programming contest hosting presented at the ccsc mid ... · presentation as a 'workshop'...
TRANSCRIPT
Programming Contest Hosting
presented at the
CCSC Mid-South 2011 Conference
April 1-2, 2011
Presented by:
Steve Baber, Harding UniversityBecky Cunningham, Arkansas Tech UniversityDavid Hoelzeman, Arkansas Tech University
Rick Massengale, University of Arkansas – Fort Smith
Organized by:
David Hoelzeman, Arkansas Tech University
Abstract
The Programming Contest Hosting Tutorial to be presented at the 2011 CCSC:MidsouthConference is based on the experiences of the presenters’ years of experience in hosting and/orparticipating in the ACM ICPC and CCSC-MS programming contests. The presentation covers all aspects of contest hosting including hospitality, problem development, hardware andnetwork, software, and a networked problem submission software. The presenters will be DavidHoelzeman and Becky Cunningham from Arkansas Tech University; Steve Baber from HardingUniversity; and Rick Massengale from University of Arkansas, Fort Smith. In addition to theabove tutorial presentation, Dr. Hoelzeman will be assisting in the programming contest heldduring the CCSC:Midsouth Conference.
Purpose/Objectives
The primary objective of the tutorial is to provide details of what is involved in hosting aprogramming contest in the style of the ACM International Collegiate Programming Contest thatis held annually. The desired result is to provide information on what has worked and whathasn’t worked, hopefully reducing the amount of mistakes a hosting site would make.
Significance/Need
With a minimum of two programming contests per year, each being possibly hosted by adifferent institution, the likelihood of a hosting institution not being familiar with the neededcontest configuration is high, at least in the immediate future. To my knowledge, only threeschools in the state have made use of the network submission software (PC2): Arkansas TechUniversity (first in the state to use it); Harding University; and University of Arkansas.
Summary and Conclusions
The presentation went well although it wasn't very well attended - probably just didn't interestanyone that wasn't anticipating hosting a contest in the immediate future. Surprisingly, thecomponent that generated the most questions was the 'hospitality' related issues presented byBecky Cunningham. In retrospect, it would've been better had we stuck with setting up thepresentation as a 'Workshop' (three hours) instead of a 'Tutorial' (1.5 hours) as we ran out of timefor some of the technical discussions.