programme result baselines and targets - a glimpse into the future annual conference of the northern...
DESCRIPTION
Rationale Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme 3/11 Programme has to demonstrate that its projects have a direct, positive and measurable impact in the programme territory Focus of the programme on the remotest, most rural and sparsely populated region within the programme territory Lack of consistent and timely statistical data on regional levelTRANSCRIPT
Programme result baselines and targets- a glimpse into the future
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme
30th of September 2015, Kuopio/Finland
The Northern Periphery in 2023?
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme2/11
Rationale
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme3/11
Programme has to demonstrate that its projects have a direct, positive and measurable impact in the programme territory
Focus of the programme on the remotest, most rural and sparsely populated region within the programme territory
Lack of consistent and timely statistical data on regional level
Selection of experts
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme4/11
Experts have detailed insight into the regional situation regarding
innovativeness and internationalisation of SMEs, entrepreneurship, telemedicine, building energy performance or sustainable environmental management.
strong regional ties well-established links with the end beneficiaries of
project interventions (e.g., SMEs, health care workers, local public authorities, etc.)
Selection of regions
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme5/11
Sample regions are selected based on the NUTS 3 statistical areas
The remotest and most sparsely populated regions within each country
One region from Scandinavia, one region from the British Isles, one region/country from the North-Atlantic Space
Capture the range of socio-economic conditions across the programme area by reference to indicator-specific statistical data
Balanced representation of the eight programme countries
Result indicator scoreboards
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme6/11
+ Composite indicator+ contextual information on external factors
likely to affect the composite indicator+ anecdotal evidence of change= Indicator scoreboard
Criteria for choosing indicators
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme7/11
‘What we measure’ should be in line with ‘what we can influence’ as a cooperation programme, with a limited budget, and within a limited time period.
Wherever applicable, we should use existing definitions and methodologies, to warrant the indicators’ comparability with other European studies.
Our experts should be able to assess the indicators without too much guessing involved.
Indicator 2.2 “Internationalisation of SMEs“
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme8/11
0
20
40
60
20.0 25.0 25.0
22.535.0
55.0Baseline 2015 Target 2023
02468
10
7.05.0
6.0
9.07.5
6.0
Baseline 2015 Target 2023
0102030
20.012.5
17.5
30.0
20.0 17.5
Baseline 2015 Target 2023
Availability of business support programmes to facilitate access to new markets for regional SMEs [0;10]
Share of SMEs in the region engaged in one or more transboundary inter-enterprise cooperation [0;100%]
Uptake of business support programmes to facilitate access to new markets for regional SMEs [0;10]
Indicator 2.2 „Internationalisation of SMEs“
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme9/11
2015 2017 2019 2023100
110
120
130
140
150
100.0
103.3
110.7
129.5
100.0
105.5
117.8
149.8
100.0
104.2
112.6
130.1
100.0
104.4
114.2
139.5
Lapland Caithness & Sutherland and Ross & CromartyLandsbyggð All regions
Baselines and targets
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme10/11
Programme logical framework
Annual Conference of the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme11/11