testing, training, stop sales and issue letters of

warning.

Goal #

Goal #

Agency Goal

Agency Goal


Original Estimate

Original Estimate


31/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


9

10

Number of seminars, tests given, compliance meetings held, training, stop sales and letters of

warning issued.

Number of state and federal phytosanitary certifications issued.

8

9

PM #

PM #

8,472

3,432

6,859

2,663

7,000

2,500

7,000

2,500

7,000

2,500

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted



Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014



PM #

PM #



Certifications Issued

Number of Exams Completed

9

10

Ensure plants and plant products offered for sale, export and shipping meet plant quarantine

requirements for both foreign country and individual states.

FY2010 to FY2011 will maintain a constant number of performed warehouse exams.

Goal #

Goal #

Agency Goal

Agency Goal


Original Estimate

Original Estimate


32/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


Number of warehouse exams in each FY will be compared to the number of exams from previous goal

attainment for result of 0 or greater.

10

PM #

42 37 35 35 35

Actual Budgeted




Consumers and industry would not have any control to ensure the quality and quantity of agricultural

products.









User Fees:

Estimated

FY-2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY-2013 FY-2014



Original Estimate



33/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:









NO



User Fees: (Cont)


34/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:

Food Safety Division - DairyProgram Name:

Title 2, Section 7-401 through 7-420 et seq., of the Oklahoma Statutes.




Food Safety Division - Dairy Services

Dairy is responsible for inspecting milk and milk by-products from the farm through all phases of

production and for supervising sanitary practices in each phase of the process, also permitting of

facilities involved in milk and milk product production and the sampling of milk and milk products as

well as the water supplies and captive water systems utilized by the dairy industry. Determinations

are made to assure only safe and wholesome unadulterated products that meet regulatory requirements

are available to the consumers. Provide consultation and advise dairy farmers, plant personnel and

the industry in general regarding construction standards, materials, and compliance with federal and

state regulations. Provide input on proposed changes in existing regulations to assure the state and

dairy industry are represented. Ratings are performed on listed producers and processors enabling

them to market their products interstate.


Assurance of a safe, wholesome, milk supply


Public Health: Detection, treatment and removal of product containing human pathogens in the milk

product or animal diseases (several transmissible to man)

FDA: Drug, chemical and microbiological residue violations in milk products.




Funding has remained relatively constant. We have reduced the number of FTEs but these reductions

have been offset by increased employee insurance and travel costs. The FY 2010 budget was reduced as

a result of declines in state revenue. An administrative position has been left vacant. The majority

of the budget reductions in the Food Safety Division have been absorbed by the Meat Inspection

Section.


accomplish.

Client Information:


35/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

Output- Any dairy not meeting standards is degraded.





Dairies Degraded

2 years.

Client Information:

Every business in Oklahoma that produces, manufactures, processes, wholesales or retails milk

products, as well as individuals who consume those products.


3,700,000

Through various inspection procedures which verify that standards are being met to assure a safe,

wholesome, milk supply.




(cont)

1 Identify and remove from food channels dairy products which are contaminated, adulterated or

unsound.

Goal # Agency Goal




36/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


2

1

Retail samples collected and tested.

Perform routine inspections and follow-up inspections as needed.

1

2

PM #

PM #

30

970

23

700

23

700

23

700

23

700

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted



Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014



PM #

PM #



Retail Samples Tested

Dairy Sanitation Inspections

2 Maintain acceptable sanitation in dairy facilities.

Goal # Agency Goal


45

950

30

950

Original Estimate

Original Estimate


37/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

1

Raw milk samples and water samples collected and tested.

Perform facility and equipment construction reviews.

1

1

PM #

PM #

1,800

2,791

1,800

2,300

1,800

2,300

1,800

2,300

1,800

2,300

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted



Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014



PM #

PM #



Antibiotic/Microbial Tests

Construction Reviews

3

4

Assurance of composition and safety of dairy products.

Maintain dairy producing facilities that meet required standards of construction.

Goal #

Goal #

Agency Goal

Agency Goal


1,800

2,750

1,800

2,700

Original Estimate

Original Estimate


38/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

Attend FDA training courses. Present training courses and provide information to producers and

processors.

1

1

PM #

PM #

37

700

17

711

17

700

17

700

17

700

Actual

Actual

Budgeted

Budgeted




The possibility of various pathogens, drugs or chemicals entering the food supply through dairy

products. Reduced confidence in dairy products as a food commodity which would adversely affect the

dairy industry, livestock industry and other related industries. Dairy industry would lose ability to

market their products interstate.


Estimated

Estimated

FY-2010

FY-2010

FY-2011

FY-2011

FY-2012

FY-2012

FY-2013

FY-2013

FY-2014

FY-2014



Contacts and Education

5 Maintain a well trained inspection force and keep industry informed of all new regulations and

requirements.

Goal # Agency Goal


40

750

40

710

Original Estimate

Original Estimate


39/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:




If this program is providing services that were not provided through this program prior to FY-2011please describe those services here:

None

(cont)


Current Oklahoma Milk and Milk Products Law allows the agency to assess production fees on in-state and

out-of-state producers and processors, but prohibits permit fees.





Is the service targeted at low-income beneficiaries? YES


Most other states charge for this service with either a permit fee, production fee, or both.

Of the surrounding states, all but one (New Mexico) asess higher fees than Oklahoma.

TX - .045/100Wt.

KS - .015/100Wt.

Ark. - .035/100Wt.

Mo. - .04/100Wt.


NO






User Fees:



40/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:




Current Oklahoma Milk and Milk Products Law prohibits permit fees.


User Fees: (Cont)


41/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:

Food Safety Division - Egg, Poultry & Organic SectionProgram Name:

Title 2, O.S. 5-21




The Poultry and Egg Section regulates Oklahoma egg and Poultry producers, dealers and retailers to

insure the quality and safety of eggs, poultry and egg products to consumers under the Oklahoma Egg

Law. The section under a cooperative agreement with the USDA, AMS provides poultry and egg graders to

Oklahoma producers. Inspectors also monitor all poultry and eggs and egg products to Oklahoma Schools

under the USDA School Lunch Program.


Assurance of a safe, wholesome poultry and egg supply.


Public Health: Detection, treatment and removal of product containing human pathogens and

undergrade in the poultry & egg products.

FDA: Drug, chemical and labeling violations in poultry and egg products.




The FY2010 budget was been reduced as a result of declines in state revenues. There have been no

significant changes due to the budget actions. The majority of the FY 2010 and 2011 budget reductions

were abosrbed by the Meat Inspection Section.

Please describe budget actions taken by agency management or by legislative actions that increased or

2011 2012

accomplish.

Client Information:

Every business in Oklahoma that produces, manufacturers, processes, wholesales or retails poultry and

egg products, as well as individuals who consume those products.


3,700,000




42/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


1

1

Number of inspections to assure quality and food safety of eggs and poultry.

1

PM #

2,800 2,063 2,063 2,063 2,063

Actual Budgeted



Estimated

FY-2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY-2013 FY-2014



PM #

PM #



Food Vendor Inspections

Labeling/Quality Inspections

2 years.

Client Information:

Through various inspection procedures which verify that standards are being met to assure a safe, and

quality poultry and egg supply.


(cont)

1

2

Identify and remove from food channels poultry and egg products which are contaminated,

adulterated, or unsound.

Assurance of labeling and safety of poultry and egg products.

Goal #

Goal #

Agency Goal

Agency Goal





43/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:


Number of routine grade and labeling inspections.

1

PM #

2,288 2,063 2,063 2,063 2,063

Actual Budgeted




No quality and food safety inspections would be performed in Oklahoma.


None









User Fees:

Estimated

FY-2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY-2013 FY-2014



(Cont)




44/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:








YES

All activities in poultry, egg and organic section are fee-for service based.



User Fees: (Cont)


45/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:

Food Safety Division - Meat InspectionProgram Name:

Title 2, Section 1-1 et seq., of the Oklahoma Statutes.




Meat and poultry inspection provides continuous oversight of meat and poultry plants in the state by

performing antemortem inspection of all animals before they are slaughtered and in-depth postmortem

inspection on every animal slaughtered. Palpation, observation and incision of internal organs and

other carcass parts are used to eliminate any harmful pathogenic contaminated meat from being

processed and entering food channels. During processing all operations are observed and various

laboratory samples are taken to assure compliance with product standards, and to detect any harmful

biological or chemical residues. Finally, all product labels are checked for accuracy and that each

label truthfully identifies all ingredients used during formulation to prevent adulteration andconsumer fraud. The compliance program extends regulatory functions carried out in inspected

slaughter and processing plants to the meat and poultry allied industries. Prevention, detection, and

resolution of violations of meat and poultry inspection laws are primary objectives of compliance.


Assurance of a safe, wholesome, properly labeled meat supply.


Animal Health-Detection of animal diseases (many transmissible to man) during routine antemortem

and postmortem inspection.

Public Health-Detection of animal diseases (many transmissible to man) during routine antemortem

and postmortem inspection and also identification and removal of human pathogens contained in meat

products.

Food and Drug Administration-Drug, chemical and microbiological residue violations in meat

products.




The division has reorganized, redistributed the districts and absorbed the loss of the plant

inspectors.

Travel expenses have been curtailed as much as possible and there have been delays in filling vacant


accomplish.


46/102

BRR0030

Printed: 11-02-2011



40Agency:

Food Safety Division - Meat InspectionProgram Name:

1

Number of pounds of meat products inspected during processing.




positions.


(cont)



Processed Meat Inspected

2 years.

Client Information:

Every business in Oklahoma that manufactures, processes, wholesales or retails meat or poultry products

whether edible or inedible, as well as individuals who consume those edible products.


3,700,000

Through various inspection procedures which verify that standards are being met to assure a safe

wholesome, properly labeled meat and poultry food supply.




1 Identify and remove from food channels, meat and poultry products which are contaminated,

adulterated or unsound.

Goal # Agency Goal




4

program information and performance measures

Documents